By Kasinathan Nadesan –

Dr. Kasinathan Nadesan
I am scared that I am going insane or even mad. You may ask why? Thankfully I don’t live in Sri Lanka now yet I have a habit of reading Sri Lankan News. I still have a great love for my land of birth that gave me everything free from primary education, University education and even Medical postgraduate education including overseas scholarship. So how can I ever dislike or betray my motherland? As a senior doctor, I have served for 22 years and wanted to continue forever. But in 1994 after the general elections, I felt that the time had come for me to leave, leave my patriotism behind, when Mahintha Rajapaksa was appointed as the prime minister. That was a time when Chandrika became the president and the minority people had a great hope of everlasting peace in Sri Lanka. But when Mahintha became the prime minister (most likely against the wish of President Chandrika), I realized that life would become more complicated in Sri Lanka. By then, I had completed 22 years of service and thus was able to take an early retirement.

Screenshot
What worries me now is the way our Buddhist religion is being practiced and the way at least some Buddhist monks are handling and taking control of the religion. Sadly, in a poor and illiterate country like ours, it is very easy to hoodwink the masses, immaterial it is north or south. Very few have the ability to think rationally. Our education means nothing and merely having a certificate is of no use. Real education must produce intelligence and thus they will be in a position to think rationally, logically, look for truth, ready to search and study instead of just swallowing what others say. When I left the country in 1995 and after the civil war was over in 2009, I really believed that there would be a dramatic change in the thinking ability of the people, politicians and the Buddhist clergy. I wrongly assumed that the majority are patriotic and being believers of a great religion will be ready to unite and build a great nation. Talking of what happened 2500 years ago is a waste of time. Today, after more than 2500 years, the world has changed so much and many countries have progressed in so many ways that have given the people a great quality of life. But in Sri Lanka, with all our past history, which is mostly turned and twisted by politicians, historians, and Buddhist monks, has gone into reverse gear and more than 30% of our people are below the poverty line. From my early age I learned that religion can only flourish in ignorance and it is meant to benefit a certain group of people who are either gullible or crooks or those with political interests.
Nowhere I could find that religions have really brought peace among the followers. What is done in religions are based on blind faith and cooked up or distorted history. I don’t refer to a particular religion here but to all religions. In Sri Lanka, the major religion Buddhism is so totally politicized that no one can survive unless they bow down to the monks. Monks, somehow, using the religion and the vulnerability and gullibility of the majority people, have virtually in the process of achieving total power. Knowing this reality, politicians too are ready to bow down to monks, though not out of respect or faith. Politicians use these monks to achieve their political aims. I personally know, many educated, enlightened Buddhists are mortally scared to express their views and criticisms. This situation has further strengthened the grip the monks have on the population. The way some of the monks behave or talk is a clear proof that they are convinced that they are above the law of the land. They have now come to a stage where they believe that whatever they want to do, they can do and law cannot touch them. Besides, they have also reached a stage where they don’t care about the public opinion. There is a young immature monk who had the audacity to ask the president to hand over the power to him and go away. Though it is a joke, yet it shows the mind set of these monks who take cover behind the robe.
In Sri Lanka the minority religions Hinduism, Christianity and Islam have no numerical or political clout and thus they are watchful of their conduct. Our venerable Gnanasara Thero’s conduct in the past and present is a clear example of this reality. He has total freedom and power to do whatever he wants to do from insulting any religions or the ability to demolish their places of worship, use languages that no civilized human could use in public and promote racial and religious violence. This most shameful conduct by him is not only against the minorities but against fellow monks too. He is the only person in our history, who has walked into a court of law and insulted the entire judiciary.
Scholars note that religion is an essentially contested concept with no single, universally agreed-upon definition. Most frameworks include a mix of beliefs, moral codes, sacred texts, rituals, organized communities, and veneration of a higher power or divine reality. While religion involves lived practices and social structures, theology is the philosophically oriented study of faith statements and divine concepts. So, what is important is that religions and Gods are manmade and not vice versa. Man can exist without religions but religions cannot exist without man. But almost all religious leaders don’t accept this concept since the above belief will undermine their power and survival. So, they always have to add some supernatural, divine, supreme power to religions to make the gullible toe their lines without challenging them. They also postulated hell and heaven, karma, rebirth, etc to caution them that even if they escape in this birth, they will get caught in the next birth. If this is really true, to my mind and experience, the first to suffer are the so-called religious clergies, monks and God-men. A priest only knows that there is no God. If there is a real God, the so-called monks, godmen, clergies will be turning in fire in hell. But they are very certain there are no such things.
