Sri Lanka rejected 100 of the 210 recommendations made to it. In the previous 206 reviews no country has ever rejected more than 95. As well as being the largest absolute number of recommendations ever rejected outright this is also the fourth highest proportion of recommendations rejected .
Meanwhile further research by the Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace and Justice suggests that there can be little hope for the implementation of those recommendations that they did accept. On 52 out of 71 pledges the Government of Sri Lanka accepted last time, they have done nothing whatsoever. So on past form we can expect the Government of Sri Lanka to completely fail to deliver on 73% of the pledges they made this time round.
Our comprehensive report analyses each of Sri Lanka’s pledges from 2008 in detail. The Government of Sri Lanka claimed to have delivered fully on 12 of their 71 pledges but we could only find this to be true in four cases. They euphemistically described progress towards the remaining recommendations as “ongoing”, but we could only find evidence of any progress in 15 cases.
Quoting from the report, Fred Carver, Campaign Director for the Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace and Justice, said,
“One of the very few things we were able to give Sri Lanka top marks for was their commitment to sharing their expertise of defeating terrorism. Sri Lanka loves do this which, given their methods of doing so, is extremely worrying for the future of the world. A recent such seminar entitled ‘Towards lasting Peace and Stability’ was held in Colombo on August 8th and attended by 19 countries. Addressing this seminar Gotabaya Rajapaksa stated ‘Sri Lanka today is one of the most peaceful and stable countries in the world and is in the midst of a national revival’. If only this were true.”
1 – Burma rejected 95 recommendations in January 2011 while leaving the status of a further 25 recommendations unclear. In December 2009 the DPRK rejected 50 recommendations outright and “noted” a further 117 – a term the precise meaning of which has never been clarified.
2 – Only San Marino (61% in February 2010), Burma (58% in January 2011) and China (56% in February 2009) have rejected a greater proportion of recommendations. A further 16 nations have accepted a smaller proportion of recommendations but recommendations for which the response is unclear or pending maintain Sri Lanka’s fourth place in terms of outright rejections.
3 – For comparison a study by UPR Info ( here) of 66 countries showed that an average of 40% of recommendations are typically wholly or partly implemented by the half way point in a UPR cycle. After a full cycle Sri Lanka had only made any measurable process on 27% of recommendations.
The complete list of accepted and rejected recommendations is available here
Notable rejected recommendations include:
129.27 Enact urgent legislative amendments to the Penal Code to ensure that the rights of women from all religious and ethnic communities are safeguarded (New Zealand)
129.96 Take immediate steps to prevent attacks on the human rights defenders and media and take action to investigate such acts (Slovenia);
129.85 Safeguard the independence of its judiciary (Slovakia);
129.80 Make every effort to ensure that those responsible for crimes against children, and in particularly concerning the recruitment of child soldiers, are brought to justice as soon as possible (Sweden)
129.76 End impunity for human rights violations and fulfill legal obligations regarding accountability (USA)
129.71 Take action to reduce and eliminate all cases of abductions and disappearances (Australia)
129.66 Take action to reduce and eliminate all cases of abuse, torture or mistreatment by police and security forces (Australia)
129.65 Publish the names and places of detention of all the imprisoned persons (France)
129.60 Take further steps to ensure more participation of Sri Lankan Muslims in the reconciliation process and national efforts of economic, social, and cultural integration (Egypt)
129.28 Fully implement the recommendations of the LLRC, in particular steps to ensure independent and effective investigations into all allegations of serious human rights violations , in the context of Sri Lanka’s civil war and its aftermath (Austria)
129.25 Adopt legislation on appointments that would ensure the independence of the Human Rights Commission (New Zealand)
Read Sri Lanka Campaign for Peace and Justice report on Sri Lanka’s response to the previous UPR here
Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details.
Your email address will not be published.