22 June, 2024


Resolving The Paradox Of Rice-Poverty Amidst Plenty

By W.A Wijewardena

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Eating too much of rice?

Sri Lankans are great rice eaters. On average, they eat 108 kg of rice per person per year as against the world average of just 54 kg per head. A plate of rice eaten by an average Sri Lankan is usually equated to Adam’s Peak or Samanala Kanda. The local saying is that if someone is to jump over it, it is so elevated in height that he has to make a lot of prior preparation and training. Otherwise, instead of jumping over it, he would just land in the middle of the plate.

This Sri Lankan practice of filling a plate with a heap of rice is followed even by Sri Lankan restaurants in other parts of the world.

For instance, the Sri Lankan food stall, Lanka Foods, at the Thailand based Asian Institute of Technology or AIT is a popular eating place not only for Sri Lankan students there but also for those from India and Bangladesh. The reason? Compared to the neighbouring Thai food stall which serves rice on the plate measured by a teacup, the Sri Lankan restaurant fills your plate with a Samanala Kanda. That Kanda can be eaten on average by three Thai students. This overfilling of the plate with rice amounts to its under-filling with meat and veggies, thereby going short of a balanced diet. Thus, Sri Lankans derive the entirety of their calorie requirement out of carbohydrate which, if not burned instantly, add to their waistline.

Wewai-Dagabai culture

Rice has been grown in Sri Lanka for thousands of years and the country’s inhabitants are proud of that long history. Hence, rice is not only their staple food but also a produce connoting great economic, political, cultural and spiritual significance.

In economic terms, they brand Sri Lanka as an agricultural land, mainly of paddy farming, that provides livelihood to a large number of people. Politically, it is so vital as a food item and if any government seeks to do even a small change in its production, distribution, marketing or consumption, that there are street agitations by people who are dressed in loin clothes, the main work-dress of a rural farmer many years ago.

Governments which tried to take away the famous rice subsidy from rice eaters have been voted out of power. Culturally, all folk rites, art and habits have been developed around the production of rice. Spiritually, the symbiotic combination of paddy farms and Buddhist icons, paraphrased in Sinhala as Wewai, Dagabai or Village Reservoir and Pagoda of the Buddhist Temple, have been identified as the door for reaching spiritual salvation by village folk.

Sticking to hard views is dangerous

These deep-rooted sentiments are being used by politicians, marketers and religious leaders to penetrate the farming community as an entry point and thereby win their support for their private enterprises.

Yet paddy farmers are poor and continue to be poor. This has become a crucial issue since Sri Lanka has now attained near self-sufficiency in rice and any increase in production levels means low market prices and low incomes for farmers.

At the same time, there is a wide gap between the price which farmers get, called the farm-gate price, and the price which consumers pay. This gap is usually about 20-25% of the farm-gate price. But farmers believe that it is as high as 100% and they are being exploited by all others in the value chain. The list is long but notable so-called exploiters are banks, millers, transporters, wholesalers and retailers. Therefore, anyone who promises to eliminate those exploiters from the chain can instantly win the hearts and minds of farmers. Politicians use it to the maximum.

Produce more and become bankrupt

This is the paradox in rice. The more you produce, the less income you get and greater your tendency to end up in bankruptcy. Farmers are aggrieved whether there is a bountiful production or a crop failure. A bountiful production means excess supply in the market pushing prices to fall.

If they fall below the cost of production, farmers begin to make losses compelling them to default on loans they have raised from both banks and village money lenders. Since the latter has harsh methods of recovery, farmers end up in losing their valuable assets. When it goes to an extreme point, farmers even choose to commit suicide. If there is a crop failure, again they lose income, despite the increase in the market prices. That is because they now do not have paddy to sell at those high prices. The decline in income due to crop failure causes the vicious circle outlined above to repeat itself. Thus, no matter whether the crop is good or bad, farmers are always poor. Politicians or religious leaders who always have a sympathetic eye for farmers do not seek to find the root cause of the problem and introduce a permanent solution.