Hinduism, which I always refer to as “Brahminism”, was created by Brahmins in ancient times to protect their wellbeing, suppress and exploit the non-Brahmins. All Vedic literature written over a period of time is written with the same purpose. The rituals prevalent in Hindu practices are all created by wild imagination and blind beliefs. From early days I used to wonder how these rituals are of any use to humanity except just hoodwinking the vulnerable. Of course, I accept that these practices act as some form of solace and may bring some kind of peace of mind. It won’t solve an issue but may give some mental strength to face the issue. In other words, it has a tranquilising effect only.
Coming to the present crisis that is happening in Sri Lanka, I am fully convinced that this so-called uprising is not due to any real religious fervour or concern but pure political move. These monks are acting as proxies to the bankrupt politicians whose existence, luxurious lives and unquestioned misdeeds are seriously threatened under President Anura’s government. The President is only doing what he promised to the masses and thus honouring his promises. All criminal, shameless, ruthless politicians and their followers are now held responsible to pay for their sins. Can any of these protesting monks or the followers, explain as to what the President doing is wrong in any way or against the Buddhist principles? The monks’ robe issue is just an excuse only to please their political masters and it is absolutely certain that it has nothing to do with Buddhism. These guys are not protecting Buddhism, but using the religion for their political agenda.
The concept of Buddhist monastic robes (Kashaya) centres on humility, renunciation, and detachment from material possessions. Originally, the Buddha instructed monks to make robes from scavenged or discarded scraps—such as burial shrouds, old rags, or cloths left by roadsides. This practice eliminated personal vanity and financial burden. As recorded in early texts, the robe was designed simply to “ward off cold, ward off heat, ward off the touch of flies and mosquitoes,” and ensure modest coverage. The cut and layout of the fabric is traditionally said to mirror the neat, square-patterned rice fields of Magadha, symbolizing an ethical field of merit for the community. Because scavenged scraps were a mix of colours, monks boiled and dyed them with natural plant pigments—most commonly saffron, ochre, or orange, to create a unified, unassuming appearance.
So, the above clearly explains the purpose and status of the robe or “sivuru” and there is nothing magical or divine about that as claimed by some of these opportunistic monks. It is meant to be worn by people who have dedicated their lives to simplicity, humility and serve humans to understand and achieve humanity. But can anyone explain what percentage of our clergies or monks, immaterial of their religions, are following this concept? I am not blaming Buddhism alone but all the religions. Just see the Miracle Dome at Katunayake, a multimillion-dollar investment, and see the patrons? All are well attired and appear well educated but how they are hoodwinked? The Prophet is behaving as if he is taking part in a fashion parade and exhibiting his great luxurious life. The Prophet is supposed to be curing all forms of diseases that cannot be cured otherwise. I am a doctor myself, and there are no such things that are possible unless they are treating psychological conditions (Psychosomatic diseases) or just drama staged by actors. I have also examined numerous cases alleged to have been cured by Hindu Holyman, Babas, etc. they are all just fake. We also know how some of our well-known politicians got screwed by Tirupathi Deyo and Anuradhapura Kali Amma.
Coming to our Buddhist monks, how many of them really follow any of these principles of monkhood, propagated by Buddha? They are ready to fight and even change governments from doing their rightful duties, but not prepared to follow what Buddhism preaches. Expensive robes, luxury living, luxury vehicles, greed for wealth, going after political powers, arrogant, abusive language and then where is real Buddhism. Simply because a very abusive and aggressive monk was brought to court in a civil dress, it has become a huge crime to some monks whose credibility itself are under serious questions. On top of that the recent protest has clearly exposed some of the most bankrupt politicians for whom exploiting the gullible monks has become a way of survival. This group of monks are ever ready and waiting for a chance to pounce on, not to protect religion, but to serve their masters’ political agenda. Their way of survival is just racism, since they believe that next to religion racism is the best weapon to create chaos and disturb the country.
