7 October, 2022

Blog

From Galle Face To The IMF

By Uditha Devapriya

Uditha Devapriya

For better or worse, the protesters calling for Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s resignation have been engaging with other issues and concerns. These include minority rights, the abduction and assassination of journalists, and the need for a clearer foreign policy. While weeks ago such concerns may have been belittled, even sidelined, now they have been incorporated into the protests. Such a development should be welcomed, even if, in the long run, it can dilute the demonstrations and eventually lose focus and direction.

The point I made in last week’s column still stands, though. Unless and until we turn the protests into a large-scale consciousness raising exercise, a campaign to educate the public, including supporters of the regime, on issues that had never been seriously considered before, we can’t hope to achieve real change, still less radical change. It’s not only because of the Rajapaksas that we are ignorant of these “peripheral” issues, indeed it’s not only because of them that such issues have become peripheralized. But 17 years of Rajapaksist rule, whether in the government or the opposition, have sidelined them.

The main problem with the Colombo protests, the way I see it, is that they lack leadership and remain limited to a largely urban social milieu. This doesn’t de-validate the protesters themselves, but it does open them up to the risk of infiltration from outside. There’s no doubt that these protests are here to stay with us for a long time, possibly even after the Rajapaksas leave. But one critique that’s frequently bandied about them is that, on the one hand, they have incorporated too many ideas and concerns, on the other hand, they have prioritised some ideas and concerns to the exclusion of others.

It’s important to know where these criticisms are coming from. It’s not just supporters of the regime: even critics are painting the protests as unnecessary and counterproductive. While recognising and even lauding the protesters for standing up to the government, they point out that the economic reforms needed at this juncture – which they claim can and will be achieved, thanks to the new leadership at the Central Bank – require stability of the sort that the Galle Face demonstrations are pre-empting. This is basically a neoliberal or right-wing crowd, whose opposition to the government was predicated on their frustration at the ruling party not following their recommendations and prescriptions.

To be sure, the protests that began in Mirihana and led to Galle Face were fuelled by similar frustrations. Not a few protesters equated the regime’s failures with its unwillingness to go to the IMF. What they themselves failed to realise was that, as a populist who could swing both ways, going to the IMF was hardly non-negotiable for Gotabaya Rajapaksa. For the government, despatching a delegation to Washington and securing Basil Rajapaksa’s and Ajith Nivard Cabraal’s resignations was easy, and could be done. Yet to believe that all the country needed then were their resignations would be rather naïve.

Why do I say this? Because while Basil and Cabraal and their policies were universally loathed, their resignations will not end these protests. For neoliberal commentators, the economy seems more important than the political crisis, which is perhaps why they tend to single out the likes of Basil, Cabraal, W. D. Lakshman, and S. R. Attygalle. Yet the situation is too complex to draw up lines between the political and economic aspects of the protests. If the preferred medicine of the neoliberal crowd is going to the IMF, and the government has gone to the IMF, the discussion over sending the regime home could have ended there. But political crises are never that simple, nor should they be considered simple.

If anyone thinks IMF reforms will dampen these protests, they are sadly mistaken. IMF reforms involve austerity, of the severest sort. No one likes austerity: not the middle-classes that try to keep up with the Joneses and not the rural peasantry and working class that just cannot think beyond survival. The combination of IMF austerity and unpopular regime is a powder keg waiting to go off, and all guesses are things will start falling apart, pretty badly, in another month or so. Already there’s talk of public utility tariff hikes to the tune of 100 percent. In enforcing these reforms and marketing them as inevitable, the country will sink deeper. This has happened before, and it will happen again, here.

Pinning all hopes on the IMF, in that sense, will not do. There are two many parties and too many tendencies within parties pitted against IMF austerity. Although the right-wing of the SJB are for these reforms, the populist (Dayan Jayatilleka identifies this as “Premadasist”) wing is not. The LSSP and Communist Party are no longer partners in the government; as the two oldest leftist formations in Sri Lanka, they are vehemently opposed to the IMF line. The Frontline Socialist Party, which controls and organises student groups in our universities, is also against it. The JVP-NPP’s case is interesting and intriguing, in that it believes there is no alternative to the IMF. Yet it too is opposed to austerity for the masses.

Which brings me to my earlier point. Initially clamouring and shouting for the exit of the Rajapaksas, the Galle Face protesters are now addressing other concerns. As far as the IMF goes, most of them are not in favour of a return to Cabraal’s tenure. Yet that does not mean they are for the IMF line either. It’s clear that while many among them preferred going to Washington to Cabraal’s homegrown solutions, since Ali Sabry’s jaunt to the IMF they have been reading and thinking about what that would entail for the country. What this means is that the second wave of protests will be aimed against the IMF, and not even the most blue-eyed of neoliberal commentators will be able to escape the tide.

