19 July, 2024


Lanka Needs An Anti-Corruption Movement

By Kumar David

Prof. Kumar David

Prof. Kumar David

Lanka needs to take inspiration from India’s Anti-Corruption Movement (ACM). Although corruption in India is horrendous an inspiring movement to combat it has grown up. We in Lanka are quite far behind in our ACM mobilisation. The JVP, groups like transparency and individuals are active, but an organised effort to cull crooks is still absent. A start has to be made and the first step is to build public consciousness and encourage awareness of the need for a systematic, organised, anti-corruption drive. Sleaze is the talking point in nearly every social and political conversation; therefore there is fertile soil for activism.

Recently I had the good fortune to be present at a preliminary brain-storming. A small group from diverse class, political, ethnic and religious backgrounds has started coming together to take up the ACM challenge. There was a clear realisation that although old liberal fogies and leftists dinosaurs can do the initial ideas formatting, eventually a contingent of energetic speaking young people must take over and drive the movement.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)

Though I am aware that readers are familiar with Aam Aadmi, Kejriwal and Hazare it is useful to divert to India before returning to the initiative taking shape here. Anna Hazare (age 77), a retired army truck driver, is the father of the Twenty-first Century anti-corruption drive in India and Arvind Kejriwal, an IIT mechanical engineering graduate, his 45 year old ‘son’. Unfortunately unlike in Christian cosmology, in India’s anti-corruption pantheon, father and son fell out. The issue post-2011 was whether, in taking the Jan Lokpal Bill forward, the movement should be broad and politically non-aligned, Hazare’s preference, or be a political party, Kejriwal’s choice. The parting in November 2012 was amicable and at first Kejriwal seemed right because at its first test, the Delhi legislative assembly elections, AAP won 28 of 70 seats and formed a short-lived minority city government with Congress support – the BJP fell marginally short of a majority. Now Hazare himself seems to imply that he was wrong by joining Mammata Banajee in West Bengal in the Lok Sabaha elections. But easy, it’s not so simple, it is early days and the last laugh may still be with Hazare.

AAP’s problems are more deep-rooted than falling short of a solo majority in Delhi. Snags extend to a plethora of issues; class base, ideology or lack thereof, spontaneity spiced with immaturity, and the lack of a definitive programme. I will touch on each, but together they demonstrate that an anti-corruption drive (in India or Lanka) must be broad-based, open to those of all political hues and ideologies, and focussed on a single issue. (“Oh dear” you must be muttering “this guy is some kind of Single-Issue nutcase!”) Seriously though, let me explain AAP’s headaches.

Srinivasa Raghavan, a well known Indian journalist, categorised the AAP as traditionalist and rightist on moral issues and left and populist on economics. There is a word for this; eclectic. General Secretary Prakash Karat of CP(M), India’s largest communist party, spelt it out thus: “The AAP’s clean image, incorruptibility, abstention from perks and privileges, funding through people’s direct contributions and its agenda of social justice, democratisation and decentralisation has long been at the heart of the Communist programme”, he claimed. On the other hand, he added, a stand against communalism and the communal Hindutva agenda are not strong points in AAP-speak. Kejriwal admitted much the same when he said “We are happy to borrow from the left and we are happy to borrow from the right”.

This dichotomy arises from the party’s class composition. Its leadership is a sophisticated core of educated and intelligent middle and upper-middle class intellectuals. Intellectually, AAP leaders can hold their own in any global forum. However they are not Marxists and lack the intellectual rigour and theoretical cohesion that Marxism, or other unified schools of thought, brings with it. You may opine that this is an advantage; let’s note the fact and leave the debate for another time. This philosophical vacuum, not individually since AAP leaders have personal beliefs, but in the morphology of the organisation as a whole, is an advantage for an entity which sets itself ACM goals, but not a party agenda. This sounds a bit of a mouthful so I had better explain.