Very rightly, the president has agreed to ensure that in the future, monks will be always brought to courts in robes. But what these ignorant monks don’t realise is that the monks who are involved in various disgraceful heinous crimes brought to court in robes is the easy way to disgrace the robe and disgrace the criminal monks. But the reality is that these trouble-making monks only want an excuse and not to deal with a real issue. One bespectacled, young monk threatened that if he wanted, he could close down the entire Colombo. What an arrogant, aggressive statement and a blind courage he has. Another monk, who newly came into limelight, claimed that by bringing the monk in civil dress to court will make the angels angry. I do not know where these angels come from? This guy uses so much abusive, aggressive language and if there were real angels, this ignorant monk would have become the first victim. There is a funny monk from Batticaloa and for him mental hospital is the only salvation. These monks started with the robe, and after that issue being resolved by the president, they jumped into another issue, that is to release a criminally convicted monk. In other words, these monks thought that judiciary is a joke, government is a joke, our constitution is a joke and being Buddhist Monks, they can just do whatever they please. This itself is a proof of the mentality and ignorance of some of these mercenary monks. But the public know who their advisers and handlers are. This gang comprises of discarded four or five jokers, who themselves have lost their credibility long ago.
The funniest thing is about a bunch of monks who wanted the Secretary to the President to give a word of agreement in ten minutes on an issue that involved the judiciary and the constitution. That is another proof of their grandiose ideation. If so, no one can rule or run this country. I feel that as a first step these monks have to undergo a course about constitution, law and order, good governance and more importantly orderliness among the monks.
Dr Kasinathan Nadesan – Retired Forensic Medical Consultant, Sri Lanka, Malaysia and Australia
Sarath / October 17, 2026
This is an absurd headline and question. Anyone will tell you that religions from time immemorial protected the cleargy, who in fact gave rise to religions. Even in times of starvation and famine, the rotund cleargy went about comfortably preacing to the starving that they will be well fed in the next life.
/
SJ / October 17, 2026
“the cleargy, who in fact gave rise to religions”
Really.
If that was the case we should have a few million religions on earth.
/
Black Lankan / October 18, 2026
Sarath, I feel sad for your comment. It is not the religion that has to protect the clergy but the clergy has to protect the religion. You are confused about what is happing in Sri Lankan Buddhsim. Yes, in SL, it is the religion that is protecting the monks. Otherwise only a very few monks would have been spared. The so called rotund clergy COMFORTABLY PREACHING the gullible to continue starving until next life. Come on, so let our gullible fools also to continue going after politcal, corrupt monks untle next life.
/
Ajith / October 18, 2026
Dear Sarath,
You ares the same person who gave this answer for my question.
Your reflections on the post-independence era spanning the last 78 years rule, and the severe socio-political crises gripping our nation touch upon painful, undeniable realities. The presence of corruption, political opportunism, financial malpractice, and societal ills like drug networks are profound afflictions on our national fabric.
2) However, a crucial philosophical distinction must be made: these structural failures are not products of the Buddha’s teachings, but are the direct result of a departure from them. When greed (Lobha), hatred (Dwesha), and delusion (Moha) infiltrate institutional structures – whether lay or monastic, it represents a failure of human conduct, not a flaw in the Dhamma. The Buddha himself continuously warned against blind ritualism, the pursuit of worldly power, and the corruption of the robe, emphasizing that a true practitioner is known by their unblemished conduct and self-inquiry, not by their label.
/
chiv / October 21, 2026
Ajith,
that is not politically appointed diplomat SD.
Also read between the lines
“ROTUND clergy went about …….. (cynical). They still continue exploiting our gullible SB Lankans.
/
old codger / October 21, 2026
Chiv,
Yes, that isn’t diplomatic Sarath. It’s a pretty common name anyway. It means “autumn” in Sanskrit.
/
Douglas / October 18, 2026
Mr. Krishantha Nadesan: Thanks for your presentation.
You said: “Sadly, in a poor and illiterate country like ours, it is very easy to hoodwink the masses, immaterial whether it is north or south”
Yes. That is the situation. But it is heartening to watch the ‘Changing’ situation. We are in a period of transition, though it could be tough times ahead. As always, such dramatic changes do have to face obstacles and unforeseen upheavals. You have seen it happening in Sri Lanka now. That long-desired and expected ‘Change’ is taking place with the direct participation of the “GENZ,” and with their participation and ‘Enlightenment’, it is hoped there will be a remarkable upliftment both in the people and the religions. Please watch. This is from the “GENZ”.
https://youtu.be/KSjeveEqL7U?si=3SZSacTXMa2NQC_F
Note: I don’t appreciate the language used, but it shows the ‘Frustrations’ and ‘Understandings’ of the predicament they are faced with.
/
Ajith / October 18, 2026
” I don’t appreciate the language used, but it shows the ‘Frustrations’ and ‘Understandings’ of the predicament they are faced with.”
