12 August, 2022


Aung San Suu Kyi Accepts Nobel Peace Prize

By  in Oslo/ The Guardian –

In an event hailed as the “most remarkable in the entire history of the Nobel prizes”, Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese democracy campaigner, delivered her acceptance speech for her peace prize in Oslo’s vast City Hall more than two decades after it was awarded.

Aung San Suu Kyi delivers her acceptance speech during the Nobel peace prize ceremony in Oslo. Photograph: Daniel Sannum-Lauten/AFP/Getty Images

Given the prize in 1991 – but by then under house arrest by Burma‘s military junta – it was left to her two sons, Alexander and Kim, to travel toNorway to receive the peace prize that year. Able to travel freely after 21 years, Aung San Suu Kyi stood in front of a packed hall, in which Norwegian dignitaries rubbed shoulders with Buddhist monks in saffron robes and Burmese guests in traditional costumes, to deliver her long-delayed acceptance speech in a moment of high emotion.

Commended in the original citation for her “non-violent struggle” as “one of the most extraordinary examples of civil courage in Asia in recent decades”, the 66-year-old activist, elected to the country’s national assembly during its fragile political transition, recalled with typical self-effacement the moment at which she heard she had been awarded the peace prize.

“I heard the news on the radio one evening. I’ve tried very hard to remember what my immediate reaction to the announcement of the award had been. I think it was something like: ‘Oh … so they’ve decided to give it to me’.”

Aung San Suu Kyi arrived in Norway from Switzerland, her first stop on a two-week tour of Europe. The journey is her first in Europe since 1988, when she left her husband and two young sons in England to visit her ill mother in Burma and became the focal point for the nascent democracy movement.

She made a wide-ranging, deeply personal lecture, which touched on her feelings of isolation under house arrest, the Buddhist concept of suffering, human rights and her hopes and fears for her country’s future, and the importance of the peace prize itself.

“It did not seem quite real because in a sense I did not feel myself to be quite real at that time,” she said. “Often during my days of house arrest it felt as though I were no longer a part of the real world.

“There was the house which was my world, there was the world of others who also were not free but were together in prison as a community, and there was the world of the free; each was a different planet pursuing its own separate course in an indifferent universe.

“What the Nobel peace prize did was to draw me once again into the world of other human beings outside the isolated area in which I lived, to restore a sense of reality to me. This did not happen instantly, of course, but as the days and months went by, and news of reactions to the award came over the airwaves, I began to understand the significance of the Nobel prize. It had made me real once again.

“What was more important, the prize had drawn the attention of the world to the struggle for democracy and human rights in Burma. We were not going to be forgotten. When the Nobel committee awarded the peace prize to me, they were recognising that the oppressed and the isolated in Burma were also a part of the world, they were recognising the oneness of humanity … The Nobel peace prize opened up a door in my heart.”

Talking about the motivation in a period during which she was separated from her family and her British husband, the academic Michael Aris, died, she said: “If I am asked why I am fighting for democracy in Burma, it is because I believe that democratic institutions and practices are necessary for the guarantee of human rights.

“When I joined the democracy movement in Burma, it never occurred to me that I might ever be the recipient of any prize or honour. The prize we were working for was a free, secure and just society where our people might be able to realise their full potential.”

Aung San Suu Kyi appeared impossibly small, entering the City Hall wearing a purple jacket and flowing lilac scarf to the sound of a trumpet fanfare.

Thorbjørn Jagland, chairman of the Nobel committee, who introduced her, said: “Today’s event is one of the most remarkable in the entire history of the Nobel prizes … We hope that Liu Xiaobo [the Chinese political activist] will not have to wait as long as you have before he can come to Oslo.”

Jagland recalled how, when the peace prize celebrated its 100th anniversary in 2001 with more than 30 laureates in attendance, “we left one chair empty [for her]”.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    Poor Mr who boasted about ending the war in Sri Lanka once hoped for a Nobel and would have loved to have got what Su Ki has got! Too bad he could not hide Gota the Goon!

  • 0

    The demure and graceful lady single-handedly has brought forth so much of goodwill and a favourable global press to her isolated hermit land. She encounters tremendous warmth and respect wherever she goes – and is, arguably, the most beloved world icon since Nelson Mandela strode the world scene like a collosus. It was in full sincerity British PM said “Madam, it is a honour to stand by your side” as he called on her humble home/prison in Yangon.

    This lady of letters and education called for the immediate release of political prisoners in all countries they are held when she said so elegantly “Even a single prisoner of conscience is one too many” Words Mrs Prageeth Ekniligoda and thousands of Tamil youth held in our jails will welcome. She does not need the services of such conmen like
    Bell Pottinger to boost up her image. It is there – naturally and spontaneously.


Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.