26 April, 2024

Blog

The Final Threat To Sri Lanka’s National Security Is New Media

By Gotabaya Rajapaksa

Gotabaya Rajapaksa

I welcome you to this lecture under the National Interest Module of the inaugural MPhil/PhD Programme of the Kotelawala Defence University. The topic of this lecture is “Sri Lanka’s National Security Concerns”. As we all know, Sri Lanka is one of the most peaceful and stable countries in the world today. Our citizens are enjoying the benefits of peace and have complete freedom and countless opportunities to build better futures for themselves. At the same time, it must be understood that as with any other sovereign nation, Sri Lanka faces potential threats from various sources. Guarding against these threats and ensuring the safety of the nation is the first duty of the Government, because National Security is the foundation of our freedom and our prosperity. As such, the Government needs to be fully aware of all the issues that impact the country in areas such as Defence, Foreign Policy, Economic Affairs and internal Law & Order. It must formulate a comprehensive National Security strategy to deal with them.

A viable National Security strategy must constantly align ends with means, goals with resources, and objectives with the tools required to accomplish them. The strategy needs to be aligned with the aspirations of the people, and it must have public support. Ideally, if comprehensive security is to be ensured, it requires the achievement of national cohesion, political and economic stability, the elimination of terrorism, the countering of extremism, and the formulation of effective responses to external challenges. The Government must make every effort to keep aware of a continually changing situation and take appropriate action in response to new developments and challenges. It is only then that the safety of the nation can be assured.

In the course of this lecture on Sri Lanka’s National Security Concerns, I will examine the following areas:

Sri Lanka’s overall National Security context

The primary threats to our National Security at present; and,

The strategies that are being formulated in response to these threats.

The Context of National Security in Sri Lanka

In the first several years after the achievement of Independence, National Security did not need to be a primary concern of the Government of Ceylon. As an independent Dominion of Great Britain, and as a non-aligned nation with excellent relationships within and outside the region, there were few pressing threats that the Government had to deal with. As a result, the attention given to National Security was minimal, as was the emphasis placed on the country’s Defence apparatus. The military was largely ceremonial. It only had to assist the Government on occasions when there were issues such as public sector work stoppages or riots. The need to strengthen law enforcement and the Armed Forces to protect the nation against internal or external threats was not seen as a pressing concern. The attempted coup d’‚tat in 1962 further reduced the attention given to the Defence apparatus by the Government. Due to fears that a strong military would be a threat to democracy, as had been the case in some neighbouring countries during this period, funding for the Armed Forces was drastically reduced and recruitments curtailed.

As a result of the weakening of the military, the country was not in the best position to deal with the first major threat to its National Security when it erupted in 1971. This was the first JVP Insurrection. Although investigations into JVP activities had been going on for some time, cutbacks to intelligence services, including the closure of the Special Branch of the Police in 1970, had left the Government largely unaware of the scale of the insurrection it was facing. The nation’s military was overstretched. In response to the Government’s appeals for help, India and Pakistan sent in troops to secure critical installations while essential equipment and ammunition was provided by Britain and the Soviet Union. Although the insurrection was successfully suppressed within a short time, it had many consequences. One of the most crucial from a historical perspective was that National Security became a much greater concern both for the Government and for the general public. As Ceylon became Sri Lanka in 1972, upholding National Security was one of its foremost priorities.

In the late 1970s, Sri Lanka saw the emergence of the greatest ever threat to its sovereignty in the form of the terrorism of the Tamil separatist groups in the North and East. As the conflict worsened in the early 1980s, particularly after the riots of 1983, the threat of terrorism loomed large not only in the North and East but effectively all over the country. The rise of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), and the likelihood of its attacks in public places fostered a deep insecurity amongst the people. There was significant loss of life, loss of property, and countless lost opportunities to achieve economic development. The law and order situation deteriorated as arms and ammunition started to flow to criminal elements in the underworld. By the late 1980s, the second JVP insurrection caused the further deterioration of the security situation throughout Sri Lanka. As a result of the increasing instability and violence, people began to lose some of their freedoms as more and more intensive measures had to be taken by the state in trying to uphold public security.

As the terrorism situation worsened, there was also an increasing involvement of foreign powers and the international community in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs. During the early stages of the terrorist conflict, India trained LTTE cadres in training bases established in Tamil Nadu. Many of the leaders of other separatist groups also frequented that state. It is also important to note that several international Non Governmental Organisations that were based in the North and East first started to cooperate with the terrorist groups active in those areas during this period. In 1985, India facilitated talks between the Government of Sri Lanka and the separatist groups in Thimpu, Bhutan. The talks collapsed due to the unrealistic demands made by the separatists. These demands would have gravely affected Sri Lanka’s sovereignty if granted, and the Government had no choice but to refuse them. Fighting soon resumed. By this time, the conflict transformed into one between the state and the LTTE, which had used the ceasefire granted for the Thimpu talks to destroy rival separatist groups.

As the fighting gained momentum, the emphasis given to National Security by the Government also increased. For the first time, the appointment of a Minister of National Security was seen as necessary. The strength of the military was also significantly enhanced, with larger recruitment drives, the acquisition of better assets, and improved training to counter the growing threats. With its improved capabilities, the military was able to make more and more progress in fighting the terrorism of the LTTE. For the first time, we also saw changes within the structure of the military. The need for a coordinated effort to combat terrorism led to the establishment of a Joint Operation Command to coordinate the three Armed Services, Police and Intelligence Services in counter terrorism operations. The military used battle formations for the first time, and the requirement for a National Intelligence Bureau to coordinate the intelligence services at a national level was also understood and subsequently brought into being.

In 1987, the very successful Vadamarachchi Operation enabled the Government to regain control of much of the North, leaving the LTTE on the brink of defeat. At this point, India intervened directly in the conflict by air dropping humanitarian relief supplies over Jaffna. This led to the abandonment of the Vadamarachchi operation, and the Indo-Lanka Accord was signed in July of that year. This led to the induction of the Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) to the North of Sri Lanka, where it got embroiled in conflict with the LTTE. After more than two years of fighting, the IPKF withdrew from Sri Lanka in October 1990, and fighting resumed between the LTTE and Government Forces.

Although there were several periodic attempts at peace talks, the intensity of the war grew during the 1990s and in the early 2000s, with several major battles being fought and much hardship suffered throughout the country. The military was strengthened significantly to deal with this threat. Specialised units such as the Commando Regiment and the Special Forces Regiment of the Army, as well as the Special Boat Squadron of the Navy were developed to deal with the increasing military challenge posed by the LTTE in the North and East. However, in addition to its battles with the military, the LTTE also frequently carried out attacks against civilians in the rest of the country. Large bombings took place in public locations in Colombo, killing thousands. Hundreds more were massacred in vulnerable villages near LTTE dominated territory. Critical installations and economic targets such as the International Airport, Central Bank and the Kolonnawa Oil Refinery were also ruthlessly attacked. In order to contain this very serious threat to national security, precautionary measures had to be greatly increased throughout the country. This led to the visible presence of soldiers on the streets, the widespread use of checkpoints, frequent cordon and search operations, and the constant upholding of the Emergency Regulations, which gave wide-ranging powers to the military and law enforcement agencies. The entire country was effectively on a war footing.

In 2002, the next major development in the conflict was the signing of the Ceasefire Agreement with the LTTE under mediation of Norway. This event can also be viewed as the next major phase in the internationalisation of Sri Lankan affairs as a result of the conflict. The Peace Process that was entered into by the Government of the time was facilitated by Norway, with the support of the representatives of major donor countries, namely the European Union, the United States of America and Japan. Together with Norway, they comprised the four Co-Chairs of the Sri Lankan Peace Process. A Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission was also established, comprising members from Nordic countries, to supervise the implementation of the Ceasefire Agreement. Despite their presence, the LTTE continued to create instability in the country; assassinating its key opponents including Hon. Lakshman Kadirgamar, the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister, and carrying out occasional attacks against civilians.

In 2006, increasing provocations by the LTTE culminated in its threatening of a humanitarian crisis by closing the vital Maavilaru Sluice Gate. This was a crisis that affected the right to water of thousands of households, and even affected national food security by preventing the flow of water to many thousands of acres of agricultural land. The Government intervened with a limited operation to reopen the sluice gate, but was met with large-scale attacks by the LTTE on several fronts. This led to the widening of the military campaign into the Humanitarian Operation that ultimately freed Sri Lanka from terrorism.