Yes. every one understands that it is heartening to watch the changing situation and we are in a period of transitition. But you have to think about the people who suffered for the 78 years with the same rulers. You may not like the language of the writer but can you assure that the government will share the power with Tamil speaking people and remove the special status to Buddhism and PTA from the constitution?
/
leelagemalli / October 19, 2026
As a Sri Lankan living in Europe for several decades, born and raised in a Buddhist environment, I believe that protecting human dignity and fundamental rights must transcend religious and political affiliations. Although I do not actively practise Buddhism, I remain Buddhist at heart and firmly uphold liberal values. The issue is not whether a convicted monk should be imprisoned, but whether he should be subjected to public humiliation through the forced removal of his religious robes, particularly in circumstances where cameras were reportedly directed at the incident. If established, such conduct raises serious questions about human dignity, religious freedom and the abuse of state power. No government, regardless of its electoral mandate, has the moral authority to use public institutions for revenge, intimidation or political theatre. Today, it may be a monk; tomorrow, it could be any citizen. Democracy means accountability, equality before the law and respect for universal human rights—not the gratification of those who celebrate another person’s humiliation.
/
leelagemalli / October 19, 2026
Those who take schadenfreude—pleasure in another person’s humiliation—from this incident are, in my view, largely among those who supported yesterday’s political outsiders, now transformed into Sri Lanka’s ruling politicians. Political allegiance should never blind anyone to the principles of human dignity, justice and fundamental rights. Celebrating another person’s humiliation today may mean accepting the same abuse when the political winds change tomorrow.
Tbc
/
Rajash / October 18, 2026
Kasinathan Nadesan -“In Sri Lanka the minority religions Hinduism, Christianity and Islam have no numerical or political clout and thus they are watchful of their conduct.”
=====
you are contradicting your self then by stating:
“Nowhere I could find that religions have really brought peace among the followers. What is done in religions are based on blind faith and cooked up or distorted history.”
your underlying argument about the relationship between Brahminical authority and caste-based privilege is historically serious. The part that needs qualification is the assertion that Hinduism was originally created by Brahmins with the specific purpose of exploiting non-Brahmins.
/
Rajash / October 18, 2026
why have you not stated what is going on in Gaze in the name of religion
====
why have you not called out Christianity – is that not used as a political power by the west?
=====
why are you selective about Hinduism ?
/
Ajith / October 18, 2026
“why are you selective about Hinduism ?”
I don’t think it is not about Hinduism as well Buddhism. It is true that some so called Religious people misused it similar to Buddhism or Islam. why the people used caste going to temple. There is nothing wrong in relgions as long as it is misused.
/
Naman / October 18, 2026
“ Sadly, in a poor and illiterate country like ours, it is very easy to hoodwink the masses, immaterial it is north or south.”
I would add political immaturity of SL Citizens. The DEEP SEATED FEARS of domination by neighbouring country and the economical and educational successes of the minorities in the country resulted in civil wars state terrorism communal hatred etc etc.
/
Naman / October 18, 2026
“ Knowing this reality, politicians too are ready to bow down to monks, though not out of respect or faith.”
SL liberation and progress will only come when politics and religion are totally SEPARATED.
It’s time for us to STOP the practice of holding a well packed political meetings to show their strength. The Knowing this reality, politicians too are ready to bow down to monks, though not out of respect or faith. Political Campaign being LIMITED to the media only.
/
Naman / October 18, 2026
“ orderliness among the monks”
Who or which body is going to check on the “ QUALITY ASSURANCES “ of the clergy? Doctors and Lawyers along with the other professions do have one in order to maintain the standards and integrity of their members.
Why not we have an effective body for the clergies???
/
Naman / October 18, 2026
I just wonder whether a Sinhala Buddhist author too would write an article similar to the above one!!!
/
bimalsenevirathne / October 18, 2026
A priest of any religion is a person based on faith but not on logic. Therefore they act on emotions if the faith is attacked, but never seek logical scientific evidence. In the case of Buddhist priests there’s no governance by a leader and as Sri Lanka has witnessed several occasions they are so radicalised , militaralised and politicalised that they do not adhere to the principles of the Buddha. This ofcourse applies to majority. The present scenario according to my notion, is a conspiracy of the opposition to gain power. It is sad that when progress is sought these type of ignorant, disrespectful and vicious human beings are trying to destroy it. More than that, it proves again that Sinhalese Buddhists are a majority who has a minority complex.
/
Sri Lankan Boy / October 18, 2026
Disrobing Convicted Monks: A More Respectful Solution
I am not a Buddhist, but I believe the dignity of the yellow robe deserves consideration. At the same time, no one should be above the law, whatever religious status they hold.
