17 May, 2022


Gender Discrimination In Sri Lankan Politics

By Muhammed Fazl

Muhammed Fazl

Muhammed Fazl

When I was a boy, I was told that anybody could become President; I’m beginning to believe it now” – Clarence Darrow

Just when we thought the circus was finally over, we are proven wrong yet again. After all that talk of Yahapalanaya (good governance), when the leadership lacks the backbone to prevent drug lords such as Lanzas, ethanol kings such as Lakshman Wasanthas, Arundikas, Johnstons, operators of gambling centers and/or murders such as Thilangas, Punchi Nilames, Premalals and Kathirearachchis among others from harming the country and its people, it certainly does not signal changes to our political culture of impunity.

Apart from considering might as right, choosing legislators to the parliament in Sri Lanka is akin to selecting a bimbo in a beauty pageant after listening to her short speech about her non-existent charitable causes. Talking of which, personalities such as Geetha Kumarasinghe and Rosy Senanayake certainly do come into my mind.

Women Representation

While I am yet to understand the rationale behind allocating a certain percentage of seats for women candidates, I would appreciate if a knowledgeable person would comment with replies to the following questions/observations,

Rosy Hirinika1. Should allocation of parliamentary seats be based on different sexual organs (just asking) or should we be allocating seats for competent/qualified individuals irrespective of which sex they belong to?

2. Taking into consideration previously elected female legislators such as Pavithra Wanniarachchi, Sumedha Jayasena, Kanthi Kodikkara, Swarnamali (Pabha), Geetha Kumarasinghe, Kamala Ranathunga, Sunethra Ranasinghe, Rosy Senanayake, Chandrika Bandaranaike etc., can one state their significant and individual achievements to date in relation to good governance, women empowerment, children’s rights etc.? (Or, need I write another column about their negative actions?)

3. If the answer to the previous question is a negative, or if 52% of the total population themselves do not want female candidates elected, would it be correct for few legislators (at the behest of Western nations) to enact laws forcing choices (limiting rather) on voters? And if it is so, would that process still be known as ‘Democracy’?

4. Can someone please state specific and factual advantages of having a woman candidate selected to the parliament over a COMPETENT male candidate? Wouldn’t it be also a great loss in the event of a qualified male candidate’s expertise not being harnessed to its maximum potential in the interest of the country, and arising due to a limited number of slots being made available for male candidates?

5. Are Sri Lankan women politically matured enough to lead people and/or the nation? Also, are they too greedy for power and perks or are they too proud to influence men surrounding them in their lives to bring about a social/political change?

6. Since service to the nation can continue even without power or authority (as in my case), would personalities such as Rosy Senanayake and Ferouza Muzammil live up to their promises made on election campaign platforms and continue their ‘selfless political activism’ sans prestige, positions and perks?

7. Taking into account their family backgrounds, marital status etc., how many of them women candidates can boast of successful family lives as good mothers and morally fit wives? This criteria may look a personal matter to some, but failure as mothers and wives disqualifies one from being exemplary to a larger society… at least in my eyes.

8. History has taught us that even though females get elected to top positions in the legislature, it is the men around them who in reality exploits and abuses the authority bestowed on the elected women. In this context, does it not indicate vulnerabilities of women by nature to emotional and/or physical pressure?

While I have no personal animosities against any female candidate, I believe women should be equal to men in terms of having the freedom to decide on their political careers. It is also essential to acknowledge the fact that an incompetent woman is never equal to a learned man, and that should go without saying. Only an equally learned woman can be on par with a learned man. Hence, let us not discriminate or prevent competent and qualified males from being selected as legislators solely for reasons of gender.

*The writer is an independent social/political activist and can be contacted at muhammedfazl@msn.com and through FB (Fazl Muhammed Nizar)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 14

    I don’t know why everyone is getting so worked up, this guy is a known douche (refer to his previously written articles)He clearly has mummy issues and needs therapy. He’s clearly enjoying all the negative attention which is making him famous so I think it’s best we all ignore his stupidity and sympathize with him. I don’t even know why CT is publishing this bull. Reeza, if you’re a woman, you should be ashamed at your comment! I couldn’t read it without cringing! You bring up the point of paternity leave? (God knows what connection that has to this) “before I forget, men in the West are now even given maternity leave with pay, just to look after the newborn kid while the mother happily whisks off to her desk job, welcoming the prospect of meeting a new man in her life. Just imagine, maternity leave for a man! What kind of society does this breed? Not everything from the West is good.Natures dictates are clearly being disrupted and we should be aware of the pitfalls to society at large.” LOL what?? Prospect of meeting a new man? you think all Western women are cheaters or skanks? You and this monkey-butt who wrote this article, both need cleansing!

  • 9

    Why is this guy allowed to publish such nonsense. Typical backward thinking. I pity his mother/ wife/sister/daughter.
    And please can someone tell me who these competent ‘men’ he keeps going on about in Sri Lankan politics?

  • 3

    Everyone is free to their own opinions, which in turn gives them the right to make asses of themselves. This douche just did. LOL. Nothing to get worked up about on matters that a douche like him has absolutely no control over. It just goes to show that he’s clearly living in the stone ages. Way to go Fred Flintstone :).

  • 3

    This article is clearly a trolling effort of such mammoth proportion that I cant even believe that the author is not giggling away behind his sleeves, utterly delighted at the consternation he has created !

  • 0

    Try asking all these questions of men in politics in SL. More negatives there. And, an idiot is never equal to a learned person, regardless of gender. You seem to assume all “men” are, by default, learned while women are not. You need to get out of the well you’re living in and, CT, do us all a favour already by not giving idiots soapboxes!

  • 1

    This little Clown will be happy when Wahabi salafist Saudis rule Sri lanka. Where even our Sinhala and Tamil both Hindu and Christian women wear the Burqa and stay at home becoming baby factories in Kattankudy, not knowing where they wear black from head to toe because it is the “Fashion” in Saudi Arabia and let their men have their way rape and breed and spread hate. I think some of the women are as unfit as the men to be in Parliament but this bloke is a complete utterly islamic fanatic misogynist. Enough said.

  • 1

    Very good article. He is not attacking women however bringing to the surface men exploiting desperate women for political gain. Concisering how corrupt our country is getting this sort of pseudo chivalry can veil the corrupt. If you are a culturally confused woman then this article will pierce through your conscience.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.