23 October, 2020

Blog

Business Plans To Encourage Solar Electricity

By Kumar David

Prof. Kumar David

Prof. Kumar David

Not only information technology but other technologies too are moving forward fast; solar electric generation has taken three steps; (a) prices of solar-electric panels have been coming down, (b) their use has increased and the experience gained has opened up new possibilities such as (c) new business models which are catching on in the US – particularly in the sunshine states.

Solar electricity will not interest small domestic consumers who enjoy a large price subsidy in Lanka. A meaningful cut-off bench mark is a home using 400 units a month owning a fridge, freezer, kettles, illumination points and maybe an air conditioner. This corresponds to the middle or upper-middle class bracket with a roof large enough for a 2 or 3 kW solar panel. Currently the electricity bill for a 300 units a month domestic consumer is Rs 8544 rising to Rs 22,046 for 600 units.

The price of solar modules had fallen below $ 1200 per kW (solar cells only to below $ 700 per kW) in 2013, and falling. Inverters (which convert solar panel direct current to alternating current for interconnection with the mains) and protection equipment, wiring and mounts will cost say $ 1000 per kW. Installation charges and labour are cheaper in Lanka, say Rs 100,000 for any installation size. It all adds to about Rs 700,000 for a 2 kW installation. Local vendors are quoting much more; maybe transportation, insurance and mark-up are more than I have anticipated.

Business models

What is more interesting is the variety of business models promoted in the US, particularly California. I will describe just one innovative model in detail and touch on another.

The $0-down Solar Lease

Most consumers do not wish to put, say $ 6,000 up front, for a 2 kW installation (higher than Rs 700,000 due to higher labour and inspection fees in the US). Vendors tried marketing outright purchase and failed to make progress and then switched to an innovative plan, the $0-down Solar Lease agreement. The requirement is a good site (physically strong, appropriately oriented roof) and willingness to enter a 20-year contract. The customer is then locked into a “secure and predictable rate much lower than the utility tariff”. This means the vendor sells you solar electricity from your roof at a price less than the utility price up the limit of the solar power available at any time. At night, or when cloud cover reduces solar generation, or when the customer demand exceeds solar production, the excess is taken from the utility supply for which the customer is charged at utility tariff. [Daytime excess solar production can be stored for night-time use but requires batteries which drive cost up considerably; hence this option is not addressed here].

KDWhat’s in it for the customer? On sunny daytimes all or much the supply is from the sun at the low tariff offered by the vendor. [Furthermore, net power taken from the utility – CEB – is reduced and paid for at a lower rate in countries like Lanka were tariffs are graded to rise with rising usage]. Solar Lease contracts include free maintenance and repair for 20 years. The small type makes provision for tariff revision after some years but since the average annual sunlight at a given location is unlikely to vary, US fair trade regulations will permit tariff revision only if labour or maintenance costs change by a large amount. I describe below a case where the monthly bill fell from about $85 to about $60.

How does the vendor/supplier make money? The vendor faces no energy cost; it’s free from the sun. What he needs to recover is investment and a fair return on capital over a time period. If the income stream is spread over 20 years, present value after discounting is what matters. Or simply, if money is losing its value at say 5% per year one would need to recover Rs 105 next year to be worth Rs 100 in today’s money (actually 100/(1-0.05) or Rs 105.26). This has to be repeated for 20 years. Methods of discounting are not the point – the web and tables are there for that – the point is that the vendor will seek recovery of capital and a fair return over the project lifetime (maintenance and repair costs are small).

If the required annual income flow divided by the number of units produced is less than the utility tariff, both consumer and vendor can be winners. Therefore production must be large enough to ensure that the cost beats the utility tariff. Chart 1 shows the monthly electricity produced by roof panels covering 250 square feet (22.3 square meters) of a middleclass Los Angeles home.

The game is a little more complicated because solar production is during the day when no one is at home and consumption low. The excess energy (only fridge and the wine-cooler are running) is fed back to the mains and the vendor is reimbursed at the marginal price of saved utility energy. If the utility’s marginal generating cost is 13 US cents per unit – Rs 17 – by buying back, say 220 units, the utility saves $28.60 – Rs 3718 – of its costs. By law this must be reimbursed to a green energy vendor. Some vendors, depending on the marketing plan, may share this with the householder. The average California tariff is 17 US cents per unit, which is more than the example avoided cost of 13 cents used above, because of other factors including fixed capital, transmission, distribution and establishment charges. (All these numbers are for illustrative purposes only and change year by year).

To press on with my Chart 1 example home, suppose that of the average 420 units a month 200 units are used by the customer during the day and 220 fed back to the supply. The customer pays the vendor, say 5 cents US (Rs 6.50) per unit for the 200 units of solar power, or $10 (Rs 1300) a month. Assume that the off-solar electricity taken by the customer from the utility is another 300 units (customer total load 500 units a month) which attracts a fixed (in the US) tariff of 17 cents or a monthly bill of $51. To summarise then, the customer monthly bill is $ 61 or Rs 8190. Without the solar installation the monthly bill would have been 500 units at 17 US cents or $ 85 (Rs 11,500).

