21 November, 2018

Blog

A Government Ludicrously At Odds With Itself

By Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena –

Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena

Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena

This week, we saw the strange and astonishing saga of two Sri Lankan human rights activists who were peremptorily arrested and detained under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA, 1979) and then released without charges with various branches of the Government differing on almost every circumstance relating to this incident.

The sequence of events thereto illustrates a regime which appears not to know what it is doing. It seems as if there is fundamentally contradictory tug and pull within the highest echelons of the ruling administration. Needless to say, the consequences thereto are immeasurably dangerous for the country.

Contradictions galore

Indeed at one point, the basic factual incongruities became stark, amounting to sheer absurdity. Following the arrests, Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative stated with appropriately dramatic flair that activist Rukshan Fernando and a Catholic priest, Fr Praveen had been ‘engaging with persons connected to Gobi’ (an ex-LTTE cadre). Gobi, we were told, was implicated in the recovery of an arms caché at Vishwamadu and a shooting incident in Dharmapuram. The arrest of a Northern war widow Balendran Jeyakumari under the PTA was also justified on this same basis.

As Alice in Wonderland would have had occasion to remark, things were thereafter to get ‘curiouser and curiouser’ after this dire warning when the two human rights defenders were released in Colombo with the police spokesman emphasizing quite correctly that no charges had been filed. Compounding this farce, the Ministry of External Affairs, in a most extraordinary blunder, then issued a release stating that they had been released was on bail which stood in immediate contradiction to what the police spokesman had declared.

Appalling misuse of the PTA

As this grim comedy went on with observers watching appalled and transfixed as it were, the Terrorism Investigation Department (TID) obtained a court order impounding the passports of the two activists (which was later varied to securing prior court permission for travel), seizing their laptops and quite unprecedentedly, warning them not to talk about the case nationally or internationally. Meanwhile Jeyakumari remains in detention without charges being filed against her and with her daughter Vibooshika languishing in a child care home. Vibooshika’s affidavit handed to her lawyers this week indicates the abuse that the mother was subjected to with the daughter as an unwilling witness.

In all genuineness, if one searched assiduously for a better illustration of the appalling misuse of the PTA, one could not find a better example than this. These three arrests give the final lie to the Government oft-repeated claim that the emergency regime is at an end. Not so. In fact, we are in a worse off situation as the Emergency Regulations under the Public Security Ordinance (1947) at least had to be debated regularly in Parliament and allows access of family members and counsel to a detainee. The PTA has no such safeguards. Access of lawyers to PTA detainees is not as a matter of right. Practically, lawyers are impeded at every point from affording basic legal counsel. The PTA’s post 2009 strengthening has been used by Sri Lanka’s defence establishment to strike terror into the hearts of dissenters and critics. Its use against Tamil journalist J.S. Tissainayagam and Muslim politician Azath Salley some time ago was a good case in point. In both instances, the vaguely defined PTA offence of causing racial and communal disharmony was utilized as appears to be the case this month as well.

Opposing the Government

In addition, Salley was accused of ‘humiliating’ and making ‘antipathetic statements’ against the Government’. This is of course a slobbery slope that we are on. A reporter, a columnist, an editor or a citizen using the media to criticize the Government will be liable to be arrested on this same basis. This flagrantly contradicts the basics of freedom of expression. Being opposed to, antagonizing or indeed, humiliating the Government are perfectly legitimate activities for citizens. This is an accepted part of democratic life. Indeed, interrogators of the two activists this week reflected that same sense of ridiculousness accusing them of ‘inconveniencing the Government.’ Frankly it is high time that this Government realizes that the people of Sri Lanka do not exist ‘for their convenience’ and that the country cannot be held to ransom by power hungry politicians and their relatives.

True enough, sense prevailed in this week’s arrests due to in large part, to national and international concern. But that does not detract from the seriousness of what took place and the further chilling effect that this would have on already cowed and frightened people. Not only in the North but in the South, villagers in Hanwella demanding clean water were characterized by the authorities as politically motivated. No effort was made to actually listen to the people’s complaints. The unfortunate death of a policeman was one result.

Mourning the country

In this crucial week leading up to the debating of the 2014 resolution in the United Nations Human Rights Council, what the world saw was a Government at odds with itself in dealing with investigations that should have been handled with the utmost delicacy if a national security threat was actually in issue. The timing could not have been worse, bringing the fiercely criticized PTA again into focus. It was almost as if there was a deliberate act of self-immolation.

