By Sarath Dissanayake –

Sarath Dissanayake
Sangha Convention at Odds with Chief Prelates
Hot on the heels of the historic 2300-mile, 110-day journey of peace accomplished by a group of monks in Washington DC on 12th February 2026, it is heartening to learn of yet another strikingly different Sangha Convention (Buddhist monks and lay community) being hosted by the All Ceylon Buddhist Conference (ACBC) at its headquarters in Colombo on the 20th February. This bizarre – hitherto little-known, sangha convention in Colombo, comes barely a week after the Buddhist monks’ silent peaceful walk in America, hailed by many as the most impactful peace walk ever to be held in any part of the world. What’s at stake for the sangha convention (Buddhist monks and lay community) is that neither of the Chief Prelates of the two main Buddhist Fraternities or Sects (Siam Sect’s Asgiriya Chapter and Amarapura Sect) out of Sri Lanka’s three Buddhist fraternities, have confirmed their participation at the convention up to now (18th), let alone on its deafening silence on the number of monks expected for the convention slated for 20th.
Parallels Between Monks’ Walk in America and Sangha Convention in Colombo
If one were to draw parallels between the two events, of course the prime movers of both, are none other than Buddhist monks belonging to Therawada Buddhist Sect, albeit, meant for two distinctly contrasting objectives; namely, the former was a silent peaceful walk by a group of 19 monks for the cause of peace, whilst, the latter event is supposedly to bring to bare the alleged injustices faced by Buddhist monks, the Buddha Sasana (Doctrine of Buddhism), and the country as a whole, at the hands of powers that be, and press the authorities to desist from such awkward actions based on mere political witch-hunt. It is reported in the media that monks from all Buddhist sects are expected to converge on Colombo on 20th February, in what is believed to be a gathering of 5000 monks. These monks, who called themselves the “guardians” of the predominantly Buddhist nation of Sri Lanka, in all but name, comprised nearly 35,000 Buddhist monks, out of 22 million total inhabitants of the island.
Proponents and Opponents of Sangha Conference
Alas, two contrasting points of views have been expressed by two leading monks of stature at the scheduled sangha convention. Speaking to the media on 16th February, a convenor of the sangha conference, Ven. Dambara Amila Thero announced that monks from all Buddhist chapters have been summoned to Colombo on 20 February to protest against the government’s clamping down on Buddhist priests, and its unlawful actions against Buddha Sasana, with no iota of respect and due decorum for the noble monks. Speaking further, the monk said their protest is meant as a direct warning to the government and added, “there have been various governments in the past, and shortcomings can be found in every administration. As the Buddha preached, there is no one without flaws. However, never in the history of Sri Lanka has there been a government – elected on the votes of people, that has targeted and launched such systematic attacks against the entire Buddha Sasana as the incumbent government. Alas, the proposed sangha convention has suffered a major setback lately, with two of Sri Lanka’s main Buddhist sects, reported to have announced on 16th that their monks would not attend the forthcoming Buddhist convention, citing non receipt of formal invitations, albeit noting that their monks may attend the meeting on individual basis.
Prelate Strikes a Balance with His Non-committal Stance
Contrary to expectations, the Anunayake of the Asgiri Chapter, Most Venerable Narampanawa Ananda Thero attending a felicitation ceremony in his honor at the Muthiyangana Raja Maha Viharaya in Badulla on the 16th instant, said that Buddhist monks should respond with equanimity to allegations directed at them by certain quarters, be it may, maha sangha in general, or individual monks in particular. Commenting further, Thero opined that rather than reacting with agitation, it would be apt to remain silent, so that the truth would eventually prevail in the end. Venerable Anunayake Thero was also of the view that a large segment of the population in the country continues to cherish and respect the Buddha Sasana, and that the faith within them will never fade. Elaborating further, Thero said notwithstanding the current status quo, people yet have high regard and respect toward Buddhist monks, in appreciation of their meritorious deeds and services to the country and society at large. Commenting on the situation in the country, Thero said despite all the good and respect, certain monks still come under criticism for no fault of theirs. Ven Anunayake Thero further remarked, “It is my personal view that rather than becoming agitated over such matters, it is wiser for the maha sangha to respond with equanimity and that “remaining silent is the most sensible course of action”. Thero also emphasized that nearly 90 percent of the country’s population is Buddhist, and their respect and reverence for the Buddha Sasana remain strong and that the bonds between the monks and lay community continue to nurture in good spirit for the well-being of monks, people and the country as a whole.
