By Sharmini Serasinghe –
With the ‘Halal’ issue exhausting all the hot-air being blown around it, now here comes the Muslim dress code to the fore. Muslim women are now being pinched, pushed and spat on because of their choice of dress in the form of a long loose over-garment called the ‘abaya’.
It was not until the effervescent Saffron Brigade (Bodu Bala Sena) drew attention to it did anyone pay much heed to the ‘abaya’ which is a common sight especially in urban areas of the country. Upon further investigation into the relatively recent popularity of this outer-garment favoured by some Muslim ladies in Lanka one finds significantly varying reasons for it.
Lankan Muslims
Of the three leading ethnic groups in the country it is only the Muslims of Lanka who bear a religious rather than a linguistic, ethnic or racial identity. Unlike the Sinhalese and Tamils, the Moslems cannot generally be identified by their language, dress or cultural identity. Therefore Lankan Muslims until recently assimilated inconspicuously into the rest of Lankan society and were never regarded as a ‘threat’ by the ‘other’.
It is interesting to note that this relatively new trend by some Lankan Muslims to embrace the Middle Eastern styles of the Arab dress code in the form of the ‘abaya’ and ‘thobe’ (long loose shirt for men) etc., is especially seen amongst the younger and more urban Muslim men and women. Others among the older generation still favour the sari draped in the customary Muslim fashion and shirt, trouser or sarong for the men.
This trend of a ‘different’ dress code denotes a stronger outward expression of the Muslim religious identity. Therefore it has drawn greater attention to the Lankan Muslims rather negatively in the eyes of some, as a conspicuous social ‘other’ as it makes them more ‘visible’ and different. This unfortunately seems to have formed a psychological barrier even between some among other communities and the Lankan Muslims.
In civilized society one’s attire constitutes a very significant form of non-verbal communication, more so in a multi-cultural one, where what one wears conveys nonverbal clues about his or her personality. In such a context the ‘abaya’ and ‘thobe’ which are ‘culturally new’ to Lanka, appear to have riled not only the Saffron Brigade but some among other communities as well.
It appears that to them the messages conveyed through this attire is “we are different from you” or “we are not one of you”. Hence the general message conveyed through this attire to the ‘other’ is interpreted to be one of aloofness, from other ethnic communities.
I personally know several Muslim ladies who until recently dressed like the ‘other’. However since donning the ‘abaya’ they have been socially marginalised by some. They are no longer invited by their former schoolmates to parties or other social gatherings. From what I have been told, it appears that the ‘others’ feel uncomfortable with their friends now covered from head to toe.
This is indeed a sad state of affairs and does not augur well for peace and unity in a multi ethno-religious country; but it is not an issue that time cannot heal. Nevertheless in the interim this could provide sufficient ammunition to the likes of the Saffron Brigade to drive their point home. This in turn makes the Lankan Muslim today, extremely vulnerable through their conspicuous visibility to the psychotics.
Lanka’s Eastern Muslims
On a recent visit to the Ampara district in the East Coast I gained a much wider perspective of how and why some Lankan Moslems have embraced the Arabian mode of attire. And strangely I didn’t see as many dressed in the ‘abaya’ and ‘thobe’ as I expected to, in an area predominantly populated by Muslims. Save a few the others whom I met and spoke to were dressed in sari, shalwar kameez, sarong, trousers and shirt.
From what I gathered it appears, that given the significant number of Lankan Moslems who have lived and worked in the Middle East, where they had to adhere to a strict dress code prevalent in some of those countries, on returning home, continued the dress code.
This has now become a ‘trend’. It makes them stand out as financially well-to-do, due to their employment abroad, and therefore sends a silent message to others in their community, that they now belong to a higher social status. The middle class Muslims refer to them derogatorily as the “new rich”.
There are other economic reasons as well. I met a mother of four daughters Aiza in Pottuvil who herself was dressed in a sari draped in the customary Muslim fashion. She confessed that since her offspring decided on their own to don the ‘abaya’, as they regarded it ‘fashionable’, there was no longer a need to spend money on a variety of clothing since this long loose over-garment covered it all.
The advantage of the ‘abaya’ says Aiza is that one could wear even faded and darned clothes beneath it, and no one will ever know. Even the men, she says, don’t require many shirts, trousers and sarongs as before, since a minimum of two sets of the ‘Thobe’ (long loose shirt and trouser or sarong) are sufficient. As a result the family as a whole is now able to afford three square meals a day on the money they save on clothes.
Then there is another section among the Muslims that attributes the new Muslim dress code to a heightened awareness of ‘Muslim issues’ around the world and therefore a greater sense of membership in the global community of all Muslims. This is a relatively small section of Muslims with a ‘political’ mindset, who displays bouts of intolerance and extremism against the minority Sinhalese and Tamils in the East, in an attempt to scare them away from the area. As a result the handful of Sinhalese and Tamil residents in the area has formed a bond in unity against the aggressor.
Whatever the reasons Lankan Muslims have for adopting a ‘different’ mode of attire, is well within their rights as human beings. After all Lanka is still supposed to be a democracy and a civilized society where all are equal, therefore no one has the right to intrude into the privacy and freedom of another.
Let those rabble rousers be advised against using superficial and lame excuses such as a dress-code of a minority community to drive a wedge between our society and create unwarranted mayhem as a result. Politicians of the past have created enough chaos between the Sinhalese and Tamils let not their successors expand on that by creating disunity with the Muslims as well.

Ben Hurling / March 24, 2013
That is not surprising.
Extremists are the same whehter they are Tamil ethno nationalsits or BBS “Balu Sena”.
It is either their way or the highway.
BBS “Balu Sena” feels they won the Halal issue. That they are the self appointed “Vigilante Police2 of Sri Lanka. That when it comes to Sinhala Buddhist heritage issues in Sri Lanka, they are the sole representatives and authority. And that they alone are right.
They want the maximum out of everything they bring to the table. Everything is black and white. Not complicated for them.
Sounds familiar. VP and LTTE was the same. Just worse.
Extremists are extremists. Whether they are Sinhala, Tamil or Muslim. Buddhist, Hindu or Chrstian.
