14 October, 2019

Blog

Government’s Credibility Will Be Strengthened Through Uniformity Of Actions

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The government’s decision to invite three eminent international legal experts on human rights and war crimes to advise its Commission of Inquiry into Missing Persons was unexpected.  It caught even senior cabinet ministers by surprise.  The government had been steadfast in denying that serious human rights violations and war crimes took place from the commencement of such allegations more than five years ago.  So far all inquiries conducted by the government have reaffirmed the government’s position that no such offenses took place.  But as those have been a case of the military investigating the military and exonerating the military, the inquiries have not been internationally credible.  The appointment of the independent UN investigative team to probe into these matters following the resolution passed by the UN Human Rights Council in March of this year appears to have jolted the government to reconsider its past position.

It is noteworthy that the UNHRC resolution of March 2014 had two operative parts to it.  The first was to call for an investigation into the past by the Sri Lankan government that met with international standards.  The second was to call for the Office of the UN Human Rights Commissioner to commence an independent investigation if the Sri Lankan government failed to carry out such an investigation itself. The appointment of the experts and expanding of the mandate of the Commission comes after the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights launched its own investigation on the war and appointed three experts, also of the highest international calibre and credibility, to oversee the probe. Now by appointing its own three member advisory panel, the government seems to be striving to operationalise the first part of the UNHRC resolution with the hope of diminishing the need for the implementation of the second part.

The government appointed advisory panel is of the highest competence and credibility. Its three members are Sir Desmond de Silva, Queen’s Counsel, a prominent British lawyer and a former Chief War Crimes Prosecutor at the UN Tribunal for Sierra Leone, who is also of Sri Lankan origin and will be Chairman;  Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice, a British lawyer who headed the trial of Slobodan Milosevic at the international tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the Hague; and Professor David Crane of the United States who was the Chief Prosecutor of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and who indicted, among others, the then Liberian President Charles Taylor. In revamping the mandate and term of reference of the Commission on Missing Persons, the government has reserved the right to expand the numbers in the advisory panel which is a possible point of controversy if future appointments are less credible.

Sceptical Assessments

The three international experts will serve on an Advisory Council to the Commission of Inquiry to advise it, at their request, on matters pertaining to the work of the Commission. In addition, the government has expanded the mandate of the Commission on Missing Persons to include the facts and circumstances regarding the loss of civilian life during the war, and whether any person, group or institution directly or indirectly bears responsibility in this regard by reason of a violation or violations of international humanitarian law or international human rights law. Also to inquire whether the adherence to or neglect of the principles of distinction, military necessity and proportionality under the laws of armed conflict and international humanitarian law, by the Sri Lankan armed forces and whether the LTTE as a non-state actor was subject to international humanitarian law in the conduct of its military operations.

The question is whether the Commission on Missing Persons which had a more restricted mandate will be able to cope with the much wider mandate that has now been cast upon them. So far they have been doing their investigations with quiet determination.  The Commission held several sittings to cover the districts of Jaffna, Kilinochchi, Mulaithivu and Batticaloa and has received over 19,000 complaints.  However, those who are skeptical about the government’s motivations in appointing the advisory panel would remember the experience of another commission of inquiry in the past.  This was the International Independent Eminent Group of Persons (IIEGP) which was appointed in 2007 to advise the Commission of Inquiry into Serious Human Rights Violations.  The IIGEP, comprising of 11 members was invited by the President to observe the investigations and inquiries of the Commission of Inquiry, in order to ensure transparency and observance of international norms and standards. The IIGEP terminated its operations after a year citing lack of progress in the investigations.  There is no doubt that the government would be mindful of this debacle and the higher stakes that exist at this time, with a parallel independent UN investigation taking place.

There is another matter that the government needs to consider seriously. This is whether it can deal in compartments with different issues, and achieve international standards in looking at the past while failing to reach those standards in dealing with issues of governance within the country at the present time. Since the end of the war, impunity has been most marked in regard to violence and harassment against the Muslim community and undertaken by groups that are seen as allied to the government. The government has also been restricting the freedom of civil society groups in a manner that goes counter to international standards. Most significant of all is its failure to stand by its commitments with regard to the devolution of power.  This is a serious problem as a reconciliation process cannot run on parallel tracks, where internationally the government shows itself to be a in a reconciliatory mode, while within the country there is confrontation and antagonism. The situation on the ground will be seen by all who are interested in Sri Lanka and will undermine their belief in the sincerity of the reconciliation process.

South Africa

There was anticipation of a breakthrough in the reconciliation process following the visit to Sri Lanka of South African special envoy Cyril Ramaphosa. However, the government failed to show any shift in its approach to addressing the issue of national reconciliation.  No sooner did Mr Ramaphosa leave Sri Lanka that the government extended the term of the Governor of the Northern Province, although the TNA has been consistently asking for a replacement who will cooperate with the Chief Minister and the Northern Provincial Council instead of acting in opposition to them. The reappointment of the Governor of the Northern Province is seen by some of the key actors in the international community as a violation of a pledge given to them by the government. In particular, when President Rajapaksa pledged to hold elections to the Northern Provincial Council he also gave assurances that he would appoint a new Governor. He delivered on one part of the promise but not on the other.