Demand is flat despite increase in incomes

Though the income of Sri Lankans has increased phenomenally during the last 20 years or so, the quantity of rice consumed by them annually has remained flat at around 110 kg per person. Hence, rice as a food item has a fixed demand. Though increases in population are likely to increase the demand for rice, it normally does not happen since those who are elevated to high income levels have a tendency to eat less rice.

As a result, there is no way for the domestic market to absorb the excess if there is a glut in the market. In such a situation, the way out is to sell the excess to foreigners. But the short grain rice produced by Sri Lanka cannot be sold in foreign markets since their preference has been for varieties similar to Thai long grain rice. Thus, a glut leads to a reduction in domestic prices causing innumerable hardships to farmers, an instance of having poverty amidst plenty.

Corrupt marketing boards

Developing countries have sought to resolve this issue by establishing state-owned marketing boards. These boards are used to buy the excess supply at a minimum guaranteed price when the market price is below it.

Sri Lanka too established a Paddy Marketing Board with this objective in mind in early 1970s. However, the experiences throughout the globe have been that these boards have served not the farmers but the officials managing them for they are a fertile ground for breeding corruption.

A report by Rodney Fink for the US Agency for International Development or USAID in 2002 has noted that the underpaid civil servants in these boards resolve themselves to adopt corrupt practices with impunity, making the conditions of farmers worse. Hence, establishing marketing boards or strengthening existing boards is not the solution to the ‘problem of poverty among plenty’ as experienced by farmers.

Eat less while improving yields

The permanent solution lies in improving the yields of rice farmers, on the one hand, and creating a demand for rice as an industrial input on the other. The former will help farmers to beat the rising costs of production. The latter will facilitate Sri Lanka to absorb a glut in the market, use it to produce industrial goods and export such goods since it cannot export its short grain rice as a food item. If there is no surplus of rice for industrial use, such surplus can still be generated if Sri Lankans learn to eat less rice and more meats and fats.

Even a reduction in average per head consumption by, say 20 kg, will generate a sufficient surplus of about 42 million kg of rice for this purpose. These are long-term strategies based on proper awareness, changes in relative prices of rice as against meat and inventions made through the development of science and technology base of the country. The science part is the handiwork of a new subject area called ‘biotechnology’ which has now been added to the curricula of some state universities and private higher learning institutions.

Rice: The water guzzler

The problem with rice compared to maize or corn is that it is a ‘water guzzler’. In farming, paddy fields are flooded by water and about a half of that is lost through seepage and percolation. It is the balance half which is used by the rice plant for its own purposes, known as evaporation and transpiration.

The researchers at the Manila-based International Rice Research Institute or IRRI have computed, after verifying a vast amount of data collected from field surveys conducted throughout the globe, the amount of water used by rice plant to produce 1 kg of rice.

The total flooding of the paddy fields from sowing to harvesting will use about 2,500 litres of water to produce 1 kg of rice. About a half of this is lost through seepage and percolation; accordingly, the real use of water by the rice plant to produce 1 kg of rice is about 1432 litres.

Imagine the price of rice if water costs Rs. 1 per litre. Fortunately for consumers, water is supplied to rice farmers almost free of charge either through rains or government-sponsored irrigation schemes. But the shortage of water due to droughts will affect both the production and productivity of rice farmers. This is a serious problem in many rice producing nations like China, India and Sri Lanka.

Developing drought resistant paddies

Scientists in IRRI and in leading universities are now engaged in developing water-efficient paddy cultivation methods. IRRI has come up with an ‘alternative wetting and drying’ method. In this method, a field is flooded for a few days and after that water is used up, kept dry for a few more days before it is flooded again. This method is to save about 30% of water normally used in paddy farming without affecting the rice yield.

Another method suggested is sprinkling water in the field, producing ‘aerobic rice’ just like watering a leafy vegetable field. This would save water up to 50% but there would be a reduction in the output by about 30%.

Hence, it is useful in cultivating paddy in relatively water-scarce regions. But scientists at the University of Western Australia or UWA have attempted developing a new rice variety which is drought resistant so that it could alleviate drought stress.

