16 December, 2019

Blog

A Country Waiting For Democracy Or Looking For A King/Queen

By Malinda Seneviratne

Malinda Seneviratne

Malinda Seneviratne

The May Day poster of the United National Party had an interesting caption: කැප කරපු ජනතාවගේ මැයි දින රැලිය (‘Kepakarapu janathavage mai dina raeliya’). Kanishka Goonewardena, Associate Professor, Department of Geography, University of Toronto, who was with me as we drove past a wall covered with this poster, was amused by the caption. ‘Kepa karapu? Doesn’t that mean “condemned”?’ he asked. A ‘May Day rally of the Condemned’ then?

The word ‘condemn’ refers to complete disapproval of something or a sentencing to a particular punishment. Now had the word been කැපවීම කරපු (‘Kepaveem karapu’) ([the people] who sacrificed) or කැප වුන (‘kepavuna’, i.e [the people who] dedicated themselves [to whatever]) the line would have held. Somehow, someone had slipped. In a Freudian way, one might add.

May Day is supposed to be about workers, the working class and their rights. It is supposed to be about the celebration of work and workers and about the injustices of a particular mode of production. It is about rip-off, the scooping up of surplus value as profit or, to put it bluntly, about exploitation. Now those rallies/meetings organized by some of the trade unions and some of the Left parties most certainly would have contained reference to these, but by and large this May Day, just like in most May Days in the last two to three decades used work and worker as prop (at best). There were only cursory references to the issues, if at all. The worker was condemned to a peripheral off-stage spot in the proceedings. In this sense, too, the UNP slogan was a lie, but tellingly a lie that was a true description of what other major rallies were about.

May Day has evolved into a nothing-show as far as the working class is concerned. It was, as it has been, a spectacle for politicians and political groups to show their strength. Now there are all kinds of claims regarding numbers at particular rallies but one can safely say, in terms of turnout alone, that there were three major rallies: the UNP at Campbell Park, the official SLFP/UPFA one in Galle and the unofficial SLFP/UPFA Joint Opposition (wait, wait, ‘Joint Opposition’) rally in Kirulapona.

Predictably and contrary to the pledges of doing things differently those in power abused position and resources to swell numbers. The ‘edge’ of being in power also would have drawn numbers. So Campbell Park and Samanala Kreedanganaya were full. Kirulapona was overflowing too and this without the edge of power that its main attraction, Mahinda Rajapaksa, was used to. Note also that there were various un-yahapaalana-like moves by those who led efforts to organize the official SLFP/UPFA to wreck ‘Kirulapona’.

That ‘Kirulapona’ turned out to be what it was should say something, especially considering the fact that Maithripala Sirisena was elected President just 16 months ago and the UNP won the General Election less than a year ago. Had the increase in VAT been implemented before the 1st of May (let’s say on the 1st of April 2016), ‘Kirulapona’ might have been much bigger.

Of course, despite the fact that apart from lip-service the working class was by and large absented in all this, it is clear that large numbers of workers would have attended one of these three rallies. They were, however, not wearing working class clothes, so to speak. They were instead decked in loyalty-garb. Does this mean that they lacked class consciousness? Does it mean that identities other than class-situation mattered more to them (at least at this moment)? Did they know they were condemned to the periphery or worse in these proceedings? Did they mind? Or was there some other kind of condemnation that was far more pernicious at play?

The three rallies referred to above was about personalities. The fourth, the JVP rally at the BRC grounds, was of course ‘Left’ in colour and content. It was far more disciplined (as always) and demonstrated the usual adherence to civic responsibility of that party on such occasions; there was clean-up after the meeting. The JVP’s politics in general however has long since abandoned working class issues, the party leaders reducing the party to a prop for this government or that government. Marx and Lenin and even Wijeweera show up but once a year, after all. The JVP however was not about personalities. The UNP was less about personality but it has consistently sided with the oppressor (as far as the working class is concerned). The two SLFP/UPFA affairs were unabashedly about personalities.

Perhaps it is time that we took stock of the ‘real’ as opposed to the ‘fake’. Democracy is a nice word. That’s not saying that democracy works better than any other system when it comes to delivering development, bringing about progress and improving well-being of the majority of a given polity. Leaving that aside, there are certain things one expects of citizens in a democracy and there are assumptions, indeed, about the relevant citizenry. But who are we? Are we democratic citizens in a capitalist system or are we in a capitalist economy dominated by feudal relations in all spheres? Are we looking to elect a true representative (since we are in democracy) or are we, given the feudal nature of our everyday looking to consecrate (democratically) a king?

We have to acknowledge that we have as a citizenry elected individuals who are known to be petty thieves, embezzlers, thugs and murderers. If that’s not an endorsement of theft and thuggery it reflects in the very least a that’s-a-given kind of mindset. There’s clearly a mismatch here: there’s the idealistic notion of democracy that is at odds with the lived reality of a feudal society. Perhaps J.R. Jayewardene understood this best, for it was he who came up with a constitution that gives king-like powers to the President. Notwithstanding the 19th Amendment, we’ve seen that the JRJ thinking has reflected reality: those out of power aspire to be kings and queens while kings and queens in power have been reluctant to take off the crown. No, Maithripala Sirisena has not done that as a careful reading of the 19th Amendment would reveal.

