31 October, 2020

Blog

Eelamism, As Livelihood

By Rasika Jayakody

Rasika Jayakody

Almost 14 months after the JVP insurrection in 1971, Eelamist Tamil Student League Leader Sathyaseelan attempted to murder A. Tiyagarajah, a Tamil Congress MP who dissented from the party, joined the ruling coalition and extended his support to the constitution of 1972.  That was one of the earliest landmarks as far as the Eelamist struggle in Sri Lanka is concerned.

The first Police force member to be killed by the Eelamist militants was A. Karunanithy, a Tamil constable attached to the Kankesenthurei police station. That was almost two years after Sathyaseelan’s attempt to murder Tiyagarajah.

Starting from that, Eelamist terrorists carried out a massive onslaught against Tamil police officers in the North during the mid 70s. ITAK, formed by S.J.V. Chelvanayagam who fathered the Eelamist militancy in Sri Lanka, whole-heartedly approved such killings and encouraged them, overtly and covertly. Chelvanagayagam protégé A. Amirthalingam was the fiery orator of the ITAK back then who later went on to form the TULF and became the opposition leader in 1977, when the SLFP suffered a landslide defeat.

It would take a bout of amnesia to forget that the first victims of the Eelamist terrorism in Sri Lanka were Tamils. They first attacked Tamil police officers and Tamil politicians who represented mainstream political parties such as the SLFP and the UNP, in Jaffna. It is widely known that the first significant act of terror, committed by Velupillai Prabhakaran, was the killing of Alfred Duraiappah, the then Mayor of Jaffna, who represented the SLFP. Not only Prabhakaran or the LTTE, but also the other Eelamist Tamil groups such as TELO, EPRLF, PLOTE and EROS, who were at the incipient stage, also resorted to the same strategy.

This was no coincidence. The conspicuous objective of the onslaught against non-Eelamist Tamils was to eliminate non-Eelamism  from the North and tilt the playing field. TULF represented Eelamism on the parliamentary front and Tamil militants represented the same on the military front, thus creating a two-pronged approach to form a separate Tamil state on the soil of Sri Lanka. Towards the end of the 1970s, the TULF and the Tamil military groups whom the TULF pampered and nurtured became the proprietors of Eelamism

In the same way, when the LTTE became the most powerful Tamil military group in the North, during the 1985-1987 period, Prabhakaran launched a massive onslaught against other Tamil militarists such as the members of TELO, PLOTE and EPRLF. In April-May 1986, a considerable number of TELO activists were burnt alive in Jaffna by the LTTE and a few months later, other Tamil military groups too faced the same destiny, making Eelamism a fiefdom of Prabhakaran and the LTTE. By 1989, Prabhakaran killed A. Amirthalingam, fearing that India would favour the latter, after militarily vanquishing the LTTE through IPKF.

Until his death in May, 2009, Prabhakaran, the ruthless leader of the LTTE, was the sole proprietor of Eelamism. There was no non-LTTE Eelamist movement as an alternative to the LTTE. Anyone who dissented was forced to do away with Eelamism and pushed towards aligning with the “government of Colombo” primarily to protect their lives. If not, they were left out of the equation using the incomparable military power of the LTTE. (Not to mention non-Eelamist Tamils)

As a result of this extreme polarization, when the LTTE leader was killed by the Sri Lanka Army near the Nandikadal lagoon in the Mullaitivu district, the Eelamist concept, for which tens and thousands of Tamil militarists fought for more than three decades, also died. There was no one was else to take over the ‘Eelam baton’ on the soil of Sri Lanka and continue any form of political struggle..

Today, four years after the death of Prabhakaran, even if the Rajapaksa government , by any chance, accedes to the formation of a separate state in the North and East, the Eelamist state will not see the light of day simply because it clashes with the ground reality! There are no subjective or objective conditions on the ground for the formation of a separate state.

It was in this context that V. Rudrakmaran became the Prime Minister of the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam, aiming to create a separate Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka. Rudrakumaran has a shadow cabinet and a consultative committee. Last week, Thinamurusu, a Tamil weekly critical of the LTTE, reported that meetings of the Provisional Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam take place via skype. They collect funds, organize demonstrations and do constant lobbying. They also hold referendums and pass resolutions. They are well organized and committed to the core. One might wonder why they display a commitment of this magnitude for a concept that has lost viability in their so called ‘homeland’.

It is unlikely to believe that Rudrakumaran and the top echelons of his TGTE government are unaware that subjective and objective conditions for the formation of a separate state in Sri Lanka are non-existent. But the TGTE and the LTTE rump are very much in action. Why?

One reason is the numerous funding channels to which they have access. Another reason is the clout they have in the electoral process of countries where there is a large population of Tamils and the bargaining power it generates. People love money and power. And they want to compromise on things that would bring them money and power. Rudrakumaran and TGTE are no exception. If they acknowledge the ground reality, that will deprive them of their slogans; in a business context, their selling points.

Considering the present state of affairs in the TGTE, one can come to the assumption although ‘Eelamism’ has lost its viability as a political concept; it is still effective as a way of sustenance and livelihood.