Sangha Convention Raises More Questions than Answers
It’s learnt that the sangha convention which was supposed to be a gathering of 8,000 monks, has now been downsized to around 1,000 monks. This seemed to indicate a decline of the monks’ support for the convention, raising more questions than answers. Coincidently, this setback in numbers, alludes to monks’s half-hearted stance and their dwindling support for the convention, in the wake of the Anunayake of the Asgiriya Chapter, Most Venerable Narampanawa Theros’ recent remarks to the effect that monks’ silence would be the most sensible course of action at a time of crises. His remarks pertains to the conduct of a few monks at the centre of allegations of misconduct, as being harmful and damaging to the reputation and respect for the Buddha Sasana in its entirety. A pertinent question to ponder is whether the upcoming sangha convention on 20th, in fact had the blessings of the chief prelates of Sri Lanka’s 3 Buddhist Sects and, if not, on what basis the monks had the audacity to call for a sangha convention, sans the approval of chief prelates in the first place. As a matter of fact, it may be of interest to the public to know as to who would be the chief convenor of the sangha convention on 20th, and, the order of precedence to be followed in respect of monks gracing the convention. and the list of speakers of the event. Unless there’s clarity on such main crux of elements, needless to say that the monks would feel reluctant to attend a sangha congregation, at the risk of alienating monks of stature and seniority in the hierarchical setup of prelates, perhaps earning ire and wrath from those holding authority and delegation of powers.
Monks’ Past Misdeeds Raise Legitimacy of Sangha Convention
The monks’ sudden outburst against the authorities is palpable, and understandable to say the least, especially at a time their so-called political masters seemed completely out of tune. In sheer desperation, the monks appeared to be trying a last ditch attempt to save those political diehards from the inevitable destiny. Judging by what these monks had been up to for almost 15 years up until the defeat of their political loyalists, the monks seemed somewhat perplexed and frustrated lately, in coming to terms with the status quo and ground realities. So much so, the monks are seldom heard by the current administration, and, even more so, they are not being able to hoodwink the current leaders into believing their false gimmicks and modus-operandi. It is also recalled, few of these monks at the behest of the then rulers, had unfettered access to highest echelons of power and enjoyed unlimited freedom to do whatever they please, thereby threatening anybody in their way, thus acting contrary to their whims and fancies. Going forward, some of these monks of the likes of Ven Muruththettuwe Ananda Thero and Ven Galaboda Gnanissara Thero enjoyed full immunity to go about doing things the way they wished, even harassing those, who they felt being unhelpful and not obliging. It is my recollection, Ven Ananda Thero who commanded the Government Nurses Trade Union as its life-time President, in fact had the audacity to call for a general strike of the government nurses at state hospitals for several weeks in early late 1990s, causing immense hardships and untold sufferings to innocent patients and those needing medical treatments from government hospitals, on the pretext of addressing the nurses long standing genuine grievances. Ven Ananda Thero should have been held responsible for the unfortunate deaths of few patients at the time, due to strike action instigated by him on political grounds. Similarly, Ven Galaboda Gnanissara Thero acted as a law-unto-himself in mid 2015s, inciting racial and communal hatred against our Muslim brethren in certain parts of the country at the risk of creating political instability, mayhem and chaos among peace-loving communities living side by side with one another in amity and diversity. In short, the conduct and track-record of these monks have been appalling and sickening, to say the least.
Concept of “Wholesome and Sacrosanct” Role of Buddhist Monks
Some opportunistic monks have been at the receiving end for their immoral conduct and abhorrent deeds, which is why certain Buddhist monks are often being blamed for their narrow-minded and selfish conduct, often at the whims and fancies of die-hard politicians. As a consequence, certain monks are openly labelled and ridiculed as being loyal to a particular familial clan of politicians of the likes of certain old-fashioned by-gone era dynastic ruling class families, as opposed to “Buddha clan”, representing spiritually-wholesome enlightened monks, who would never switch allegiance of monkhood, for the sake of mere positions, influence of power, lust or possessions for that matter. But with the passage of time, certain monks’ unwholesome acts and unethical behaviour have been called into question by people. Such immoral conduct and practices have led to the erosion of Buddha Sasana and respect for monkhood, thus exposing lavish lifestyles and cravings of certain monks at the risk of compromising their monkhood, respect and purity. Above all, there are those erudite monks who are well respected and revered for their simplicity, nobility, spirituality and morality, who would not betray their wholesome spirits and unwavering loyalty to monkhood. Unlike them, it’s a pity that few of our monks have made themselves a mockery and laughing stock in the eyes of the laypeople with their ignoble, shameful and ill-gotten mindset and deeds, who often being ridiculed for singing hozannas of praise for their political masters, loyalists of certain political idols. Such kind of pseudo- monastics in robes are commonplace today, unbecoming of their monkhood, at the risk of jeopardizing the goodwill of laypeople and bringing Buddha Sasana and the noble monkhood into disrepute in its entirety.