The Humanitarian Operation required significant strengthening of the military to enable its success. During the ceasefire period, the LTTE had managed to strengthen its offensive capabilities significantly. It had approximately 30,000 cadres in its ranks and a vast arsenal of weapons and equipment that included heavy artillery, mortar, missiles, rocket propelled grenades, and light aircraft. Combating such an enemy that employed guerrilla tactics required the Sri Lankan Armed Forces to grow significantly. Between the end of 2005 and the end of 2009, the number of Army personnel grew from 120,000 to over 200,000; its 9 Divisions were increased to 20; its 44 Brigades expanded to 71; and its 149 Battalions increased to 284. The Navy and the Air Force were also expanded significantly, and given tasks beyond their classic role. The upholding of security throughout the country also required the Police and Special Task Force to be strengthened, and the Civil Defence Force was revamped and significantly expanded.

Because of the internationalisation of the Sri Lankan situation during the previous decades, there was a great deal of foreign scrutiny on the progress of the Humanitarian Operation. By keeping the Indian leaders constantly informed about what was happening on ground, and by skilfully managing our relationships with other nations, it was possible for the war effort to continue unimpeded. Nevertheless, towards the end of the war in 2009, the Foreign Ministers of France and the United Kingdom arrived in Sri Lanka and attempted to intervene in the military campaign, although they did not succeed. Efforts by such parties to end the Humanitarian Operation reflect the tremendous influence that the LTTE’s international network had on foreign capitals. Many in the international community wilfully ignored the fact that the Government of Sri Lanka was duty-bound to protect its citizens from the aggression of the LTTE terrorists. Even after the war ended and peace dawned in 2009, this bias against the Government led to Sri Lanka being taken up at the United Nations Human Rights Council. Although the initial Resolution against Sri Lanka was defeated that year, two more were sponsored by the United States in 2012 and 2013, and successfully passed.

Today, Sri Lanka is a country enjoying the full benefits of peace, and it is engaged in a concerted push to accelerate its economic development and bring prosperity to its citizens. The country has much to catch up on. Three decades of conflict lost us countless opportunities for growth: foreign and local investment suffered due to fears about the war; tourists did not visit the country, and many of our best and brightest went overseas to build better futures for themselves. Countries such as Singapore, which were in a similar economic position to Sri Lanka when we reached Independence in 1948, developed at a tremendous rate during this period. This is because they did not have a major conflict to contend with. Sri Lanka’s prospects on the other hand were greatly curtailed as a result of the war. This is why the biggest responsibility of the Government of Sri Lanka even today, in the post war situation, is to ensure the continued security of the country. Without security and stability, there will be no economic development. The maintenance of National Security is therefore of the utmost importance.

The National Security of Sri Lanka needs to be addressed in context of the history of this country and the realities of its present situation, and most critically from the perspective of several responsibilities of the state. The state must ensure that the Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of the nation is maintained, and that there are no threats to the safety of our population. Ensuring economic growth so that the people of the country can uplift their standard of living is also critical in order to prevent internal problems recurring in the future. Creating a favourable environment for Sri Lanka internationally is similarly of the utmost importance in keeping adverse external influence at bay. Securing the safety of our physical assets and safeguarding the nation’s democracy are also critical. Considering this overall context, it is clear that National Security must be understood within a unified, single framework that integrates the nation’s Defence, Law and Order, Foreign Policy and Economic Policy. These four areas need to come together in the creation of a comprehensive National Security Strategy. This is essential if Sri Lanka is to consolidate its present peace and stability and fulfil its potential.

Present National Security Concerns

There are several potential threats in today’s context that Sri Lanka needs to be concerned about. These include:

The possible re-emergence of terrorism

The emergence of other extremist groups

The creation of ethnic divisions and communal violence

The challenges of maritime security and border control

The growth of organised crime

Foreign interference in domestic affairs

Non-traditional threats through technology driven new media, including social media.

In discussing terrorism, it is first of all important to appreciate the sheer scale of the problem that the Government of Sri Lanka was confronted with as a result of the LTTE over the past three decades. Since the 1970s, the LTTE grew from a small organisation of armed individuals to a large, sophisticated terrorist outfit with very advanced combat capabilities. At its height, the LTTE had more than 30,000 battle-hardened cadres; access to large stockpiles of modern armaments, ammunition and equipment; a sophisticated naval wing and a fledgling air wing. For a considerable period of the conflict, the LTTE was able to maintain the illusion of a functional state apparatus in the territories it dominated. It also had significant influence in foreign capitals as a result of its extensive international network. Defeating the LTTE required a concerted effort on the part of the Sri Lankan Government. As a result of the unwavering leadership of His Excellency the President Mahinda Rajapaksa, this task was achieved in May of 2009.

In the immediate aftermath of the war, there were a number of issues that needed to be dealt with. First was the problem of nearly 300,000 internally displaced people who had been used as the LTTE’s human shield during the last phases of the war. Then there was the need to demine the North and East so that those areas would be safe for human habitation. This resulted in the recovery of hundreds of thousands of mines and improvised explosive devices laid by the LTTE during its retreat. Infrastructure development and reconstruction of those areas after years of neglect under the LTTE’s dominance was another significant issue that had to be dealt with, after which it was possible to resettle the IDPs in their places of origin. One of the most important issues was dealing with the nearly twelve thousand surrendered LTTE cadres and four thousand detained cadres. The Government took the bold step of rehabilitating nearly all of them so that they could become productive citizens in future. The vast majority of them have already been reintegrated with society.

Amongst other post war achievements has been the disarming of other armed groups that used to operate in the North and East, and the encouragement these groups have been given to contribute to society through democratic processes. The restrictions that used to be in force on movement, fishing, high security zones etc., have all been removed. Democracy has been completely restored, with free and fair elections taking place. Economic growth in the North and East has been truly remarkable in the recent past, and it is clear beyond doubt that normalcy has been restored to the people.

Despite all of these very positive developments, however, the threat of terrorism re-emerging still persists. One of the main reasons for the LTTE’s success during its heyday was its extensive international network, which has been in operation for many decades. Following the ambush and massacre of 13 soldiers in the North by the LTTE in 1983, there was a major communal backlash against the Tamils in the rest of the country. As a result of the July 1983 riots, a large number of Tamil people left Sri Lanka and travelled to countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, Malaysia and parts of Europe. These countries granted asylum to these immigrants, and later granted them citizenship. As such, there is a large population of immigrant Sri Lankan Tamils in other countries. A small minority of this population supports the LTTE even to this day. Extremist elements within this community, together with LTTE agents and operatives, including trained terrorists who fled Sri Lanka at various times during the war, comprise the LTTE’s international network.

After the demise of Prabhakaran, the LTTE’s former procurement chief Kumaran Pathmanadan, better known as KP, took control over this network and indicated that it would continue to work for the separatist cause through peaceful means. However, a breakaway faction emerged almost immediately, led by Nediyawan, who wanted to continue Prabhakaran’s ideology of violence. Nediyawan’s group, was previously known as The Tamil Eelam People’s Assembly or the Tamil National Council and is now known as the Tamil Coordinating Committee, Based in Norway, this group has been working with other international groups to promote the LTTE’s separatist cause in many parts of the world. The Tamil Coordinating Committee has control over most of the assets of the LTTE’s international organisation, including its media networks such as Tamil Net.

Following the arrest of KP in August 2009, Rudrakumaran took over the leadership of the main network and began working towards establishing a “Government in Exile”. This group now fashions itself as The Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam. In the guise of fighting for Tamil rights, its primary objective is to lobby foreign Governments for the establishment of a separate state in the North and East of Sri Lanka. The so-called “Transnational Government” has about twenty “Ministers” and “Deputy Ministers”, and was formed with assistance of an advisory committee comprising prominent pro LTTE activists, including foreigners who have been helping the LTTE for many years. There has recently been a revolt within the TGTE, where one third of its members loyal to Nediyawan, went against the leadership of Rudrakumaran because they wished to engage in more radical action.

Another prominent LTTE-linked group emerged out of the British Tamils Association, which was active since 2001 in supporting the terrorism of the LTTE in Sri Lanka. In 2006, the leader of the BTA, Arunachalam Krishanthakumar, alias Shanthan, was investigated on suspicion of supporting terrorist activities. As a result of these suspicions about the BTA, the British Tamils Forum was formed in 2006 to carry on the same activities in a new guise. The BTF acted as an umbrella organisation that mustered support from the immigrant Tamil community and local British politicians for dividing Sri Lanka. With Shanthan’s arrest by British authorities in June 2007 for providing material support to terrorism and his conviction in April 2009, as well as the defeat of the LTTE in May 2009, the role played by the BTF needed to be changed to suit the post-war environment.

As a result of this, the Global Tamils Forum emerged in February 2010, with many of the same members as the BTF. The head of the GTF is the so-called Father Emmanuel, a Priest who was once hailed by Prabhakaran as “a freedom fighter who has given leadership to a movement committed to setting up the homeland to Tamil Eelam”. Father Emmanuel has been engaged in a propaganda campaign against Sri Lanka for many years, targeting Tamil expatriates, Foreign Governments and International Organisations. He is known to have visited LTTE strongholds in Sri Lanka in mid-2000 to conduct training for selected youth who were earmarked to take up overseas appointments for fundraising and propaganda for the LTTE.