The revised resolution tabled before the Council requests the Office of the High Commissioner to lead a comprehensive investigation into alleged serious violations by both parties in Sri Lanka with assistance from experts and with a view to preventing future impunity. Its focus on institutional Rule of Law reforms is singularly uncommon. As history will record, what will happen this week at the Council is no small matter. It is of grave consequence to Sri Lanka.

And the responsibility for isolating ourselves in this manner can only be on this Government, notwithstanding angry condemnation of the West’s double standards. Let us be clear about this, even at this late stage.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    2

    Kishali you say sense prevailed but what about Jeyakumari held with no charge no counsel? What about her daughter who has been separated from her mother? Please add your voice to Jeyakumari’s release from Sri Lanka’s notorious torture chamber, also known as Boossa. Would appreciate it.

    • 0
      4

      Harbouring a known terrorist is an exteremely serious crime, and the PTA no doubt covers such an act. It is for this reason that the woman is in custody. Pinto-Jayawardene may think it is being misused, but others don’t. As Asoka Weerasinghe points out, Canada had a similar act which was used with far more vigour when fighting a pussy cat organisation in Quebec.

      • 4
        0

        How is Jeyakumari proven to be harbouring a ‘known terrorist’ Ram? That can only be proven on evidence and beyond the word of the Army that this terrorist was there when they went into the house, we have nothing. Are you swallowing all that the Ministry of Defence says without any critical thinking?

        • 0
          3

          I do NOT know that she was, but that WAS the accusation. If she wasn’t it should be easy enough to prove. I would rather believe the Ministry of Degence than the mouthpiece of the terror rump.

          • 4
            1

            oh, come on Ram, this is a mother and a fourteen year old child that we are talking of. I am not saying that everyone’s innocent and certainly not the LTTE rump which I would be the first to blast but we are talking of a human problem here. Why immediately believe the Defence Ministry, why not allow an independent court to review the facts? But the problem is that Lanka does not have independent courts any more. Destroyed finally by the Rajas. Why does the terrorism law not allow a judge to look at the case?

            As for your deciding to believe the Defence Ministry over the LTTE rump, I do not believe in either of them!

          • 4
            2

            …and you say ‘that should be easy enough to prove’? What nonsense is this? One woman – Jeyakumari – with the entire defence establishment ganged up against her?

            If we showed more humanity towards others, our case as a world class ruffian state will not be this established!

        • 0
          0

          There are further questions here that require answers. An unrepentant terrorist who is still allegedly working with the LTTE faction which wants to continue with the ‘struggle’ comes to Sri Lanka. When did he arrive ? How did he get through Immigration ? Did he have help ? Let’s hope that the MoD looks into these aspects and come up with the answers. Sri Lanka should NOT be allowed to become a playground again for returning terrorists simply because they are on a foreign passport ?

      • 1
        0

        Ram, that is a valid point you make, but in the context of all the glaring acts of mis-governance and the unparalleled events of the past several years under the stewardship of this clan-Rajapakse regime, your view betrays a deep sense of ignorance and lack of objective thinking.

        Please don’t take this as being patronising in any way, but we suggest that you take a quick lesson in contemporary events and then rejoin this august forum.

        • 0
          0

          It s rather patronising to be told that one lacks ‘clarity of thought’ and ‘objective thinking’.
          What is galling is the fact that clarity of thought DID NOT happen (under advice from various do gooders in the international arena) for near 30 years while the enemies of the nation were running riot within killing and causing mayhem. We were lucky that somebody at last realised as to what was happening and took decisive action, salvaging the nation and it’s inhabitants including some of the enemies who are still at large.

    • 5
      1

      Jeyakumari’s arrest is dealt with Usha as you can see in what Kishali has written. This comes from her strong condemnation of the PTA. It is a good point that this is worse than the Emergency.

      I did not know that Jeyakumari’s daughter has given an affidavit detailing what happened. Glad to see this. Is there any way that Colombo Telegraph can publish that affidavit for our information?

  • 0
    1

    There is no end to the dirty tricks by the government forces to subjugate defenders of human rights. The ex LTTE cadres are all under the government control.These youngsters are being intimidated and used for government propaganda and other nefarious tasks undertaken to quell the opposition. Ex militants like KP,Karuna and Pillayan are in charge of these nefarious programmes. The whole world knows about the kind of “democracy” practiced in SriLanka. Now it is difficult to hoodwink the international community.

  • 0
    1

    Where is that De Facto CJ heading the Judiciary in the country? while this tragicomedy unfolds directly under Sec Defense? What a moron this Sec Defence is having to withdraw his action of brevity? I believe the De Facto CJ’s job is to dust and clean Hulftsdorp for his masters the Rajapaksas.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.