18 June, 2026

Blog

It’s The Context, Stupid!

By Fr J.C. Pieris –

Fr Chryso Pieris SJ

The following is our common human experience. In this universe nothing happens in a vacuum. Everything happens in a ‘context’. This is reality. It is a universal truth. There are no isolated happenings unrelated to the rest of reality. That would be illogical and unreasonable.

The third law of motion discovered by Issac Newton says – every action has an equal reaction. This is not exactly the Buddhist principle of Karma which says – The law of cause and effect in Buddhism, commonly known as Karma, posits that all voluntary actions (thoughts, words, deeds) are “causes” (hetu) that inevitably produce corresponding “effects” (pala) or results. Positive actions create happiness, while negative actions—undermining the dignity of life—lead to suffering, with individuals responsible for creating their own destiny over many lifetimes.

In our study of the concept of ‘context’ the deepest understanding of the concept is found in the Paticca-samuppada, or Dependent Origination. It is the fundamental Buddhist doctrine explaining that all phenomena—and specifically suffering (dukkha) and rebirth—arise in dependence on causes and conditions. Often translated as “dependent arising” or “chain of causation,” it states that “if this exists, that exists; if this ceases, that ceases”.

In our daily life of good behavior and bad behavior, right governance and wrong governance, economics and corruption, ethics and morality, we can easily see a chain of causation. We can reverse and go back in the chain to find the original cause that bore all the consequences we experience now. In short it is finding the “Maha Molakaru”. And that “Maha Molakaru” must take full responsibility for whatever result of his action. Our Supreme Court once did just that declaring who caused the ruin of our country, naming and shaming them. We must always seek the ‘context’ in our study of a situation, happening or incident. Otherwise, we come to wrong and dangerous conclusions we shall regret.

This is not something very abstract or rocket-science. There are folk sayings that depict clearly the ‘context’, the chain of causation and the inevitable results of our actions. “Thala vapurala mun kapaganna beha”- you cannot sow sesame and reap green gram. “Nayaata gahala polla varaddaganna epa”. Don’t strike the cobra and miss! (for you will regret it) and so on.

I must explain the title of this short note. It is akin to the famous “It’s the economy, stupid” which became a famous political phrase coined by Democratic strategist James Carville in 1992 to focus Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign on the recession, defeating incumbent George H.W. Bush. Its meaning is obvious. So obvious that if you do not grasp it, you aren’t very intelligent.

The point I want to make is that we must not disconnect a happening from its context and conditioning and judge it in isolation which can have serious repercussions on society at large. For it could mean life or death for some people. Of course, I am talking about an incident that happened in the State of Jillabagadiyawa on the 9th of May a few years back. A few days ago, it was taken up for consideration but some, apparently, took it out of context and in isolation. I am open to correction.

Latest comments

  • 1
    11

    If I understand correctly, the good “father” seems to be saying in a rather circumlocutory fashion that the group of people convicted of the killing of Amarakeerthi Athukorala on 9 May 2022 and sentenced to “death” a few days ago should have been judged with the incident that occurred prior to that on the same day considered as a mitigating circumstance and that it is those who are behind the earlier incident who bear the prime responsibility also for the violence that followed that incident.

    It is true that the 9th May incident was what sparked off the counter violence that followed but that doesn’t absolve the killers of Amarakeerthi of the crime of murdering him according to law just as, if A murders B’s father and a week later B murders A in revenge, B is still guilty of the crime of murder and must face the full legal consequences for his act.

    If I understand the gist of the author’s article properly, wouldn’t that contradict what he was writing so passionately about Israel during the Gaza war because of the way he thought they prosecuted the war? 7 October is Israel’s 9 May by the good father’s own logic.

    • 2
      9

      Leonard,

      If A murdered B’s father and B murdered A in the heat of the moment, it is called voluntary manslaughter. In most jurisdictions, it is a 1st degree felony, and not even a 2nd degree murder. The sentence passed down is usually a prison term for 10-25 years and not death by hanging, and certainly not for 12 people. Shame on our courts system.