Under Father Emmanuel’s guidance, the GTF has successfully influenced a number of politicians from various political parties in European countries as well as the United States, Australia, Canada, and India to support the separatist cause. In addition, the GTF has courted officials within international organisations such as the United Nations, the European Union and various international non-governmental organisations to obtain their support. Part of the success of the GTF in these activities can be attributed to the involvement of influential pro-LTTE foreigners in it. These include Mrs. Joan Ryan, a former British Parliamentarian who has become the Head of the GTF’s Secretariat.

Yet another group that is active internationally in supporting the separatist cause is the LTTE Headquarter Group, which is based in France and headed by Vinayagam, a senior intelligence cadre who managed to escape during the final stages of the war in Sri Lanka. This is a group that is known to engage in Human Smuggling, with some of its past operations including the sending of the “Sun Sea” and “Ocean Lady” vessels from South East Asia to Canada in 2009 and 2010. The members of this group generally maintain a low profile and their movements are kept to a minimum as most of them have been issued Red Notices by Interpol for their involvement in criminal activities. They also keep their distance from both Nediyawan’s and Rudrakumaran’s groups, but maintain links with the GTF.

All of the LTTE-linked groups are coordinated by the GTF and united by one overarching objective. Their unwavering intent is the division of Sri Lanka and the establishment of a separate state for Tamil Eelam. There are several strategies through which they will try to achieve their objective. These include:

The winning of international opinion for the separatist cause,

Increasing international pressure on Sri Lanka in various areas; including pushing for international investigations into war crimes and claims of genocide, and by encouraging international monitoring of the national reconciliation process,

Undermining all efforts of the democratically elected Government of Sri Lanka to create a better future for its citizens through reconciliation and economic development, and

Continuing to push for the resumption of conflict through reorganizing local pro-LTTE elements within Sri Lanka.

Some of the efforts of these LTTE-linked groups have been successful to a certain extent in that despite the war having ended four years ago, the internal affairs of Sri Lanka have been kept at the forefront of the UNHRC’s Sessions as well as at the top of the agenda of several prominent international NGOs even in the recent past. It has to be noted that many of those who create this pressure by claiming to be human rights activists and victims of state repression are actually trained LTTE cadres and operatives who are now fully engaged in propaganda activities. It is very important to understand that their attempts to put pressure on the Government through international bodies such as the UNHRC and non state actors such as international NGOs is designed to strengthen those who work against Sri Lanka’s interests.

In this context it is important to realise that there are groups even within the democratic mainstream in Sri Lanka that obtain funding from the LTTE’s international network and pro-LTTE elements overseas, which more or less openly talk about achieving the very same objectives that the LTTE had. Though they appear to have a democratic face, their actions and remarks clearly show that the extremist separatist ideology has not yet disappeared. Their ultimate objective is achieving the division of Sri Lanka. As a result of their actions and statements, it is very much a possibility that certain radical elements will feel empowered to once again attempt to take up arms in the name of separation. This is a major National Security threat that needs to be taken with the utmost seriousness.

In addition to the threat of terrorism, Sri Lanka also faces a potential threat from other extremist groups. These are the remnants of the radical groups that were involved in previous insurgencies. Some of these groups are trying to reorganise within Sri Lanka and mobilise people to once again take up their extreme left wing causes. There is information that some of these groups have started to link up with the LTTE-linked groups to create further problems in Sri Lanka. Some of their activities include radicalising students and encouraging them to take to the streets in various protests. Though such activities are still in their early stages, they pose another serious National Security concern that we need to be vigilant of.

Another growing concern in the post-war environment is the increasing communalism amongst ethnic groups, which if left unaddressed, could result in the rise of ethnic tensions in the future. During the period of the war, it was not only the Sinhalese and Tamil communities that were affected by the terrorist separatism of the LTTE, but also the Muslims. After the LTTE started engaging in ethnic cleansing in the North in the early 1980s, it expelled the Sinhalese community from Jaffna and soon after turned its attention to the Muslims. Several massacres were carried out at Mosques in the East, and in October 1990, the LTTE expelled more than 75,000 Muslim residents from the North. This was followed by further brutal attacks on Muslims in vulnerable villages near the territory dominated by the LTTE. In this environment, the Muslims also started to organise themselves for their own protection against the LTTE. After the LTTE’s defeat, some of these groups have begun to engage in activities that stem far beyond self-protection. There is some information that some of these groups have even tried to link up with the global Islamic terrorist movement. This is a situation that requires careful monitoring.

On a broader scale, it also has to be acknowledged that one of the consequences of the terrorist conflict Sri Lanka endured for thirty years has been the increased insularity of ethnic groups. Rather than identifying themselves on the basis of nationality, the communities of Sri Lanka have begun to identify themselves on the basis of their ethnicity or their religion. Instead of calling themselves Sri Lankan, they identify themselves as Sinhalese or Tamils or Muslims or Buddhists or Christians. This fragmentation of the Sri Lankan identity is most unfortunate, because activists within these communal groups seek minority rights or ethnic rights rather than working within the framework of a common national identity.

The cross-border links that can arise as a result of such insular ethnic or religious identification is also very troublesome. It is clear that there are some in the Tamil community who identify themselves more with the Tamil community of Tamil Nadu than with their fellow Sri Lankans. This has been encouraged by some parties overseas who wish to promote the idea of a greater Tamil Nation. Similarly, it has been observed that there are some foreign groups that wish to encourage Sri Lankan Muslims to identify themselves more with the global Muslim community, thereby reducing their integration within Sri Lanka. This trend has been particularly prevalent in the post September 11 world, in which there has been a tendency among certain groups to try and influence the global Muslim community towards religious extremism has become visible.

The increasing insularity and cohesion amongst minority ethnic groups has also led to the emergence of hard line groups from the majority community: the popularity of certain political groups and movements can be viewed as being largely a response to this trend. In turn, the emergence of hard line groups in the majority community causes further tensions amongst other communities, which leads to a vicious cycle of greater fragmentation of the Sri Lankan identity. Sri Lanka had enough divisions in the past that ultimately led to conflict; we must learn the lessons from our past and ensure that history is not repeated. This is therefore a very serious National Security concern at the present moment.

The maintenance of maritime security is another serious National Security Concern that the Government needs to be vigilant about. As an island, Sri Lanka does not have land borders to worry about, but maintaining maritime security is a serious challenge. In the past, the only maritime security issues that had to be dealt with was the illegal movement of Indians into Sri Lanka and the smuggling that took place between Sri Lanka and South India. Preventing these threats was one of the foremost duties of the military in the 1950s and the 1960s. However, with the development of the LTTE and other terrorist groups in the 1970s and beyond, maritime security became a major concern to Sri Lanka.

For example, it is a well-known fact that the LTTE acquired a vast arsenal of weapons and equipment including artillery, missiles, mortars, armoured vehicles and even light aircraft. None of these items were produced in Sri Lanka, but were brought into Sri Lanka through the sea. In addition to military supplies, the LTTE’s cadres were initially trained at bases in Tamil Nadu. Given the recent activities of LTTE-linked organisations outside Sri Lanka and particularly in Tamil Nadu, this is very much a current threat even today.

The organised trafficking of persons or human smuggling is another significant maritime security issue. Organised groups, some of which are connected to LTTE-linked organisations, have lured many people seeking better economic prospects into this lucrative illegal operation. During this year alone, more than 440 such people have attempted to leave Sri Lanka illegally. Having sold their properties and handed over all their wealth to the operators of these schemes, the victims of human trafficking find themselves trapped on board unsafe vessels along with hundreds of others, travelling to countries that will most often refuse them entry. In order to make a compelling case for their acceptance by border control authorities abroad, such economic refugees often concoct stories about being persecuted in Sri Lanka, thereby damaging the country’s reputation. Furthermore, the mechanisms of human trafficking have enabled trained terrorists to escape justice in Sri Lanka and flee abroad to safe havens, from which they may once again attempt to cause problems to the country through other means.

A further consideration with regard to maritime security is the protection of our maritime assets. One of the problems Sri Lanka has faced in the maritime domain after the defeat of the LTTE has been the increasing incidence of pirate fishing in Sri Lankan waters by South Indian fishermen. These fishermen use illegal practices such as bottom trawling to maximise their catch. This causes serious damage to the healthy fish stocks in Sri Lankan waters, and also adversely affects the livelihoods of our own fishermen. These fishing boats that enter Sri Lankan waters illegally have also been known to engage in other criminal activities including drug smuggling. Protecting our waters from these fishermen, as well as from others who might seek to exploit our other oceanic resources including oil and gas, will be one of the key maritime security challenges for Sri Lanka in the future.