If it is a king or queen that this society wants, then it is about strength and not necessarily about upholding justice, fighting crime or doing things in a civilized manner where principles of equality are affirmed. It matters little, after all, whether the king indulges in wealth-accumulation, favours his near and dear, and bashes a few heads in the process. It matters little if a queen keeps people waiting for hours and hours and consecrates cronyism. All that counts is strength. That’s what May Day, once again, affirmed. Naturally a yahapaalana regime that has little or no ‘yaha’ (goodness) in it doesn’t help democracy and the democratizing drive that some people swear by, but perhaps the problem is deeper and lies in the bedrock of what this society really is. Feudalist.

Condemnation, then, is not the UNP preserve or rather the fate of the ‘subjects’ (shall we say) of that particular ‘Royalty’. It is a national condition, cutting across party lines for the main part.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    1

    “A ‘May Day rally of the Condemned’ then?

    The word ‘condemn’ refers to complete disapproval of something or a sentencing to a particular punishment. “

    What an apt poster for the Rajapakse faction!

    • 3
      0

      Quote “That ‘Kirulapona’ turned out to be what it was should say something, especially considering the fact that Maithripala Sirisena was elected President just 16 months ago and the UNP won the General Election less than a year ago. Had the increase in VAT been implemented before the 1st of May (let’s say on the 1st of April 2016), ‘Kirulapona’ might have been much bigger.” Unquote

      With all respect a man who is said to have his degree from Haward,

      why you think VAT is unreasonable.. and what are the options according to you to gap up the huge debts and loan intrests left by most abusive president the island prodcued since independence ?

  • 6
    0

    Malinda’s statement:

    “Had the increase in VAT been implemented before the 1st of May (let’s say on the 1st of April 2016), ‘Kirulapona’ might have been much bigger.”-

    Some common questions flying in the Air:

    How much would have been the crowd if the Yahapalanaya government allowed the 42 criminals’ name published as per the OISL wanted?

    How much would have been the crowd if a minimum inquiry had been carried by Yahapalanaya Goverment with the “Foreign and Commonwealth Lawyers and judges” as the Yahapalanaya Goverment Promised.

    How much would have been the crowd if some of the murders like Thajudeen, Lasantha, Premachandra, Suriachchari, Kathirgamar & other TNA M.Ps were investigated by Yahapalanaya goverment and the public had been informed culprits behind those?

    How much would have been the crowd if the Nuraicholai, Port City, Hambantota white elephants, Air Lanka losses and other economic sabotages investigated and the results published to mass?

    How much would have been the crowd if the truth about the previous PM’s illegal imports and the international network behind it are investigated and the mass was given the information.

    How much would have been the crowd if the Avant Garde criminals are investigated and the criminals are put in prison.

    How much would have been the crowd if Pillaiyan was brought out and allowed freely tell about what he did, to the court.

    How much would have been the crowd if the account of the looted $18 billion had been submitted to public?

    How much would have been the crowd if the New King had released file he has on Old King and Old Kings released the file he has on New King,

    How much would have been the crowd if…………

  • 7
    0

    I am surprised Malinda did not know that we have a veil of a democracy that elect Kings, Queens, Prince and Princesses with their court. They make sure that the Feudal Kings take turn to make their fortune and do not allow one family to perpetually make their fortune through loans and aids from countries, WB, ADB, IMF and others. The moment they stop giving loans or write off the debts we will not elect kings and queens. But then of course the Thugs will takeover to rob the people.May be Kings and Queens are necessary as they give jobs to the Thugs. It is a social protection levy I suppose.

    With so many religious holidays and ceremonies, May Day as a secular celeberations by Kings and Queens without Rev Frs, Hindu Priests and Buddhist priests on the Dais is a rare Sri Lanka Celebrations that is welcome. The workers were probably working on the farm and sea I am sure.

  • 1
    0

    “A Country Waiting For Democracy Or Looking For A King/Queen’

    Sri Lanka has already had her share of kings and queens. All it needs now is a Drag Queen. And there are plenty of them in the present govt led by a great Drag Queen himself.

  • 3
    0

    “”A Country Waiting For Democracy Or Looking For A King/Queen””

    Humpty Dumpty BodiSira government cannot be put together again.Kotta Uda!!

    100 days!! Cluck cluck just rotten eggs.

    Between being loved and being feared,

    Its not possible to have a leader who is loved-
    weeping widow was loved- rice from the moon.

    A leader who is feared would take this crocket nation forward.

    Just Gotabaya and BBS fit the challenge.

  • 0
    0

    Poor guy, Malinda! His next ‘article’ will be on ‘The secrets behind Eclipses’.

  • 0
    0

    Left extremist writing. Typical uninteresting delusional piece of work

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.