This is the best method of cultivating rice in arid places like the Hambantota or Mannar districts in Sri Lanka.

Improve farm practices

The productivity of Sri Lankan farmers can be improved significantly through a change in farm practices. Sri Lankan rice farmers have mostly picked the skill either from their elders or from peers; in most cases, they are guided by marketers of weedicides and pesticides. Hence, they lack the skills in scientific farm management. As a result, there is a tendency for overusing inputs like freely available water or purchased inputs like fertiliser or pesticides. Any entrepreneur who is not conscious of his costs is likely to end up as cost-maximisers and in bankruptcy. Then it boils down to making farmers aware of the proper way of cultivating paddy in order to maintain a higher yield level continuously.

Divulwewa experiment by Lion Breweries

Already an experiment in this regard has been done by Lion Breweries with some 3,500 farmer families in Divulwewa in the North Central Province. Its CEO, Suresh Shah, explains the experiment as follows: “We got the selected farmers to a classroom and educated them of the whole process of cultivating paddy properly. They were given knowledge of the correct preparation of land, correct seeding, correct planting, correct water, fertiliser and pest management and finally how to harvest, thresh and offer paddy to the market. This new system of management, which did not involve any high technology or capital investment, helped farmers to get on average about 160 bushels per acre. Their previous yield rate was just 85 bushels. There were farmers who even went up to 200 bushels per acre. They were able to maintain these average yield levels continuously for five years.”
Lion Breweries, which is taxed heavily at 70% by the government because it is considered a ‘sin industry’, had to give up its experiment. When it withdrew from the project, it was necessary to replicate it in other areas of paddy farming. Shah says his attempt at canvassing it with the top government authorities was unsuccessful.

Significant improvements in yields

The production of 85 bushels per acre per year amounts to some 4,383 kg per hectare per annum and that is Sri Lanka’s present average yield rate of paddy. If it is increased to 160 bushels, it would increase the yield rate to 8,200 kg per hectare per annum, reducing the cost of production of farmers by half.

This is exactly what the Government should do today, instead of seeking to address minor issues of rice farmers and introducing palliatives to a perennial problem in the country. Shah says that Lion Breweries is willing to share its experience with anyone who wants to replicate this new farm management technique with other farmers in the country. The advantages are numerous. It would raise incomes of farmers, help them beat rising production costs, facilitate the alternative use of land for forestry, etc. conserve water which is a scarce resource today and generate a rice surplus that can be used as an industrial raw material.

Rice as an industrial input

Rice is now used increasingly as an industrial raw material in other parts of the world. Rice straw which is now wasted or burned down in fields is a good raw material for paper manufacturing; it is estimated that every kilogram of rice also produces 1-1.5 kg of straw which is a high harvest. Paper manufacturing using rice straw pulp can be started as a cottage industry by imparting the needed technical knowhow to villagers.

Rice can be used as malt for producing wine, whiskey and beer. This will open a good export market for Sri Lanka rice which cannot be exported as a food due to its shortness of the grain. Rice bran can be converted to rice bran oil, an alternative edible oil. Rice milk, like soy milk, is a substitute milk for those who have lactose intolerance.

Proteins isolated from rice can be presented as supplementary protein capsules like the fish oil capsules available in the market today. Rice can also be used for producing perfumes, a natural variety that will have a good attraction.

Local varieties are rich with antioxidants

New research will add more to this list. For instance, a paper presented by Thivanka Fernando and Mathi Kandiah at the International Conference on Health and Medicine in 2017 has found that five local rice varieties, namely Heenati, Suwandal, Rathu Nadu, Pachchaperumal and Kurulu Thuda have a greater concentration of antioxidants than popular varieties of imported rice.

Even among the local varieties, the raw rice has a much larger concentration of antioxidants than cooked rice. The conclusion of the two researchers has been that when cooked, antioxidants get diluted to water and wasted away.