The Government appears prepared to allow convicted monks to wear their robes when taken to face further court proceedings. But would this not create an awkward situation if a monk, wearing the sacred robe, had to appear in court handcuffed like any other prisoner?
In my view, handcuffing a monk in his yellow robe could be more insulting to the robe than requiring him to wear ordinary clothing after conviction.
Why not adopt a more respectful and practical solution? When a monk is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, the judge could formally recommend to the relevant Sangha authority that it consider his monastic status and decide whether he should be defrocked within a reasonable period, say one week.
This would leave the religious decision to the appropriate religious authority while avoiding unnecessary controversy over prison clothing. It would also affirm an essential principle: the law applies equally to everyone, and the dignity of religion should be protected without compromising justice.
/
Ajith / October 18, 2026
“When a monk is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, the judge could formally recommend to the relevant Sangha authority that it consider his monastic status and decide whether he should be defrocked within a reasonable period, say one week.”
It is possible but for the past 78 years Sangha knew well that they are doing wrong against the law and they did not do anything. It is the first time that the law is implemented after 78 years. You also have to remember he was charged long ago and he was in jail and he was given Presidential pardon by a past president who was punished with just 100 million rupees. He paid it. Even after his removal of his yellow robe, the yellow robe priests who marched from Kandy to Colombo (like JRJ march in 1957). All the crimes from 1948 to 2022 bankruptcy, robes are responsible all the crimes including bankruptcy. It means that Sangha needs to clean up themselves based on Lord Buddha.
/
Naman / October 18, 2026
I agree 100% with SL Boy’s suggestion on the judge requesting the Sanga to disrobe/defrock prior to appearing in the courts. We do not the ROBES to be disrespected!
Robes should be worn by only the WORTHY ones who are following the preachings of the Lord Buddha.All others need to derobed.
/
Black Lankan / October 18, 2026
Do you think any of the mahanayakas have the guts to check these evil monks, that has now become a majority. Beisdes the Mahanayakas themselves are corrupt, immersed in power and luxury. So they are not in a position to call a kettle black. I doubt that Buddhsim will continue to enjoy the respect except the gullible, illiterate masses.
/
whywhy / October 19, 2026
If it is politics that shapes the modern world then everything else is
under its radar , religions no exception and for any nation that does
not understand this , religions are their salvation . And in that sense ,
Srilanka is better off with religions , they are proud of being called
devotees of this or that religion . The size of those who do not belong
to this are few in numbers and so , helpless . Some believe dead are
their rescuers while others put their weight behind invisible forces
and real time politics of all sorts exploits this to the fullest . Make
your choice .
/
leelagemalli / October 19, 2026
Hello Readers,
Germany vs. Sri Lanka: Religious dignity and state power
–
Germany: Under Articles 1 and 4 of Germany’s Basic Law, human dignity is inviolable, and freedom of religion is protected. If authorities forcibly stripped a Christian priest of his religious clothing purely to humiliate him or satisfy political supporters, that would raise serious constitutional concerns.
–
Sri Lanka: Articles 10, 11 and 12 protect religious freedom, prohibit torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and guarantee equality before the law. Article 9 also gives Buddhism the foremost place and obliges the State to protect Buddhism.
supremecourt.lk
–
The crucial comparison: Neither a Buddhist monk nor a Christian priest should be deliberately humiliated by state authorities as political theatre. A lawful, necessary court procedure is one thing; arbitrary religious humiliation is another.
–
The important qualification: Without verified evidence about the circumstances and the court’s orders, it would be premature to declare the specific incident unconstitutional. Germany is also not officially a Christian state.
–
The principle is universal: conviction does not cancel human dignity, and political revenge is not justice.
/
whywhy / October 20, 2026
Prison is not a Temple , Church or Mosque for preaching so that you
get there as a priest or monk . Not one Galagoda , there are many
still out there truly hating followers of other religions and ready to
spread violence without having to think twice . No doubt Galagoda
incident of stripping of his robe in prison is being exploited by
these forces to repeat their past . No Religion is above the Law is a
Good Religion . Ranil has forgotten his uncle JRJ outburst ” I will
break open those shaved heads and fill them with Asphalt . “
/
Black Lankan / October 20, 2026
I personally know and got it from his very mouth as to how he hated these Buddhist monks. He really hated the joker Murutetuwa and chased him many times when he attempted to meet JR nmany years ago. This monk was having a paka time with nurses when he was potent. Now of course old and senile.
/