Buddhist Doctrine Advocates Monks to Remain above Politics
In terms of Buddha’s timeless message, which resonates well and truly among monks, the Doctrine of Dhamma is essentially meant to spread the essence of Buddhist teachings among followers, in order to rid themselves of greed, cravings and clinging to worldly things and material possessions. Though the monks’ (who have taken up cudgels against the authorities in power) so-called grievances and harassment claims against the incumbent government may be genuine and real, their protest action stands hollow, contrary to the principles of the Buddhist Doctrine of Dhamma. According to Buddhist teachings, monks are advised to remain above politics and refrain from getting involved in state / government affairs, and are essentially forbidden from joining protest campaigns in violation of state’s laws and religious dictums, often leading to the detriment of peace, harmony and compassion. Suffice it to note, the monks campaigning against government have been seen voicing their anger and frustration against authorities in power, acting as if they are a law-unto-themselves, in what could be termed as, in violation of basic tenets of Buddhism and practices / principles such as ahimsa (non violence) and metta (amity). In this regard, Buddhist monks’ adherence to unethical and illegal acts cannot be condoned whatsoever. Instead they should always be mindful of conducting themselves in conformity with the Doctrine of Dhamma which cannot be overstated, requiring their complete adherence to Buddhist principles of non interference and non-violence at all times, while desisting from acting against a legitimate government elected by people, as amply embodied and described in the Vinaya Pitaka, which is codified in the monastic rulebook within the Tripitaka (Pali Canon) and in the Patimokkha (list of stansas recited regularly by monks)
Buddha’s Timeless Message of Dhamma and Universal Ultimate Truth
Talking of the essence of the Dhamma, it is worth recalling the three cannons of Buddhism or core teachings of the Dhamma, spoken by the Buddha which were compiled shortly after his passings (Parinirvana), known in the Theravada Tradition as “Thripitaka” or “Three Baskets”. These three cannons / baskets, are comprised of Vinaya Pitaka (Basket of Discipline), Sutta Pitaka (Basket of Discourses) and Abhidhamma Pitaka (Basket of Higher Doctrine/Philosophy) which go hand in hand in Buddhist Doctrine. In particular, Vinaya Pitaka is the disciplinary code for self-training laid down by the Buddha for monks and nuns to observe. Vinaya plays a pivotal role among the monastics, thus ensuring monks of the essence of preserving the sanctity of monkhood and their code of conduct in discipline, as a way of life – full of purity and spirituality.
It is noteworthy, three cannons / Thripitaka serve as the sacred pinnacle for spiritual practice and enlightenment, viz-a-viz Buddhist Monks’ code of conduct, inter-alia, meant to guide them on the key aspects of day-today affairs of monkhood and actions, including, speech, thoughts and deeds. According to Buddhist teachings, the doctrine of the “cause and effect” (patichchasamuppadaya” gives rise to karmic nature of living beings, in terms of how karma results in, transforms itself into, birth, life and death of all living beings, leading to bhavaya (samsara) – a vicious cycle of rebirth, sufferings and death, which is unique to all sentient beings. The bhavaya, culminating in the rebirth and death of all beings, based on one’s life-long deeds (karma), nama – rupa, often referred to as interdependent and inseparable combination of mentality (nama) and materiality (rupa), represents the constituent parts of a living being. In essence, the sensory organs and 5 aggregates of a living being, work in tandem with (in conjunction with and simultaneously) one’s mental perceptions and sensations, thus impacting and forming the central pillars of a living being’s (individual’s) daily routine of life, which is part and parcel of one’s karmic acts and deeds. Intrinsically, a living being’s sensory organs, sensations and thought process essentially lead to Dukka or sufferings, eventually transforming itself into a vicious cycle of karmic samsara, permeating seamlessly over a living being’s entirety of life, based on merits (Kusal) and sins (Akusal), which is aptly illustrated in the Doctrine of Dhamma.