Somewhat farther afield, the threat of international piracy is also a concern for Sri Lanka’s maritime security. Many of the world’s most important Sea Lanes of Communications are located in close proximity to Sri Lanka, and both the newly built Hambantota Port as well as the Colombo port are ideally situated to service the hundreds of vessels that cross these lanes on a daily basis. The reach and sophistication of the pirates originating mostly from East Africa has been increasing in recent years. This factor undermines the security of these Sea Lanes and could pose a serious problem to shipping in the region in the future. This will have an impact on the country’s economic security as well, and is therefore another challenge that needs to be monitored.

With regard to border security, one of the concerns Sri Lanka has is the possibility of the country being used as a transit point for transnational crime. The arrest of certain elements connected with extremist regional terrorist groups in India and Pakistan have shown that they have used Sri Lanka as a transit point from which to coordinate their activities. Some who are known to have been temporarily sheltered in Sri Lanka by an International Organisation after claiming refugee status in the west, are known criminals who engaged in illegal activities such as credit card fraud, drug smuggling and counterfeit currency printing abroad.

Organised crime in Sri Lanka is another issue that needs to be addressed. As a result of the rise of terrorism and the insurrections Sri Lanka experienced over the last forty years, and the response required from the state, a considerable amount of arms and ammunition inadvertently fell into the hands of criminals. This led to the rise of the underworld, which is now engaged in a number of organised criminal activities including drugs, armed robberies, kidnappings for ransom and financial frauds. There are also groups that engage in seizing land illegally. Tackling the challenges posed by organised criminal groups is another priority for the state.

In today’s environment, the possibility of foreign interference in our internal affairs remains a significant National Security concern. With the involvement of countries like India, Norway, and the United States of America in Sri Lanka as a result of the terrorist conflict, matters relating to this country’s internal affairs have gained increased visibility within the international community. India in particular is very sensitive to what is going on in Sri Lanka because of the large Tamil population in its influential southern state of Tamil Nadu. Especially during the elections cycle, Sri Lanka figures large in its power politics. In the recent past, we have seen even the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu attempting to pressurise the central government into opposing Sri Lanka internationally. This is a serious threat to Sri Lanka’s security, and perhaps even its sovereignty.

Furthermore, as a result of the rapid economic and military development of countries like India and China in recent decades, the entire Asian region has become increasingly important in global affairs. Because of Sri Lanka’s important geostrategic position within the Indian Ocean region, a great deal of attention is therefore placed upon it in the present era. There is a possibility that some western powers wish to have a Sri Lankan Government that is closely aligned with their interests, and will seek to influence Sri Lanka’s destiny so that it cannot pursue the independent course it is following at present.

A third factor that has led to Sri Lanka’s increasing importance in the international arena involves regional power politics. The issues between India and Pakistan, and the issues between India and China are particularly sensitive in this regard. With the rise of China as a world economic leader, there is a widespread belief that India feels insecure and is seeking to align itself with the other powers that seem similarly threatened by China’s ascendancy. The likelihood of the United States showing more interest in the region and aligning more with India is a factor that may affect Sri Lanka. Further, its establishment of a base in the Maldives is also changing the complexion of the region. These are developments that need to be monitored from the point of view of Sri Lanka’s national security.

The final threat to Sri Lanka’s National Security that I will highlight during this lecture is the emergence of technology driven new media including social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and other websites on the Internet. We have seen the potential of this new media to destabilise nations and affect serious change in the case of countries like Tunisia, Libya, Egypt etc. Although the likelihood of events such as the Arab spring transpiring in Sri Lanka is minimal as a result of it being a democratic nation with an extremely popular political leadership that enjoys a very large electoral majority, this is yet another threat that needs to be monitored. Particularly due to increasing Internet penetration and computer literacy in Sri Lanka, many of our youth are familiar with social media and use it as a tool to gather information as well as propagate ideas. Those with vested interests can exploit social media to cause problems in Sri Lanka by propagating certain ideologies online and mobilising and organising people. This can be done with a minimal physical presence, and therefore forms a threat that is difficult to contain through the traditional tools of national defence.

National Security Response

Considering the foregoing threat assessment, it is clear that despite Sri Lanka being in a post-war situation in which most people are only concerned about economic development, National Security remains very much a core concern for the Government. In addressing the challenges discussed above and developing a comprehensive National Security Strategy, it is important for the Government to take a holistic view and incorporate many of its elements into a single policy framework.

In terms of internal security, the best response to most of the threats that we face is the development of the Intelligence Services. Sri Lanka has two primary intelligence arms: the State Intelligence Service and the Defence Intelligence, which comprises the Directorate of Military Intelligence, Directorate of Naval Intelligence, and Air Intelligence. In addition, the Police maintains the Special Branch, while the Special Task Force also has its own Intelligence Division. Furthermore, the Terrorist Investigation Department and Criminal Investigation Department of the Police also work closely with the other Intelligence agencies on matters relating to National Security.

In the past, the lack of strength and coordination amongst these various intelligence services used to be a serious issue. It is essential that they work together under a unified command structure in order to improve coordination and enhance capabilities. Towards this effect, one of the efforts undertaken by the present Government has been to bring these intelligence services under the Chief of National Intelligence, who reports directly to the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence. This has streamlined coordination and improved cooperation amongst the intelligence agencies.

Another important development in this regard has been the augmenting of resources allocated for the Intelligence function. After the war, the number of military intelligence units have been increased and each Security Force Head quarters now has its own Intelligence Unit. The Intelligence personnel are being afforded more and more training in order to enhance their capabilities and capacities, and as Sri Lanka moves forward, it is hoped that the Intelligence agencies will be able to keep track of and contain domestic National Security concerns.

Furthermore, although the requirement for offensive military operations no longer exists in Sri Lanka, it is of the utmost importance that our security measures are not relaxed. Although the military is not engaged in law enforcement activities, and although their visible presence has been greatly reduced, it is essential for the military to be placed in strategic locations throughout Sri Lanka. Particularly in the North and East, where we know that there are still potential threats to National Security, it is essential to have a significant though unobtrusive military presence. Some recent efforts of international elements to reorganise pro-LTTE elements in the North underscores the need for this. For example, the recent arrest of some youth in Jaffna and Chennai who had been recruited by a Chennai based LTTE-linked group funded by the LTTE’s Europe based network, shows the utmost need to remain vigilant in this regard.

It must also be underscored that as a Sovereign nation, Sri Lanka has every right to place its security elements in any part of the country it so chooses. While some in the international community talk about the so-called militarisation of the North and East, and some political parties in Sri Lanka decry the presence of the military in these areas, it must also be understood that the people of the North and East mostly have a very cordial relationship with the military. Since the end of the war, the military has been involved in a great deal of reconstruction work, and they have also supported the people of the area to resume their livelihoods. They have provided equipment and material for agriculture, fishing and various types of assistance for small business development. The increased attention given to Civic-Military affairs also helps National Security because it helps the Armed Forces to win the hearts and minds of the people in the former conflict areas.

With regard to the work of the Defence services in the post-war environment, it is also essential to expand the responsibilities of the Navy and the Coast Guard. The protection of Sri Lanka’s maritime borders is of the utmost importance, and there is a great deal of responsibility on these two institutions to safeguard our seas. The Exclusive Economic Zone Sri Lanka enjoys needs to be protected, as it is a vital economic asset. The Navy needs to get more naval assets so that it has the ability to patrol or dominate the blue seas. It is also important to improve the Navy’s surveillance capabilities through augmenting its Radars and adding a new air surveillance capability. The Air Force, too, needs to improve it capabilities with regard to surveillance operations.

Another aspect of internal security that needs to be mentioned is the rectification of weaknesses that we used to have with regard to the national identity system. Because it was a manual, paper-based system, criminal and terrorist elements could very easily obtain forged identity cards. This enabled the terrorists to operate throughout Sri Lanka under various names and aliases; this is why the threat of suicide bombings and other attacks in the rest of Sri Lanka was such a pressing problem during the period of the war. To address this critical weakness, the Registrar of Persons Department was brought under the Ministry of Defence & Urban Development, and a new identity card system that uses biometric information will be introduced shortly. Similarly, the problem of people coming into Sri Lanka and staying here illegally under false pretences will be addressed through the introduction of a proper border control system in which biometric information will be incorporated into the passport and international standards used for identity verification.

From the point of view of domestic security, perhaps the most critical aspect will be the achievement of national reconciliation and the forging of a common Sri Lankan identity. Economic development is an absolute necessity in this regard. The fact remains that unless people enjoy a reasonable standard of living, peace and reconciliation are very difficult to achieve. This is why the Government has spared no expense or effort to develop infrastructure and build up the North and East to a high standard. This will enable the benefits of peace to flow down to the people of those areas. When people know that they have the opportunity to achieve a better future for themselves, it is highly unlikely that they will waste their time on violent ideologies. The achievement of economic development and national reconciliation are therefore two of the key areas of focus of the Government in the present national context.

