27 October, 2020

Blog

Prabhakaran, The LTTE And Fascism: The Evidence

By Dayan Jayatilleka

Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka

Was the LTTE fascist?  Certainly not according to Comrade Surendra Ajith Rupesinghe, who considers it a “political organization that represented the national-democratic aspirations of a nation”. If the Tigers were representative of a national–democratic aspiration of any nation, it sure doesn’t speak much for that nation.

Unfortunately for the good comrade, the fascist character of the Tigers is no longer a matter of speculation or theoretical argumentation. There is first hand evidence of the explicitly fascist nature of the organization, which turns out to have been not merely fascist in a generic sense, but explicitly Hitlerian and Nazi, from its genesis and in its very DNA.

I refer to the testimonies of two founder members of the LTTE, the Tigers first treasurer Ganeshan Iyer and a respected militant, Raghavan. Let us commence with Ganeshan Iyer:

“…Prabhaharan’s personality was adapted by the military regulations and the victories of Hitler; therefore he opted to implement the military discipline into the training of LTTE. He claims that the military of Hitler secures victory due to its formation and determination.

All who were trained for the first time ordered to salute as in the discipline of Hitler’s military. Since Prabaharan respected the formation and determination of Hitler’s military, he had liked that to be duplicated in the Tamil Eelam army and I did not reject it.

All who were trained for the first time ordered to salute as in the discipline of Hitler’s military. Since Prabaharan respected the formation and determination of Hitler’s military, he had liked that to be duplicated in the Tamil Eelam army and I did not reject it.

During this period only, the waves of opposition against Prabhakaran surfaced. Some members of LTTE argued that the salute of Hitler was unnecessary and Prabharan counter argued them. He claims that if a proper army formation is wanted, relevant algorithm should also be there. He argues that the beginning for a proper military formation is the system of Hitler. Especially Kumanan, who was later killed by the LTTE was against this. When he also participated in the planning discussions on the military training camp, this debate occurred. At the end of it, Hitler’s system was accepted and practiced based on the presentation of Prabhakaran.

…The leading members such as, Kittu, Sellakkili, Santhan, John, Chithappa, Kumarappa, Maathaiya were invited to the training camp. Prabhakaran provided training. Prabhakaran was saluted according to Hitler’s way as scheduled.

…. Prabhakaran: since Thuraiyappa’s assassination he was like a hero to all of us, and he joined the struggle from the age of 17. Prabhakaran‘s opinion was to struggle without any continuous waiving and surrender and he did not think beyond pure military tactics. He reads on Subash Chandrabose and Vaanchinathan and had more sympathy over them. He had great respect on Hitler. This strange mixture did not have any political background. The reason was that all three of them reached victory through military tactics.”  

(‘My entries on Eelam struggle’, part 14, Ganeshan Iyer, http://inioru.com/?p=12399)

Now for the corroborative testimony of Raghavan, who joined the Tamil New Tigers in 1974, the LTTE at its founding in 1976 and quit the outfit in 1984:

Raghavan - "Prabhakaran was also of the same mindset but he was also, strangely, inspired by Hitler"

“…Thangathurai was pro-US and pro-Israel. Prabhakaran was also of the same mindset but he was also, strangely, inspired by Hitler. He had with him a copy of ‘Mein Kampf’. He also was inspired by Bhagat Singh and Subash Chandra Bose. It was a strange combination. On the one hand, I think he had ideas about Jewishness, the state and the formation of Israel. On the other hand, the idea of eliminating the “other” came from Hitler. There was a connection in his mind….”

(‘RAGHAVAN, LTTE’s co-founder with Prabha, tells all’, interview by Ahilan Kadirgamar, Nitharsanam.net)

Surendra Ajith Rupesinghe demonises a ‘war of annihilation’. A war of annihilation is a bad thing depending on who and what one wishes to annihilate. If one intentionally aims to annihilate a nation or a people or innocent non-combatant civilians, it is a ghastly crime against humanity.

On the other hand it was no less a Marxist-Leninist, communist and revolutionary than general Vo Nguyen Giap who in his military writings, repeatedly stressed that the object of military strategy must be ‘the annihilation of the living forces of the enemy’, that is of the enemy as a military force.

Well before Mahinda Rajapaksa was even a cabinet Minister I had advocated, in an interview given to DP Sivaram in the North-East Herald, and in my first book published in Delhi, that the aim of the Sri Lankan state should not be to use military means to drive the LTTE to the negotiating table, but precisely to ‘annihilate the living forces of the enemy’; to win the war by smashing the LTTE as a military machine.

I simultaneously advocated as clean a war as feasible and a parallel track of the devolution of power by implementing the 13th amendment. I stand by those positions and that line, which I am glad to have seen coming to fruition in its military aspect.