We are living in interesting times. They are about to get more interesting.

*The writer can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 8
    0

    “Such a development should be welcomed, even if, in the long run, it can dilute the demonstrations and eventually lose focus and direction.”
    *
    What is UD trying to say?
    Will sticking with GGH keep the protests in focus and in direction?
    What is the point in being focussed on a demand that will not mean very much to the vast majority who want to know “what next”.
    If we do not want another ‘Go Home’ campaign in our lifetime, this ‘Go Home’ should bring to life every fair question that begs for an answer.
    By doing that it will activate the public in ways that will keep alive the fighting spirit that dares to question everything.
    Why don’t we encourage more questions?
    Questions are more precious than answers, for they seek correct answers, and will not stop even when the correct answer is arrived at.
    They will be reborn as new questions.

    • 3
      1

      Uditha: Who is leading the ‘Protestors’ who strangely support the IMF and trade Unions to further destroy the Lankan economy NOW? Facebook was used to spread hate and divide the county by CIA bots and tolls in Myanmar and Ethiopia and in the Arab Spring regime Change operations in the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Frances Haugen the Face book Whistleblower has revealed how social media is used to game elections and other outcomes.
      Don’t you think that the protestors who are organized anonymously via social media platforms are also controlled by external actors who control the internet? Are we all being led by the nose to disrupt and further destroy the suffering Lankan Economy and send it to the arms of IMF and Washington?
      If these same protestors protested during the past 2 years of Covid LOCKDOWNs the destroyed the economy which were promoted by GMOA, SLMA and on Social media messages promoting Covid fear psychosis , the country would not be in the current mess?
      Covid-19 fear was also spread via corporate conrolled social media channel to digitalize and inject people!

      • 0
        0

        Also have you heard of the FBI’s Sonic-Sonic who directed the Easter Sunday attacks on the internet? FBI took the phones of the 2019 Suicide bombers and came up with “Sonic Sonic” as the Master Mind behind the Easter attacks.??!!
        Sonic is Social Media Bot controlled by FBI’s external puppet masters… English language Social media chats and whatsaap groups also proliferated Covid fear and Lockdowns..
        Have you heard of FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE ? Now the Protestor wreak the country… while IMF and US hedge funds gets ready to asset strip while everyone is distracted with protests and US citizen Jarapassa brothers show..

  • 5
    2

    I seldom comment on what Uditha Devapriya writes. I take him to be different from me.
    .
    I make an exception, today. I cannot let this pass.
    The main problem with the Colombo protests is that they lack leadership and remain limited to a largely urban social milieu.
    .
    Why does Uditha think that the leadership should be visible. Does it have to be visible?
    I have written weeks ago that the time for leader to show up is not yet ripe. I stand by it.
    .
    As regards to that the protests remain limited to a largely urban social milieu, it is the most practical scenario, isn’t it?

    • 4
      0

      there are smaller protests in other areas too

  • 5
    0

    I glanced through the article. I agree with points raised. What is needed is system change where next person ruling will not end up like another monster Rajapkase .
    Being a member of the parliament should be a service position should not carry perks like luxury cars , luxury houses in Colombo and other allocations.Then only people want to serve the country not people want to serve themselves will come to politics.
    They should be subjected to common law without any immunity.
    There wealth must be audited at regular intervals and auditor general should be given powers to file cases against them directly to the courts if they found irregularities of their income.
    Duration of time that MP can sit in the parliament should have time limit for example 15 years and age of 70 years they should be subjected forceful retirement.
    Monster Mahinda started as progressive minded MP at the age of 18 but ended but most corrupt theave this country have ever seen by the corrupt system

  • 3
    0

    Where is the daily update of country situation Parliamentary debate is going on what is the improvement, If some one is in the ISU we get daily Medical Report Country i in ISU for IMF
    Rather When the politicians supports resorts to the state of Emergency card, for no violent action of people it’s a sure sign of moral bankruptcy

  • 2
    1

    From Galle Face t IMF?
    The journey to IMF started from Nandhikadal

    • 0
      0

      R
      “The journey to IMF started from Nandhikadal”
      Can you outline the route please?

  • 0
    0

    You say “These include minority rights, the abduction and assassination of journalists, and the need for a clearer foreign policy.”
    Whom you are trying to fool?
    Tamils have seen from Colvin to Vasudeva. Their ultimate goal is to establish a Sinhala Buddhist country. These faceless and goal-less Galle Face gangs never recognise Tamils’ rights when they come to power.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.