      • 4
        1

        I wonder which of the 12 assailants’ father or mother or wife or child was killed by their victim!
        What a comic defence of murderers.

        • 0
          9

          Relationsip does not come into the equation here. In this situation, there was the fear of the potential of being hit. So it is also self-defence. And those hit by the bullets might have been related to or friends of those around.

          • 2
            6

            Ramona: “Relationsip [sic] does not come into the equation here. In this situation, there was the fear of the potential of being hit. So it is also self-defence. And those hit by the bullets might have been related to or friends of those around.”

            What “potential of being hit”? The MP and his security guard were killed after they had fled the scene after being confronted by the mob and the shooting, as CCTV footage shows.

            The self-defence was on the side of the MP here. According to the judges, his vehicle was blocked by a protesting mob who had already gathered at the scene of the incident before the arrival of the MP (consituting a “riot”). The security guard of the MP must have fired, which resulted in one person being killed and several others injured– because they feared for their personal safety. That’s called “justifiable homicide.” Would the shot have been fired if the protesters had been just standing on the road and shouting abuse at the MP and may be even throwing light objects at his vehicle as he passed by?

            • 0
              8

              Leonard,…..they had their right of peaceful protest. There were protests all over the country. It was the MP and driver who shot at them and killed one and wounded others. Naturally then did the crowd erupt in self-defence and anger.

              • 10
                9

                Ramona,

                These politicians are crafty. 12 protestors given the death penalty, will it actually happen? The EU (=tariffs) is already sending warnings. Another example is Ranil. He will attend a bunch of show trials, no serious prison time. If they were serious, they would go after him for the Bond Scam, not a Euro jaunt.

              • 1
                7

                Ramona
                I think you have missed your vacation. You should return to Sri Lanka, sit on the bench and entertain us with your “kakille” judgements.

                • 0
                  6

                  Typo: “vocation’” not “vacation.”

          • 2
            0

            You invoked it in:
            “If A murdered B’s father and B murdered A in the heat of the moment”
            then you plead:
            “Relationsip does not come into the equation here.”
            Do you bat an eyelid before making a BS comment?

    • 10
      9

      LJ:

      Israel invoked the right to self-defense. Had the coalition government of Netanyahu stood by idly, it may have well have collapsed. Politicians are creatures of expedience when it comes to retaining power.

      By the way, Old Pervert the Haji gave your post 6 thumbs down. Elsewhere, 17, 15, etc. Is Allah on some kind of monthly cycle?

  • 3
    1

    “The third law of motion discovered by Issac Newton says – every action has an equal reaction.” etc.
    *
    I wonder what Newton’s reaction to this assault on his 3rd Law of Motion could have been if he faced it in his day.
    Perhaps, he would have laughed his guts out.

    • 2
      0

      Hello SJ,
      Many people (and even Physics Students) misunderstand Newton’s Third Law.
      • Forces Do Not Cancel: Because action-reaction forces (e.g., foot pushes ground, ground pushes foot) act on different objects, they cannot balance or cancel each other out.
      • Equal Force, Different Acceleration: Although forces are equal in magnitude, the resulting acceleration is not. An object with less mass experiences greater acceleration (Newton’s Second Law).
      • Misidentified Pairs: A common error is pairing forces acting on the same object (e.g., gravity pulling a book down and a table pushing it up). These are not Newton’s 3rd Law pairs.
      • Movement Misconception: A frequent question is how something moves if an equal, opposite force exists. The horse-and-cart paradox, for instance, is solved by understanding that the horse pushes the ground, while the ground pushes the horse forward—a force that acts on the horse, not the cart.
      • Simultaneity: The action and reaction forces are simultaneous, not sequential; one does not cause the other to happen later.