Key Takeaways
1) The proposed Sangha Convention lacks credibility in the eyes of the general public, hindering its stated scope and purpose.
2) Prelates of 2 Buddhist Sects neither have been invited nor being consulted on the sangha convention, which is self-defeating and counter productive, to say the least.
3) Anunayake of the Asgiriya Chapter, expressed his views on the conduct of monks raising more questions than answers
4) Certain monks involved in the sangha convention face serious allegations of misconduct and immoral behavior, calling into question the legitimacy of the convention
5) Though sangha convention had initially anticipated around 5,000 monks, but could not muster enough support, thus down-sizing the gathering for about 1000 monks, supposedly due to lack of interest or support from monks, casting doubts about its stated scope, purpose and objectives.
6) Monks are supposed to conduct themselves strictly in adherence to monkhood and principles of ahimsa and metta. As such, monks should not deviate themselves from the path of monkhood as spiritual and noble monks worthy of being Buddha’s disciples
7) Buddha himself has advised monks against doing politics while in robes and denounced instigating any activity that may hinder the spiritual role of monks. That said, any action in contravention of the code of conduct, stated objectives and purpose are unwholesome and go against the Doctrine of Dhamma, which the monks are duty bound to protect, adhere to and follow through at all times as monks dedicated and committed to serve as Buddha’s disciples, in keeping with day-today monastic life and sanctity of monks
8) Any fallouts from the sangha convention could have serious consequences, undermining the legitimacy of Buddha Sasana, Doctrine of Dhamma and members of Sangha – putting their integrity and reputation at stake, and, in the worse case scenario, resulting in serious splits and divisions among monks of faith.
9) If by chance, any misunderstandings, divisions, splits or conflict of interests come to fore, it is inevitable that setbacks and implications could befall the Buddha Sasana and members of the maha sangha, jeopardising the goodwill, harmony and long-cherished principles of peace, harmony and loving kindness, amidst sharing and caring spirits of all followers, at the risk of causing mistrust, hatred and enmity among Buddhist monks and members of the Buddhist community at large.
10. Maha sangha is always respected and treated as supreme, placing them above all others in the society. It is therefore the supreme and sacred duty of monks to reach out to the authorities in power and keep them duly informed of any grievances affecting their members then and there, being the foremost duty of monks, so as to resolving any issues of mistrust and concern between the maha sangha and the government in power, viz-a-viz people, in a matter of urgency at all times. It is only after such avenues are exhausted and any perceived grievances cannot be resolved through dialogue and close consultations between monks and the authorities in power, that the monks should resort to any other possible avenues for action at their disposal (such as administrative action at higher level) outside the given boundaries, as deemed appropriate, which is what the Buddha has espoused for the members of the maha sangha in the Buddhist Doctrine of Dhamma.
11) Should the monks had resorted to the said course of action and had failed in their efforts to resolve the perceived dispute and grievances in the end, resulting in a stalemate with no plausible avenues at their disposal for any course correction, the monks as a last resort could resort to extra-ordinary measures to have their matters resolved through other means (calling for a sangha convention) as appropriate. The above course of action sounds sensible, given that the current government is well disposed, and has shown utmost sincerity, commitment and willingness to discuss any burning issue affecting any section of the public in an open and transparent manner.
12) Let’s hope saner counsel prevails, amidst goodwill and wellbeing between members of the maha sangha and authorities in power continue to flourish in good-stead and harmony for the betterment of all
“Dhamma is about to demount the pole and demount the flag” – A monk should not align with political factions or nationalistic symbols – Dhammapada
*The writer is a retired Ambassador and Foreign Ministry Spokesman. He can be reached at schandrad@hotmail.com
Native Vedda / February 18, 2026
CChampa
–
Hope you read this brilliant exposition and still unable to grasp the essence of the content. It has nothing to do with the author however it has everything to do with being Sinhala/Buddhist.