Finally, with regard to external threats, it is of the utmost importance that Sri Lanka maintains cordial relationships with its allies. Despite the present pressure from Tamil Nadu, it is essential to maintain a strong and healthy relationship with India. Relations with the many countries that helped us in the past, both in economic terms and through political support, should be strengthened further through skilful diplomacy and further development of mutual ties. It essential to further strengthen the existing cordial relationships with powerful nations such as China and Russia, which have permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council and can influence any international action on Sri Lanka more significantly than other nations. In this overall context, it is very important that the foreign policy of Sri Lanka needs to be realistic. It is essential for Sri Lanka to have close ties with certain powerful nations in the international community in order to safeguard its National Security interests.

During the course of this lecture I have outlined the overall context of Sri Lanka’s National Security concerns; identified our most pressing threats and discussed the broad outlines of the Government’s strategy to deal with all these issues. Ultimately, the best way to ensure that Sri Lanka remains safe and strong in the future is for all of us to put aside the differences of the past; unite as Sri Lankans, and work towards a better future for ourselves and for each other.

Thank you.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Today the world is interconnected with one another;dependency is unavoidable. When the Government is silent toward hate project such as demolishing of mosques and business organizations on one side and the defense secretary is attending as chief guest to promote organizations that promote hate campaign, simply both Government and Defense Secretary opening the gate for others intervention.

    We need to use the brain to think before uttering as it matters to the entire population of this country. One thing is for sure DS very rarely uses his Brain these days.

    • 0
      0

      Unfortunately, Nande Master’s (GOATa) brain is embedded elsewhere!! Hence he cannot think before uttering?

    • 0
      0

      He actually SITS on his brains… Bet he did NOT pen this article but one of HIS’ YES men did..Further he is just an ordinary ex army guy with NOT much intellect….. I am always awed how a NON citizen of ONE country hold the VERY important position of DEFENSE SECRETARY. Leaking of Vital information is a possibility.

      • 1
        0

        MR and the siblings are the final and only threat to Sri Lanka

        • 0
          0

          I have hardly seen this writer contribute to Colombo Telegraph if at all. Therefore I am puzzled as to why this forum has been chosen.

          Is it to test the kinds of responses the article (speech) receives?

          Is it with a genuine interest in feeling the pulse of the people in order to ensure their welfare?

          Could it possibly be for any other purpose than to inform and educate etc?

          Perhaps more readers should also be asking questions rather than venting their emotions only?

    • 0
      0

      Unfortunately Sri Lanka today is run by Three Blind Mice and Musketeers who know nothing of Governing of a State except Dumb,Lie, Rob, thuggery and double character duplicity.

      It is time to unveil the Mask.

  • 0
    0

    Sorry, the comment language is English – Ct

  • 0
    0

    Bravo . Proud to have a def sec of such a high calibre. He has clearly outlined the threats that SL face . Anyone who try to out smart his lecture is wasting their time . Possibly as they are not fit to hold a candle to GR.(Fathima please note. )

    • 0
      0

      Not the lectures, but the actions by Defence secretary in terms of the safeguarding the security of the general public has become the MOST critical issue for us all today. Why not you guys – as if hallucinated not taking the issues seriously ? Alone the confess of DIG being in REMAND is prima facie evidence of ruler^s extra judicial killings. Why have you got to say about all these ?

    • 0
      0

      This “LECTURE” is the brain-child of his Consultant Rohan Guneratne in
      Singapore. If Gota has this much, he is certainly fit to lead!

      • 0
        0

        Rohan Gundaratna, the WMD warmonger of the UN. The bastard made a lot of money for stitching the Iraqi rags and a bogus stinktank to fiction on terrorizing asian countries based in Stinkapore.

      • 0
        0

        “Gota has so much”… come on, he cannot think straight! If Sri Lanka is so peaceful then why is he having military rule in the North? If Sri Lanka is so peaceful why are the Sinhalese who are the majority leaving the country and asking even asylum in foreign countries? If Sri Lanka is so peaceful why are the news papers being attacked? Where is the peace with BBS (balu bala sena)and the Cheap Justice protecting the government stooges?>

    • 0
      0

      Anyone who support BBS is a racist, including the Rajapaksa. People do talk from both side of their mouth.

    • 0
      0

      Sarojani,

      I am of opinion, there is a Ghost Writer, like punchinilame was eluding to, a Rohan Goonaratna or others.

      However, it is secondary to the information, the message and the issues.

      1. Even though it is a good narrative, like describing the symptoms of the disease, and to how the outbreak spread, this is still Half-Baked.

      Why Half-Baked?

      1, This is a symptoms only.

      2. The disease itself, the roots go back to Monk Mahanam Myths, and the Sinhala Buddhist Racism is nor addressed.

      3. Treatment of the symptoms will not treat the disease. Need to treat the disease. Need to Expunge the Monk Mahanam Myths, just like the German Nazi Myth Master Race was expunged.

      4. This problem has been made worse by the support for the Racist BBS and the breakdown of law and order.

      5. It is becoming clear that it was the Introduction of Buddhism to Jain and Hindu Lanka, that gad a great civilization, that was the downfall, going by what has happened over the past 66 years, curse of Monk Mahanama.

      6. The core problem, the curse of Monk Mahanamam is not addressed,by the writer, in order to arrive at a just society.

      After all that is what the Enlightened Buddha weaned. So Sri Labka does not practice Buddhism,. It practices Mara ism and Racism.

      DeJa Vu……

    • 0
      0

      U want to hold HIS candle seems the case…. DUH it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that this article was NOT personally written by him… Ever heard of “Presidential Speeches” being prepared for THEM by Speech writers?

    • 0
      0

      sarojini you are equally deluded as Gota, the very existence of this government is by hallucinating about non existing threats. What national security is under threat? Time will tell when We come under Chinese rule. The Script writer for Gota has done a very good work using the illogical concepts hatched by MR clan to keep them in Power. Chasing a mirage! Some Gullible Srilankans are unable to infer their government’s plot for their survival. The very weak opposition of Ranil will keep these jokers in power some time, until Sinhala people understand that they are taken for a ride by MR with many deceptions. Try and rationalise all events since 1948 then you will come to some understanding of the present state of affairs.

    • 0
      0

      Sarogini,

      Please watch these two video clips………

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6_jE7bJ03k

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjjH49zQVTc

      and compare the difference between a Mutt and a Wizard.

      Be your own Judge.

    • 0
      0

      sarojini;
      NAD DEAR ALL

      BRAVO I LOVE YOUR TALK SARO [ AKA PAY CHECK BEGGERs].

      BECAUSE, this lecture script’s wordings looks like a script of one Singapore Nanyang Tec Institute Teacher’s.
      SO SO,
      IT IS WASTE OF TIME TO GIVE REPLY TO THIS LECTURE,
      As IT IS NOT GOTHYA’S OWN BRAIN’S WORDINGS or INTERLECT.

      HOOOOOOOOOO.

  • 0
    0

    Trying to next president mattering utter rubbish

  • 0
    0

    Trying to be next president by short cut, mattering utter rubbish

    • 0
      1

      How can he be a candidate for the presidency, he has gotten a record of political exp ? I dont think people would ever accept him as a leader for the country though some idiots add comment that the bugger is more pupular than MR to this date.

  • 0
    0

    tut,tut,tut… ”From the point of view of domestic security, perhaps the most critical aspect will be the achievement of national reconciliation and the forging of a common Sri Lankan identity. Economic development is an absolute necessity in this regard” ??

    No, not in this planet. To achieve national reconciliation and SriLankan identity, all must have political freedom which would naturally lead to many things one of which is economic development.

    Does the author live in another planet?

  • 0
    0

    Dear mr.Gotabhaya Rajapakse,

    An objective analysis, no doubt. However, while the symptoms are well identified, the causes for the JVP insurrections and the Tamil militancy have not been addressed. The outcome is like the medicine, private medical doctors practice. They tend to treat symptoms, without trying to identify the cause- the aetiology. This approach though palliate in the short term, frequently leads to aggravation of the disease. Some patients of course recover. The late Prof, Senaka Bibile called this phenomenon, ” The patient getting well despite the doctor”, and gave credit for this to the natural ability of the body to fight against and overcome disease.

    The JVP insurrections had economic and developmental disparities in their back drop. These were recognised and superficially addressed by the governments of the day. The opportunities that opened up in the middle-east for employment of unskilled and less educated workers, played a much bigger role in treating the cause in this instance.

    However, the Tamil militancy was of a different nature. Open discrimination, societal alienation and state- supported and or sponsored violence against a meek , submissive and timid community, touched a raw nerve among its youth, setting the stage for the birth of the LTTE and the tiger phenomenon. It was not the lack of economic opportunities that bothered and angered the Tamils, but the deprivation of the opportunities that were hither-to available to them, not as a favoured minority, but as a hard working and ambitious minority. They were denied an equal playing field and made aliens in their own country. They were no less patriotic. They were patriotic enough to stand up for their rights in the country that was theirs as much as any others. An upwardly mobile society was deliberately crippled and driven towards backwardness, as a result of deliberate political design. The benefits of development were also deliberately denied to the Tamil-majority provinces. The reaction was natural and justified, though what the tiger phenomenon, was abhorrent.