/
j.muthu / March 24, 2013
U live in moda land, dont filipin compare your f….ing BBS with ltte. Learn and put your damn point.. ltte created by your sinhala evil budhist fools. They gone for good sinhala budhist fools like u all live in continuous blood and violense. u live in blame culture, never going to change. Only way peace in bloody srilanka and tamils of tamil ealam go separate ways. I heared today tamil passeger busses attacked by sinhala budhist thugs. innocent sinhala and tamils had enough let them respect their own way of life. GOOD FOR SINHALA AND TAMILS..
/
Eelam Tamilan / March 25, 2013
“[The Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) says Sri Lanka is not a multiracial or multi-religious country but a Sinhala Budhist country.]”
The BBS is absolutely correct, Sri Lanka is a Sinhala-Buddhist country but Tamil Eelam (N & E) is a Tamil country. While the BBS is planning to make Sri Lanka a Sinhala-Buddhist country the Tamils are also planning to make Eelam a Tamil country. AT least now it is gradually turning into a reality, the Tamil Eelamiists should be thankful to the BBS.
/
David Blacker / March 25, 2013
Thee will be no Sinhalese Buddhist nation, and no Tamil Eelam. Both are fantasies of fanatics, and both will chucked into the dustbin of history.
/
Wuliangguobinjiu / March 26, 2013
ET:Summarising, its true like the IPKF admits a state of Hindustan from the days of Ravana and beyond say 7000yrs ….let’s get it back we have the Jews on our land too from Roman times.
/
AMT / March 25, 2013
Extrimites are DIFFERENT! Some are Government Sponsored and there are others who are antti Government.?
/
Native Vedda / March 26, 2013
Ben Hurling
“Extremists are the same whehter they are Tamil ethno nationalsits or BBS “Balu Sena”.
Tamils never had saffron clad thugs you stupid man.
They had LTTE terrorists just like you had JVP terrorists.
They have stupid politicians just like you have stupid thieves representing you.
By the way not one Sinhala/Buddhist renounced his/her Sinhala/Buddhist identity. Yeah since they form the majority community they have earned the right to wear Sinhala/Buddhist ethno nationalist identity.
/
Rama / March 24, 2013
i suppose bikku perverts want the burka removed so that they can ogle at their breats.
/
OutRider / March 24, 2013
Rama
Gotcha, Sita doesn’t wear burka so you can ogle her breasts.
/
anonymous / March 26, 2013
This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy
https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/
/
kumudini / March 24, 2013
Are you aware that the Burka is banned in France ?? No BBS there !
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
No. It is not banned from a religious perspective.
Overt religious symbolism is what is banned in Schools. And in each one of these cases the affected students have files cases and have been allowed to wear the Burka, (provided the face veil is discarded).
What is banned as is officially called, ‘the bill to forbid concealing one’s face in public.’
“It refers neither to Islam nor to veils. Officials insist the law against face-covering is not discriminatory because it would apply to everyone, not just Muslims.
Please get your facts right
/
kumudini / March 25, 2013
Are you serious ? Do you think that the French cover their faces in France ????? Get your facts right as well .
/
Commode Diny / March 26, 2013
French cover their asses, mukudini.
/
whywhy / March 26, 2013
Kumudini,let France ban it,let America ban it and let
any other western nation ban it.Muslims have not lived
there for centuries yet they enjoy a lot more than they
do in their mother lands.Haven’t you heard any good news
for all foreigners living in the west and especially
Muslims?You need to know that Muslims are the second best
community the west prefer to live in peace with despite
many odds.
/
Tharu Paba / March 25, 2013
Yes, why can’t the GOSL ban “Burka” under human rights violation!
/
ahmad / March 26, 2013
This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy
https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/
/
PaluToba / March 26, 2013
Already human rights violations are going against for what they do against the minorities. And in between, why do you want a resistance of a violation to be violated by the human rights.
If you are idle count the stars around the moon or something closely the shrubs around your pace.
/
Tharu Paba / March 28, 2013
Palu Toba,
If I am idle, you too fall into the same category. Think before you utter idle words.!!! :)
/
Riza / March 25, 2013
In France, you pay to see a woman naked (sometime it’s free) and get FINED if you cover up. What a world we live in!
/
lionel / March 26, 2013
Kumudini,
Yes face veil is banned in France. So much for freedom of religion. France is very oppressive country. Ask any Algerian if in doubt.
BBS is not just a label, but a reality – a reality that is intolerant, racist, misogynistic and islamophobic. It is called NF (National Front) in France.
/
Native Vedda / March 26, 2013
kumudini
French eat snails, do you want to follow them?
/
Lion / March 24, 2013
Why not allow the others to appriciate the beauty of the nature.
/
David Blacker / March 25, 2013
That is up to them, not you. Why don’t you wear your sarong round your head and see how much appreciation you get.
/
Oliver G / March 25, 2013
The BBS arguments on the black feminine Toga are so convoluted, and it deemed to ponder our mind on the insights on Alexander Pope’s “Rape of the Lock.
The close recesses of the virgin’s thought;
As on the nosegay in her breast reclined,
He watched the ideas rising in her mind,
Sudden he viewed, in spite of all her art,
An earthly lover lurking at her heart.
Amazed, confused, he found his power expired,
Resigned to fate, and with a sigh retired.”
-Alexander Pope, The Rape of the Lock, (Canto iii, 139-146)
While Ariel and the other Sylphs are guarding every inch of Belinda’s body, the Baron approaches Belinda’s hair to chop off a lock to keep for his own. When Ariel becomes aware of the sexual thoughts (the “earthly lover lurking at her heart”) that have risen in Belinda’s mind, Ariel is “resigned to fate” and no longer able to protect Belinda. More than retired, Ariel has lost his power to protect her and therefore must forfeit the battle.
……..is what the sex opiated Rednecks vie.
/
Lallo / March 25, 2013
Oh there shrivels the spoofy Rambuttans of the wimpyRex, the ‘Lion Kumar’.
/
Mahadana Muththa (Jnr) / March 26, 2013
Good one David Blacker:-)
Much needed humour for a change on this thread.
/
Sangunni Kakkuputa / March 25, 2013
Even the beauty of our country’s nature is being raped unequivocally by the Kurakkan party politics, and who will appreciate your women.