In the aftermath of the Ramaphosa visit there has been no publicly visible manifestation of the spirit of accommodation or goodwill that is necessary for any reconciliation process.  The role of South Africa would be to ensure that there will be fair play to all sides, not only targeting the government. Such a partnership with South Africa in pursuing the path of truth and reconciliation can go a considerable part of the way to support a nationally driven process of truth and reconciliation that feeds into international investigations. The only item of discussion between the government and Mr Ramaphosa that has become public from the government side is that the government requested him to persuade the TNA to join the PSC process.  The Ministry of External Affairs website stated that “The government asked Mr. Ramaphosa during his visit to Sri Lanka to convince the TNA of the importance of participating in the PSC process for a solution to the national question.”

The PSC remains the government’s chosen mechanism to pursue a political solution to the national question.  The government remains adamant in its position that only a discussion by all political parties represented in Parliament can lead to a political solution.  However, the opposition parties that are presently boycotting the PSC remain unconvinced that it will lead to a solution being found.  They are mindful of the fate of the All Parties Representatives Conference (APRC) that lasted nearly three years between July 2006 and June 2009 and held 128 sessions. But the final report has not yet been officially released, nor has any action been taken on it. If South Africa is able to facilitate a revision in the terms and mandate of the PSC to enable the TNA and other opposition parties to participate in it, there could be a breakthrough.   In line with the government’s appointment of an expert panel to advise the Commission of Inquiry, there could be another expert panel that is established to advise the PSC.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 6
    0

    Rajapakse invited South African special envoy Cyril Ramaphosa to facilitate reconciliation and several minsters insulted him publicly before Cyril left.

    The Mara regime appointed an Indian Judge-lead investigation team sometime ago and insulted them by frustrating it, and no results published.

    An interesting question asked by the recent Missing Persons investigation panel, which is being widened to the present one, is this:

    Do you think that your missing relative was taken by a tiger or a pole cat? The people who participated in the investigation was naturally annoyed by this insulting question.

    The way the recent anti-Muslim riots and destruction by the BBS, which has connections with the regime was distorted and covered up the regime shows it will be deceptive in its actions.

    If these are some of the examples of investigations of inquires, it is easy to guess the outcome of the proposed war crimes investigation with impeccable foreign advisers. They will be frustrated if not insulted, and the victims hood winked together with the international community.

    The regime is a collection of liars,con-artists and spin doctors.

    Sri Lankan rulers think they are the craftiest foxes who can outwit anybody all the while: May be they are right!

    Time will tell.

    • 4
      0

      What credibility.
      See how the king try to move his loot to swiss banks via Seychelles.

      ———————————————————————–
      ‘Seychelles Strategy’

      The Seychelles now has a Sri Lanka High Commission. President Mahinda Rajapaksa, declared it open during a state visit there on June 28. Seychelles has 90,400 people. And Mihin Lanka flies direct to the Seychelles. We have a branch of the Bank of Ceylon in the Seychelles.

      People who study international economics and international finance will come across this term called the Seychelles strategy. The Seychelles strategy is to compete for black money. The strategy is to go so low that you become the preferred money launderer. That is to say for instance if you deposit US$ 10 million in any of our banks you will get ‘immunity’ from criminal prosecution in the Seychelles. When you go so low to get ‘dirty’ money then it s called ‘The Seychelle Strategy’.

      http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=107044

      ———————————————————————-

    • 2
      1

      Jehan Perera –

      Government’s Credibility Will Be Strengthened Through Uniformity Of Actions

      What credibility?

      Govt. has no Shame. So No effect. They know how to lie.

      The Sinhala “Buddhist” monks have no Shame

      The Politicians have no Shame. They even raped and murdered tourists.

      Credibility is NOT a Deterrent.

      A Tomahawk or a drone can be a deterrent.

  • 4
    1

    Jehan, you talk about the possibility for the government to strengthen its credibility. But how can it strengthen something it does not have?

    • 5
      1

      Saman Wijesiri ,

      Exactly, there is no credibility at all a the present.

      Jehan is in the business of glossing over things done by the regime!

  • 6
    0

    Jehan Perera another apologist sucking up to the Rajapaksa dictatorship by stealth. Another Dayan type con man making all sorts of excuses to please the powers that be. I don’t think readers should take this mans writings seriously. He plays a double game while in the pay of some NGO. The Government has no credibility to strengthen, only lies and deception.

  • 5
    0

    Jehan,
    Sadly you are looooooosing credibility.

  • 5
    0

    This fellow is forever talking nonsense. He proves
    to any sane person that he is singing hosannas for
    the monies his Peace Council receives. For his humbug,
    he pretends to be a journalists. He circulates his
    own pieces to win invitations from missions in
    Colombo. What a shame? With all his ranting, he has
    found no place in Sri Lanka except to be a preacher
    of nonsens. Stop insulting the intelligence of CT
    readers Jehan Pacha Perera.

  • 3
    0

    “..
    President would not have appointed these people if not for the UN Investigations..
    the reasons for this sudden change is also very well known to everybody ..
    however the million dollar question is…
    “what the President is trying to say or to prove to the World…? ”

    These appointments alone proves that in fact there had been Crimes committed against
    humanity at the end of the Armed Conflict with the LTTE in the North… the surrendees
    had been killed and that the Government was deliberately trying to conceal the truth…!!!!

    Therefore …Jehan must say credibly where this so called ” Credibility of the Government “..is..

  • 0
    0

    credibility is a alien word for this govt. anyone who is trying to even suggest otherwise has sinister motives or impaired judgement.

    read section A different motive?
    even the credibility of the so called expert panel is being questioned on the basis how they dealt similar HR violations in the past.
    http://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/archives/32300#more-32300

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.