    For the Sri Lankan identity to be redeveloped, the minorities must be made to feel equal in every way to the majority as citizens. They cannot be forced to become that. The minorities will take pride in their national identity, if they are made to feel secure and comfortable in their communal identities. There should be a level,playing field for every citizen, though he or she may speak a different language and profess a different religion. Development while necessary, especially in the post-war circumstances, will not resolve the deep felt insecurity and alienation of the Tamils. Economic prosperity alone will not remove the feeling of alienation from the national polity among the Tamils. Cake, however well made and decorated, will not substitute for rice.

    The diversity in this country should be recognised, respected and empowered. This is the only way in which national security can be ensured, short of driving all the identifiable minorities into the deep blue sea. Even if the latter is achievable, the fissures within the so-called Sinhala-Buddhist behomith will appear to split asunder the illusion of a homogenous Sri Lankan identity.

    The security apparatus you head and the concepts you as a military person and the Defence Secretary propound will only lead to an undemocratic and authoritarian society, if the government you are a part of fails to address the fundamentals. Your brother, the President seemed to have grasped this fundamental soon after the war ended, but has since lost sight of it.

    Dr.Rajasingham Narendran

    • 0
      0

      Two corrections:

      1. Palliative not palliate.
      2. — though what the tiger phenomenon became, was abhorrent.

      Dr.RN

    • 0
      0

      A good assessment – except I would rather prefer the terms “Tamils” or even Tamil-speaking people to “minorities” now that Suresh P has a case in insisting the Tamils are a majority in their “land” The other point is the reality on the ground before the arrival of the Portugese.
      For anyone in the Sinhala side to spear-head durable reconciliation
      it is necessary they are able to insist on this undeniable historical fact to the Sinhala South, which many are totally unaware of.

      Senguttuvan

  • 0
    0

    Can somebody please tell me that this whole lecture was written by somebody else? He is not G L Peiris to give lectures like this…

    • 0
      0

      Read Puncinilame’s comment – courtesy Rohan Guneratne

    • 0
      0

      For that matter this bugger cannot even speak or write proper English nor Sinhalese!

  • 0
    0

    Gota seems to have got the point that forging a srilankan identity is a must for unity and lasting national security.However he is not practising what he preaches by opposing devolution.Why does he not look at India and ask the question whether 1200 million people comprising more than 25 ethnicities and languages think of themselves as Indians first.What is the reason for that?Devolution.Nehru used the thread of devolution to stitch a country together of 25 ethnic and linguistic groups,while we are struggling to forge a national identity with just 3.

  • 0
    0

    A good lecture. Sri Lanka needs good diplomats to maintain cordial relations with all nations. The performance of our diplomats must be evaluated and some political appointees who are below par should be replaced. There is also a need to develop a diplomatic strategy. It is not possible to have diplomats who do not accept the national diplomatic strategy.

    The US and Indian intelligence helped Sri Lanka to destroy the LTTE supply ships and get the military hardware required to win the war. The challenge is to integrate the diplomatic strategy with the National Security Strategy.

    • 0
      0

      Correction, a good lecture – courtesy Rohan Guneratne.

      • 0
        0

        Good one.Wanted to ask whose speech.

    • 0
      0

      With Grease yaka’s white vans and murderous DIG’s no way we can have a peaceful country… extra judicial killings is the ONLY sport known to the ruling elite and their YES men….

  • 0
    0

    threat to sri lanka is rajapassas. sri lankan literacy rate is high but iq is so low. you people are ruining the country.brainless idiot like you and your rajapassa clan should not been considered to rule sri lanka. unfortunately majority sri lankans brain is the size of a sesame seed.

  • 0
    0

    if politics were of the singaporean kind, with equality of opportunity for all and discrimination toward none on account of ones ethnic background ,perhaps there wouldnt have been a need for terrorism.

    If there isnt Justice , even as it is today,then does anyone think that this country will progress ?

    why , after 4 years of liberation, more people are leaving the land ?

  • 0
    0

    This is a very comprehensive and deep analysis of the threats internal and external faced by Sri Lanka. The Defence Secretary has not only enunciated these threats with alacrity but also has given the solutions and the impediments faced in implementing the solutions against these threats.

    As so eloquently expressed, some of these threats are political with a terrorist dimension that are from the escaped ex-terrorists now masquerading as legitimate movements internationally like the GTFE and BTF and various factions within the Tamil Diaspora. These organisations are utilising their electoral power in the countries they now inhabit to malign Sri Lanka at the UNHRC and various International bodies for the detriment of Sri Lanka together with their media friends, friendly NGOs and authors with dubious statistics that is portrayed as gospel truth.

    Internal security in Sri Lanka is succeeding in keeping Sri Lanka peaceful with the added bonus of economic development that has superseded expectations as attested by International economic bodies such as the IMF, OECD and ADB to name a few. However on the diplomatic front Sri Lanka has performed rather poorly.

    Influencing the movers and shakers in International politics like China and Russia against the tirade of the USA and EU is not adequate as the USA has the political and economic resources to influence the smaller nations against Sri Lanka for their own geopolitical ends. Sri Lanka has been rather inadequate in creating relationships with these smaller countries to mitigate the political and economic hegemony of the USA and EU. A good case in point is at the last UNHRC meeting where Malaysia that voted with Sri Lanka before abstained this time – a lesson in point for Sri Lanka to hone its diplomatic skills especially in this area.

    While many that comment in these columns are disparaging about Sri Lanka, for a country that went through a devastating thirty year war its achievements within the last four years since the culmination of its victory over the LTTE has been not only remarkable but admirable. I quote below from a German journalist whose observations I reproduce below that I am fully in agreement with.

    ‘’ Sri Lanka eliminated a dreaded terrorist group, with intricate global
    links, but receives little credit for it! Unlike elsewhere in the
    world, Sri Lanka has succeeded in resettling 300,000 IDPs. There are
    no starving children for the NGOs to feed but this gets ignored!

    Sri Lanka has avoided mass misery, epidemics and starvation but the
    West takes no notice of this.

    Sri Lanka has attained enviable socio-economic standards for a
    developing country while eliminating terrorism but gets no
    acknowledgement!

    The Government of Sri Lanka and its President continue to enjoy
    unprecedented popular approval through democratic elections but this
    is dismissed!

    The economy continues to boom, but remains not encouraged by the West’’.

    • 0
      0

      Merlin writes: “The Defence Secretary has not only enunciated these threats with alacrity but also has given the solutions and the impediments faced in implementing the solutions against these threats”

      The Defence Secretary is a buffoon who needs people to tell him what words like ‘alacrity’ and ‘enunciated’ mean. This speech was prepared by someone else as if it was written by Gota, there would be many swear words and threats of the type he used to aim at Frederica Jansz before she fled the country to avoid the fate of Lasantha. This Defence Secretary is good for things such as preparing mafia-style hits and preparing illegal documentation to allow the likes of Col Karuna to claim asylum abroad with the LTTE rump.

      “with their media friends, friendly NGOs and authors with dubious statistics that is portrayed as gospel truth”

      Merlin does this include Amnesty International because we know your master has a liking for this organisation from his days as a quaker peace activist in 1990 making trips to UN human rights council in order to ask international forces and human rights organisations to intervene in Sri lankan domestic affairs.

      “Internal security in Sri Lanka is succeeding in keeping Sri Lanka peaceful”

      Indeed keeping the northern province as 1 big military garrison whilst stripping its provincial council of any meaningful power is keeping sri lanka very peaceful indeed. The wonderful relations it enjoys with its overseas Tamil diaspora population and its neighbour Tamil Nadu as a result of these measures, will no doubt only boost Sri Lanka’s relationship with India and the international community in the long run whilst keeping the development loans pouring in (and not having it cut by the USA).

      “a lesson in point for Sri Lanka to hone its diplomatic skills especially in this area”

      Merlin has the thought dawned on you that rather than sharpening the skills of the SL diplomatic corps so they can use big english words when they speak to the white man, their job might be made much easier if your thug president and his brothers can actually run a civilian govt properly instead of ransacking the coffers, using lowest common denominator buddhist monks to intimidate the minorities and talking great things about 13A to the indians before looking to dump the agreement in public at the most convenient opportunity thus leaving these normally mild-mannered indians red in the face.

      “its achievements within the last four years since the culmination of its victory over the LTTE has been not only remarkable but admirable”

      Indeed- the way Mahinda went from being an executive figure tied down by presidential limits and a relatively free judiciary in 2009 to being a semi-mythical demi-god/autocrat running the SL govt like his own private family business is nothing short of amazing. I’m sure there are many young would-be dictators in poor African and Asian countries taking prodigious notes of how this scheme was pulled of so seamlessly and in such a short amount of time.

