22 October, 2020

Blog

Colombo’s Political Drama On Devolution And Basil’s Visit To Delhi

By R Hariharan

Col. (retd) R.Hariharan

President Mahinda Rajapaksa appears to have taken a pragmatic decision to go ahead with the Northern Provincial Council (NPC) election without tinkering with the 13th Amendment (13A). The presidential proclamation made on the election last Friday, has been welcomed by India as it has removed a rider that could have hobbled India-Sri Lanka relations. The NPC will go to polls along with the Central and North Western Provincial councils which have been dissolved. According to media reports the PC elections are likely to be held on September 27.

Fortuitously or otherwise, Basil Rajapaksa, Minister for Economic Development, and the President’s brother, was in New Delhi to convey the good news on holding the NPC election to Indian counterpart he was meeting. According to the Sri Lankan External Affairs Ministry’s statement, Rajapaksa’s visit to New Delhi was to deal with other areas of discussion, and was also “aimed at apprising the Indian leaders on Sri Lanka’s changes to the 13th amendment — the move to strip police and land powers to provinces.”

As it invariably happens when Indian and Sri Lankan counterparts meet, there are two versions on what the Sri Lanka minister discussed with Minister for External Affairs Salman Khurshid, National Security Advisor Shivshankara Menon and the Secretary MEA Rajan Mathai in New Delhi.

News despatches from New Delhi said India had emphasised to Rajapaksa the need “to fully implement the constitutional provision dealing with devolution of powers to provinces without dilution and go beyond it to ensure meaningful development.”The Indian External Affairs Minister who welcomed the decision to hold the election asked Basil Rajapaksa “not to dilute the provisions of a promised political settlement known as the 13th Amendment plus.”

13A plus was a term President Rajapaksa had coined during the Eelam War to keep India on his side. But he “forgot” about it when political priorities overtook after the war. By bringing 13A plus back in the discussion, India probably wanted to remind the President that India still remembered his unfulfilled promise. Of course, New Delhi’s reminder also had the advantage of convincing the increasingly restive Tamil constituency in India that New Delhi was sincere in pursuing the Tamil aspirations.

In a BBC interview the Indian Minister of State Prime Minister’s office V Narayanaswamy on the same day, reminded Sri Lanka that if it wished to change anything related to the India-Sri Lanka Agreement (ISLA), which resulted in the 13A and in the setting up of Provincial Councils, it must renegotiate with India.“When it [international agreement]is signed between two sovereign governments, both governments are bound to implement the agreement,” he said. If one government wanted to change it, it should renegotiate with the other government. “One government cannot unilaterally cancel the agreement,” he added.

Though this was the first time a representative of the Indian government had publicly spoken about renegotiating the ISLA, at present Sri Lanka may not opt for it. Sri Lanka will have to come with a viable political option on the core issue of devolution of powers to the Tamil minority if it wants to negotiate a productive, win-win agreement.

Sri Lanka may be wary of undertaking this time consuming exercise for few other reasons reasons. politically Sri Lanka may not be able to get its home work right before broaching the subject with India

Given Sri Lanka’s critical economic situation, it would like to broaden India’s multifaceted economic involvement and trade and commerce with Sri Lanka rather than jeopardise it by reopening a touchy 25-year old issue. Moreover, Sri Lanka needs India’s support when it confronts the issue of accountability for its actions during the Eelam War at the UNHCR once again.

Lastly, the Indian coalition government is already under siege due to fluctuating political realignments, particularly in Tamil Nadu. And as the deadline for the Indian parliamentary election nears, New Delhi is likely to be hypersensitive to any escalation of tensions between India and Sri Lanka due to tinkering with the Indian dispensation of 1987 vintage on the Tamil issue.

In this context, Namini Wijedasa write up in the Sunday Times on the reaction of Basil Rajapaksa on his return from New Delhi is interesting. Replying a pointed question whether the Government had abandoned the bill on the removal of police and land powers from the provinces he replied: “When we bring a bill like that, we don’t let go of it so easily without informing the public. There are times when we have brought that type of thing and retracted but we won’t give it up.”

According to the news item he further said, “We hold the common position that it must be broadly discussed by the public,” he said. “The Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) is a good forum for this.” This would indicate that Basil Rajapaksa had appraised India of the proposed changes it would like to carry out in 13A based on the PSC recommendations.