      To use Newton’s Third Law as an Analogy for Karma is, in my opinion, Stupid. Karma only exists in People’s heads, it is not a real objective thing. This is Deepak Chopra style mysticism.
      Best regards

      • 2
        0

        LankaScot:
        The Middle Path:

        The healthiest approach often includes:

        – Respect for cultural traditions

        – Openness to spiritual meaning

        – Willingness to question claims

        – Reliance on scientific evidence for health and public policy

        – Personal responsibility alongside faith

        In other words:

        -Belief can enrich life.
        -Blind belief can distort it.
        – Skepticism can protect us.
        – Cynicism can empty life of meaning.

        Balance is key.

        • 5
          0

          HelloLeelagemalli,

          -Belief can enrich life.
          -Blind belief can distort it.
          – Skepticism can protect us.
          – Cynicism can empty life of meaning.
          I would suggest that the days of the “Gods” and the God Botherers are numbered. We don’t need any supernatural explanations or hand waving Apologetics to keep us in ignorance. Belief without evidence has never been shown as a good way to determine if our ideas comport to reality.
          The Scientific Method is, in my opinion, the best method to determine if our Models are tenable. There is no such thing in Science as 100% certainty. Look at the Vastness of Space as revealed by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which has recently shown the molecular origin of Exoplanets, and then tell me that the Universe was created just for Humans to appear 13 or so Billion years later to have a relationship with a God.
          https://www.chemistryworld.com/features/the-jwst-reveals-the-molecular-origins-of-planetary-systems/4022623.article
          In a single spot that was believed to be empty JWST revealed 800,000 Galaxies.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jId8sqwZQpQ&vl=en
          Finally, there is no “meaning of life”, so enjoy it while you can and treat everyone as you would like to be treated.
          Best regards

          • 4
            0

            Hello LS,
            Belief in the Modern World:

            In the past, religions developed when people had limited scientific knowledge about the world. They helped explain life, death, illness, and natural events, while also guiding moral values and social order.

            Today, science has answered many questions that were once mysteries. In places like China, many people identify as non-religious. In India, many still identify with Hinduism, though often more culturally than strictly religiously. Overall, modern life is increasingly focused on material progress and personal goals.

            On a personal level, people may still turn to the idea of unseen forces during illness, loss, or difficult times. However, with time, many come to accept that life has a natural beginning and end. While we cannot avoid mortality, we can improve our quality of life by caring for our health and making thoughtful choices.

            Beliefs today vary widely—from religious faith to spirituality to trust in science.

            What matters most may not be which belief we hold, but how responsibly and compassionately we live.

  • 6
    6

    According to sources, “Athukorala and his security officer fled and sought refuge in a nearby building, where they were later attacked and killed by a mob.”

    The bar is very high for the death penalty. The evidence cannot be circumstantial (he/she said). You have to prove premeditation(=deliberate intention) on the part of the accused. In this case, “It revealed he died from multiple injuries, fractures, internal bleeding, and haemorrhage caused by severe blows/beating.” The beatings came from poles and clubs.

    The sentence is in proportion to the crime. Multiple injuries=deliberate intention. Severe blows, again intention. Haemorrhage is painful, this adds to the sentence. Considering |Mob|=5000, the Court made an example of 41 and out of those 41, a further 12 were given the VIP treatment. This is textbook prosecution. It has to be done to deter future protestors from carrying out similar actions. Out of those 12, at least a few will have the sentences changed to life.

    • 2
      6

      Lester,….out of 5,000, you just can’t randomly pick out 40 and make an example out of them and give the raw sentence to hang 12 of them. It is random, for accusations and proof goes haywire when choosing from a crowd of 5,000. And the MP did shoot and kill one person and wound multiple others. Yes, he was afraid, but considering all the contextuals of the situation, 12 persons to be hanged (even if a few will eventually not be), sounds like a very stupid judiciary system steeped in sadism and perverse relishment over the fact. What a carnival, in our so-called Buddhist nation that also resides in the modern international settings.