/
Nas / March 24, 2013
It is not dress or halal food issue. But sickness of mindset in BBS that worries every one. These monks may think that their religion is in decline but they should have own agenda to revive it . It’s not Muslim fault but theirs because people are going away from it. No religion on earth more strictly followed as Islam and judadim. People of these two religions are daily practising religion while all other religious people practice their religion at convineint times. At birth and death time or once in poya days or Sundays. For a muslim religion shapes and moulds his or her life. It’s not mere philosophy of life rather way of life. Dress code come from this point. When ladies go half-dressed showing all private parts no one complaints but when Muslim demands modesty why is this fuss? What is wrong with humanity. Why want to go back in history into naked age of first man on earth.
/
Que Sera / March 24, 2013
Does the BBS realise that Lanka’s biggest benefactor is condoning the denigration of Buddhism by not stamping down on products such as this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddha_Jumps_Over_the_Wall
Is this Halal or Haram, I ask in all innocence?
Now that their testosterone has built up to an optimal level after the anti-halal success, perhaps the BBS should organise an army of concerned Sinhala Buddhists to make an unauthorised landing in China and go hound the people who would dare insult Buddhism….after all, aren’t there are at least 13 other countries to whom Lanka could turn if China closes off the aid spigot?
/
Periyar E. V. Ramasamy / March 24, 2013
mAY BE THERE ARE GETTING their ideas and possibly finance form the French Government which passed Harsh Laws to Ban the Muslim women dress code ins public places in France.. and now adopted in other European Countries. As many journalist have contributed the constant demonetization of muslims and given rise to groups such as stop the islamination of Europe.. Based near the European Parliament..(and the French and other European nations which banned were not extremist.)
/
Salah Al Din Ayyoobi / March 26, 2013
And, remember France is the birthplace of the Crusades the forefathers of the Owl worshippers.
/
Why? / March 24, 2013
While it certainly is the right of any one to wear any garb, it is not clear why the donning of such black ‘over-alls’ appears to have increased of late. Perhaps the Muslim elders and those who would be leaders of society should try to de-emphasise this (relatively new and burgeoning) urban practice on grounds that it is being used to needlessly provoke those with agendas to spread hate and dissent and perhaps worse in our dear country??
Frankly I find the argument that it is more economical to wear the abaya because it can conceal darned garments beneath it a little disingenuous.
All citizens have to share in the responsibility of promoting harmony in society and if anything done innocently becomes a symbol of ‘difference’ then it should be discouraged and desisted from. Those who would wear the abaya (or thobe) should take comfort from the author’s observations of what prevails in predominantly Muslim populations and revert to wearing clothing that is suitable to the climate, achieves the requisite level of modesty they desire and that is acceptable to others in a multi-ethnic pluralistic society.
/
Umbala Kada / March 25, 2013
Why?
I agree with you.
Doesn’t the sari draped in the Muslim fashion and the shalwar kameeze serve the same purpose as the ‘abaya’ except that it’s far more pleasing on the eye? What is indecent in these two garments that it now has to be covered up with a hideous black bag? There appears to be more to this than just religion as they claim.
Even the Muslim men started wearing the thobe and long beard after Osama Bin Laden. So is it surprising that these Muslims are regarded as extremists and therefore dangerous?
Muslims who want to wear their religion on their sleeve through their dress ought to be more sensitive to others in a multi religious and multi cultural society.
I see Muslim women every day dressed in skin-tight jeans and T-shirt with a scarf covering their head. Isn’t this hypocritical?
I have also seen Muslim women dressed in this ‘abaya’ in hotels down South seated by the pool smoking cigarettes and drinking wine. Had they not been wearing the abaya and doing the same it would not have looked so strange.Why this hypocrisy?
/
Karawala / March 25, 2013
Does it mean that multi cultural, multi ethnic,multi religious societies should be racially intertwined physically and mentally and copulate like the domesticated bullocks. First know what does multi-cultural, multi ethnic society means. Tolerance is an essential key to a multi-cultural society, abhorring hatred and to live in harmony.
Your definition of Civic obedience in Lanka is like the general notices found in the gates of all zoological gardens “No dogs allowed”.
Remember, once upon a time the common Sinhala man was never entertained in the greens of Galle Face esplanade to stroll or roll, except the Whites with their dogs. Now, the Sinhala masters too living up to the colonial vagaries.
/
lionel / March 26, 2013
Karawala,
Good points! However, the term ‘tolerance’ (of minorities by the majority) may be xenophobic. ‘Tolerance’ is to let some nasty piece to do whatever nonsense it is doing.
We must be talking about rights (not ‘tolerance) of each communities, and the responsibility of communities towards each other.
/
kattakarawala / March 26, 2013
Karawala,
You seem to be forgetting that Sri Lanka IS a multi cultural, multi ethnic,multi religious society intertwined physically and mentally.
I should know because I come from a family where almost all ethnic and religious groups are represented through marriage and no one is treated any different from the other.
/
Bombili / March 26, 2013
Do you know why the Up country Sinhalese never give their offspring to the people of Muwanpalassa?
/
kattakarawala / March 26, 2013
Bombili,
The ‘Up country Sinhalese’ is a hodgepodge of everything including British :-)
/
lionel / March 25, 2013
Women, these bloody women! They must be told what to wear. How dare they choose to wear what we haven’t told them to wear?
See! I agree with UMBALA KADA! I am just being raw in my expressions, whereas this ‘stinking stuff’ is intellectualising its misogyny and islamophobia.
/
lionel / March 25, 2013
@ Umbala Kada,
“I have also seen Muslim women dressed in this ‘abaya’ … smoking cigarettes and drinking wine”
Yet what he is condemning is a piece of cloth, not the dangerous wine and cigarettes. Hatred is so powerful that it can easily blunt one’s senses wholesale! In him is a proof of this!
/
lionel / March 25, 2013
@ Umbala Kada,
These guys, dressed up in coat and suit resemble some of the worst mass-murderers like Bush, Blair, Obama etc. We should consider them outright dangerous! A preventative measure is imperative! Shall we shoot them on sight? Let us have a debate whether it should be through their knee caps or their foreheads!
/
Bazooka / March 27, 2013
‘WangAte’ is to snipe.
/
Riza / March 25, 2013
We are becoming an intolerent society. There is no problem in what a person wear (unless you have nothing to wear!), the problem is intolerence. A Sinhalese friend made fun of me for wearing a sarong. I make fun of people wearing sari in a hot climate in SL. We tolerate women walking half naked on SL beaches, or watching half naked brides. The world has gone crazy!
