15 July, 2020

Blog

Brigadier Fernando Had Brought Disrepute And Embarrassment To Sri Lanka And The Army: Senior District Judge Emma Arbuthnot

Brigadier Priyanka Fernando found Guilty and Convicted by British Courts London: On the 6th December 2019 Brigadier Priyanka Fernando has been found guilty and convicted under
Section 4A (1) and (5) of the Public Order Act 1986 which states:

1) A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he – a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress

5) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or both.

Brigadier Fernando had been charged for committing criminal offences under the British law, by threatening with a throat slashing gesture to the Tamil People who demonstrated waving the Tamil national flag in front of the Sri Lankan Embassy in London on 4th February 2018 which marked the 70th Independence Day of Sri Lanka and 70 years of Genocide of Tamils. Prior to him making this gesture, Brigadier Fernando filmed protestors from outside the embassy before returning inside.

Following this incident, The International Centre for Prevention and Prosecution of Genocide (ICPPG) initiated a high-level diplomatic campaign urging UK Government and the FCO to convict the Sri Lankan Military Attaché. Despite the British Police refusing the arrest Brigadier Fernando, on account of his diplomatic immunity, the ICPPG assisted the victims to seek legal advice and open a private prosecution under the guidance of our legal advisor Geeth Kulasegaram.

Given the Brigadier Fernando choose to ignore the summons issued by the Westminster Magistrates Court, the Court had to hear the trial in his absence and found him found guilty. An Arrest Warrant was also issued. However, the Warrant was later withdrawn following intervention of the FCO who contacted the Court upon the pressure from the Sri Lankan government who claimed that Brigadier Fernando was immune from prosecution. As a result, the case was reopened and listed for a retrial. At the first stage of the hearing, the arguments on diplomatic immunity where were heard by Emma Arbuthnot, Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) and it was decided that Brigadier Fernando is not entitled to claim diplomatic immunity as issuing death threat is not part of his official duties. The evidence was heard on 18th October 2019 and 19th November 2019 and the Judgment was reserved.

On 06th December 2019, the Chief Magistrate Arbuthnot handed down the landmark Judgment in an open hearing at the Westminster Magistrate Court. In which she has stated that the cutthroat gestures were made by Brigadier Fernando whilst uniformed, that Brigadier Fernando has intended to cause alarm with these ‘purposeful gestures’ whilst starting at the protesters.

Arbuthnot also states that Brigadier Fernando’s body language appeared ‘to be arrogant and intimidating’ and that Brigadier Fernando had known that his gestures would cause alarm.

Arbuthnot also stated that alarm was caused to the victims in this case. Accordingly, Brigadier Fernando was found guilty and convicted.

In sentencing the Judge made the following remarks:

“I note the authority held by Brigadier Fernando. He was working as a senior diplomat at the time of his behavior. He had brought disrepute and embarrassment to Sri Lanka and the army bearing in mind the seniority of his position.”

“After these events, the Foreign Minister had had to write to the High Commissioner raising the actions of the Brigadier Fernando. I note that he had been recalled to Sri Lanka, I assumed in disgrace”

Brigadier Fernando is also ordered to pay a total of £4,344.00 in total including a fine of £2,000.00, a Surcharge of £170.00, Compensation of £350.00 for the prosecutors and a cost of £1,824.00

Geeth Kulasegaram who is instrumental in this case, says “In spite of this case being adjourned and delayed multiple times by the Defense in a desperate attempt to force us to drop the case, it has finally come to a conclusion and the ICPPG is proud to have brought justice to the victims in this matter. This also helped in restoring trust in the British Legal system”.

The ICPPG wishes to thank the Prosecutors Majuran Sathananthan, Palliya Guruge Vinoth Priyantha Perera and Gokulakrishnan Narayanasamy and the key witnesses Sabeshraj Sathiyamoorthy and Sockalingam Yogalingam, MP of TGTE for their braveness in bringing this case and their tireless effort in continuing the case to this point.

