29 October, 2020

Blog

De Facto Chief Justice Clears Way For De Facto Denial Of Parliament Control Over Public Finances

The De Facto Chief Justice Mohan Pieris (with two other judges K. Sripavan and S. Hettige not dissenting) have officially cleared the way for the Executive under the Rajapaksa regime to be able to plunder public finances by avoiding effective control by Parliament. Several commentators have pointed out that Parliament is now reduced to a mere rubber stamp, with the powerful Rajapaksa regime doing as it wants with public monies.

De facto Chief Justice Mohan Pieris

De facto Chief Justice Mohan Pieris

Pieris has made the ruling in the challenge to the Appropriation Bill 2013 by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, its Executive Director where the Supreme Court was asked to rule that some provisions which removed and weakened Parliament’s supervision and control of public finances was inconsistent with the Constitution. This was on the basis of the Constitution providing for Parliamentary control of Public Finances, to be able the legislature to act as a check and a balance against possible wastage or plunder by the Executive.

Earlier, when 2012 Appropriation Bill was challenged by the CPA, a Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Shiranee Thilakawardene had held that Parliamentary control of public finances was important and upheld the principle.

This is said to have upset the Rajapaksa regime. President Mahinda Rajapaksa then quietly referred to De Facto Chief Justice Mohan Pieris, the question whether such controls by Parliament were required. This ‘reference’ (using the power given to an Executive President to refer a question to the Supreme Court for its determination) was taken up by Pieris in a controversial way. He had taken it up in court, clearing out all parties and lawyers except for the officers of the Attorney General sent to make submissions so that there was secrecy. Pieris sat with five judges picked by him. This set the stage for overruling the ruling by Justice Thilakawardene. The opinion of the five judges was communicated to the President Rajapaksa and total silence was maintained on the matter until the 2013 Appropriation Bill was challenged.

After the case challenging the 2013 Appropriation Bill was filed, the ‘opinion’ of Pieris and four others picked by him was suddenly brought into circulation. Our correspondents confirm that Pieris himself kept citing from it during the submissions made on the 2013 Appropriation Bill, which was fixed before himself and two other judges only. Pieris could not have failed to realize that if the five-judge opinion was to be brought into play (as he himself tried to do), at least five judges should have heard the case. But that risk was not taken.

The Colombo Telegraph contacted several legal experts, all of whom asked not to be named.  However most of them (a few refused to comment at all) confirmed that according to their professional opinion the ruling by Pieris is clearly wrong, undermines controls and checks on spending of Public Finances and only paves the way for the Executive (Rajapaksa regime) to do as it pleases without controls. One expert said even joked that though it is of very poor quality reasoning, it seems like an attempt to at least sound like Chris Nonis (UK High Commissioner, who used big words in a recent CNN interview). But his smile vanished, as he added that “The implications of the ruling for greater abuse, wastage and squandering of public finances is terrible”.

The determination by Pieris on the 2013 Appropriation Bill is now published in the Parliament Hansard of November 21, 2013 which we publish for the benefit of our readers.

Click here;  Hansard – Appropriation Bill 2013 – Determination of the Supreme Court 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Don’t mind this blatant power grab, just keep repeating ” LTTE, LTTE Rump, Diaspora, NGOs, Foreign powers” etc.. etc..

  • 0
    0

    This guy,Mohan Peiris will even offer his backside to MR.Shameful people that SL had ever produced in its history since independence.

  • 0
    0

    This judgement is against all previous judgments on public finance. What else you expect from Mohan Peiris, who has vested interest in this government?

  • 0
    0

    WOW
    Family regime control public finance I remember it call dictatorship
    Why the hell Sri Lankan Need parliament and budget?

  • 0
    0

    Moron Peiris the disgusting acolyte of this medamulna dictator will soon learn his lesson. He is all involved with crooked Rodrigo who fixed Namal Babas bogus law exam results and has done a repaeat performance of his sons exam results.These crooked buggers should rot in hell. Now Law college Lecturers are all united and mad as hell for ruining the reputation of a once elite College, They are going to spill the beans and watch out Moron Peiris and his crooked attorney general Fernando. The International court of Justice are watching you dirty mongrels.

    • 0
      0

      ‘ justice is blind and the law is an ass ‘ we the countrymen as a laughung stock.. what do we do ?

  • 0
    0

    welcome to ‘DICTAMOCRACY ‘ soon the guiness book and dictionaries will have to find a meaning and reason for this word. a first from sri lanka ? jaya weva !

  • 0
    0

    This Cheap Bast…d Cheap Justice Mohan Pi-ris is a disgrace to his Alma Mata. His name will go down in history as another Rajapakse Pariah CJ.

    After taming ex.CJ Sarath N.Silva to get away from Tsunami scandal and allowing opposition MPs to cross over, MR used and forced all three CJ’s ( Sarath S, Asoka S, and Shirani B.) to pass 18th Amendment.

    Now the country’s 80% of Budget is controlled by the Three Blind Mice.

    Very soon people will have to eat Polkudu and Grass when Maha Eka Playing Russian Roulette at the UNHRC.

  • 0
    0

    Isn’t this the very reason why this Joker was appointed for that position?

  • 0
    0

    I don’t think Mr. Peiris is as bad as some of the others who are around the Government. No one is all bad and its better that someone like him is there rather than some others who malign the government to others and ‘eat of the fruit’ themselves.At least he’s honest enough to openly show his allegiance to the government.Maybe his closeness to the hierachy has brought about jealousy thus causing him to be insulted and criticised.Ultimately he has to answer to his conscience and his religious beliefs.There is always a reason for things to happen.If each one does what he/she has to do to the best of their ability we could make Sr Lanka a better place regardless of who’s who and whose there!

    • 0
      0

      What an idiot you are. Peiris is good because he is an honest sucker of the medamulana dictator.. Fools such as you are either mentally retarded or not worth commenting on in a decent news sheet such as the Colombo telegraph where we expect people of any intellect or erudition should express their views.

  • 0
    0

    Silence are the guilty.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.