/
Nabil / March 26, 2013
@Umbalakada
Since when did you become the arbiter of what is pleasant and unpleasant?
To me the Pant and Shirt that women prefer today makes women look masculine, and the skin the expose in their short skirts and low neck blouses is unsightly.
Now you and I have opposing view points. How do you and I reconcile this?
Would be interesting to how you present your side of the story.
/
Umbala Kada / March 26, 2013
Nabil,
I totally agree with you on Pants and shirt on women as well as that revolting mini skirt and plunging necklines BUT you haven’t answered my question?
Doesn’t the sari draped in the Muslim fashion and the shalwar kameeze serve the same purpose as the ‘abaya’?
/
katheeja / March 24, 2013
Abaya is their choice. Why BBS has to bother about that. When people wear skiny or bikini BBS police men dont bother. only when ladies wear modest clothes.they have their concern.
/
Bikini Baja Serendib / March 25, 2013
Next will be the inauguration of HellaLanka’s BBS sponsored Bikini-Baja-Style parades, with the ‘Roaring Lion’ National emblem on the buttocks of the formulated bikinis.
/
AYMAN / March 26, 2013
SIMPLE.
THESE BBS ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE ABAYAH BECAUSE THEY CANT SEE WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO SEE. SKINNY’S AND BIKINIS IS WHAT THEY LIKE TO SATISFY THEIR LUST. WHY THE HELL DONT THESE BBS GET OUT OF THEIR SAFFRON ROBES AND GET MARRIED. BLOODY HYPOCRITES.
/
Probono Publico / March 24, 2013
BBS are nothing but a bunch of mad racist ‘monks’ and laymen hell bent on creating strife in Sri Lanka I’m sure practicing real Buddhism is the last thing on their perverted mind!
Lets see what the cardboard ‘patriots’ say on this
/
Shiva / March 24, 2013
So sharmini – tell us … when did u convert to Islam…
With thousands of muslim women not complaining – why is it only you?
these antics are generally done by those paid!
/
Linga Reddy / March 25, 2013
Keep you ruined antique in your own hand-fold. Soak of that emits the pungent lava in your own gag.
/
Mahadana Muththa (Jnr) / March 25, 2013
Shiva,
I have noticed your comments on other threads on CT too. You are either mentally retarded or down right sick.
What kind of a religion do you believe in? Obviously it is one of intolerance.
You are just another racist SinhalaBuddhist masquerading under a Hindu name.
/
Nabil / March 26, 2013
Agree. sometimes its impossible to reconcile his thinking with his pseudo name.
/
Citizen / March 24, 2013
This Bodu Bala Sena is a stupid group with half-baked knowledge. Perhaps the BBS may remain calm when the clips from the YouTube where Pakistani actress Veena Malik is fighting with Muslim clerics and flaying them with left and right, Bodu Bala Sena can watch and enjoy it. It will be better for Bodu Bala Sena to invite Pakistani actress Veena Malik, Kuwait Prince Al-Shaha who will even be afforded with State invitation and can have a healthy discussion on the Muslim Dress code. Moreover, the North American Muslims also are prepared for a discussion on variety of topics, including the issue of tattoo. It is time for the BBS to show these YouTube to the Muslims in the East and remain silent, because there can be many Veena Malik to emerge.
In a changing world, the message that is been conveyed through the attire that they are distinctly different from the other is fast becoming unpopular. Muslims appeared to be not interested in the Arab dress code in the form of ‘abaya’ and ‘thobe’. They want to mix with other communities and gradually becoming westernized. Perhaps this is due to globalization. Is actress Veena Malik wearing a hijab being a cultural Ambassador from a Islamic country like Pakistan and she has asked number of questions which the Islamic clergy could not answer. Even Muslim women, especially from Pakistan, are smoking cigarettes, which was seen in India when they came for a conference.
What is the answer from BBS, when Sri Lankan Buddhist priests are found guilty of raping women both in London and Sri Lanka. In every religion, there are draw backs among the clerics. Why should the BBS worry about the Muslim Dress code. Western countries have reason to suspect that hand grenades and some other explosives may be hidden in the Muslim dress. Even then, there are equipments to scan and detect any any unlawful explosives. What is vital is conscience. In my view the BBS is embarked on an unwanted issue. The BBS should focus its attention on economic development for the benefit of the entire country and develop good relations with the Western democratic countries.
/
Fouzi / March 25, 2013
I wish to correct the true position of wearing the “Abaya” by Muslim ladies.I hail from Beruwela. Abaya was worn in Beruwela even more than sixty years back and they were known as “ThuppattI”, at that time.I have seen this myself as a school-going child then. So it’s not really a new attire.
/
Lester / March 25, 2013
Wearing an abaya is neither healthy nor hygenic. It is not about preserving “modesty”, but deferring to male domination. Male domination is at the heart of all three of the Abrahamic religions: Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. In the Bible, for example, it says Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says . Christianity and Judaism, of course, have mostly outgrown this tradition of patriarchy. In Islam, however, it is alive and well.
/
David Blacker / March 25, 2013
If their religion tells them to shave their heads or remain celibate, or any other such idiocy, it is their own business whether they wish to follow that faith or not. No one has the right to prevent them. What’s funny is that the Buddhist priests are cool with wearing a toga but have a prob with the burkha.
/
Native Vedda / March 26, 2013
David Blacker
“What’s funny is that the Buddhist priests are cool with wearing a toga but have a prob with the burkha.”
Only Aryans and countrymen are allowed to wear Toga.
How dare you question the Aryan Sinhala/Buddhists saffron clad thugs?
/
Mirth / March 26, 2013
You vituperate extravagantly. For example which edge of your carcass do you exhibit to a livid mate. So, what would be your social standing if they infuse thou with gait in the dorsum.
