17 October, 2021


An Open Letter To Those Who Wish To Deny Or Delay Their Marriage In Sri Lanka

By Kulani Abendroth-Dias

Kulani Abendroth-Dias

Even in the advent of social media, the newspaper remains an important source of information in present day Sri Lanka. According to a Central Bank’s Economic and Social Statistics report, 538.82 million newspaper copies alone were sold in 2016, up 6.06% from 2015 (“Newspapers Still the King in Sri Lanka,” Daily Mirror, 2017, August 30). Being one of these many readers, I came across a “case” of sorts in the Daily Mirror, against the denial or delay of marriage in Sri Lanka, directed at our supremely beautiful, supremely patriarchal nation’s women specifically.

Why do I care about one poorly written article, with no concrete “sociological,” or “biological” references to back it up?

One article is not the problem. What is important is what the article perpetuates: norms of femininity that are based on motherhood, subservience, and dependence. While a number of the claims that the writer makes (such as all women having a pseudo-biological yearning to be a mother, which has no sociological, biological or anthropological basis behind it), his point on the societal taboos of “waiting too long” to get married is indeed an issue faced by dozens if not hundreds of families around the island (just take a look at the matrimonial sections in any newspaper!)

The solution is not to push women – indeed, a “female past her adolescence” no less – into marriage.

If we want to discuss the “sanctity of marriage,” and the religious and traditional roles of this type of communion, we need to first answer the question: What is marriage?

While there are dozens of definitions of marriage worldwide, across religions and traditions, one can argue that overall, marriage is a commitment one makes to another, to live as their partner, for better or for worse, till death (or abuse) does them apart.

So how can we force our daughters, “young ones with no experience” as we say in Sri Lanka, into such a commitment without any discussion, or consent, of their own? Isn’t it possible that a woman may have career goals of her own, that may allow her to delay her marriage given her specific circumstances? Isn’t it possible that a woman simply hasn’t met a man whom she wants to spend the rest of her life with? By pushing women into marriages of convenience in the fear of “delaying or denying” a marriage, aren’t we quelling a workforce that can help our country move forward?

Marriage is not the institution to be fought here. Whether one chooses to marry or not, have children or not, have a career or not, is one’s own choice — regardless of whether you are a male or female. As a trained social psychologist, I can list hundreds of studies by Deborah Prentice, JaneMaree Maher, Lise Sauggeres, Jean Baker Miller: sociologists, anthropologists, psychologists, etc. from around the world who discuss the various reasons for subduing the female workforce: threat, procreation, intergroup relations, evolutionary biology etc. Spewing that research from the ivory tower is not going to change anything. What we need to influence, to bring about change, are the norms surrounding marriage in Sri Lanka.

What are norms and why are they so important?

Social norms dictate behavior. It tells us right from wrong: it tells us certain things should be like this, or certain things are like this. They are dictated to us by our social institutions; schools, parents, and the media. The norms around marriage nowadays are such that females should be married (the age range can vary as a function of geography, socio-economic status etc.) They should be married around a certain age.

But times are changing. And so are norms.

You are not going against your religion or culture if you choose to put your career ahead of finding a mate in your twenties. This is the time when you are most able to work, to put in the hours that will get you ahead in your career. We need to set the precedent, change the norms around marriage, to make it more acceptable to say, “I choose when I will get married.” Or even, “I will get married when I find a compatible partner.”

We need to put our daughters first, to truly care about their well-being and prosperity. They now have a chance at carving out their own life and not depend on their male counterpart to protect and provide for them. If we accept that our social norms are such that it is unsafe for a woman to live by herself in this day and age, isn’t it time we take steps to change that? Instead of making her even more dependent on a stranger, why not change our rhetoric, our norms, to better protect, and help the daughters of this country stand on their feet?

Marriage is, ostensibly, for life. Why not take the time to find someone you won’t despise in 20 years?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 9

    Yeah trust me, this isnt just a thing women face in this country.

    And more often than not, it’s the matriarchs of the family that push this agenda.

  • 1

    Sri Lanka needs this perspective to come through regularly in print media to foster meaningful discussion on how best to continue to progress towards an equitable society.

  • 7

    I suggest this author to interview ten unmarried women in their sixties in Sri Lanka and revisit her article. Sri Lanka is still highly dependent on immediate family for care for the sick, the older and the elderly, and would remain so for the next 50 years (projecting from the current rate of development). Marriage may not be a biological imperative for a country with one of the highest population densities in the world, but it is a sociological necessity.

  • 5

    Marriage between man and woman is the start of a society/community.
    The children they have,
    need a stable family to grow up into a normal healthy (mentally and physically) kids.
    We need them to build a healthy prosperous country!
    Late marriage leads to more complicated and difficult pregnancies!

  • 3

    What Kulani Abendroth-Dias means by the term ‘supremely patriarchal’ is really ‘obscenely misogynist’.
    We accept misogyny as part of our culture. This must change.

  • 2

    You are corret. It is the mother and father who wants to make her daughter or son married. So, take your own decision. that is if you hate your mother saying get married. Just forget it. that is not a big deal. If your intention is to sleep around and them look for the richest, welathiest, most educated and most decent, romantic man, only the stupidewst men get caught, and you are destroying the spciety, because mother is extemely important figure in the society.
    On the other hand, don’t think women are only found around the man’s environement. Women can be found all over the world. there are many women and societies more decent than Sri lanka and thiose women are good to marry and ear to establish a family.. they are ready to sacrifice everything in order to have a stable maraige. So, don’t think only the Sri lankan women should be considred. YOu are over estimating yourself.Mother’s responsibility to protect the culture. Otherwise, if you want to live together without getting into a marriage, that is OK as long as your parents OK it. Marriage is achristian concept in order to promote the christian society. What is important is trust, dedication and respect for each other. Otherwise, if you are trying to pass on men just by sleeping with them until you find the right onw, you are dead wrong. You may start trying women too then.

  • 2

    There is not limit to fantasacies and making your mind happy or content. So, think, Everything has a some different result,.

  • 2

    Kulani: You value, I think, christian – western, IDeals which respect mateiral everything. Do not think society evolved in the stupid way. LAte marriage and late pregnencies increaes disabled children. If you marry at 30 instead of 20, the propability for getting disabled children. IF you marry at 40, the probability is really high to get malformed children.

    • 0

      You parents must have been quite elderly when they got married, no ? Or were you born before that happy event ?

  • 0

    Yes if you are looking for the ideal partner go sampling a selection of males and you may strike gold, if that’s what you are seeking. Marriage is a tried and testedinstitution which has evolved in different ways I never different cultures, often in response to other sociological factors. A typical matriarchal society is Kerala where the matriarch rules the roost and I need former years it was polyandrous because most males were called out to war. In Sri Lanka too Kandyan families have been polyandrous in the past. Sororal polygamy where one man is wedded to two sisters was prevalent in the North, and there would have been some underlying the prActice. In modern Sri Lanka the dowry system is fading away and young people are emancipating from their parental homes at relatively early ages. However due mainly to economic reasons the average Age at marriage which was around 25 years about 40 years ago is now near 30 again because people want to be economically stable before marriage given the decline of the dowry system.So this whole issue is highly debatable and has many aspects to it.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.