KD1Now consider the vendor’s perspective. By selling 200 units, which cost nothing, to the customer at 5 cents, the vendor is foregoing an income of 8 cents because the reimbursement benefit for green energy fed back into the supply was assumed to be 13 cents in this example. This therefore is a case of sharing benefits between vendor and customer. The vendor’s monthly income derives from the 220 units pumped into the supply at 13 cents and the 200 units given to the customer at 5 cents; that is a total of $38.60 a month or $463.20 a year.

In the third paragraph of this piece I estimated the investment cost at $2200 per kWh ($4400 for the 2kW example used here) excluding installation and labour costs which are higher in the US. A fair estimate of the vendor’s investment outlay would be $5500 (see also Chart 2). The annual return, neglecting discounting of $463.20 (say $450), makes the payback period 147 months or 12 years and 3 months. This does not seem an attractive business proposition but it is necessary to take account of the 30% tax rebate offered by the government which shifts the economics markedly. If $1650 of the investment cost is refunded then the payback period on the remaining $3850 is reduced to 103 months (8 years and 7 months). Not marvellous, but its money for free for over 11 years after that.

Three lessons flow from this example. (a) A 2 kW installation producing 400 to 450 kWh per month is the border line; handsome profitability requires an installation of twice this size and a roof large enough to carry the panels. (b) California is remarkably cloud free; annual average daylight hours may not be much different from Lanka, but I am not sure of cloud cover comparisons. (c) Solar electricity will not be competitive unless a government subsidy of about 30% is offered.

The Outright Purchase Model

It is a pity that vendors are offering only outright purchase business models in Lanka; a solar lease agreement would attract many more takers. (Some sort of a capital repayment clause will have to be written-in for the case when a property is sold and the new owner does not renew the lease). The investment needed is around one million for 2 kW, maybe 1.3 million rupees for a 3 kW installation. Enterprising and far seeing vendors can surely come up with plans demanding less capital from end users. The CEB domestic tariff for consumption above 180 units a month is a prohibitive Rs 45 per kWh (US cents 35). US tariff is below 10 cents cents in 10 states, the highest is 22 cents (Connecticut and Massachusetts) and the national average is only 12.3 US cents. As far as I know only Denmark at 41 US cents is higher, Germany 35 cents is equal and even Japan at 26 US per kWh cents is cheaper.

Of course these are flat tariffs and cannot be compared with the high tariff (for consumption above 180 units a month) paid by high-end consumers in the CEB’s price ascending block tariff. But hat is a different matter whose only relevance here is that high end consumers may find it profitable to go solar. How helpful would it be on a national scale? Well if 10,000 homes were to regenerate 420 kWh per month (504 GWh per annum) it is about 4.7% of CEB generation of 11,800 GWh (2012). This is not huge but not to be neglected either. Solar has a brighter future than wind in Lanka and one way to tap this potential is to promote plans which prompt rich people to circumvent “discriminatory” CEB tariffs by going solar.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Cannot tidal waves be harnessed for hydro-electricity in the North Province after a
    feasibility study which the NPC can initiate. They may even take the first step to
    follow Tamil Nadu which has 9 on-going project around Chennai in desalination of sea-
    water, to meet the needs of a part of the population. The Presidential Palace of MR
    has these installed in NP.!

    • 0
      0

      ”Presidential Palace of MR has these installed in NP.”

      Are ordinary citizens allowed to go and see it please?

  • 1
    0

    In Germany the German Govt gave a guaranteed price for green energy supplied to the grid for 20 years. As s result the private sector started investing heavily in wind and Solar energy. There are solar panels along the motorways on the sound barriers, on roof tops of corporations, wind turbines on empty farmland etc. As a result they have progressed very fast on green energy. They are dismantling some of the older nuclear plants and shutting them down. Sri Lanka Govt needs to do similar thing to encourage private sector investment in green energy. If you search on Google you can find a lot of information. They are ahead of USA on green energy since the Republican party does not accept climate change. The head of the environmental committee in USA says there is no global warming against all the scientific evidence. All the efforts made by President Obama to give tax breaks for green energy were blocked by the Republicans. The biggest lobbies for Congress and Senate are the Coal, Oil and Gas lobbies.

  • 0
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 1
    1

    thank god kumar has woken from his slumber dreaming of abolishing the presidency and moved on to solar energy.

  • 0
    1

    At last something refreshing from AKD who is sticking to things he knows well, instead of political theory. Keep it up AKD.

  • 0
    1

    To an investor getting the hurdle of bureaucracy is a nightmare. Perhaps the new government will cut the red tape to set up.

  • 0
    0

    A new market should be developed for farmers to grow energy crops. Schemes and Grants should be given for farmers to produce bio-fuel crops. Our land and soil all over the island is suitable for these crops.

  • 1
    0

    Good stuff. Hopefully the CEB will allow concesions like they did for CFLs

    There is a online solar calculator here to help you plan

    http://www.wholesalesolar.com/solar-information/start-here/offgrid-calculator#systemSizeCalc

  • 0
    0

    Mr Kumar david,

    CEB introduced this concept as Net Metering in 2009.

    http://www.ceb.lk/sub/business/readmore.html

    Below explanation from Dr Siyambalapitiya how it applied to any renewable energy sources you can have.

    http://www.ceb.lk/sub/business/readmore.html

  • 0
    0

    I wish to give some more reference to read, Two Books written by JEREMY RIFKIN

    1 THE ZERO MARGINAL COST SOCIETY

    2 THIRD INDUSTRIAL REVOLUATION

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.