/
Citizen / March 25, 2013
Thank you for this, Sharmini. More power to your pen. It’s good to see someone taking the trouble to actually understand the situation before opening their mouths and taking out their frustrations on a convenient scapegoat. BBS and their likes are doing much damage to Buddhism, by directly going against the teachings of the Buddha. By inciting hatred towards others, and anger, pride, jealousy, the lust for power in Buddhists, are they not the very anti-thesis of Buddhism? If this is the face of Buddhism in Sri Lanka, what does it say about Buddhism itself to non-Buddhists and what sort of karma are they creating for Sri Lanka as a whole? What for example can these yellow robed brigade tell us about the ironies of karma — that the law of cause and effect is dependent upon intention, action and speech, and that once this life ceases, no amount of political clout will help save them from the effects they are now sowing. Then, even their Sinhaleseness will end, and they may end up in the shoes of the very people they hate, or worse. By bringing Buddhism to ridicule and causing confusion in so many minds, what karma are they creating for themselves and all those they are encouraging to shout, heckle and swear in the name of Buddhism. They should refer to the dhamma for the answers. Shame on these people, and shame of Sri Lanka’s leaders for sitting back and allowing such things to happen. Life is not a game, you fools, and there will come a day when you find out what Buddhism is all about, and then it will be too late for you.
/
Jay / March 25, 2013
The dresses should be pleasant whoever wears them, the Muslim dress for women is designed to prevent other males looking at them. But I must say that Male muslims are the worst sexual offenders in the develop world and in the Middle East.
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
Such brilliant analysis. Don’t go that far. We have over 2000 incidents of rape in Sri Lanka annually. Can we fix that?
Why do you alook at the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Mathew 7:3
/
Dr.Rajasingham Narendran / March 25, 2013
Jay,
Visit Saudi Arabia to see how fashionably the Abaya is worn by the young women there. Their abayas have beautiful motifs sewn on them and are draped elegantly. The fashionable abayas are very expensive. This type of abayas are yet not available here and even if available it will take years for the Muslim women to learn to wear them elegantly. The same applies to the Thobe worn by some Muslim males here.
Uncleanliness, someone mentions in these comments relate to the person and not the dress. The abaya used here being black, as in the Arabian gulf , will of course be very uncomfortable to the wearer in our climate.
Dr. Rajasingham Narendran
/
Psychologist / March 26, 2013
Dr. Rajasingham Narendran,
I agree with you that the abaya can look very elegant if draped properly.
Can someone please enlighten me as to why the abaya must be black?
Could it not be made with other soothing colours perhaps even with floral printed fabric?
Colours have a lot to do with human psychology. All black in particular worn during the day can be very harsh on the eye of others and appear very foreboding.
Perhaps this may be why some believe the abaya conveys messages such as “we are different from you” or “we are not one of you.”
/
Dr.Rajasingham Narendran / March 27, 2013
Psychologist,
I had noticed many Syrian women wear cream or beige coloured abayas. I also learned that the Abaya wearing started in the then Arabia, to protect their women from the marauding Turks. The Islamic requirement is modest dress, covering of the hair and arms. The face cover is not a religious requirement .
Dr.RN
/
lionel / March 26, 2013
Jay,
We have some jobless men loitering in street corners. They would love to see your wife and mother dressed in a pleasant manner. Some call it ogling! BTW, what would be pleasing to them are semi clothes, transparent and tight fitting so as to reveal the curves. huh, it may not be the dress that is pleasant, but the skin and curves of the woman. How would you like it?
/
Glee / March 26, 2013
Gay jay shiv shankar. You are the Marco Polo, you are the all seeing eye. If one of your idle-eyes are free, scratch it with a strut full of molten fluids.
/
Watcher / March 25, 2013
burka is a insult to any women since its a bondage dress forced upon by muslim extremist and has nothing to do with the religion.
I saw in Habarana that women were wearing block dress completely covered from the floor to the head and only eyes can be seen. What the hell is this in a country that is so hot and humid and why muslim women are treated like this?
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
that’s not for you to decide. They choose to do it. No one is forcing them to do what they do.
/
Riza / March 26, 2013
If Abaya is wrong for you, Watcher, why don’t you tell your daughter and wife to wear mini-skirt so other men can desire them?
So, you wanted your wife and daughter to dress decently, but wanted other women to dress immodestly for you to feast your eyes upon.
Do as I say, not do as I do, eh!
/
C. Wijeyawickrema / March 25, 2013
Any man or woman looks the same if they do not ware clothe. When Captain Cook went to Pacific islands his ship-men saw women with breasts uncovered and thighs covered and they went crazy. In European settings legs are exposed and breasts covered. Actually even now in some states a woman cannot breast-feed a child if it exposes her breast.
Generally we see women’s dress going up or down cyclically, in Victorian time it was all covered and little by little it regressed.
Also generally when a woman’s body is not exposed fully the curiosity of men is increased and a woman can be prettier with a nice dress. A Sinhala woman wearing a saari or lama saariya can expose her waist a little bit or if a fat woman exposes more it would look ugly.
I had Arabic friends who told me that inside home Arab wives wear see-through dresses and no outside man can enter from the front door.
The muslim woman covering her face like a goni billa is now a political act. It spread in Europe and in the middle east against American aggression, humiliation and white imperialism aimed at robbing their oil. Wahabism. Sharia law, Taliban are all such reactions.
In Sri Lanka we do not want Sharia laws just like we should get rid of Tesawalamei law. Since governments were cheating Buddhists and not doing these changes finallY Bodu Bala Sena came to force the govt to do this.
A Muslim woman if she wants can cover all her body, but her face and head must be open because otherwise we do not know if the person with a face mask is a woman, man or a killer.
Eurocentric Colombo Christian people like this Serasinghe want to think of gonibilla freedom now because village girls and boys went and saved Colombo for them to have parties in the middle of the night in Colombo hotels.
/
Mahadana Muththa (Jnr) / March 26, 2013
C. Wijeyawickrema,
“Eurocentric Colombo Christian people like this Serasinghe”!!!!!!!!!!!!
Where you there when “this Serasinghe” was baptised?
Go to the archives of CT and read her previous articles and you will know if she’s a christian,hindu, muslim or buddhist.
Don’t comment thru your rear end you racist bigot.
/
Roshan / March 25, 2013
I hope all the bikkus who were against Halal issue are vegetarians as Sakyamuni Gautama Buddha.
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
:) :) Hear Hear! :)
/
Native Vedda / March 26, 2013
Roshan
Bikku’s are expected to consume whatever the people give them. They eat meat because people give them meat non veg.
If lay people give Ganja,Kassippu, arrack…….. the bikku’s have no option but to consume all of them as they don’t want to hurt the people.