Ideological eclecticism, that is the absence of unifying paradigm or outlook, is disastrous for a political entity that wishes to craft a programme and run a government. It will fly apart as illogical and unstable coalitions do. On the other hand, if there is a cry across the nation against a hideous problem and nearly everybody is willing to address it, then that which unites all should turn into a single-issue campaign. Of course other things that agitate partisans are also important, but can wait their time or be delegated to other forums. This is the genesis of single-issue campaigns and there are two matters on which Lanka is thus motivated; abolition of the executive presidency and the battle against corruption.

Unfortunately, AAP missed this broad-bottomed boat. Wikepedia has this to say: “AAP says the promise of equality and justice in the preamble to the Indian constitution has not been fulfilled and independence has replaced enslavement to a foreign power by oppression to a political elite. The party claims the common people remain unheard and unseen except when it suits politicians. It wants to reverse accountability of government and has taken the Gandhian concept of swaraj as a tenet. It believes that through swaraj, government will be directly accountable to the people instead of higher officials, and stresses self governance, community building and decentralisation”.

This is a partially obsolete ideological mandate. A pure Gandhian model harks back to an antiquated world, infeasible in globalised times – elements of it though have vitality. But that is not my point. An ideological mandate or belief system such as this, or any other, sits ill at ease with the plurality essential for an anti-corruption movement which must integrate people of all ideologies and beliefs. The AAP has fallen between two stools, having become a political party, it must now set up another, separate, parallel, uniquely focused anti-corruption entity in which all hues and shades can assemble exclusively for that purpose.

And now to Sri Lanka

There is an advantage in Lanka being a late developer; it can benefit from the achievements and learn from the mistakes of others. I have dwelt on one AAP mistake – adopting a party structure rather than the loose style of a movement. The great achievement of AAP is that it has taken the corruption issue head-on, laid it bare, and brought a rotten can of worms into daylight and public attention. Thanks to AAP’s sterling efforts there is now a focus on the issue not only in urban areas (the educated city classes anyway are AAP’s core constituency) but to a degree the issue has also penetrated the vastness of rural India. Of course AAP will win no more than 20 seats in the elections, it lacks machinery outside Delhi and Haryana; but these are early years.

The gravest threat to national security in Sri Lanka is neither tigers nor lions, neither Chinese nor imperialists; it is that the political system, as a whole, depends on graft and on payments by the drug trade to rent-seeking politicos. Crummy power-stations, and useless airports, harbours and roads, are born of crony capitalism; efficient firms are throttled by politically connected rivals; “rent-heavy capitalism sets a tone at the top that lets petty graft flourish. When ministers are on the take, why shouldn’t underpaid junior officials be?” (Economist 15 March, 2014).

‘Rent-seeking’ is a term used by economists to describe money collected not by productive effort, initiative, entrepreneurship or legitimate business activity, but by outright graft, regulatory abuse, transfer of public assets at knock-down prices, illegitimate licences, permits and contracts, and payment of protection money by the drug trade to law enforcement, the security establishment and politicos. This is all rampant in Lanka and has worsened since the end of the war.


That issue of the Economist devotes its leader to graft and also contains a three page special report on crony capitalism in India. Except for a huge difference in scale, the sorry tale of India is applicable verbatim to Lanka. Nay, in a certain sense it is worse here. Although some in the Gandhi family are suspect and though there may be up to half-a-dozen big time crooks in the Indian Cabinet, the collective apex of government is not entirely tarnished with as black a brush as Lanka.


The start that has been made in Lanka in putting together an anti-corruption movement has got off the ground in the right direction. It is broad based (class, politics, ethnic and religion wise) and while old hands can provide early impulse and guidance there is an appreciation that young people must take the helm and drive the wagon. JVP people, in their personal capacities, bring useful energy; business leaders may be linked to conventional entities (UNP, SLFP, TNA and SLMC sympathisers; I am not sure and it does not matter) but they want to help; retired top public servants inject a wealth of experience. For obvious reasons I am not splashing names at this stage.


The ACM must be independent of party politics and must learn from the collapse of the Platform for Freedom. I was a founder and drafted its Charter, but others pushed it into the arms of the UNP where it became an appendage. It lost its appeal and the broad base withered; it now lies flat on its face, useless. Launching an ACM and benefiting from this collective experience is the first step on a long road; but every journey begins with the first stride. Public support and shelter are crucial in making this not-so-easy trudge towards a less corrupt Lanka.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    Prof Kumar, stop bleating like a goat. First identify the leader and conductor of the corrupt band. He is Mahinda Rajapaksa. Isn’t he? Say it out loud. Otherwise just keep your fmouth shut.

