27 October, 2020

Blog

A Toxic Brew Of Election Fury Promising Disunity

By Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena –

Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena

As Saturday the 21st of September 2013 draws to a close, marking the first provincial council election held in Sri Lanka’s Northern region for decades, there is a certain terrible inevitability as to where the metaphorical (so far) lines of battle are drawn between this Government and its most determined detractors.

Driven to their backs against the wall

Unmistakably defined by the hardline majoritarian policies of the Rajapaksa administration which has left little room for compromise during the past few years, the political rhetoric of minority parties has grown increasingly defensive in turn, reflecting their grave apprehensions as racial and religious minorities in post-war Sri Lanka.

During the last month, campaigns around the provincial council elections only revealed an unhappy intensification of these positions. While such stridency on the part of this government is only to be expected, it is unfortunate that Tamil parties such as the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) appear to have taken battle positions as it were, on a pronounced hardening of the rhetoric.

From one perspective, this may be understandable as Tamil citizens are driven with their backs against the wall, their places of religious worship being defaced, their very language and culture being subordinated and their lands being occupied on the flimsiest of pretexts in the North, ostensibly for public purposes but later used to expand the burgeoning hotel industry with fat commissions being paid to those at the highest levels of the political hierarchy. Yet as to whether this decidedly provocative rhetoric is exactly wise or strategic in the prevalent political environment is a different question altogether.

The silencing of moderate voices

For in a way, the continuation of such divisive debates is what this Government actually wants in terms of its own priorities for its long term survival. Its greatest problem would be the assimilation and identification of common majority and minority grievances ranging from land disputes and the dispossessed to the inability of the law to safeguard basic life and liberty rights, whether in Chunnakam or Weliweriya. During a week which saw Sri Lanka’s 43rd Chief Justice being put literally into the dock on a trumped up case of bribery by a Bribery and Corruption Commission which has deprived itself of all credibility, such a focus in the run-up to the provincial polls in the North may have had interesting possibilities. This was however, not the case.

The more pronounced divisions there are on ethnic lines, the more fearfulness that is created among religious and racial lines and the more that national parties appear to tread the line of the radical Tamil disapora characterized by its reluctance to condemn the excesses of the late leader of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the happier the Government hawks would undoubtedly be. This divisiveness forms a toxic brew which keeps the moderates marginalized and silences otherwise disgruntled voices who fear, (irrationally maybe), the ghost of the Wanni Sun God rising from the ashes, to mix one’s metaphors, unforgivably perhaps but quite irresistibly.

It is hoped that with the heat of the election campaign over, a more nuanced strategy would drive approaches adopted by the minority parties, which would have as its centre point, the identification of a common strategy at opposing this Government with the Rule of Law at its centre.

The Election Commissioner must talk less and perform more

Meanwhile elections in the Central and North Western provinces have, in the absence of an effective and dynamic opposition, predictable outcomes dominated by intra-party fighting. This week, we saw Sri Lanka’s Elections Commissioner engaging in amusing theatrics before national television while promising to uphold the integrity of the electoral process. The precedent of his predecessor breaking down in tears in lamenting his inability to prevent political pressures exerted on him by this government is indelibly imprinted on our minds.

Yet even within this most unpromising process and in the absence of an independent Elections Commission, the incumbent Elections Commissioner may well be advised to use Article 103(2) of Sri Lanka’s Constitution, left intact by the obnoxious 18th Amendment, to the fullest extent possible. Similar provisions have been used to good effect by India’s abrasive Elections Commission. Even in the vastly weaker electoral process that prevails here, this constitutional provision may surely be utilized more effectively. Moreover sanctimonious announcements by polls candidates, most of whom may be better adorning a rogues gallery, that they have declared their assets are little reassurance. It is up to the Elections Commissioner to ascertain the actual truth of these so-called declarations, even if the law can do little in punishing political rogues given state patronage.