/
Vejja Lajja / March 26, 2013
Sakyamuni was a meat eater, He insisted his own cousin Devadatta to be removed from the Samgha for he was fostering ideas of Vegetarianism & Hermitage.
/
Riza / March 26, 2013
Yes, they are vegetarian but loves KFC (as long as it’s not Halal)!
/
Jamal / March 25, 2013
The Abaya and Hijab is nothing new. During our childhood the Muslim women wore an overcoat with a hood to cover their hair. The affluent who owned cars had curtains installed in them to cloister their womenfolk. The poor would wear a sarong over themselves serving the same purpose. This is not borrowing any traditions from the ME but is in compliance of the Quranic command given below:
O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies. That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allah is Ever OftForgiving, Most Merciful. Surah 33:V 56
Whilst the removal of the Halal label did not affect the generality of Muslims, this one will and be certain that the repercussions will be very much different.
/
A Muslim woman / March 25, 2013
Women’dress has been the subject of debates for centuries.Dresses are blamed for sexual assault. Even the judiciary believes that rape and incest has got to do with the way a women dresses. Aaccharya Mervyn thinks that way and he praises the abaya and nikab. But we hear of women in the middle east wearing this so called Islamic dress is subject to harassment. Sexual harassment takes place due to power relations though triggering facts can be dress alcohol etc.
In fact many of my male friends think that the hijab and nikab are attractive as it creates a sense of mystery around women and that tingles their curiosity to find out what is beneath the dress!!!
We have to dress modestly and modesty is a cultural concept and differs according to context. What I think is modest may be different from what another person thinka.
The Quranic verse on covering came at a time when prophet’s wives were harassed therefore they were asked to cover themselves. It is meant for prophet’s wives and not for us. It can be argued that what is prescribed for Prophet’s wives is prescribed for the others too. But Prophet’s wives had different rules re remarriage etc. What is prescribed for Prophet’s wife is not a commandment for the others. Also I remember a famous Islamic Scholar Badwi discouraged women from wearing Hijab and Nikab after 9/11
I think it is the women’s right to dress the way she feels. Again its argued that women internalise these values and dress according to what the family dictates, religious beliefs, culture, level of income and trends in fashion. Even Abayas and Nikabs are subject to fashion trends, though it is not visible for non hijab and nikab wearers.Therefore in one way or the other the women and men for that matter are “forced” to dress.
Lots of poor persons do tell me about how its economical to wear the hijab. I was a working woman and I advocated uniforms to cut costs, but it was not heeded.
/
essie / March 25, 2013
Sharmini, I dont think the ‘shawl’ and ‘burka’ are restricted to returnees from the middle east or muslim ladies who want to advertise their financial status. I think the sudden increase in this type of clothing happened after 9/11; muslims all over the world wanted to show their resistance to the military attacks by the western powers on middle eastern states. It started with Iraq and Afghanistan. It is a show of solidarity-understandable, perhaps.
/
Owly / March 25, 2013
An article well researched and written, how sad that this cannot be read by the majority of Sinhala speaking population, who depend totally on politicians and other interested parties to provide them with fuel to fire any issue to create havoc in the island. Sharmini well done but try to get a Sinhala Translation.
/
lionel / March 25, 2013
We live in a society where women are paid to shed clothes, and punished for wearing them.
Which animal wears clothes? None, to my knowledge. It is the clothes that distinguishes men from animals.
Primitive men wore no clothes. As man progressed as a civilisation, he began to hide his nudity. So less clothes is a sign of primitiveness, while more of it is a sign of progress.
And, do you notice that gentle man cover as much of his body as he could afford? A ‘gentleman’ wears full sleeve shirts, long trousers, shoes and neck ties. While the same ‘gentleman’ has cunningly manipulated the women to shed more clothes, and regress back to primitiveness?
/
P.Kariwasam / March 26, 2013
You Clown, shed you clothes in the suburbs of Matale, you can see the reaction of BBS woo, poo or the rule of their thumb will work on you, a penicillin sized incision will soon be in your gape.
/
Safa / March 25, 2013
Sri Lankan society has always been fashion conscious and followed the latest trends. The Sinhalese cloth and jacket is hardly seen and has been replaced by western skirts and tops. In urban areas men have discarded the sarong and wear trousers, denims, shorts etc. So there can be no valid objection for muslim women covering up which is also an injunction in the Quran.
Of course there are various interpretations and variations but that is left to the individual to decide. Least of all it is not the business of celibate monks to object to women covering up when they remain silent on women wearing revealing dresses etc.
/
Tharu Paba / March 25, 2013
Dear Sharmini,
If the “Shariya Law” is enforced in Sri Lanka, you too would be compelled to wear the “Abaya” when you travel to the eastern part of this country.
And what a pity, those people in the eastern part of the country will not be able to see your pretty face at all ! :)
Tharu
/
Maghribi / March 25, 2013
Shariah is a Divine injunction applicable to the Muslims in their day to day life. This is built in and no practicing Muslim will ever discard it no matter what the consequences are. Muslims believe that only The Creator can explain His creation; how life on earth should be lived according to His Will. The most striking feature in Shariah is that all Muslims abide by the ‘law of the land’. Those who apply the Shariah in their lives socially and economically enjoy the fruits of this life and hopefully they will receive the reward of eternal salvation. Increasing the prosperity of the Muslims in the world has become so visible; jealousy has crept in. Jealousy is cancerous and can eat up human values and blinds rational thinking. Shariah complies with most of the Universal laws. The application of Shariah is only in Islamic countries collectively and in the non Islamic countries the Muslims apply on an individual basis thus abiding by the local laws.
/
Citizen / March 25, 2013
Dear Tharu,
Your literal meanings of your choice words, and the words of many others here, don’t do much to hide the anger, envy and hatred you hide in your hearts. Tell me, are you a Buddhist? If you are not, why are you so angry and why do you indulge yourself in this hatred against muslims. I am not a muslim but a Buddhist and this is so against the teachings of the Buddha.
This great Sinhala Buddhist life of yours, if you are one since you are part of the heckling anonymity, is only a tiny blip in an endless chain of lives you have and will live in the future. If you generate words of hatred towards others, somewhere down the line hatred will come back to you. If you generate fear, somewhere down the line, fear will return to you. If you heckle, one day somewhere down the line, you will be the subject of heckling. If you confuse people or cause confusion in others, you will someday experience mental confusion. It’s not a matter of being who is right or wrong, its a matter of cause and effect. If you don’t believe in that, then you don’t know the basics of the faith.