This, therefore, provides an opportunity for a businessman to use raw local varieties, especially Nadu which is produced in plenty in Sri Lanka, as an industrial raw material to isolate antioxidants and supply the same as a supplement to consumers. It is therefore a blue ocean or an unchartered territory for rice in Sri Lanka. All we have to do is to incorporate it into national policy, direct research into it and get the private sector into commercial production eyeing the export market.

It is now time for politicians to stop shedding tears about the pathetic condition of rice farmers in Sri Lanka. If they go to the source, they can offer permanent solutions for their multiple problems.

*W.A. Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2

    On average, we eat 108 kg of rice per person per year as against the world average of just 54 kg per head. Sounds a lot and probably is! But some of us start with kiributh and one more rice meal often two. We depend on rice for our protein requirements.
    Our eating habits have changed and diabetes is afflicting us. There is a case to get our proteins from vegetables, pulses and if we can afford milk/meat/fish. The change in eating habits can be achieved through education at primary level onwards.
    We moan a lot when it comes to depreciation of the rupee. Of course imports get pricier. GoSL must encourage production of pulses, chillies and the like through subsidies. This will reduce unemployment. Was tried earlier with great success. Rice flour substituted for imported flour will save us a lot.
    Depreciation has become a political football. The slogan is, “Can reduce taxes and also stop the rupee depreciating”.

    • 1

      Dr. W.A Wijewardena, RE: K.Pillai’s comment

      RE: Resolving The Paradox Of Rice-Poverty Amidst Plenty

      ” GoSL must encourage production of pulses, chillies and the like through subsidies. This will reduce unemployment. Was tried earlier with great success. Rice flour substituted for imported flour will save us a lot.”

      Thanks. The populace must be informed, at least those who know can make an impact.

      During World War 2, the British encouraged that the people eat rice and preparations from rice as pittu, hoppers and string hopper instead of wheat products, like bread and other sweet foods containing wheat. The wheat flour is processed, and .digested quickly, leading to an increase of glucose (symptom) in the blood, followed by a increase in insulin. This leads to insulin resistance ( the cause) and type 2 diabetes.

      Eating wheat products, is a typical example of imported products that are not healthy, expensive and detrimental to health and national interest.

      How to Reverse Type 2 Diabetes Naturally


      Diabetes is a curable disease. As a dietary disease, it demands a dietary treatment. The principles are outlined here.

      • 0

        ” The wheat flour is processed, and digested quickly, leading to an increase of glucose (symptom) in the blood, followed by a increase in insulin. This leads to insulin resistance ( the cause) and type 2 diabetes.”
        There are wheat flour varieties that are not highly processed, such as Atta flour. This costs only about SLR 40 in India, but is heavily taxed here. Rice flour too is processed and roasted to ward off insects.
        There are countries where rice flour is not available, but the people are definitely not suffering diabetes epidemics.
        The fact is that imported wheat flour is much cheaper than rice flour, and items made from it are much more palatable and easier to make than those made with rice flour.
        It is unfair to condemn wheat flour in order to promote rice flour. The two are chalk and cheese.

        • 0

          “Rice can be used as malt for producing wine, whiskey and beer. This will open a good export market for Sri Lanka rice which cannot be exported as a food due to its shortness of the grain. Rice bran can be converted to rice bran oil, an alternative edible oil. Rice milk, like soy milk, is a substitute milk for those who have lactose intolerance.”
          Much of the problem comes from our inability to learn, and the habit of mixing up religious issues with economics. For instance, alcoholic brews are currently “haram” even though toddy has been drunk for millenia.
          Rice bran oil is popular next door in India. Why do our policy-makers not learn from them and not spend all their time on junkets in the Weat?

  • 4

    It will be more appropriate to look at the average Sri Lankan consumption of Rice per person against the Asian average, not the World average. Ineffective governments and corruption in the value chain will see dire consequences in paddy farming. The paddy farmer should not be exploited but given all assistance and encouragement to be successful. Modern farming techniques, storage, distribution, marketing, pricing, alternative uses of rice will ensure sustainability.

  • 3

    This article is much appreciated.
    Hope govt and private sector will collaborate (team work)
    To get our Rice right!!