    • 0

      Very good points KD.

      1.Taking apart and destruction of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s DEEP STATE and MILITARY BUSINESS COMPLEX, and reducing the military’s role in business (tourist hotels, urban development, agriculture vegetable trade, land grabbing) must be the first focus of the anti-corruption movement.
      2. MONEY POLITICS is the second problem and curbs must be put on election financing. Ending Staggered elections is a priority and all elections held at the same time to avoid graft.
      3. Cleaning up the EDUCATION SECTOR, civil and diplomatic services of the military food print the next anti-corruption priority. We must speak of MORAL CORRUPTION in the Education sector.

      • 1

        1 sri lanka needs a strong military for the next 30 to 40 years because, as can be seen through ltte is though week, is not dead.

        2.keeping a large army to combat ltte raising its ugly head as a preventative measure at present is costly and is unaffordable for a small country like ours.

        3. the corollary of all this is it is best to keep the army engaged in commercial activities to finance its existence. Not very different from a voluntary force- difference neing they are better trained, earn an income and always ready to fight. Bravo the brains behind this original model.

        • 0


          “1 sri lanka needs a strong military for the next 30 to 40 years because, as can be seen through ltte is though week, is not dead.”

          It is a good idea, let the country go bankrupt, fatten the arms merchant and other suppliers.

          “the corollary of all this is it is best to keep the army engaged in commercial activities to finance its existence”

          Another good idea, privatisation of armed forces. Have you really thought about the concept and consequences of army generating its own finances?

          • 1

            They stopped the killings that took over 100,000 lives, stopped the destruction of property worth billions of rupees, people can now go about living without fear of getting killed or maimed.
            To prevent going back those bad old times through which I lived, I will give anything mate, unless you have a better answer :-)

  • 1


    “He is Mahinda Rajapaksa. Isn’t he?”

    Yes he is, the band consists of 21,250,333 members.

    • 1

      So we have a band of one ‘troll’ campaigning against 21,250,333? About right.

      It is a pity that the Edmonton Forum tactics will not work here in SL, like they did not over there!

      As to Kumar David’s flipflap, an anti-corruption party along the lines of the Indian one seems another one of his ‘flashes’ to bring down the government, now that the ‘single candidate’ idea has fallen flat as a one man idea.

      Remember the fox that went behind the goat to waiting toeat the fruit that falls?

      You pathetic sods remind of that story.

  • 0

    Only those who publicly state their assets and liabilities should join any “anti corruption movement.
    Most politicians are reported NOT to have declared their assets as required by law.
    The president can set an example to all others by a making a PUBLIC declaration of assets.

  • 0

    Well, KD…. Lankan Spring is the only way to clean up corruption, thuggery, anti-democratic practices, nepotism and such. But, we cannot have Lankan Spring with chickens. Bhikkus will use religious and national sentiments to keep the majority silent. Vocal minority will be beaten up. No hope for a Lankan Spring with chickens.

    Let’s see what the lection results from West and South bring.

  • 4

    `|`The start that has been made in Lanka in putting
    together an anti-corruption movement has got off
    the ground in the right direction. `|”

    ☻/Rocking horse stool – Rapid Lead Infusion`#\◕/#

    ▂▂▂ ▂▂▂

    ☻/ They have said AAP’s is a Congress (I) stooge.

    Arvind Kejriwal will not contest Amethi, Rae Bareli,
    both of late Indira the Kashmir Brahmin, but AK49 is
    contesting Narendra Modi at Varanasi ◕`’`◕

  • 0

    Lanka need all good systems but we have to wait until people wake up from their halozination mode. Even today, they have voted Raja in both provinces.They have almost won the elections.

    • 1


      “Even today, they have voted Raja in both provinces.They have almost won the elections.”

      Does the Election Commissioner know about the result?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.