Sharmini’s article shows compassion. Where is your’s, and why do you make personal remarks about this writer? Do you also have lust, or jealousy in your heart as well?
/
Maghribi / March 25, 2013
Thank you Citizen. Your response carries a profound message to all communities. Its got be read a few times to grasp the essence of the advice.
/
Citizen / March 26, 2013
It’s very sad, Maghribi, to see the behaviour of BBS and their likes, and even to read the words on these pages. They are to Buddhism, what anti-christ is to Christianity and Shaitan may be to Islam. Buddhism is not a religion – it is a way of life, and to be a Buddhist, you have to practice the dharma, and in that practice you come slowly to understand just how true the message of the Buddha is. Just knowing the teachings, and walking around all puffed up about being a Buddhist is not the way a Buddhist behaves because Buddhism comes from somewhere deep inside the roots of the being.
To Buddhists, the samsaric mind is prone to trouble making, it is drawn towards trouble, nothing is permanent, happiness gives way to sadness, and sadness to happiness. This is the nature of the mind. This is why relationships go through their ups and downs, why in time we get bored with whatever is our current preoccupation and move on to something new and so on, and on and on it goes. Mindfulness training is the core of Buddhism, to watch what we think, say and do. We watch, build awareness and try to avoid the habits that lead us to generate sorrow not only in others lives but our own lives, meaning current and future lives. It’s like sowing a field, your life field. If you plant seeds of sorrow, you will have to feed on it one day, somewhere down the line of samsara – there is no getting away from it. As Buddhists, we believe that all this is, anyway, empty of meaning, an illusion that we are caught up in, entangled in, and which we weave the tapestry of our lives. Sanga is supposed to show us how to disentangle ourselves from this samsaric web. However, sanga seems to be very busy telling us how to tie ourselves up in samsaric knots so bad that it will take countless lives of suffering to free ourselves. Our self-serving politicians – all of them down the line and the current lot, and sadly, many of our sanga too – are busily weaving a very ugly tapestry for not only themselves but all of us and the country, and in doing so they are destroying the very fabric of Buddhism, and leading the country into even more misery.
Isn’t all this talk about being the holders of a tradition nothing but the voice of Ego and Pride? What did the Buddha have to say about Ego, Arrogance and Pride? Did he say, Proudly, Arrogantly, Selfishly proclaim your Buddhism? How about actually practising dhamma in of kindness and compassion, sincerely and genuinely – to show the world what Buddhism truly is, without all this chest beating? How about starting Buddhist charity of the heart at home, so that the country can truly heal from all the strife it has gone through.
Someday, all of us will face Mara and then we will realise just how meaningless and empty all our insane rantings and ravings have been, how utterly useless and damaging they have been to our own selves. When we look Mara in the face, we won’t be able to say, “Hey, I have this Mercedez Benz and several million ruppees, I can transfer them to you, so can you give me a pass.” No amount of pooja vattis and boru shobana pin will help. Death will come at the time we are due for death, and then we will realise just how empty, ignorant, careless and harmful we have been to ourselves.
For Buddhists here who sincerely want to practice: The samsaric mind is a trap, do not give into the voice of anger and hatred. If it rises, put it on hold, kill it because it is your worst enemy. Anger is not a virtue – if you nurture it, it will grow happily, rise up and devour you, and bring you endless suffering. Do even a bit of meditation every day – you don’t have to retreat to a cave, do it at home. If you have time to read the newspapers, get involved in angry debates, then you have time for meditation too – it’s very important to tame the mind. Do it a little at a time, but daily – its the practice, the effort and the intention that matters. Even if you do not get results, keep trying every day, and soon you will find – slowly and gradually – a inner peace that is your’s and your’s alone. As you grow this peace, you will find yourself shifting away from anger. As you continue to grow it, it will transform you and the positive change it will bring to you will not only benefit you, but all those around you. This is the path you should be on: try it because you have everything to gain from it, and nothing at all to lose. Meditation does not make you passive: as you progress, you will learn to understand more about what the Buddha taught. Grow your intention to learn the dhamma, to understand the dhamma – that intention, if very pure, is hugely powerful – it will open doors to you, the teachers will come, the learning opportunities will come. Do not listen to rable rousing robed people and politicians – they are showing you a short-cut to the hell realms. May there be peace in our beautiful island, and may all its people live happily with each other and celebrate their differences.
/
Tharu Paba / March 27, 2013
Dear Citizen,
No I have no hatred towards Sharmini or any writer in this coloumn.
If Sharmini was born in to an Islam family, which adhere to the strict “Shariyah” law, I don’t think she’ll be alive today, as divorce is a sin for women according to the Shariyah law.
Please enlighten me, if I am wrong !
Tharu
/
Tharu Paba / March 27, 2013
Dear Citizen,
I meant what I wrote, and there is no hidden meaning to it. Sharmini has a pretty face and if it was covered with a “burqa” will it be seen at all? And how do you want me to describe her?
You say her article show compassion. Compassion to whom, may I ask you?
And who are you to judge me citizen, as you too hide yourself in the cloak of anonymity ! :)
/
Balu Topa / March 27, 2013
Taru Pupa, Why do you want to fascinate Sharmini’s face or arse.
Her article shows compassion to her own writings and the Colombo Tribune, you are an uninvited intruder who wants your description of her.
If the citizen cloaked in anonymity, and what skin is the Boru Topa wearing?
/
Tharu Paba / March 27, 2013
Balu Topa,
You too are uninvited to reply me.
My question was directed at the Citizen !:)
You don’t have to be his spokesman.!!!
/
Tharu Paba / March 27, 2013
Dear Citizen,
I have realised that there is no point in commenting on a web site which is run by EXILED JOURNALISTS. Since we live in sri lanka, we are better equipped to comment on what is happening in this beautiful island.
I am neither ‘pro’ nor ‘against’ on any faction be it for the governing body or against it. I have gone through the thirty year civil war in this country, the 71 insurrection, etc. and have vivid memories too.