    • 4
      6

      Lester,….out of 5,000, you just can’t randomly pick out 40 and make an example out of them and give the raw sentence to hang 12 of them. It is random, for accusations and proof goes haywire when choosing from a crowd of 5,000. And the MP did shoot and kill one person and wound multiple others. Yes, he was afraid, but considering all the contextuals of the situation, 12 persons to be hanged (even if a few will eventually not be), sounds like a very stupid judiciary system steeped in sadism and perverse relishment over the fact. What a carnival, in our so-called Buddhist nation that also resides in the modern international settings.

      • 6
        5

        Ramona,

        As I understood, most of the incident was caught on CCTV.

        Detailed accounts from news reports, court proceedings (including the 2026 Gampaha High Court Trial-at-Bar verdict), post-mortem/forensic findings, and eyewitness/CCTV descriptions consistently describe the sequence of events:

        – The MP’s vehicle was blocked and surrounded by protesters on the highway.

        – Shots were fired (killing or injuring at least one protester).

        – Athukorala and his bodyguard fled into a nearby building (often described as a garment shop or commercial premises).

        – A large mob (around 5,000 people) quickly surrounded the building.

        -The two men were then dragged out (or emerged) and brutally assaulted with poles, clubs, and other means until they died.

        ————

        The 12 sentenced to death were probably the ones who dragged the MP out of the shop and carried out a prolonged assault with lethal weapons, which clearly establishes the motive.

        The Court is going after the ones who were directly involved in the murder. This is where the burden of proof is the highest.

        • 4
          3

          Lester……Poor guy, Athukorala. But there is obviously a huge doubt with any Cctv camera, as it was probably not there, and even if there, it couldn’t have filmed the killing part so directly. Forenesics is also hard to determine for anyone could have used those poles and clubs and they were probably not at the crime scene by the time the police got to them. Eyewitness ac counts would be haywire in such a big crowd. All lies by the courts. They just wanted to punish anyone so as to clear the case and satisfy sadistic medeival punishment cravings.

          • 5
            0

            Ramona,

            If we are talking about 5K people, there is no lack of evidence. Everyone carries a cell phone these days. Someone would have filmed the beating and handed that over to the police.

            You are correct that the System is corrupt to the core. Nevertheless, the death penalty is not handed down lightly. Because the victim is politically connected, you can assume the Courts actually did their job for once.

            • 1
              1

              Ok, Lester. But still in the context of the MP being part of the government that took the money of the hardworking-suffering- Lankan masses for its own futuristics, should the death penalty not be an option. And that is how the government changed for the better….not immediately, but eventually. Otherwise, it will be an autocratic dictatorship where people who have the right to protest, cannot do so, and also cannot retaliate when shots are fired on them, killing one. Anyway, cell phone pics. cannot be trusted because of the potential of photoshopping and editing….anyone can put their enemies face on a photo or video.

              • 0
                0

                Ramona,

                Did you know the entirety of the Akuregoda shooting was captured on CCTV?

                https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=880902618120364

                It’s probably not as extensive or sophisticated as the one in London or Seoul, but still operational. The police will watch the footage from various angles. Numerous clues, such as the build and maybe license of the getaway car. If the license plate is in a database, and the car is not stolen, then you have a suspect. You might be knowing Brian Kohberger, he thought driving the Kia in the dead of night through circuitous rural roads was clever, but the CCTV spotted the car at numerous places. And then the car’s location was matched with the phone ping. Even when off, it will ping the tower. Last year in France, police used CCTV to find the escape route of the Louvre thieves.

                Regarding the MP, yes he was a dirty bastard. I heard the car he was leaving in was full of liquor. But mob justice is not a solution. Then you get a Zimbabwe type situation.

                Robinhood type wealth transfer does not work either. The poor people will blow the money quickly. Check lotto stats.

                • 0
                  0

                  Lester,….Where’s the footage of the Athukorala case? That is far more difficult to prosecute because there were too many protesters. Robinhood type wealth transfer of wealth takes time to implement. If you simple throw loaves of bread to starving people, they will gorge on it. It has to be in a systemic way over time. Don’t blame the victims; blame those who put them in that state.

          • 3
            0

            The unstoppable cannonball meets the immovable object.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.