On behalf of the Tamil Community, the ICPPG also takes this opportunity to extend our sincere gratitude to the legal team including counsel, Peter Carter QC leading Shanthi Sivakumaran and instructed solicitors Paul Heron and Helen Mowatt of the Public Interest Law Centre for their excellent and dedicated service in achieving this landmark victory.

The ICPPG acknowledges the invaluable contribution of Geeth Kulasegaram for his support and guidance for making this prosecution possible and successful. We also thank all other
lawyers and other activists who continue to support in various ways in taking this further. (by ICPP)

Judgement can be read here

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 6
    5

    About Judge Emma Arbuthnot
    Her husband, James Norwich Arbuthnot, is a Conservative member of the House of Lords. He is intimately connected with the British armed forces and security services, whose criminal operations were exposed by WikiLeaks.
    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/07/11/assa-j11.html
    Here you go!
    British conservative cat has come out of the judge’s handbag!
    Justice system in Britain is like that of Yahapalanaya thrown to garbage bin recently by Sri Lankans.

  • 6
    4

    Richmond,

    This so-called Judge was kicked out of Julian Assange’s extradition hearing because she had a conflict of interest in that case.

    British judges are required to declare any potential conflicts of interest. But this disgraceful judge did not do and had to be removed involuntarily.

    In 2014, Mrs Arthbunot was offered tickets worth 1250 pounds for a floral show. They were provided by a US military contractor while her husband was working for the UK defense Ministry.

    Julian Assange’s wikileaks leaked this information to the public. And the dishonorable judge chose to silently preside over Assange’s extradition case.

    What a shameful creature. Good for the Tamils. LOL!

  • 2
    1

    Eagle Eye

    in a earlier comment has chosen to compare our standards to behaviour to that of Tony Blair. Load of rubbish! We should be setting our standards and maintaining them. Now, it is possible that with the need to increase the numbers in our armed forces we lowered standards and promoted oicks like ‘Brigadier’ Fernando. Old soldiers of the Ceylon Army would be turning in their grave at his behaviour.’Brig Fernando has disgraced our Armed Forces with his lack of discipline.

  • 1
    2

    Rowdiesare appointed to the High commission. They behave in the same way as in Sri Lanka, In Sri Lanka Judiciary politically linked.

    • 1
      1

      Pon
      Can you gurantee that UK is not?
      Are you a UK barriter ?

  • 2
    1

    The recent Judgement on Brigadier Fernando appeared to be flawed & full of controversy since the British elections round the corner.Beside her husband political connections make it highly bias.It is well accepted Judical norms those who seek judicial redress must be free of wrong doing but the learned Magistrate had ignored the photo evidence which clearly shows protesters carrying Ltte flag I think still it is banned organization in U.K. The learned Magistrate should instead of dismissing case ignores protesters carry banned organization flag & asking to penalised embassy officer who covers his conduct by Geneva convention .To my knoweldge learned Magistrate does not carries any credential as she is expert on Body language only FBI & MI5 other similar agencies have them.Having said that during the trial she had not called independent expert on that subject to interpret what the accused Brigadier Fernando meant as this gesture meant otherwise.It is my opinion by showing Sri Lanka flag he meant you should cut reputation of your country.To substantciate that claim before that in civil attire he speaks with the protesters invite them to visit the our country in very calm voice that video is available in internet.Like Duminda Silva vs Ag case learned Supreme Court Judges pointed out there is criminal intent but here there no intention .It is too bad our Foreign Ministry & A.G. Dept .just kicking the heels sitting in a.c. rooms doing nothing while heroes who defended our country get drags to guillotine.This same drama enacted in Geneva.

  • 5
    1

    Congratulations to Brigadier Priyanka Fernando on his appointment as the Director of Real Estate and Quartering of the Sri Lanka Army (SLA) !!!

    http://www.adaderana.lk/news_intensedebate.php?nid=59555

  • 3
    1

    Machang Keyboard Vedda
    Thank you for your support to expose UK’s double standards of diplomacy!!!!

    • 2
      1

      Keyboard Veddha……..LOL

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.