26 October, 2020

Blog

Sri Lanka: Beware The Ides Of March

By Kumar David

Prof Kumar David

Prof Kumar David

“Do not dictate to me, I’m not ready to take orders from others. We have a tradition and culture of over 2500 years and a time tested legal system together with a law enforcement process to address any issue”. This was President Mahinda Rajapakse‘s angry retort to British Prime Minister David Cameron’s threat in the CHOGM conference hall and at a news conference: “Let me be very clear, if an investigation is not completed by March, then I will use our position on the UN Human Rights Council to work with the UN Human Rights Commission and call for a full, credible and independent international inquiry.”

However, despite this bravado Rajapakse was actually sounding a retreat because he went on to say: “This is not something you can do overnight. You must respect our views without trying to push us into a corner, so please be fair.” He has conceded that an inquiry into the allegations is needed; he is only arguing about the timeframe. It seems that by holding CHOGM-2013 in Colombo, Lanka has shortened the road to The Hague, that is if Cameron is as good as his word and finds support in the UN-HRC. It will be difficult to back off when (not “if”) Rajapakse frustrates every independent inquiry, as he has done since 2009. But whether enough votes in UN-HRC will go along with Cameron is moot.

In the unlikely event that matters come to such a pass in March, one key player will be Delhi. Nothing can be said at this stage about what India will do since general elections are likely to be held before then. Whether Congress is re-elected or not, the uncertainty remains. A newly elected Congress administration, no longer constrained by Tamil Nadu sentiment, may return to gaming on Colombo’s side, as it has for the last five years – except recently. Though the BJP has been harsher on Colombo, in words at least, there is no knowing what it will do if elected to office. Hence, it is a fair to say that Delhi’s approach to this matter, after the elections, is a great unknown.

From victory to distemper

Up to the end of October many commentators, including this one, assessed CHOGM as a triumph for President Rajapakse since he had succeeded in getting a great majority of Commonwealth leaders to attend, and war crimes and human rights concerns seemed to have receded. It seemed he would pull off a PR coup and enhance his international standing. This is what I said in a newspaper article in late October: “So far CHOGM has been a triumph for President Rajapakse and there is no reason to suppose that there will be some sudden change of fortunes”.

This turned out to be sanguine; things began to unravel within a week and the outcome was different. I would not go so far as to say that CHOGM was a disaster, but it has been a public relations setback. It was assumed that if extremists created trouble they would be smashed, but Rajapakse failed to take command of the situation or to gain control of extremists who ran amok during the Conference. There were numerous mob incidents; I will name a few. Harassing BBC and Channel 4 news-teams by pro-government mobs led by Buddhist monks has been reported internationally; the government panicked and aired flagrantly incendiary TV programmes against foreigners; it threatened to lynch civil society personalities; it closed universities; it closed down NGO seminars. In sum, it was international public relations chaos.

One reason why President Mahinda failed to come off with flying colours is that Defence Secretary and brother Gotabahaya is the patron of Sinhala-Buddhist extremism. The mobs felt they could do as they pleased with impunity. They were not dispersed or dealt with firmly. Another reason is that Mahinda himself is chauvinist, to a degree, and it goes against his grain to discipline fanatic monks and racist trouble makers. Manmohan Singh has been lucky; by keeping away he has saved himself the embarrassment of being in Lanka while chauvinists baited conference delegates and attacked press and civil society gatherings running in parallel with CHOGM. The international media, particularly the BBC, gave publicity to these incidents. Energised chauvinism at home and bad global publicity turned CHOGM, which it was hoped would improve Rajapakse’s image, into a setback.

It was not all bad however; the President got the opportunity to advance a strong argument that by eradicating terrorism he had saved the most important human-right, “the right to life”. He also made his case that defeating the LTTE was essential for Lanka and insisted that wanton excesses had not been committed by his armed forces. This too was carried worldwide by the BBC in fair coverage. Much more significant however is that he has enhanced his popularity among Sinhala nationalists, and they are many, who loved his talking tough to Cameron and his refusal to be cowed by what they see as intimidation of white imperialists and old colonial master. Local television – one and all, de facto government mouthpieces – and panicky newspapers played up the nationalist fervour.

Importance of the IC

Turning to another aspect, a crucial argument that I have been pressing for some years has been decisively confirmed by the turn of events. This is the immense importance of the international community (IC). I would like to repeat the following remark from a previous essay:

“The power of the international community (IC) over local polity is far greater than analysts have been prone to grant. The IC must keep up relentless pressure till the Lankan regime is compelled to end human rights violations and stop trampling on judicial independence”.