–
” 12. Let’s hope saner counsel prevails, amidst goodwill and wellbeing between members of the maha sangha and authorities in power continue to flourish in good-stead and harmony for the betterment of all – Sarath Dissanayake”
–
For the wellbeing of all communities, Buddhism must be freed from the grip of Sinhala-Buddhist nationalism, political manipulation, and those who exploit religion for personal or ideological ends. Only then can it truly serve as a path toward harmony and justice for everyone.
–
In other words
this can only happen when Buddhism is liberated from Sinhala/Buddhism, Sinhala/Buddhists. Saffronistas, crooks, politicians, ……… and the murderers.
/
old codger / February 18, 2026
Native,
Ddont you tthink it’s too much to aask of Cchampa to llisten to rreal Bbuddhism ?
/
SJ / February 19, 2026
oc
Is a stammer infectious?
/
schandrad / February 20, 2026
Thanks for your candid opinion and perspective on what I summed up in my write-up .
/
Douglas / February 18, 2026
“The Sanga Convention” to be held in Colombo on February 20th is to protest against all the ‘INSULTS’ directed at the Buddhagama Priests and pressure the Government to take appropriate action to ‘Protect’ them from such slander and humiliations.
One of the organizers, Rev. ‘Prof?’ Danbare Amila, at a media discussion, disclosed the scornful terms used on them, viz. “Thatteya”, ‘Wanacharaya”, “Bana Mudalalila”, “Pottanikarayas”, but stop from being called “Kupadiyas” ( living with women, homosexuality, abusing the novices in the temples, sexually abusing children (both girls and boys).
I hope all these ‘High Priests’, including the Chief Organizer, Rev. Muruthettuwe Ananda, will openly discuss and resolve to be ‘TRUE’ priests and take an ‘OATH’ to live a life of the disciples of Buddha Dharma, so that the laymen would not henceforth direct all of the above-mentioned derogatory terms on them.
If that ‘OATH’ or ‘PLEDGE’ is taken, this “Sanga Convention” will be a great success.
/
nimal fernando / February 19, 2026
“terms used on them, viz. “Thatteya”, ‘Wanacharaya”, “Bana Mudalalila”, “Pottanikarayas”, but stop from being called “Kupadiyas” ( living with women, homosexuality, abusing the novices in the temples, sexually abusing children (both girls and boys).”
–
–
Girls!
–
I want to be a Buddhist priest ……… where do I join?
–
–
Boys …. only if the girls decide to go on strike ……. and have a convention.
–
And ….. as long as I’m not next to Ranil ….. or Native ……. in the line.
/
old codger / February 19, 2026
Nimal,
“I want to be a Buddhist priest ……… where do I join?”
It takes time. Organize a union for, say, Midwives, get them to buy you a Rolls-Royce (with an LED halo on the back head-rest) , organize a few Kelani River snakes for Namal, and you’re set. You’ll be a doddering old bugger by that time, but at least you’ll still have the midwives.
/
Douglas / February 19, 2026
nf: “I want to be a Buddhist priest… where do I join”.
I strongly recommend ‘Mihintale Raja Maha Vihare’. You might ask what is special about Mihintale.
The ‘Chief’ priest runs an ‘Academy’ of ‘Gal Katu’ and ‘Aappa Dish’. You get the best of both worlds.
Remember, when this was announced by the ‘Chief Priest’, Lalkantha the Minister commented and said, this ‘Chief’ is a ‘Wanacharaya’. I don’t know why Lalkantha said it.
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
The Sangha does not possess any political backing or authority. By its very nature, it cannot establish or participate in any political or rights-building conventions, nor can it pass resolutions related to such matters. As a result, any meetings or votes conducted by the Sangha that pertain to political issues are devoid of meaningful effect or significance.
If two subgroups within the Sangha were to complain about not being formally invited to such a meeting, this would not be a matter of serious concern. In this context, these complaints would hold little weight and could be regarded as inconsequential.
In the case of a religious convention, the Sangha would be obligated to attend upon learning of the congregation. However, since this is a political protest, it does not carry any binding authority over the Sangha. Members are free to accept or reject any resolutions passed at such a convention, without impacting on their religious standing or neutrality.
Participation in this political meeting serves only as an exercise in demonstrating political strength, rather than fulfilling any religious duty. Choosing to ignore such activities can actually enhance the Sangha’s religious attainment and reinforce its neutrality.