On the Indian Government reaction to the  establishment of the PSC, the minister is reported to have said,“They accepted it…Democracy is the best way and India is of the opinion that all parties that respect democracy must participate in it [PSC], including the Tamil National Alliance. They told us that they notified the TNA several times of this and that they will do so even in future.”

The minister explained, “It was an exchange of information between the two countries. They told us their opinions, we told them our opinions. This was a discussion between two friendly countries.” In other terms, both sides reiterated their positions on the issues of 13A and PSC.

India probably would like to accommodate Sri Lankan use of the PSC to give a veneer of acceptance to the proposed changes in 13A from all shades of political opinion. But the PSC has become a joke after the main opposition parties – the UNP, the JVP and the all important TNA have refused to participate in it. Even some of the partners of the UPFA coalition like the LSSP and the Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) are averse to the exercise. Now it is largely a UPFA body of ‘yes men’ to approve the changes in 13A. While technically the PSC might carry the day, politically it would be a non starter.

India would like the TNA to participate in the PSC deliberations in a bid to find a workable solution to the impasse. But its argument may not carry conviction unless the other opposition parties and the SLMC change their mind on participating in the PSC.  If we go by news reports, India had probably drawn Rajapaksa’s attention that the PSC set up must have “all shades of opinion on board.” As this is largely an internal political exercise of Sri Lanka, there is little India can do.

So the PSC recommendations are unlikely to improve the environment hostile to bring a meaningful resolution to the overall devolution issue.

While President’s decision closes one chapter of the Colombo’s political drama on the devolution contretemps and the future of 13th Amendment, it opens up another speculative chapter on the winners and losers of the NPC election with its footnote on the fair conduct of election. Jaffna has already seen some unpleasant acts of thuggery and mischief making targeted attack on the detractors of the regime, notably the TNA which is likely to win a majority in the NPC. Will acts of violence mar the much delayed exercise of NPC election? Will the TNA be allowed to rule the NPC in case they get most of the seats in a fair election? Only President Rajapaksa can probably can answer these questions confidently.

*Col R Hariharan, a retired Military Intelligence specialist on South Asia, served with the Indian Peace Keeping Force in Sri Lanka as Head of Intelligence. He is associated with the Chennai Centre for China Studies and the South Asia Analysis Group. E-Mail: colhari@yahoo.com   Blog: www.colhariharan.org

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Thirteen (13) is a majic number. Most believes this number is troublesome and can create havoc for ever. The day it came to Sri Lanka, it has taken a tall and the nation has collapsed completely. The law and order is at the worst. Human rights violations are on the peak. The country is facing the worst racist and fundamentalist uproar. The economy is in disaster. So, it is important to get get rid of 13 from this Nation. But you can’t move from bad to worse. It has to be bad to best. What is best? It is not the best to politicians, it is for all the people recognizing the diversity and sharing the power, sharing the wealth, sharing the love.

    • 0
      0

      There are about 10 to 20 government MPs oppose what ever the tinkering , any changes proposed dilution or complete repealing of 13A are opposed.

      JVP and some UNP Members of parliament do not support partial tinkering. However, they insist on complete abolition. More than 30 votes can be secured.

      Therefore only option now available is to go ahead with JHU bill to abolish13A and plan devolution on the basis of districts.

      Government is going to be defeated in PC elections, best option is to completely abolish now. Problem of Budget deficit can also be solved.

  • 0
    0

    Old Colonal must have penned this before the Indian Terrorists blasted the Buddhists in Buddagaya.

    • 0
      0

      These Colonels are such that Terror can strike any where , anytime in India , be it Mumbai / Delhi / Chennai/ north eastern states & now even Gaya by IM, LeT, Taliban or Maoists , they just examine ground after the terror struck & vanished in to thin air.
      Pathetic show all around, even to flush out dozen terrorists in Mumbai ,it took 03 days & cost some 270 lives, became a joke in the eyes of whole world watching Mumbai attack live on TV.

  • 0
    0

    India is the new colonial master of Sri Lanka.

    • 0
      0

      Do not blame colonial masters for the nonsense what our racist Sinhala Buddhists doing to the Nation. We had 65 years of Sinhala rule in this country since British left. From that date we broke all the norms of life and we had continuous bloodbath in our soils. Thousands of innocent civilians were massacred and national resources was destroyed by our Politicians. We are not prepared to share our nation with our fellow citizens but prepared to share with Chinese and Indians.

