By Colombo Telegraph

“While few Sri Lankans think of the JVP when they think about political reconciliation, we believe they are sincere in wanting to move the country forward to a new era of national peace and inter-ethnic cooperation.” the US Embassy Colombo reported to Washington.

JVP - sincere in wanting to move the county forward to a new era

The US Ambassador Patricaia Butenis met the JVP leader Somawansa Amarasinghe and JVP MP Sunil Handunneththi on January 15, 2010. In the meeting they discussed the JVP’s version of a United, multiethnic, multi–lingual Sri Lanka, JVP’s support for Sarath Fonseka’s presidential candidacy, JVP’s support for a truth commission instead of a war crimes trial and JVP’s view of the involvement of the international community in Sri Lankan internal affairs.

The cable classified as a “CONFIDENTIAL” by the Ambassador Butenis. According to the cable she has reported to Washington “This presidential election has had many surprising developments, not the least of which is the alliance between the old arch-enemies of the right-liberal UNP and the neo-Marxist JVP.” “This represents, in part, opportunism on the part of both parties. But it also reflects the highly polarizing character of Rajapaksas. The JVP supported Rajapaksa in 2005 but h alienated them by appointing cross-over (mostly UNP) MPs to ministerial positions coveted by the JVP, and the latter has been looking to settle the score ever since. At the same time, the JVP position appears to be more than opportunism and paybacks.” Butenis further wrote.

The Colombo Telegraph earlier published part of the cable with the following related news reports.

WikiLeaks :JVP is a reformed Marxist party- Somawansa said to US Ambassador

WikiLeaks: Rajapaksa has an inferiority complex

WikiLeaks: There is no “International Conspiracy” against Sri Lanka

We now publish the full cable related to the JVP-US discussion. Read the below cable for further details;

VZCZCXRO6699
OO RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHLM #0053/01 0251022
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 251022Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1157
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2293
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 9315
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 7570
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 5395
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3730
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 5320
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0181
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 0842
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 4442
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI PRIORITY 9878
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI PRIORITY 7165
RUEHON/AMCONSUL TORONTO PRIORITY 0176
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0023
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000053

SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/25/2020
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: LEFTIST JVP EXPLAINS SUPPORT FOR FONSEKA

COLOMBO 00000053  001.2 OF 002

Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS.  REASONS: 1.4 (B, D)

¶1. (C) SUMMARY: In a January 15 meeting with Ambassador,
neo-Marxist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party chief
Somawansa Amarasinghe and JVP MP Sunil Hanunnetti discussed
the JVP's vision of a united, multiethnic, multi-lingual Sri
Lanka; their support for Sarath Fonseka's presidential bid;
their support for a truth commission, instead of a war crimes
trial; and their view of the involvement of the international
community in Sri Lankan internal affairs.  END SUMMARY.
JVP REVAMPING IMAGE
-------------------

¶2. (C) Amarasinghe described the JVP as a reformed Marxist
Party, which stood for a united, multiethnic, multi-lingual
Sri Lanka, with equality for all.  He emphasized that they
were not a nationalist party and believed strongly in
multiparty democracy.  The JVP was even in favor of a Tamil
prime minister.  The JVP also believed in devolving power as
far as possible, including allowing villages to decide on the
allocation of funds.  On election violence, Amarasinghe
claimed that although JVP members were forceful at
demonstrations, they were very disciplined and avoided
violence.  He asserted that the JVP had never engaged in
political violence during peacetime.  (NOTE: The latter claim
might only hold true if one accepted the JVP line that the
1971 and 1987-89 JVP insurrections, in which thousands lost
their lives, could be considered "wartime."  END NOTE.)

SUPPORT FOR FONSEKA
-------------------

¶3. (C) Regarding JVP support for Sarath Fonseka's
presidential campaign, Amarasinghe cited several reasons: 1)
He was the only person who could defeat President Rajapaksa;
2) the JVP had never supported the current government (NOTE:
This strains credulity.  The JVP supported Rajapaksa in 2005
then grew increasingly alienated as Rajapaksa favored his own
party supporters over the JVP in government appointments.
END NOTE.); 3) Fonseka was willing to eliminate the executive
powers of the president; 4) his focus was on education and
health issues, not the military; 5) he was well-respected by
the people; 6) he was very direct; and, 7) he had a broad
vision for the future of Sri Lanka.  Amarasinghe went on to
add that Fonseka was marginalized after the military defeat
of the LTTE because he was in favor of reconciling with
former LTTE members.  This convinced the JVP that Fonseka
truly was committed to uniting the nation.

THE JVP AND RAJAPAKSA
---------------------

¶4. (C) Amarasinghe was very critical of President Rajapaksa,
saying he had a very narrow vision and an inferiority
complex, which stemmed from the fact that he was not from one
of the traditional power families.  As a result, he suspected
everyone, especially "learned people."

WAR CRIMES
----------

¶5. (C) On the JVP's position on the war-crimes issue,
Amarasinghe said there were human-rights violations in every
war.  In the last year of the Sri Lankan war, however, there
were, in fact, far fewer human-rights violations then ever
before.  In terms of moving forward, he favored the idea of a
"truth and reconciliation commission," not a war-crimes
trial.  He added that the JVP had issued a statement in favor
of this approach, which was provided to the Ambassador.

INTERNATIONAL "INTERFERENCE"

COLOMBO 00000053  002.2 OF 002

----------------------------

¶6. (C) Amarasinghe expressed opposition to any outside
"interference" seeking to impose solutions on Sri Lanka, such
as the UK government's drafting of a new constitution without
consulting Sri Lankans.  (NOTE: We assume Amarasinghe was
referring to the joint British-Sri Lankan drafting of a
constitution in 1948, which adopted many terms from British
usage but also took into account local conditions.  END
NOTE.)  Nevertheless, he went on to say that all countries
had to surrender some of their sovereignty when they signed
international agreements and that this gave other countries
the right to interfere to some extent in other nations'
affairs.  He also said that there was no international
conspiracy against Sri Lanka, claiming instead that the
president's raising this issue was a sign of his election
desperation.

COMMENT
-------

¶7. (C) This presidential election has had many surprising
developments, not the least of which is the alliance between
the old arch-enemies of the right-liberal UNP and the
neo-Marxist JVP.  This represents, in part, opportunism on
the part of both parties.  But it also reflects the highly
polarizing character of the Rajapaksas.  The JVP supported
Rajapaksa in 2005 but he alienated them by appointing
cross-over (mostly UNP) MPs to ministerial positions coveted
by the JVP, and the latter has been looking to settle the
score ever since.  At the same time, the JVP position appears
to be more than opportunism and paybacks.  While few Sri
Lankans think of the JVP when they think about political
reconciliation, we believe they are sincere in wanting to
move the country forward to a new era of national peace and
inter-ethnic cooperation.
BUTENIS