Historic but disillusioning polls

In conclusion, these elections may be heralded as historic for its holding of polls in the North. True enough, the sight of formerly war affected villagers trudging determinedly to cast their vote at polling stations is an uplifting sight. Not so long ago, as may be remembered, the LTTE’s ban on citizens of the North casting their vote was enforced so barbarically that a man who defied that order had his hand cut off. Yet nonetheless, bereft of a proper Rule of Law framework and dominated by divisive campaign propaganda, these polls promise to heighten disunity, regardless of whatever outcome.

One is forcefully reminded thereto of the frenzied rat on the proverbial wheel, going round and round but to little avail until the inevitable end comes. As ultra-nationalist positions on both sides of the Sri Lanka’s ethnic divide harden, that essential middle ground is lost to the detriment of the country as a whole. This seems to be the sad fate of this country, illustrating time and time again that the lessons of history are never quite learnt in all their grim foreboding.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    I do not agree with this utterly pessimistic view of the aftermath of the just concluded NPC election.
    Tamils have shown their desire to manage their own affairs in the nothern province as allowed by the constitution, which has allowed land and police powers – which have been dormant for past 25 years and unused by all other PCs – which are necessary for the Rule of Law for the province,within a united sri lanka.
    Why should these powers upset anyone – except the army which has grabbed lands belonging to citizens for purposes which they have not agreed to.
    Tamils are not going to run away with the nothern province – anyone who thinks so, is an imbecile.

    The army is subserviant to the government,and not vice versa.

    The “Wanni Sun God” is dead and cremated,his former troops are in secret jails,some free and trying to lead normal lives and many dead.
    KPJ appears worried of the dead being resurrected!
    LTTE did prohibit tamils from voting and were paid a massive bribe for same by those who are now part of the ruling elite.
    That now has no bearing on this present post-election scenario.
    Is KPJ trying to ‘arouse sleeping dogs’ which are best left alone?

    TNA has a tough battle ahead to convince the Governor and President to allow majority consensus rule the affairs of the NPC.

    • 0
      0

      it seems that those on either side are equally blinded to the issues that incite distrust. The issue was not the TNA victory but the election language used by the TNA candidate etc….this has definitely made Sinhala moderates nervous…

  • 0
    0

    What happened to the UNP?

    What happened to moderates in this country?

    TNA Tamil racists.
    SLMC Muslim racists.
    UPFA Chingalam racists.

    These racists won.

    Moderates are the losers of this election. I fear what the future holds for this country. Hopefully it will lead to another May 2009 style victory for the best army.

    Let the best army win!

    • 0
      0

      It’s best to leave this one alone: An agent provocateur.

      The more we react to its venom, the more it enjoys, and spits more venom – that’s right it’s a snake in the grass!

  • 0
    0

    Northern Tamils have spoken. TNA asked the Northern Tamils whether they wanted development promised by the Government party or they stood for Tamil Nationalism and Self Determination. By voting overwhelmingly for the TNA, Northern Tamils have categorically said they wanted the latter promised by the TNA. Well and good, let us see whether TNA with their power of “internationalism” (meaning the support of the so-called international community) could deliver on their promises. The ball is now in the court of TNA leaders. Government should now allow them to pursue their goal but not through another armed struggle.

    Since Northern Tamils have rejected development, Government should immediately stop all development work in the North and allocate funds already set aside for these works to develop other regions of Sri Lanka. There is no need now to extend rail service beyond Kilinochchi. In the first place it was LTTE that destroyed the railway lines and other infrastructures. Why should other Sri Lankans pay for their repair and restoration.

    Vigneswaran should shift his residence permanently to the North and live in the midst of his people. He should renounce his Sri Lankan pension and the pay and privileges the Sri Lankan Government would provide him as the Chief Minister of Northern Province. Sumanthiran should also pack his bags and go to Jaffna.

    It is also better for all those Northern Tamils who are now settled in Colombo and other parts of Southern Sri Lanka to leave to their promised by the TNA.

  • 0
    0

    Kishali Pinto-Jayawardena fits the stereotype Sinhala Buddhist majoritarian mind set.

    • 0
      0

      and you fit the stereotypical Tamil minoritarian mindset! Try to get out of that box for the good of your people!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.