      “Sri Lanka eliminated a dreaded terrorist group, with intricate global links, but receives little credit for it!”

      Merlin please can I ask why you are witholding the identity of this German journalist? Do they work for a reputable publication or for one of the numerous western PR groups that your President likes to hire at short notice when stuff starts hitting the fan? I know you inhabit a strange fantasy world (thus explaining your name) where your President is some kind of misunderstood Thomas Jefferson-style nation builder but I am still puzzled why you think the western nations and india were not pleased to see the demise of the LTTE? They are upset not because they no longer get to hear Prabhakaran’s annual hero’s day speech but because your President is displaying Gaddafi-like behaviour sticking his face on the currency, naming white elephant structures after himself and letting his mentally retarded younger brother Gotabhaya and his bodu sena mates dictate public policy whilst shamelessly reneging on promises made before the war like full implementation of 13A.

      “continue to enjoy unprecedented popular approval through democratic elections but this is dismissed!”

      This popular approval has come naturally and is the result of his highly educated southern vote-base realising the merits of Rajapaksa economic management and definately not ever tightening media controls or use of the bodu sena to portray the nation as under threat with only the brave duo of Mahinda & Gota able to rescue the day.

      “The economy continues to boom, but remains not encouraged by the West’’.

      Small asian economies at loggerheads with the West are not normally described as ‘booming’ and their financial outlook normally goes down if this tension increases. However we must remember the Mahinda mantra that SL is the only nation that defeated terrorism with zero civilian casualties and complete respect for human rights (as confirmed by those pioneers of freedom Cuba and China) so anything is truly possible

      • 0
        0

        Ramanan

        “thus leaving these normally mild-mannered indians red in the face.”

        It was India which persuaded Chandrika to go the whole hog, and backed it with training, loans,intelligence, strategy, …….. hardware including radar, ships, helicopters……… provided cover by their diplomatic footwork.

        Indians are able to take it in their stride.

        They know how to spoil the party.

        The Indians believe in and practice the fine art of “Sama, Dhana, Bheda, Danda.

        Sama – conciliation or gentle persuasion.

        Dhana – offer material wealth

        Bheda – cause dissension

        Danda – punishment or violence

        Indo LTTE relation came to its logical conclusion, Dhanda. Note LTTE has been completely wiped off from the face of the earth.

        As for Sri Lanka, India is in its second stage and two more to go.

        Well India needs not to use Dhanda as it did 25 years ago through its Tamil stupid proxies.

        Bheda will be suffice.

        • 0
          0

          “The Indians believe in and practice the fine art of “Sama, Dhana, Bheda, Danda”

          Native Vedda I like how you seamlessly combine the political and the spiritual- and I agree with all your points.

    • 0
      0

      Merlin Van Tweest

      “Sri Lanka has been rather inadequate in creating relationships with these smaller countries to mitigate the political and economic hegemony of the USA and EU.”

      Let us band together with Syria, Iran, and other other countries with similar interests.

      My elders told me that in 2011 Sri Lanka’s exports to EU and USA together amounted to 56% of its total exports, its nearly $5 billion. In order to teach a lesson, Sri Lanka must impose unilateral trade sanctions against these countries.

      When can we see serious actions against these group of countries are being taken by Sri Lanka?

      • 0
        0

        how about also projected $10 billion under FTA with India?..

  • 0
    0

    Wow !! Man who ran away and lived in US for 15 years(never
    visited SL even for a holiday) during the most difficult time of the
    the war particularly when the majority of the world’s influential
    players were against us and our army had to fight with rationed
    arms and amos, is now giving lectures on 30 year war.
    It is an absolute tragedy that so-called patriots never pay
    tribute to real war heros like Densil Kobbekaduwa,
    Janka Perera, Vijaya Wimalaratne,
    Lucky Algama particularly Gen. Sarath Fonseka and many
    others who fought this war with very limited resources
    through out the whole military career
    until their untimely demise or retirement. When you
    dishonour dead in a war for political or any othe
    reson you have no right to utter a word about that
    war.

  • 0
    0

    What a fascinating example of cognitive dissonance. I’m sure more people will comment on the rather skewed “historical” analysis he presents but what struck me was his complete focus on potential threats to national security rather than on actual threats such as the complete breakdown of the rule of law and order that is very much a current reality in the country.

    Of course he cannot mention the actual things that are undermining national security as opposed to the bogeymen he puts forward. The following are just a few examples that have far reaching implications on national security: fast-tracking the 18th Amendment that undermined the checks and balances of the powers of the Executive and scraped term limits; the illegal impeachment of the Chief Justice; land grabbing by the military; murder and disappearance of journalists; illegal detention of people in custody and their subsequent murder; the close link between himself, the thugs he talks about and his family members; and the intransigence of the government in implementing the LLRC recommendations etc.

    The supreme irony is that he mentions that “the most critical aspect will be the achievement of national reconciliation” while the current cabal in power does everything within their means to undermine reconciliation.

    His is a tried and tested approach; scare the devil out of everyone and get them to acquiesce to the most draconian of policies. That’s how the American Patriot Act came about post 9/11 and we’ve seen which direction that’s taken the world in. I’m sure the DefSec would love to have his own little “PRISM and Boundless Informant” programmes so he can spy on all of us (that is if he doesn’t already have it in place).

    This is an unabashed attempt at making a case for further consolidation of the military state Sri Lanka has turned into!

    I’m not bamboozled; hope neither are you.

  • 0
    0

    It’s called “paving the way”…

  • 0
    0

    After the war was won by the sacrifices of thousands of foot soldiers, this man has the aplomb to style himself as the main architect of the victory. He incarcerated the Commander of the Armed Forces and sacked several Generals and now is the self styled expert on security. Everything that moves in this island is a security risk.

    NGO’s are concerns. Sri Lankan expatriates living abroad are a concern. The media is a concern. Facebook and Twitter are concerns. Muslims are a concern. However people like Gnanasara, BBS, SH, RB are legitimate reactions to these concerns??? Tamils are a concern. India is a concern, US is a concern.

    He is least concerned about the lawlessness and attacks on the opposition and journalist. He is not concerned about attacks on the Uthayan (30 attacks). He is not concerned about the remand prisoners killed in Welikada. He is not concerned about the graves in Matale. etc. etc.

  • 0
    0

    Me. Gotabaya Rajapaksa:

    The analysis of the Situation, Problems and Implications is correct. But the NEED to DO is very much lacking.You say “…it is clear tht National Security must be understood within a unfied frameworl that integrates the nation’s Defence, Law and Order, Foreign Policyand Economic Policy” That is fine and acceptable. Yet have you taken stock of the present situation in regard to these very areas of such importance? Don’t you agree that all these aspects solely depend on the “dedication” “integrity” “honousty” and “skills” of people who are entrusted with the Governance of the country. One good example for you to direct the attention is the subject of “Law and Order”. What have the people incharge of this area done to it? You would not have been “blind” or “deaf” when the Impeachment of the CJ was going on.Leave aside the pros and cons of the Impeachment. Did you observe the disgracefull manner in which the members of that PSC behaved? That was more than enough to prove your point of view viz…..”the internal affairs of Sri Lanka have been kept at the forefront of the UNCHR’s sessions as well as at the top of agenda of several prominent internal NGO…. So did you observe how, we ouselves provided the “ammunition” needed for them to fire at us.

    How about the latest scandle relating to the “indictment” of a DIG involved in a “killing spree” of a businessman? Is this how the law enforcement personnel at the “Apex “Level” are carrying out their assigned duties?

    These are few of the examples; but the situation is far, far from being praiseworthy. Please think of these matters seriously.

    You also mentioned about Sigapore. I remember how somewhere aroung in the 1980s a Minister was summoned by the Prime Minister to inquire about an allegation of corruption and bribery reported in the papers. Before the appointed date and time of the meeting he checked into a hotel and committed suicide. WHY? He knew what was in stock for him. That is how Mr. Lee Kuan Yuy carried himself in the administration of the Government. He did not say in “public” “he was Ape Miniha”. Please check this incident with your associate Mr. Rohan Gunaratne.

    You also say “Although the likelyhood of events such as the Arab Spring trnaspiring in Sri Lanka is minimal as a result of it being democratic nation with an extremely popular political leadership that enjoy a very large electoral majority”.

    The reason for this, in my vew is, nothing but the “extinct opposition” lead by a group of people who are not worthy of being called members of the Opposition in the Democratic Parliament.

    I could have said more; but stop at this with a request you to take a serious look at the situation, implications, problems and needs to be done.

  • 0
    0

    Those of you who are in love with the White Van Goat and National Securuity should watch this movie.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_State_(film)

    http://youtu.be/0aRh52pUkh8

  • 0
    0

    Well said Gota. This is why most SLs love Gota and a few hate him.