Should there be a need for legal representation, the Sangha has the option to invite individuals such as Lemon Puff Veeraya or Rear Admirable Veera Kuddy for assistance.
/
old codger / February 19, 2026
Malli,
“The Sangha does not possess any political backing or authority. “
Really?
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
Old,
I meant the legitimate “Sangha”. But the Sinhala Buddhist Sangha is an exception to that. In a hurry, I did not properly differentiate them both in my comment. Sorry!
Thanks for pointing it.
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
Name calling or word use doesn’t have any hurting on this matter. In Hinduism, there is an accepted prayer format called Nintha-Sthuthi. That is, using cursive words in the hymns. There is abundance of this material available in Tamil and Sanskrit of this nature. Of course, the laymen use only Tamil Thevarams or Sanskrit Mantras. But idea behind Nintha Sthuthi is, prayer only comes from a mind. A word of language only gives meaning if that language is used. In all other times it is only some noise. Priests raising up for that makes no sense.
/
SJ / February 19, 2026
“cursive words”
I have heard of cursive script and cursive writing but not this!
The BSer does not know what Nintha-Sthuthi means.
*
I suppose some of us are targets of his Nintha-Sthuthi.
Do we bless this devotee for that?
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
Media writing about the country has started to eat rice and curry, after the time Siri Ma O vacated the country’s wealth. But you are the only one in the whole country still eating Chili Sambol and boiled Yams. So, the stomach is rumbling because of the hot chili, not even being able to release some H2S. So, you are standing behind others to get a sense of if any smell is coming and comment on that. Not stupidity, but ultimate poor judgment in the life of the devotee of the Socialist queen Siri Ma O. That is because when everybody was talking about politics, you were the only one illuminating the world with your H2S propaganda, in CT. That is not illuminating but spreading your Roham to everyone else, not being able to move forward. The SLFP government devotees never knew what their government was doing, but only concocted, like you, what others are (were) doing. You tell medicine to everyone else but did not come out with one for your Roham. How can you advance anywhere other than sitting and boiling about others, in the pharmacy Kottle.
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
Anybody who has visited the country from outside has said the country has advanced a lot in the past two years. What lies & curses the playboy minister spread locally? Playboy minister, Old Rowdy King, Gothapayal are still at the same spot because there is no Siri Ma to show them a path to steer the Super Sat to the moon to get some rice so you don’t have to eat yams and chili and your stomach can feel better instead of boiling all 24 hours of the day.
“I suppose some of us are targets of his Nintha-Sthuthi.” The head is bold or not, but your Siri Ma O devotion is directing anybody’s talking to you in your hallucination. about them will take it to you. That is because of the guilty feeling of unwantedly inviting me & challenging directly that you will ridicule every one of my comments”. For you, giving seems to be too easy but when it is taking, it is an ailing Roham. Keep it up. Don’t dishearten because it is time for Bathiudeen to reincarnate and soon he will rock your cradle.
/
Naman / February 19, 2026
“ few of our monks have made themselves a mockery and laughing stock in the eyes of the laypeople with their ignoble, shameful and ill-gotten mindset and deeds, who often being ridiculed for singing hozannas of praise for their political masters, loyalists of certain political idols.”
These are the MONKS who were being manipulated by Rajapaksas esp GR to create disharmony distrusts hatred & violence in our motherland. These monks and the crooked politicians were used by Rajapaksas to ACHIEVE their political ambitions and ill gotten wealth. I do hope that this convention of Buddhist priests ends up in FAILURE. Hope they BEHAVE as Lord Buddha wanted to. These monks should realise that they are not ABOVE the LAW. They should go to prison and serve their sentences without being PARDONED by the Government
/
SJ / February 19, 2026
“These are the MONKS who were being manipulated by Rajapaksas esp GR to create disharmony distrusts hatred & violence in our motherland”
Nice to know that there were no such monks before 2005!
/
Mallaiyuran / February 19, 2026
Correct, you know for sure that Solomon West was the one floated the Pancha Maha Pala Vegaya. This guy Naman seems to be didn’t know that. But still, you will not let it go, but have to have it collected in your gas cylinder?
Bravo!
/
Naman / February 19, 2026
Thanks a lot to the Author of the above article. I do hope that those who intend to attend the convention read it and assimilate its contents. Any members of any clergies should realise that they are not above the law of the country.
