23 May, 2022


Sri Lanka, Through The Bathiudeen-Mirror

By Tisaranee Gunasekara –


“It is society that is dying so the tyrants can live” 
Irène Némirovsky, (Suite Française)

A magistrate is not a displaced Tamil, a Sinhala worker or a university student; a magistrate is not even a journalist or a Samurdhi official. A magistrate is a far more august personage; the representative of an institution which is an indispensable pillar of any functioning democracy. But neither magistrates nor the judiciary are safe in a country with a power-elite habituated into trampling underfoot anyone or anything standing in its marauding way.

When Rishad Bathiudeen allegedly threatened the Mannar magistrate for refusing to change a judicial decision displeasing to his ministerial-palate, he was not breaking new territory; he was merely taking the next logical step forward in a well-worn path of lawlessness crafted by his political masters.

In a country where dissent is a de facto crime, even dissenting judges cannot be safe. And whenever the judiciary ceases to play by the Rulers’ rules, it may have to suffer the consequences of non-compliance, like all lesser institutions/individuals.
Sri Lanka owes thanks to Minister Bathiudeen for revealing these truths in stark hues.

Reflected in the Bathiudeen-mirror is a ruling elite addicted to power and impunity. Reflected in the Bathiudeen-mirror are a people sunk in a torpor of cowardice and indifference. Reflected in the Bathiudeen-mirror is the extent of our present degradation and our future danger.

In his comments on the Mannar incident, President Rajapaksa did not criticise Minister Bathiudeen. He said that he “regretted the doubts entertained by the Courts…pertaining to a member of his Cabinet” (Daily News – 23.7.2012). He did not say he was outraged by the alleged activities of his minister which caused these doubts. The tattered clichés he used about an independent judiciary served to cover his total lack of condemnation of the alleged attack on judicial independence by his ministerial-henchman.

Constitutionally only the President is above the law. In reality the law cannot touch members of the Rajapaksa clan or key Rajapaksa acolytes. The police are yet to question Nishantha Wickremsinghe, Presidential brother-in-law and Chairman of SriLankan Airlines, who in his interview with The Sunday Leader admitted that his son brought a hoard of undeclared foreign currency into the country (an activity also known as smuggling) and that he stashed this hoard at his home. Presidential offspring and parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa became a lawyer in a manner which caused serious doubts in the public mind about the conduct of the Law College.
When Samurdi officials united to protest the crime committed against a colleague, the President took away Mervyn Silva’s Deputy Ministership and ordered a SLFP and police inquiry. But, in the end, matters were so arranged that the victim said he tied himself to a tree and not a single eyewitness could be found to testify against Mervyn Silva. So Mr. Silva was declared innocent and made a Minister.

If the regime is allowed to have its way, the Mannar inquiry will either exculpate Minister Bathiudeen – as happened with the Mervyn Silva vs. Samurdhi official inquiry; or its (adverse) report will be interred forever in the Presidential safe-box – as happened with the Roshain Chanaka inquiry. Left to their own devices, the Ruling Siblings will not allow Minister Bathiudeen to suffer the legal consequences of his alleged misdeeds. As long as he remains a loyal acolyte, they will protect him, just as they protect Mervyn Silva or Duminda Silva.

The only way the Mannar outrage can have a different ending is if the judiciary and the public insist on a free and fair inquiry which enables the law to take its proper course, leading to the punishment of all the guilty, if any, irrespective of rank and connections.

Necessary Resistance

Last week the UPFA, bowing to public pressure, removed the Chairman of the Akuressa PS, currently in detention for child rape, and appointed the Deputy Chairman in his stead. Within hours, the media revealed that the Deputy Chairman had been charged with rape in 2010. Since the PS polls were held in 2011, those who gave this man nomination and at least some of those who voted for him would have known that they were empowering an alleged rapist.
The Rajapaksas bear the lion-share of guilt for the sad state of Sri Lanka; but that does not mean that we, voters and citizens, are guiltless.

We, the people, bear some responsibility for what befalls us governmentally, even in a semi-democracy in transition to an autocracy. Even the most dictatorial rulers are sensitive to sustained and public pressure from their core-support groups. For instance, faced with protests from their base, the Nazis ended the gassing of the mentally-ill and postponed the deportation of Jewish spouses of ‘Aryan’ Berliners.

In Rajapaksa Sri Lanka, protest matters, because it has an occasional chance of success. The protest by private sector workers compelled the regime to withdraw its kleptocratic pension-plan. Resistance has so far saved Colombo’s poor from being evicted from their homes, en masse. The regime has reportedly abandoned a plan to construct two airports in the hill-country, due to public outcries.