The demonstrations and the hooliganism during the Conference proved conclusively how important the IC is in the eyes of all categories of local actors. Demonstrations in Jaffna during Cameron’s visit showed mothers begging the outside world to intervene. Their cry was that something be done about the hundreds, if not thousands, who have disappeared; that is abducted and probably killed by state security forces. This demand took precedence over economic and development matters. The cry of southern extremist mobs was precisely the polar opposite: “Don’t talk about war crimes and human rights; don’t accuse the military; don’t interfere in disappearances”. Sri Lanka washed its dirty linen in full view of the world. Mobs and supplicants alike know that international opinion is crucial; the regime is desperate to put its pariah status out of view.

China’s new (18 November) approach is refreshing. It has not raised human rights concerns explicitly, but the Chinese who are masters of gesture and innuendo, are well aware that the Foreign Minister’s statement will be read as signalling a shift. What interests me more is whether this is a follow up of the Third Plenum of the CCP-CC held last week. If there was general reappraisal of Chinas stand on global human rights controversies, it will have implications beyond Lanka on other foreign policy debates as well.

The Ides of March draws nearer

The atmosphere inside the hall was different from previous CHOGMs. Usually these are bland and boring gatherings where niceties are trotted out. The exercise is an opportunity for leaders and sycophants to enjoy First Class air travel and luxury accommodation at public expense. Not so this time; the atmosphere at times was acrimonious and rancid, harsh words were exchanged. When Cameron demanded an independent international war crimes probe and promised to take the matter up at the UNHRC if this is not done, government mouthpieces responded that he was playing UK politics in a Colombo conference hall to shore up Tamil votes for his party at UK elections. This very likely is true, but shining the spotlight on Lanka’s war crimes and human rights concerns at a leading international forum has had an electric effect, whatever Cameron’s motives.

I need to pause for a moment to debunk a logical fallacy. Its common form is this: When developing country leaders are accused of misconduct, instead of refuting the charges per se, the defence takes the position: “The Americans did such and such, the French this and that, the British, the Russians, etc, such crimes in the past”. This defence is pervasive in Lankan media and websites. It is flawed on two counts. First, it implicitly concedes the alleged crime. Second, that the British, the French and whoever else did such and such is no defence. Imagine a murder suspect pleading before a judge “Yes your honour, I did murder the victim. But Colonel Blimp of the Fusiliers murdered an innocent person in 1915 and was not convicted because he had influence. Therefore I too should be pardoned.” This fallacy, called a non sequitur, is widespread when war crimes and human rights violations are debated in Lanka.

Irrespective of Cameron’s, Canadian PM Harper’s, and the Madagascar PM’s motives, that the war crimes can-of-worms was opened at an international conference is of significance. Irrespective of colonialist and imperialist crimes, and they are many, if there is a prima face case that war crimes may have been committed in Sri Lanka, then an independent international investigation cannot be avoided. If eventually, and this may take quite a while, investigations against Lankan leaders, the military and the LTTE, are initiated it would be the most significant outcome of CHOGM-2013. I say this without prejudging the outcome of a probe. For the historical record and for posterity’s sake, though some not all LTTE leaders are dead, its alleged crimes must also be probed and responsibility assigned, albeit posthumously in some cases.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    “Let me be very clear, if an investigation is not COMPLETED by March, then I will use our position on the UN Human Rights Council to work with the UN Human Rights Commission and call for a full, credible and independent international inquiry.”

    if you refer to PM David C’s and FS William H’s post CHOGM statements , there is no mention of completion by march , it says only commencement by march , haven’t you noticed that professor kumar ?

  • 0
    0

    Time buying tactics may fulfill his regimes rule for another five year but the rest of his life he and his allies life become very short and he will replace the gas chamber that was given by him to thousands of innocent people.

  • 0
    0

    Isepriya was abducted as a 13 year old, deprieved an education. You did not humm did you?

    Isepriya then start singing hossana about suicide bombing. She glorifies the war crime that killed 90 unarmed sailors in a suicide bomb. I bet you did not lift a finger in protest then.

    Ulimately she is found dead legs apart. She did not commit suicide as she forced on others, did she? All of a sudden you develop a “sense of justice”?

    That is why people are protesting isnt it? None of this has anything to do with “justice” is it? You are a fraud really arent you??