* The writer is a Sri Lankan journalist who may be contacted at rasikajayakody2@gmail.com 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Excellent article!

  • 0
    0

    the writer seems to be confusing a few things. the tamil struggle with the militant separatist cause for instance. also what is the point trying to be made?

    • 0
      0

      The writer is very clear because he focuses only on “Ealamism” and not anything else. In Sri Lanka we have experienced capitalism, socialism, nationalism, racism, nepotism, etc. etc. and also Ealamism.

      All isms which are political concepts are ways of sustenance and livelihoods. Sri Lanka is fast becoming a good case study. The writer discloses the emerging concept of eGovernance which the TGTE is putting into practice. With high degree of mobile phone penetration, eGovernance may also be possible in the future.

  • 0
    0

    A response from a TGTE Minister should be forthcoming soon I hope?

    • 0
      0

      Don’t hold your breath!

      • 0
        0

        Buddy learn why tamils started fight against Sinhala budhist monsters. then comment…I know you live in srilanka so many comforts you have which you don’t have have in your countries. I mean rule of law in srilanka…

        • 0
          0

          j.muthu

          “Buddy learn why tamils started fight against Sinhala budhist monsters.”

          I haven’t got a clue. Please tell me more about it.

          While you are attempting to evaluate your stupid war against stupid state could you also look into Sinhala/Buddhist JVP’s two stupid wars against their own stupid Sinhala/Buddhist state.

          Why did the Tamils unwisely fight a loosing battle with Sinhala/Buddhists state?

          Why did your stupid brethren the racist JVP unwisely fight two loosing battles against the Sinhala/Buddhist state?

          Please try.

        • 0
          0

          So,it was to fight against Sinhala Buddhists that the moderate Tamils were killed in early 70’s and then kill the Tamils who could or would challenge them in late 80’s!

  • 0
    0

    The days of the giants of Lankan English journalism – objective and articulate men like the late Mervyn de Silva, Reggie Siriwardena, Ajith Samaranayake et al is gone. The fare meted out to the readership by the larger number of journos now comes from pygmies – save but a few. Tamil resistance to the Sinhala state has been studied and researched by many, including that darling of the Army and Sinhala chauvinism, Rohan Gunaratna. That the latter’s credentials are questioned in many quarters being another matter. But to call the struggle as “effective as a way of sustenance and livelihood” must come from a mental facility of shallow depth and incredible hollowness. It is an open secret the Rajapakse Govt itself fears the diaspora, its financial resources, global influences and the many features of legitimate Tamil resistance recognised by the world. This fear is exposed by the fact that very hallmark of the “kept-Press” – the Ceylon Daily News – has been carrying a daily harangue on the Jaffna Tamil daily “Uthayan” trying in various ineffective ways of trying to silence that small regional paper – now that many violent and intimidatory attempts – including arson and murder – by State uniformed actors to destroy its publication have all failed.

    Young up and coming journalists need to be encouraged. They have a role in building the Just Plural Society all of us yearn to create. But the source of their analysis, comments and information must come from credible quarters – not from jaundiced minds, prejudice and delusionary populism.

    Senguttuvan

    • 0
      0

      Senguttuvan

      Did the author Rasika Jayakody say S.J.V. Chelvanayagam shot and killed Jaffna Mayor Duraiappa and went on to set fire to the Jaffna library?

      Was S.J.V. Chelvanayagam trained by PLO in Beqaa Valley, Lebanon?

    • 0
      0

      Very good senguttuvan,that’s the way to go,If you can’t attack the content attack the messenger

  • 0
    0

    Rasika Jayakody – what went on in Sri Lanka before 1970?

    • 0
      0

      Before 1970 nobody targetted and killed moderate Tamils!!

      • 0
        0

        NAK

        “Before 1970 nobody targetted and killed moderate Tamils!!”

        May be they were not killed. However they were targeted and beaten up on many occasions.

        What amazes me is the fact that you continue to ignore the suffering of ordinary people who were targeted and killed before 1970 through out the island in as many riots.

        Selective memory serves well to maintain an indecent hypocrisy.

  • 0
    0

    Rasika Jayakody has provided a historical narrative which is useful as a reminder of what transpired. However I disagree with his conclusion that “eelamism” has lost it’s viability. In my view it becomes more and more viable the longer the Sinhala people adopt a hegemonistic and discriminatory approach.

  • 0
    0

    Tamils appointed as Sri Lankan Ambassadors to some European countries had been involved in degrading in Sri Lanka. In 1983, LTTE had dressed Tamils as Sinhala villagers and had made them involving in attacks. Those videos had been shown in front of Europeans. There are sinhala people who had seen those videos. Those Tamil Ambassadors had passed those videos among foreigners.

  • 0
    0

    Library buring by Sinhala politicians is also a lie. they had chosen a day that some sinhala politicians were in Jaffna for some other purpose.

  • 0
    0

    Jim softy

    “Library buring by Sinhala politicians is also a lie. they had chosen a day that some sinhala politicians were in Jaffna for some other purpose.”

    What was the purpose if one might be permitted to ask?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.