So there is an alternative to silence and inaction, to wringing hands and asking, rhetorically, ‘but what can we do?’ Because our collective voices can still prevent, delay, alleviate and mitigate some of the worst excesses of the regime, some of the time. True, resistance is a risky business; the struggle against the private pension rip-off cost a young life. But the alternative is equally unpalatable – allowing the Siblings and their kith and kin to turn Sri Lanka into a dysfunctional, lawless unliveable place.
Mahinda Rajapaksa’s megalomania or Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s lingua franca is not the greatest of problems facing Sri Lanka. The steady undermining of every public institution and service should concern all Lankans of every political hue and none. The ongoing Z-Score fiasco is emblematic of this general crisis. Sri Lanka has been having public examinations with remarkable efficacy until the Rajapaksas came in and placed education in the hands of the incomparable Bandula Gunawardene and the inimitable S. B. Dissanayake. Today AL Exams have become a veritable labyrinth of horror. The colossal damage done to the education system and other public institutions should concern even avid Rajapaksa supporters because, unlike the absence of a political solution or white-vanning, it affects every Lankan, directly or indirectly.

The Rajapaksas cannot be dislodged until the ‘hunger in the belly and hunger to be free’ (Grayling) coincide – and that can take a while. If it is possible to oust the Rajapaksas at the next election, there would be no urgent need to resist them in the interim. Unfortunately, thanks to the 18th Amendment (enabled by a pliant Supreme Court), the Rajapaksas will rule hard and rule long, barring a fluke. This is precisely why the worst Rajapaksa excesses must be resisted in between elections, even by Rajapaksa supporters. There is no other way to prevent Sri Lanka from becoming an unliveable land; or to ensure that the country is in a salvageable state on the day the Rajapaksas are finally dislodged.
The Bathiudeen-mirror has shown us what the future will be, if we fail to resist.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    The Chief Justice has reportedly said that the “Bathiudeen Affair” is a private matter between Bathiudeen and the Mannar magistrate.
    So,we now know which way the wind is blowing.

    • 0


  • 0

    Thissaranee’s is biased as all other allegations by the lawyers and judiciary. She and all others do not believe that an accused is innocent until proven guilty when it comes to themselves – the holy cows. It is disgraceful that the lawyers and the judiciary should go down to such low levels and pronounce a person guilty without proving their charges. This is the legal system we live in and how can governance be improved when people who are supposed to be the custodians of democracy behave like thugs. Has anyone ever looked back at the judgement of the manner judiciary either related to land rights, fishing rights, agricultural rights or just the right to return for these innocent Muslims who were expelled and ask to levee without any of their belongings overnight. Does anyone care about the Muslim refugees as much as the other christian and Hindu refugees?. Has anyone looked at all the petitions submitted to the JSS against this particular judge? Can a person who is party to a legal case ever be the Judge? Can a judge order the arrest of persons demonstrating against him? These are legal and moral questions which the lawyers and judiciary should first answer before they condemn an alleged offender even without an inquiry.
    Has anyone spoken out against the magistrate who walks out on to the street and orders the police to shoot at a group of peaceful protesters? Like in any other situation, any one would react and pelting stones is the least they can do when they have been ordered to be killed. First, the conduct of the Magistrate should be inquired in to before any other inquiry. It is also been brought to the attention of the Public that a programme which interviewed Rishard Bathyudeen has been stopped by lawyers who represent the platform for freedom. They have exposed their biased agenda. Should they have allowed the victim to express his opinion. YA Television has been producing all programmes which are anti-government and they should be punished in the same way by the government. TNL TV which is owned by the opposition leaders family is also supporting the present government and in future any programme critical of government will also get the same treatment. For these lawyers who speak about human rights, freedom of expression or any other right, the rights of the holy cows are more important than what they say in their meetings and demonstrations. Is this justice delivered from an independent judiciary.

    The Judiciary, The State, The UN or International agencies just do not care. about the plight of the Muslim returnees

    • 0

      Thereis a prima-facie allegation and the correct action has been taken,
      by Lawyers themselves. You have to let the action takes its course,
      and not relate irrelavant matters to the charges.

  • 0

    It is painful to see INJUSTICE committed right in front of the eyes of the masses and the perpetrators getting away scot free. I am sure many entertain the idea of liquidating these individuals so that the rest of society can live better. Unfortunately many of us are unable to, due to the concern of the families that will suffer dire consequences if we do so. The only consolation I have is that we are not here for ever and ever. Thank whoever for that!

  • 0

    Thanks Tissaranee – hats off to you again! There is another socio- political reality that explains the goon Bathudin. The Muslims have benefited at the expense of the Tamils through out the war. This is a fact; not a statement of prejudice. For instance, drive along the eastern province and you will see that the most developed town today is Kathankudi – not Batti and not Trinco which were historically far more important Tamil dominated towns.
    The ‘success’ of the Muslim middle-man during the war has been enabled by their utterly unprincipled Politicians like Rauf Hakeem who have made alliances with dictatorships for personal and communal gain. Of course no one denies that the barbari LTTE hounded and ethnically cleansed the Muslims, but they have made much mileage out of this. The plight of the Tamils in Lanka today, a once educated and industrious people is aparent by the fact that they are ruled today by uneducated war lords supported by the Rajapakse goon-ocracy. Tamils are second class citizens in Lanka also due to the arrogant absentee landlord bahaviour of the TNA and this has made the Muslim political upstarts arrogant and abusive. This is the context in which a Muslim political goon intimidates a Tamil Magistrate with the tacit support of a racist Sinhala regime.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.