    If the few stops hating him, the most will stop loving him!

    This is the reality in SL.

  • 0
    0

    But why did he appoint a useless person as the new army commander?

  • 0
    0

    GR is the local version of Goebbels!

  • 0
    0

    1. Most importantly sir the biggest threat to our democracy is you and your family!

    2. amazing how you tacitly places the blame on the radicalization of Sri Lankan Muslims but fail to mention the anti-Muslim activities of the various hard-line Sinhala-Buddhist organizations you support.

    3. How long before you block facebook and twitter in Sri Lanka? I assume you haven’t done so yet only because you lack the technological capacity

    4. you seem to have recruited the services of a decent writer. For once the speech is well written. But even with lipstick its still a pig

  • 0
    0

    “The organised trafficking of persons or human smuggling is another significant maritime security issue. Organised groups, some of which are connected to LTTE-linked organisations, have lured many people seeking better economic prospects into this lucrative illegal operation. “

    Huh! Ask those who reached Australia who was behind those boat trips…. Shame on you, Gota.

  • 0
    0

    Ooof, the country faces this much security threats? Who will come to fight with you now, you have already jailed the one who won the war?

    How on Earth the people renounced the world would carry play cards and chant slogans against another religion. Shamelessly keeping such people besides speaking of security threats?

    This man seems to be biggest threat to security and integrity of the country.

    Sarojini, think twice before you lit a candle for this man, you might be the next target.

  • 0
    0

    What does a California Petrol Shed attendent cum office clerk Know about National and International threats to our country with no visible resources and mega national debt…… other than Nanthikandal Mass Murderer a White Van abductor and a crook who Jailed the War Hero Gen.Sarath Fonseka.

    Suppression does not work Mr.Looser.

  • 0
    0

    Dear Mr.Ramanan,

    Your paucity of analysis of the Defence Secretary’s excellent insights into Sri Lanka’s threats is reduced to a personal attack on the ability of Defence Secretary to speak the Queen’s English. The first language of the Defence Secretary is not English and it is regrettable that you do not acknowledge that to enable a wider audience to listen, he has made this supreme effort to deliver the speech in English. There are many political and near political figures that do not indulge in the Queen’s English for speeches. Examples that spring to mind are Francois Hollande, Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin, Shinzo Abe and Xi Jinping to name a few.

    As for the Defence Secretary’s speech written by a professional speech writer – this is clutching at the proverbial straw when your arguments are bereft of any substance worth considering. Do you honestly believe that President Obama does not employ professional speech writers? It is a well known fact that Tony Blair’s speeches were authored by his spin doctor Alastair Campbell. Are you attempting to convey that it is permissible for other prominent world political figures to depend on professional speech writers but for the Sri Lankan Defence Secretary it is not permissible? This is duplicity at its worst on your part.

    You even had the temerity to refer to the Defence Secretary as a ‘buffoon’. For your information it was the excellent organisational and executive skills of this so called ‘buffoon’ that permitted the defeat of the most ruthless and well armed terrorist organisation in Sri Lanka. This accolade is that much sweeter as about five other Defence Secretaries before him attempted the ‘coup de grace’ of Velupillai Prabaharan and the LTTE and failed miserably.

    As for your other febrile arguments I leave that to others to comment upon.

  • 0
    0

    Dear Mr. Native Veddah,
    It is on the diplomatic front that I urge Sri Lanka to develop relationship with smaller countries. The voting at the UNHRC is based on the majority of countries supporting or not supporting a particular resolution. While the UNHRC does not have the power to compel any country to comply despite a majority (a good example is Israel that has been castigated by a majority of countries at the UNHRC), it is diplomatically advantageous for Sri Lanka to make an effort to develop relationships with smaller countries for this very purpose.

    Trade is entirely a different matter (or as the Americans would say it is a very different ball game) as even during the height of the ‘cold war’ the USA and Western Europe continued trading with the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. While trade barriers like the recent ‘GSP’ by Europe on Sri Lanka do surface from time to time a total boycott of trade is unheard of. Even during the height of the South African Apartheid State, Europe and USA continued trading with it.

    • 0
      0

      Merlin Van Tweest

      I am puzzled.

      Are you saying that,

      Sri Lanka should not grant devolved powers to the minorities,

      No need to treat the minorities with dignity,

      State sponsored colonisation should be accelerated in areas where minorities are in majority in order to destroy their political representation in elected offices,

      assimilation is the best way to dilute minorities by speeding up colonisation,

      Army occupation should be permanent

      essentially democracy for minorities is a very bad practice,

      all protests against the state brutality should be rightly eliminated,

      diaspora protests should be brought to halt,

      you perceive USA & EU are with minorities hence countering should be through forming alliances with small nations and Sri Lanka become a hub for dissension as Champika Ranawaka would have it,

      All because Sinhala/Buddhists will not want to share power with the minorities,

  • 0
    0

    A good speech from the Defence Secretary but there are some issues with which I disagree.

    1. There is no ” complete freedom” in Sri Lanka. Free speech, even legitimate criticism, though tolerated to an extent, is curtailed to the degree that exposure of government misdemeanours pertaining to murder, abduction, torture, corruption, and injustice is suppressed by intimidation, and often by resort to violence. When there is fear of the government, wrong doing is observed but not acted upon, and thereby perpetuated and accepted as inevitable. Freedom from terrorism of the LTTE kind is not the only freedom. When the government instills fear amongst the citizen that too is terrorism.

    2.It is not freedom when the government acts with impunity, fails to be impartial in it’s actions,and ignores the rule of law. When you have one rule for the governing elite and their kith and kin, and another for the ordinary people, where is the freedom that is spoken of in the speech? The graduate students of the Academy must be told that the people’s rights come first and they the armed services, have no right or authority over the sovereign rights of the people and that such rights supercedes the rights of the elected representatives as well. The freedom in the armed forces with it’s rules of conduct is not what the citizen enjoys.

    3. “….that National Security must be understood within a unified, single framework that integrates the nation’s Defence, Law and Order, Foreign Policy and Economic Policy.” This is not enough. It is the citizen that requires his sovereignty and his security. Therefore the policy must encompass Human Rights and the protection of Freedoms enshrined in the constitution. Often the politician tends to interpret national security to mean the security of the government. The students must understand the difference.

    4….”Another growing concern in the post-war environment is the increasing communalism amongst ethnic groups, which if left unaddressed, could result in the rise of ethnic tensions in the future.” Quite right. But why was the extremism of the BBS and other attendant groups not taken to task for causing a threat to national security? Why did the DS allow “ethnic tensions to rise”?

    5….”This fragmentation of the Sri Lankan identity is most unfortunate, because activists within these communal groups seek minority rights or ethnic rights rather than working within the framework of a common national identity.” Agreed. Why is the government inactive in encouraging a national identity confining itself to only rhetoric?

    6….”The final threat to Sri Lanka’s National Security that I will highlight during this lecture is the emergence of technology driven new media including social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and other websites on the Internet. We have seen the potential of this new media to destabilise nations and affect serious change in the case of countries like Tunisia, Libya, Egypt etc.” This statement is false. Social media has increased communication between people. It can influence the formation of opinion but it cannot cause the fall of a government. On the other hand if the government is despotic, corrupt and self serving to the extent that it indulges in unlawful acts, then the social media may help in acting as a catalyst to throw out such a government. By doing so the Social Media will in fact be the instrument to safeguard the citizen from such oppressive government and perforce safeguard National Security. It must be reiterated that National Security does not mean the Security of the Government. In the countries mentioned the downfall of the government was due to their own despotism.

    7. Development of the Intelligence Arms is a necessity. Proliferation of Army Camps and Bases is also necessary. The point that students of the academy must understand is that all these are required to protect the citizen. Not the Government.

    8. When discussing Internal Threats we tend to always look at fledgeling terror groups, radical student bodies, or tough trade unions. However from the point of view of a citizen there can be an Internal Threat from the Government as well. This is not within the purview of the military, but is a concern of the citizen, which the government must seriously address. I assert that our security (and our sovereignty) is seriously threatened when the legislature and the judiciary is subjugated to the will of the Executive. It is threatened when the Executive arrogates to itself over riding powers over all branches of government.

    These are also issues the Defence Secretary should have emphasised in an otherwise fine speech.

  • 0
    0

    It seems the Rajapakshe brothers are using our Mother Lanka for their peivate colony destroying enthnic harmoney,human right, good governamce,juditial systems. Also they are supporting under the carpet for Rwna,BBS and Helaurumaya whic are deadly racist groups working harder day and nights by taking law and orders in their hands to undermine non Buddist Faiths in the Island,they are destrying churches and Mosques.Whos is responsible to stop them?????? Also Rajapakeshe family milking the country and poor masses strugging for daily meals.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.