  • 0

    Rather too many strands in this article about rice!
    The problems that arise as a result of changing conditions and environment. A certain way of doing things has evolved, over many centuries. Rice was probably a suitable food crop when we had a manageable population and, in relation to that population, a good deal of water. Now everything in short supply – didn’t Malthus predict something like that?
    The bottom line surely is that youth should stay with food production jobs, using LOW technology. Young people unfortunately have other aspirations. Not surprising given the changing value systems etc. So, obviously, there are many facets to these “paradoxes”.
    Yet another article which underlines the fact that we need a system of government that makes decisions objectively. Short term politics-driven decisions will never lead to sustainable practices relating to the environment.

  • 1

    “National Policy” on rice is formulated in consultation with paddy mafia .

    • 0

      Let the market take care of it with minimum or even no intervention from the government.The government should only hold a s buffer stock which must be rolled over -selling older stocks in the market while buying new stock. to replenish the buffer.
      The buffer stock can be used to check any sudden or unusual rise in the price by selling from its stock or buying any market surplus which depresses the market. This is not an easy policy to implement since it requires much knowledge of the production probabilities but over the years the Food and Agrarian Services Departments have developed the skills. This is all the national policy required and the rest can be left to the market. Senanayake

  • 2

    The politicians are put into power to run the country for us the people, not for themselves. Seventy years of UNP & SLFP democracy and what have we to show for it?
    47% of the people have no mains electricity, a third of the children and a quarter of all women are malnourished. Lanka is a rich fertile country. Why can’t the Government pass laws so that anyone with more than x perches of land has got to plant fruit trees or vegetables? Either Yahapalanaya provides yaha palanaya or they will be replaced, permanently.


  • 2

    This looks like another ‘economic’ prescription by Mr Wijewardana. His untold message is that we should eat less rice and expoert more of it.

    Unfortunately, he is prescribing this solution without any knowledge or background in biology. Rice rates the best among all carbohydrate sources trialled and chosen by humans (wheat, potato, maize and other inferior starch foods) and our civilisation has lasted without an ill effects of diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, for longer than 3000 years based on a rice diet with fish and vegetables. Over eating of Rice has not caused any diseases because Rice is the only grain with an optimum Glycemic Index (GI) that is harmless. Transfer from this diet to wheat flour based bread and other starches has introduced new diseases.

    So the evil economic prescription of exporting our rice rather than eat it is based on the theory that we can solve all our problems by hooking ourselves on to the global trade circus that is biased towards rich countries robbing our raw materials and, energy and food.

    Thank you very much. We can do without that kind of advice.

  • 0

    Dear Mr. Wijewardana,

    It is a good analysis and good article. I have heard that in Australia, Rice Farmers are now growing rice varieties that utilise less water or “Goda Wee”. On the other hand the developed countries like Australia, they grow good quality rice varieties like Jasmin Rice and Basmati. I do not know why our farmers can not grow that kind of rice varieties. Not only that our rice does not have the required import quality due to poor processing systems and packaging, I hope that you can guide our policy makers and “Booru” politician who are governing the Agricultural Department of Sri Lanka, in your next article.

  • 0

    I think we should make these better innovative ways available to our farmers . This task has to be performed by the State since it is outside the market forces. With the TV and Radio being freely accessible to our farmers this in no longer difficult. Let the Agriculture Department take the initiative as they have all along done deserving our appreciation. RMB Senanayake

  • 0

    Dr. wijewardane: I read in more than one country when they got into a debt trap, the rist thing they did was stopping importas and ask people to produce thiose locally. Srilankan Prime minister says Sri lanka is in a debt trap (earlier he said it was PRevious govt but was not Mahinda Rajapakse) and Srilanka has to increase FOREX earnings which comes mostly from WOMEN working in the middle east and boys in South Korea. Then how about fuel and dwindling forex earnings because Oil prices are low. PEople say there is an economic policy for sri lanka but no one knows who prepared it. Ranil does not say his american friends from HARVARD’s and not from HARVARD (even then they know very rich capitalist eocnomics and not a agricultural country with 23 million supposed to be a third world, middle income country) and MCC prepared this economiic policy that is what Mangala, their agent and the business community of Ammerrica and EU wanted.