  • 0
    0

    “As it invariably happens when Indian and Sri Lankan counterparts meet, there are two versions on what the Sri Lanka minister discussed with Minister for External Affairs Salman Khurshid, National Security Advisor Shivshankara Menon and the Secretary MEA Rajan Mathai in New Delhi…” This has been the case under the Rajapakse regime.
    What is told to the local media and the Cabinet after returning from
    Delhi is often what is politically apetising – and not what was discussed and agreed upon with GoI. Governance cannot be run by mendacious means is something the regime must understand pronto.

    After all the brouhaha by the Rajapakses and their Goebellesian team of rabble rousers Ranawakes, Weerawansas, Nalin de Silvas, Amerasekeras et al the 13th Amendment will cannot be touched. Police Powers, Land rights will remain – at least for the time being. As Lawyer Nirmala Chandrahasan explains elsewhere, terms of a solemn agreement between two sovereign governments cannot be violated without offending articles of the Vienna Convention governing protocols between governments. One can understand the Rajapakses being ignorant of this – but what of the “advisors” close to The Family. Presumably, Professori who knows better knows when and where to open his mouth to keep his job.

    Finally, it well may be a case of what Shiv Shankar Menon came, saw and conquered. It is time we learnt governance must be in good faith and not through deception and procrastination. The next step is for the regime to indicate what is on the table as offer to get the TNA and the UNP to participate in a PSC – to be called on a different date. Not the one arbitrarily imposed by a widely suspected regime.

    Senguttuvan

    • 0
      0

      So what Ayathuray Rajasingam stated in his article ‘Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord & 13A – Who is the winner?’ is affirmed. What then is the option available? As usual it is a million dollar question.

      • 0
        0

        Government is going to be defeated in certain provincial councils.

        • 0
          0

          The strategy is president to announce northern elections to deceive India and parliament completely abolish 13A.

  • 0
    0

    “In a BBC interview the Indian Minister of State Prime Minister’s office V Narayanaswamy on the same day, reminded Sri Lanka that if it wished to change anything related to the India-Sri Lanka Agreement (ISLA), which resulted in the 13A and in the setting up of Provincial Councils, it must renegotiate with India.“When it [international agreement]is signed between two sovereign governments, both governments are bound to implement the agreement,” he said. If one government wanted to change it, it should renegotiate with the other government. “One government cannot unilaterally cancel the agreement,” he added.”

    The lies and deceptions of the Sri Lankans govts. are well known locally. Now they are stuck with an international agreement.

    Fortunately, India was able to retain its original Hinduism, as opposed to Sri Lanka. Buddhist Monks running Amok is a rare scene in India, as opposed to Sri Lanka.

    So much for Buddhas’s principles. Do not honor your commitments.

    • 0
      0

      Amarasiri

      “..Buddhist Monks running Amok is a rare scene in India, as opposed to Sri Lanka”..”

      What a joke,In India these is very little Buddhism but saffron violence is referred to extremist Hindu violence against Muslims

      You don’t know Ayodhya Mosque was razed to ground by Hindus led by L K Advani & BJB & rebuilt a Hindu temple there & resultant violence took more than 3000 lives in India & destroyed hundreds of Hindu temples in Pakistan & Bangladesh ? Where did you live during last 30 years ? in the moon ?.

      • 0
        0

        John,

        Thanks for the correction.

        Yes, The Saffron Clad terrorists in India were Hindus, not Buddhists,

        The Saffron clad Monks running Amok, is confined only to Sri Lanka, as I have personally seen in 1958, and as you see with BBS and JHU Monks these days.

  • 0
    0

    It is inexplicable as to why MR had to initiate this fuss about 13A when all powers rest safely in his hands. The entire armed forces and police come under his brother. All lands too come under the UDA and Military either as development projects, security zones, archeological sites or sacred areas. Perhaps these people just do not want to give even the crumbs to the Tamils.

    • 0
      0

      TNA and Thamilani Daya Master combination capitalize on PC to form a separate state. What they could not achieve in a war can easily be achieved. UNP might also win some provinces. Before that 13A will be completely gone.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.