If an enemy is fascist, it is all the more valid that  the war against it should be one aimed at ‘the annihilation of the living forces of the enemy’, with the enemy defined, not as the unarmed, non-combatant civilian population, but as the fascist armed forces. For instance the war of annihilation of the forces of fascism waged by the Allies hardly resulted in the annihilation of the German nation!

Related articles;

Theoretical Sophistry, Political Sycophancy And Craven Careerist Apologetics Of Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka Continued ; By Surendra Ajit Rupasinghe

FASCISM, SOVEREIGNTY AND THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TAMIL STRUGGLE ; By Dayan Jayatilleka

The Theoretical Sophistries And Political Sycophancy of H.E. Ambassador Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka ; By Surendra Ajit Rupasinghe

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    1

    More rubbish by this man. Why do you publish it..

    • 1
      1

      Hey ‘Kalyana’, be fair by the editor of the website, huh :) He’s hardly the only one who publshes me, every Sri Lankan newspaper does. And it isn’t only the Lankan press. Take this for instance:

      Security Index, a leading Russian academic and policy journal on international security, features in its latest issue (Vol 18, Issue 1, 2012) an essay by Dr Dayan Jayatilleka, Sri Lanka’s ambassador to France and the UNESCO. Security Index is the journal of the PIR Centre, the Russia Center of Policy Studies, Moscow.
      Welcoming the jubilee edition of Security Index in Spring 2012, the Russian Defence Minister, Anatoly Serdyukov wrote: “Since issuing of the first edition in 1994, your journal gained the reputation of one of leading Russian editions on the issues of international security and nuclear disarmament. Publications of the journal receive broad recognition among experts and governmental officials both in Russia and abroad. For representatives of the Ministry of Defence, Security Index journal has always been a publication where nonpartisan assessments of WMD non-proliferation and arms control topical issues can be found”.
      A member of the editorial board of Security Index, Dmitri Rogozin, former ambassador to NATO, was recently appointed by Russia’s President, as Deputy Prime Minister responsible for the defence industry.
      Ambassador Jayatilleka’s ten page essay in Security Index is entitled ‘The End of Global Equilibrium: A Counter-narrative from the South’.
      Dr Dayan Jayatilleka has been on the International Experts Group of the Russian Center for Policy Studies since 2008.

  • 1
    0

    The 2500-year accomplishment of Sinhala-Buddhism is a civil war that killed more than 100,000 people. All of these 100K individuals died in the name of Sinhala-Buddhism. Of course, there have been ideologies which have killed far more people than this; for example, National Socialism and Bolshevism. On the other hand, National Socialism, Bolshevism, etc. are accepted as failed ideologies by most people today. One can readily see that they have no place in the modern world. Similarly, Sinhala-Buddhism has no place in the modern world. Just as National Socialism was based on the myth of the Aryan,Sinhala-Buddism is based on the myths of the Mahavamsa. Just as Nationalism Socialism believed Hitler to be a superman, the SInhala-Buddhists of the 21st century have adapted a mythical reincarnation of Dutugemunu, aka Mahinda, to be their “saviour.”

    • 0
      0

      Nihal (or Nihalam),

      Why you drag Sinhala-Buddhism for everything? Did Sinhalese ask for 50:50? You can go to Anuradhapura and Pollonaruwa to see the achievements of 2500 year Sinhala-Buddhist achievements. At the least Sinhala-Buddhists have a country. What do the other-side have after 2500 year struggle with child soldiers and suicide bombers? Reputation as terrorists, bogus asylum seekers and fraudsters.

      • 0
        0

        What country are you speaking of? The fake state created by the British? Do you know why even the Kandyans didn’t want to be part of this fake state at the time of Independence? Because they knew the Southern Sinhala-Buddhists are a gang of egotistical power-hungry fascists that would hog all the power and resources of the island for themselves.

      • 0
        1

        Er… no, it’s because they preferred to be independent rather than under the rule of the Christian invaders. How exactly would the southern Sinhalese hog the power when the country was ruled by the Brits, dimwit?

  • 0
    0

    Hey Dayan! Don’t you EVER get tired talking of yourself?????

  • 0
    0

    This ‘debate’ seems to be about the meaning of ‘Fascist’, but what is more important than semantics in this case is that both Prabhakaran’s LTTE and the Rajapakse regime are equally guilty of abhorrent crimes against humanity. Unfortunately DJ cannot get himself to agree to this and, perhaps because of his ‘position’, has to continue being the apologist/defender of the ‘regime’. Or will he agree that at present there is no good governance and that crimes against humanity are being and continue to be committed?

  • 0
    0

    Hey Chandra ….That was a pretty lame effort, If their ever was one !

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.