17 June, 2024


Muslim Minister Tackling MMDA, ACJU & OCOL

By Ameer Ali

Dr. Ameer Ali

The Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act (MMDA) is once stirring the All Ceylon Jamiyyathul Ulema (ACJU), which is a Men Only Mullah Organization (MOMO). In between the MMDA of colonial origins and a MOMO of religious conservatives is an unelected Muslim Minister of Justice, who is a professional lawyer and part of a political party elected to power to implement what a monkish parliamentarian called, one-country-one-law (OCOL) during the previous regime.   

MMDA, since it was legislated in 1951, has no doubt undergone some changes. However, it has remained fundamentally gender biased in favour of men and continued to be shaped not by the spirit of Islam but rather by the rules of fiqh, which is customarily dubbed as shariah in order to stamp those rules with divine seal. Like many aspects of Islamic jurisprudence, guidance regarding marriage, divorce, and child maintenance needs to be contextualised and it is the changed context of today that has made reforms to MMDA, vital and unavoidable.

The most important change in the current context is in the status of Muslim women. When MMDA was introduced in 1951, it was meant for a Muslim community in which women were deemed to be queens in kitchens and bedrooms, but considered worthless outside those precincts. In fact, family rules and customs in majority of Muslim countries developed under that rule. This is not true today. Muslim women are at least as productive as Muslim men, if not more, intellectually, professionally, entrepreneurially, educationally, and are also involved politically and in pioneering social changes in countries where they live. In Sri Lanka too, thousands of Muslim women have become the chief bread winner in their families and accordingly men have become dependents. There has been a radical change in the role and status of Muslim women, especially over the last forty to fifty years, thanks to the spread of secular education among them.

Given that fundamental transformation, it was chiefly due to the women’s tireless agitation to get legally recognized as equal partners in all matters relating to matrimony that prompted the appointment of an expert committee, chaired by Chief Justice Saleem Marsoof (JSM), in July 2009, by the then Minister of Justice Milinda Moragoda. The committee also included a few eminent Muslim women. After a laborious ten years of deliberation and inquiry JSM submitted its recommendations, which included a number of progressive changes to MMDA, to the yahapalana government in 2019. The government at the time of submission was in its dying days before facing a General Election. ACJU/MOMO was immediately up in arms against some of those recommendations, especially regarding Quazi courts and polygamous marriages. In this protest, Muslim parliamentarians were coaxed with threats of losing their electoral support, and they therefore, dragged their feet and blocked JSM recommendations legislated. It was an opportunity missed because of ACJU’s sabotage with the connivance of Muslim parliamentarians. However, in that environment of delay and uncertainty, a monkish member of legislature, Athuraliye Rathana Thera, proposed a Private Bill calling for the removal altogether of MMDA, and argued for OCOL. ACJU/MOMO won the day of course, but without realising what was to come with the change of government.

Rajapaksa Regime came to power on the promise of implementing OCOL. It has an appointed Muslim Minister of Justice in the cabinet, who admittedly does not have the same aura and influence of a previous Muslim minister, Badiuddin Mahmud, who was also an unelected member in the cabinet of SLFP regime in the 1970s, but who was able carry through several controversial measures in the field of education, which proved to be beneficial to his community, amidst stiff opposition from the cabinet. The new minister is caught between the Viyathmaga advocates of OCOL and agitators from ACJU/MOMO. The cabinet appears to have approved proposals to raise marriageable age to 18 and to allow brides to sign the marriage registration document as proof of their consent. However, on the abolition of Quazi courts and polygamy no decisions have yet been made. In the meantime, ACJU/MOMO is agitating with its usual threnody against radical changes in both.

OCOL advocates would demand Quazi courts be abolished altogether. That will have international repercussions at a time when the regime is already taken to task for its human rights violations and ethnic and religious repression of minorities.  Abolition of Quazi courts tantamount to doing away with MMDA completely. If Rajapaksa Regime is going to leave other legal systems such as Thesavalamai and Kandyan Laws untouched while abolishing only MMDA, Muslims will have the right to take their complaint of religious discrimination to international courts of justice.

Similarly, the abolition of polygamy altogether requires a rational approach. Almost all societies that did away with polygamy are faced with the evil of producing concubines and mistresses. Let the Muslim minister decide which one he prefers. Rationally speaking, the final say on polygamy should be left to the women. After all, marriage in Islam is basically a civil institution although strongly recommended in the Holy Text. No marriage should be allowed without consent of both parties, “and any woman who does not wish to enter into polygamous marriage has the right to refuse. Islamic law goes even further than that and grants the wife the right to incorporate her refusal of polygamy in the marriage contract.” (Shaykh Muhammad al-Ghazali, A Thematic Commentary on the Qur’an, The International Institute of Islamic Thought, Herndon VA, USA, 2000, p. 57).   

The Muslim Minister of Justice has a delicate but epochal task in his hands.  On the one hand within his own community women are crying for justice and equality in matters of matrimony. On other, conservative quarters want to maintain their domineering position in such matters. Above all, there are the OCOL elements within his government who wants MMDA to be rooted out. Will he come out of this test a hero or villain?   

*Dr. Ameer Ali, School, of Business & Governance, Murdoch University, Western Australia 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4

    It is good to have one law for all only if the rulers or governments have a strong principles of guidance and standard procedures to ensure the law should be equal to all citizens. It is also important to recognise that the law of the country should not differentiate between races, languages, religions and gender etc. The diversity should be recognised.
    Unfortunately, in this country one law is not practiced. So, one law will never work. I don’t think that the justice minister has the courage and guts to change the special place given to Buddhism in the constitution.

  • 2

    “Will he (the Minister of Justice) come out of this test a hero or villain?”

    He is the Minister of Justification, particularly when it comes to Muslim affairs, because he will justify whatever the President says and does. His prime concern is NOT Justice but justifying and defending the President’s words, deeds and inaction, particularly as regards the Muslim community.

    Soon after the rule on compulsory Cremation of Covid 19 victims was imposed in late March last year and the Muslim Community as a whole felt aggrieved, he is reported to have remarked:

    “The President has no objections to Burial, but it is the Committee’s decision to Cremate.”

    Just imagine, a Committee appointed by President GR Deciding against the President’s thinking? And the President GR taking it lying down?

  • 0

    Key to this One country – One law should align all these traditional and customs laws to be under the general country law. If UNICEF and SL agrees Child is defined as age below 16 years – then no custom/ traditional law should be going against that !! MMDA has not evolved from 100 years just like its Islam religion. Polygamy was used in 1400’s when men went to war and was killed, with more women than men (Like 4 women to 1 man) – world has moved on and Islam and MMDA needs to move on !!! If you can’t sign to your own marriage, if Muslim women can’t opt to get married under SL law its unfair and MMDA allows under advantage for Muslim men..!! how many Muslim men will stand up for MMDA changes #lethersign?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.