    • 1

      Jim softy Dimwit

      Why hasn’t the Nobel Committee recognise your contribution to the study of Economics?
      Racist white Christians!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • 1

        NAtive Vedda: I heard SLPP/SLFP and UNP bought CT. I mean if we write without thinking that would affect CT bottom line. SO, I cut down.

  • 0

    What this article says is lies. Unlike thsoe days of CBK who said eat rice three times a day (that is what we were used to), unlike MahindaRajapkse’s days, now ricee is imported and expensive. On the othe rhand, Wheat Flour consumption is three times high. IT is all Austrlian flour. that is how IMF/WB want. Wheat flour has allergy (Gluten is allergic). Sri lanka’s agricultural lands were destroyed since the times of building new cities. Now, for the last 30 years may be people are building house sin agricultural fields. Now, there is this new land registry system which needs building parcels of alnds for REMAX/RO YAL LE PAGE company for maintaining a Real estate market for Sri lankan politicians’ whose investments in the west and EU are doing nothing for them, I mean the divident is negligible, most of the time, value depreciation, so, Rice is bad for Sri lankans.

  • 1

    Politicians are living in luxury with all the perks they have given themselves. Eating plate full of rice and filling their stomachs and their families stomachs.while most poor people don’t have enough to eat. Lots of school children have no lunch and they go hungry. WHY NOT reintroduce SCHOOL LUNCHES. Better than tablets/computers.

  • 1

    Dr. Wijewardane: YOu are a finacial person from CB. Even in the king’s times, or ancient times, what any kingdom would do is first make the country self sufficient and not importing everything. Say if were doing that during the LTTE times. they would have very easily. Just sink some ships importing Rice and Sundry goods. Take USA, Are they importing Wheat and MEat even though the cost of production for them is very high. for example,. Eggs can be imported from MExico which is warmer. but they rare chicken. they grow pigs and cattled in cold areas in heated buildings. they could have imported those directly from wamrer Mexico. but, they do not do.

  • 1

    rice subsidy, Fertilizer Subdisy are political tools as ways for them to earn Commis. I heard now even businesses ask for subsidies. So, the best way is sell Even the SOTHOSA to WALMART chain and that is why USAID (you know what, they gave us PL 480 and 481 and Flour and used it for what) is helping SAthosa. Now, KUDU by pakisthanis has replaced Wheat flour.

  • 0

    This comment was removed by edwin rodrigo because it abides by CT Comment policy. For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 0

    This water consumption of rice story is misleading. There is no conservation of water use in Sri lanka. Sri lanka doe snot haver odernization of anything. The work force is very depressed and not motivated. the reason is high politicization. See orphaned -African elephants are treated very humanely. but, Sri lanka abuse them. IT is the same thing with wild life. Many deaprtments are lazy, not working and corrupt.

  • 0

    Billionaire Businessman and Banker Dammika said the Colombo Citizens are well on their way to USD 12 500 Min Income per Annum in 2021.
    So it is appropriate that Dr Wije trying to put them on Meat & Three Veggies or Bangers and Mash diet.
    [edited out]
    Three Meals of Rice have kept them alive for 2500 years continuous.
    With Dr Ranil and My3 Siras Yahapalanaya . it is all nearing the end. unless things change drastically.
    Not sure about cutting the Consumption of Rice but Dr Ranil’s Economics is doing a pukka job to cut the Incomes of our local Paddy Farmers.
    Just had a quick look at Rice Imports in the first 3 Years of Yahapalanaya ..
    From an average of under 100, 000 Metric Tons Dr Ranil has increased the Imports to 400,000 Metric Tons of cheap stuff grown by Hindians, Thais and even poor Rohingas in Myanmar…
    So it can’t be the consumption which shafts our Local Farmers.. Can it?..
    Wonder whether the Rice Mafia is still around?…

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.