19 September, 2020

Blog

How this will apply to international news websites – Civil Society questions GSL

By Colombo Telegraph

“This requirement of registration coupled with the blocking of websites, which potentially constitutes a form of prior-censorship, not only produces a chilling effect on the freedoms of expression and information on the Internet, but also constitutes a prima facie violation of a number of constitutionally protected fundamental rights, including Article 14(1)(a) of the Constitution of Sri Lanka, which guarantees an individual’s right to freedom of opinion, expression and publication.” says Sri Lanka’s civil society today.

Issuing  a press release civil society  further says ” It is not clear whether and how the requirement for registration will apply to international news websites and websites operated by international organisations that publish news on and in Sri Lanka”

Below we give the full statement they issued;

We the undersigned civil society organisations and individuals express grave concern over the press release issued by the Director General of the Department of Government Information on 5th November 2011, which requires all ‘websites carrying any content relating to Sri Lanka or the people of Sri Lanka… uploaded from Sri Lanka or elsewhere’ to ‘register’ for ‘accreditation.’ We also condemn the actions of the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (TRC) that has, according to a Sunday Times news report, moved to block a number of specific websites in line with this. While it is unclear whether the two measures are part of a single initiative or not, they represent an unacceptable incursion into free expression in Sri Lanka.

Websitesincluding www.lankanewsweb.comwww.srilankamirror.com,www.srilankaguardian.org and www.lankawaynews.com were blocked on the day the press release was issued without any consultation or forewarning, raising concerns about the government’s real objectives and the freedom of expression in Sri Lanka.

We note that the Information Department press release does not state what the process of ‘registration’ will entail and whether any sort of liability or conditions will be imposed. We further note that this move by the government is the first step in the realisation of plans mooted by the TRC in 2010 to draft legislation that would make it compulsory for news websites to register with the authority. We also have additional concerns about the press release. Firstly, the press release does not establish with sufficient clarity the categories of either websites or persons who are required to register with the Ministry. Secondly, it is not clear whether and how the requirement for registration will apply to international news websites and websites operated by international organisations that publish news on and in Sri Lanka. Finally, in the interests of transparency, consistency and equal treatment, the Information Department and TRC must explain the legal framework and process under which registration of this nature can be enforced.

This requirement of registration coupled with the blocking of websites, which potentially constitutes a form of prior-censorship, not only produces a chilling effect on the freedoms of expression and information on the Internet, but also constitutes a prima facie violation of a number of constitutionally protected fundamental rights, including Article 14(1)(a) of the Constitution of Sri Lanka, which guarantees an individual’s right to freedom of opinion, expression and publication. The obligations of the government with respect to international standards are made clear by Sri Lanka’s ratification of enforceable international legal instruments, which includes the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Needless to say, these measures also do not meet broader standards of international best practice as reflected for example in the report of Frank La Rue, the UN Special Rapporteur for the Freedom of Expression and Opinion submitted to the UNHRC on 16th May 2011.

Concerns about defamation and the right to privacy notwithstanding, the government has failed to provide a legitimate rationale for the registration process consistent with the values of a democratic society or international standards on permissible legal restrictions on the freedom of expression. While under the law of Sri Lanka there is ample scope for legal redress in case of defamation or an invasion of privacy, the measures the Ministry has taken so far are also inappropriate and disproportionate to its stated aim of ensuring online media ethics. Furthermore, the practicability of such arbitrary blocks is questionable. Any attempt to impose widespread blocks on websites would lead to an increased interest in them and the use of easily and widely available circumvention tools (and proxies) to access these sites.

The blocking of websites is unconstitutional, illiberal and technically infeasible. The consequence of such arbitrary and extra-legal action is that restrictions are based on the subjective judgement of government authorities in the protection of narrow partisan interests, the complete infringement of international freedom of expression standards, and the quashing of dissent. We are also concerned about the submissive acquiescence of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with arbitrary orders issued by the government for the blocking of websites, and remind them that such conformity makes them complicit in the violation of fundamental rights.

We reiterate that the fundamental right to freedom of expression, information and opinion includes wide access to diverse sources of information on the Internet and call upon the government to rescind the requirement of registration contained in its press release.

Signatories:

1. Anoma Rajakaruna

2. Association of War Affected Women

3. Cedric de Silva

4. Centre for Policy Alternatives

5. Chandra Jayaratne

6. Chandragupta Thenuwara

7. Chulani Kodikara

8. Deanne Uyangoda

9. Dr. Devanesan Nesiah

10. Dilrukshi Handunnetti

11. Emil van der Poorten

12. EQUAL GROUND

13. Families of the Disappeared

14. Floating Space Theatre Company

15. Free Media Movement

16. Gowthaman Balachandran

17. Herman Kumara, National Fisheries Solidarity Movement

18. INFORM

19. IMADR Asia Committee

20. J.C. Weliamuna, Attorney-at-Law

21. Jayathilaka Kammallaweera

22. Jovita Arulanantham

23. Juanita Arulanantham

24. K.S. Ratnavale

25. Prof. Kalinga Tudor Silva

26. Kaushalya Attygalle

27. Kanishka Ratnapriya

28. Lakshman Gunasekara, President, South Asia Free Media Association – Sri Lanka Chapter

29. Lanka Nesiah

30.  Lal Wijenayake, Attorney-at-Law

31. Lawyers for Democracy

32. Luwie Ganeshathasan

33. Mahendran Thiruvarangan

34. Dr. Mario Gomez

35. Marisa De Silva

36. Mothers and Daughters of Lanka

37. Muslim Women’s Research and Action Forum

38. National Peace Council of Sri Lanka

39. Nirmanusan Balasundaram

40. Peter Rezel, Management and Development Consultant

41. Priya Thangarajah

42. Priyadarshanie Ariyaratne, Social Democratic Solidarity

43. R.M.B Senanayake

44. Right to Life – Human Rights Centre

45. Rights Now Collective for Democracy

46. Ruki Fernando

47. Dr. Selvy Thiruchandran

48. Sharmini Boyle

49. Shanthi Sachithanandam

50. Sharni Jayawardena, Writer and Photographer

51. Shifan Ahmed

52. Subha Wijesiriwardena

53. Sumathy Sivamohan

54. Shyamala Gomez

55. VILUTHU

56. Women’s Centre – Ja Ela

57. Women and Media Collective

58. Women’s Political Academy

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    This is ‘civil society’? Come on, you can find a better descriptive! There’s a reason why these kinds of petitions have no impact.

  • 0
    0

    Most of these Non Governmental Organisations are the linked to the Policy Alternatives and therefore Pakiyasothy Saravanamuttu, Sunila Abeysekera and Sunanda Deshapriya. This is the Holy Trinity of Professional Liars for Handouts from the LTTE.

  • 0
    0

    peter chetty…” This is the Holy Trinity of Professional Liars for Handouts from the LTTE “…..I LOVE IT !!!

  • 0
    0

    Malinda, You are a lackey of Rajapkse. An Insult to the entire country similar to Merwyn Silva. There is a thin difference between the name Merwyn and Malin

  • 0
    0

    I read “Lankaenews” once, and the articles in that webpage says how civilized those journalists are. Just gossips, and namecalls for leaders for tarnishing their images. Is that freedom of expressing? It is not better than a “Kalaa Paththara” that we used to see decades ago in our rurual villages. I don’t know about other banned websites. I think government did right things banning these kind of websites.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.