If you have been living in Sri Lanka for the past thirty years, my apologies, for this comment. If not, I have wasted my precious time with you.
We the Sinhalese Buddhists who believe in “non Violence” and live a life according to the Buddha’s teaching on taking the middle path, (here I mean the lay people and not the monks !)
should stay away from coloumns of this nature, as they serve no purpose to us. Any one can voice their opinion and believe it to be the justifiable truth, and we should not be any part of it.
Good Bye!
Tharu
/
DODU / March 26, 2013
Dear Tharu PABA, if you wants to see your wife and sisters in nude, we have no objections. Go to the seaside tourist hotels or swimming pools you can see a lot of them as you wish, almost in nude take your wife and loved ones with your little children there. You can really enjoy the nature there and can teach your children how to roam only with bikinis. You can make your children more civilized, sexy. We have no objections. But you can’t force it on others.
/
Tharu Paba / March 27, 2013
Hi Dodu Machang,
Have you seen the photos of Princess Reem Alwaleed bin Talal of Saudi Arabia touring America ? I suggest you see them before you make any silly comments !!!
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
“Speaking at the Bodu Bala Sena convention in Panadura, the venerable Medagoda Abayathissa thero urged the Sinhala-Buddhists to protect the nation and not let other races or religions to take over. The monk also urged Sinhala-Buddhist families to have at least 5-6 children so that the Sinhalese Buddhist population grows in order to protect the Sinhala race and Buddhism in Sri Lanka.”
This extremist fanatical sex starved Medagoda Abayathissa thero of the Budda Balu Sena says a Sinhala-Buddhist should have 5-6 children and is ready to help the Sinhala-Buddhist women at any time. If any Sinhala woman thinks her husband cannot fulfill this obligation the monk Medagoda Abayathissa thero is more than ready to step into his shoes at no cost.
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
this is a Tamil masquerading as a Muslim :)
/
DODU / March 26, 2013
Anvil, I have an idea to increase the Sinhala BUDHIST population immediately within 10 months. ALL THE BUDNIST MONGS SHOULD MARRY TOMORROW. I am sorry to say this, but there is no other options. If they do so within 10 months we can increase their population easily by at least another 1 million! Imagine,within another 10 YEARS at this rate there will be 10 million additional BUDHIST population! That is 1 core additional to the existing. So it is better BODU BALU SENA STARTS THIS. They are already exposing their half nude hairy, sexy bodies to girls.
/
Malayali Kolayali / March 26, 2013
This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy
https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/
/
Mohideen / March 25, 2013
“BBS says Sri Lanka is not a multi-racial multi-religious country.”
This is exactly what the Tamil Eelamists are expecting to hear not only from the leading Sinhala-Buddhist organizations but also from the government. The Tamil Eelamists are saying the North & East of Sri Lanka is a Tamil country (Tamil Eelam) which belongs only to the Tamil nation. The Sinhala-Buddhist BBS is saying Sri Lanka is a Sinhala-Buddhist country and belongs only to the Sinhala nation. The Tamil Eelamists are saying Sri Lanka is separate from Tamil Eelam and the Sinhala-Buddhist BBS is saying Sri Lanka is not a multi-ethnic multi-religious country.
Looks like both BBS and the Tamil Eelamists are having the same agenda, two sides of the same coin and they both are supporting to split the country. If the so called two nations (Sinhalese and Tamils) fight for Sri Lanka (Sinhala country) and Tamil Eelam (Tamil country) as two separate countries where will we Muslims go?
/
Citizen / March 25, 2013
Dear Mohideen, why not experiment Federalism in Sri Lanka. There won’t be any problem. There will be unity in diversity.
/
Yehiya / March 25, 2013
Dear Sharmini, Most of findings are not true.Man have the right to change his dress according to his or her wish.we are blindly follow lot of things from west.Even it harmful to our society & health.Muslim dress code is come to world 1400 years ago. Even you not follow the Jesus (PB) mother Mary,s dress.
/
John the Baptist / March 26, 2013
The argument, Abhayas scaring-off urban settlements is inconceivable, and vague. Please, ponder on something digestible to purge.
/
Commentator / March 25, 2013
Sadly, BBS is not winning but Sri Lanka is losing!
What happened to the mainstream media in Sri Lanka? Do they not have one iota of moral fiber left in them to speak out against racism and corruption? Or are they too afraid to speak up?
/
Nabil / March 25, 2013
There are TV stations giving a lot of face time to Leela/BBS. What a shame :(
/
Mohammed / March 25, 2013
Our Muslim women too have desire to wear something like a Redha Hetta, Skirt & Blouse a Jeans & Top but their religious obligations is a deterent for them to dress in such a fashion in public. Thus women folk in the privacy of their homes wear the dresses as aforesaid. When it necesitates for them to venture out in public the Abaya comes in as a very handy garb. It’s only necessary for them to wear the abaya on top of any garments they are wearing and venture in public. The Muslim women folk in public are required to dress MODESTLY. They should not reveal any part of their bodies except their face and hands below the wrist, and also should not wear tight garments which reveals their contours. It’s to negate such matters the abaya has become a sort of necessity. I don’t feel this particular dress code to be offensive to anybody. Any GOD fearing person should appreciate such people and society.
/
K.A Sumanasekera / March 25, 2013
Why did this BBS “fan” travel all the way to Batti?.
Any super market including the new ARPICO Super Centre in Cinnamon Gardes have many of our Muslim Men and Women in their Arabic style dresses.
In fact there is a super market in the South, a major one where not only the customers, but the staff also wear their traditional outfits and it is no big deal.
Ms Shamini perhaps hasn’t been to “No Limit”.where our proletariet buy their fashion gear.
Not to mention the Galle Face Green where over 60% are our traditionally clad Muslim brothers and sisters every weekend.
Is this a new lead from our Diaspora base to the Bodu Bala Sena?.
/
Mahadana Muththa (Jnr) / March 26, 2013
K.A Sumanasekera,
Why did this BBS “fan” travel all the way to Batti?.
Who is the BBS “fan” you are referring to and what the hell are you talking about?
Have you got the wrong end of the stick as usual?
/
kattakarawala / March 26, 2013
K.A Sumanasekera always has a bone to pick with Sharmini whatever she writes on.
Looks like a very bad case of “hell hath no fury like K.A Sumanasekera scorned” :-)
/