    • 0
      0

      “iseypriya…was deprived of education…”
      her news reading was brilliant her song writting was brillianr, and she sang so emotionally and motivated Tamils all over the world…”
      That is what education is all about

      you call your self educated…?

      • 0
        0

        iseypriya…was deprived of education…” her news reading was brilliant her song writting was brillianr,

        Killing innocent people is brilliant

  • 0
    0

    When is this Ides of March ??????????Kumar……………..

    Next month or in 2014…………………Yeap, Cameron , Harper &TN has to face t
    yhe voter………… MR too will be in the running but its a one race horse.

  • 0
    0

    dont worry about ‘ides’ of march we have in our midst chaps like K A Sumansekera (LEELA),Jim(bo) softly,Vibushana,or mad hatters like Ella Kolla with such illustrious fellows in our midst we dont have a care in the world folks !

  • 0
    0

    …..”This defence is pervasive in Lankan media and websites. It is flawed on two counts. First, it implicitly concedes the alleged crime. Second, that the British, the French and whoever else did such and such is no defence. Imagine a murder suspect pleading before a judge “Yes your honour, I did murder the victim. But Colonel Blimp of the Fusiliers murdered an innocent person in 1915 and was not convicted because he had influence. Therefore I too should be pardoned.”….

    I would like to suggest that the application of double standards do need to be pointed out, reiterated and highlighted, when they are blatantly practiced, not in 1915 as the author states, but quite recently and as common practice in any war of choice where the US/UK/Aust go and wreck third-world countries and kill millions in the process, and then preach from a non-existent farcical moral high ground for political expediency..

    • 0
      0

      You are quite right Lasantha. The Sinhala Nationalists are not saying the US commited far more serious attrocities in Vietnam and the UK in Kenya. Therefore the Sinhalese can do what they like to the Tamils.

      What they are asking is what right does the UK and US to accuse Sri Lanka when they have commited far worse crimes themselves? Not only that they continue to hide the evidence and obstruct investigations by refusing to declasify records from Kenya. The “investigation” into the Mai Lai massacre was a mere whitewash by non other than Gen. Colin Powell, that found “nothing to investigate” despite graphic photographic evidence and testimonies from within the US Army itself. And how can India call for an investigation when they have not yet investigated the massacre in Jaffna Hospital by the IPKF. We can also be sure that had the LTTE won, non of those baying for blood today would be demanding investigations into the massacres they carried out on the Sinhala villages in the North and East.

      The analogy is not as Prof. David puts it “Yes your honour, I did murder the victim. But Colonel Blimp of the Fusiliers murdered an innocent person in 1915 and was not convicted because he had influence. Therefore I too should be pardoned.”

      What these people are asking is ” Your honour what right do you have to sit on my trial for murder when you commit the same crime with gay abandon?”

      • 0
        0

        Look at how arrogant Tamils are today from Kumar David, S. Sivathasan, J. S. Tissainayagam to ISS!

        These people talk as if they have the all big powers from US to India are in their bag and don’t give a damn about the opinion of the Sinhala people. They think they can bring in any tom dick and harry they like to conduct inquiries and what not as they please and drag MR to Hague!

        If this is how these people speak today, I cannot imagine how things must have been like in this country for Sinhalese when Tamils constituted majority of the civil servants in the mid 90s!

        Today S. Sivathasan a former civil servant speak about unconquerable genetic traits of Tamils. Just imagine what it must have been for Sinhalese to be served by such people always bragging about their race, intelligence and what not.

    • 0
      0

      Lasantha Pethiyagoda:
      I see you have dropped the facade of pretend-objectivity and have jumped in with both feet to justify crimes against humanity with what Kumar David very accurately calls a non sequitur: going back in history to find crimes of which the current accusers have been guilty. While you are about it why don’t you blame Vijaya’s father for kicking him out of Bengal/orissa because if he hadn’t come here Native Veddah’s people would still be running this country peacefully?

  • 0
    0

    There is huge difference between a terrorist organisation and an elected government.

    The way Mahinda brothers wiped out LTTE, USA can wipeout IRAN-North Korea-Parkistan-China or any other country in few minutes.

    How many years they are trying with IRAN & North Korea.

    Also there is huge difference between Civilised and Uncivilised.

    • 0
      0

      Mahinda ,

      oH no , US can’t and would not dare to attack N.korea , when senior Kim was in power he openly threatened American administration of wiping off the west coast of USA if American tried to attack N.Korea.

    • 0
      0

      And believe you me they will. If any of these countries attacks the US, Kill its people and grab its territory.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.