Buddhist clergies need A Council to monitor the BEHAVIOUR and morals
/
schandrad / February 20, 2026
Thanks for your candid opinion and perspective on what I summed up in my write-up.
/
Paul / February 20, 2026
The whole affair is very disheartening. Buddhist monks should have nothing to do with politics, yet the organiser M. Ananda was the leader of the nurses trade union. One major reason these scoundrels have such influence and power is that our buffaloes do not differentiate between those monks who keep the Vinaya rules and those who do not.
/
Native Vedda / February 21, 2026
Paul
–
“Buddhist monks should have nothing to do with politics, …..”
–
In fact Buddhist monks have nothing to do with mundane life however this is Anagarika Homeless Dharmapala’s Sinhala/Buddhism.
–
Therefore anything goes, including excessive consumption, …… violence, racism, …… Soon they may demand Designer (Kasaya) Robes imported from Italy/Milan, designer sandals, designer alms bowl, (paathra), ………… The rich crooked devotees may be willing to pay for the luxuries hoping to accumulate good Karma.
/
Douglas / February 20, 2026
Yesterday ( 20th) was the day that the ‘Maha Sanga’ (estimated participation originally was 10,000 and reduced to 8000, and yesterday dwindled to around 300) convention was held with around ‘250 to 300’ ‘ Sanga’ participation. I would request the readers of this forum to listen:
https://youtu.be/ppHzKnDOlf0?si=54cb8yvlvMqLM5oV
I would request all participants in this forum to listen to this discussion, leaving aside all types of affiliations (political, ethnic, religious) and think FREELY of where, what we should be. Thank you.
/
old codger / February 22, 2026
Douglas,
This monk has a strange mixture of ideas. On one hand, he is very inclusive of the minorities. But on the other hand he has nutty ideas about the rate of cancer patients etc, and concludes that Sri Lankans will be extinct in a few generations! Doesn’t he know that the population has increased from 6 million to 21 million in 78 years, cancer notwithstanding? The reason that cancer stands out nowadays is that old scourges like polio, Cholera, smallpox, measles, TB , Malaria, etc were completely eradicated. Monks should not talk about things they know nothing about. Those who claim that there has been no progress in the last 78 years must also take note.
/
CChampa / February 21, 2026
Mr. Sarath Dissanayake
Re: 7)
It is a misconception to say “Buddha himself has advised monks against doing politics while in robes and denounced instigating any activity that may hinder the spiritual role of monks.” Lord Buddha (in Sinhala බුදුරජාණන් වහන්සේ, which means “the King or the Ruler of Buddhists”) never said such a thing. In fact, he was very much involved in “politics” in advising kings, sub-kings, rulers and leaders.
Let me explain.
According to Wikipedia, this is the origin of the word “politics” which means “affairs of cities and citizens”.
“The English word politics has its roots in the name of Aristotle’s classic work, Politiká, which introduced the Ancient Greek term politiká (Πολιτικά, ‘affairs of the cities’). In the mid-15th century, Aristotle’s composition was rendered in Early Modern English as Polettiques which became Politics in Modern English.
The singular politic first attested in English in 1430, coming from Middle French politique—itself taking from politicus, a Latinization of the Greek πολιτικός (politikos) from πολίτης (polites, ‘citizen’) and πόλις (polis, ‘city’).”
Lord Buddha preached “Dasha Raja Dhamma” and “Saptha Aparihani Dhamma” to Monarchs advising them how to manage “affairs of citizens, organizations, cities, and countries” or how to “serve in politics for the betterment of people”.
/
schandrad / February 22, 2026
Thanks Champa. The Agganna Sutta (Digha Nikaya 27) is a key text where the Buddha discusses the origin of the state, social classes, and the roles of rulers. According to this sutta, the Buddha had maintained close and cordial relations with kings / rulers and offered moral guidance, often advising them to govern ethically by adhering to the Dasa Raja Dharma (Ten Royal Virtues). In the same sutta, it is noted that the Buddha, however advised his disciples to abstain from worldly administration / state affairs (meaning “politics” in today’s context, though the word “politics” was not used at that time), and, instead, focus on personal liberation, ethical cultivation, and the pursuit of enlightenment. It is this misunderstanding of the Buddha’s close rapport with Kings (who often had been advised how best to conduct themselves in their lay lifestyles), that has been taken out of the broader context of liberation, and, is used as a pretext / justification, as if the Buddha himself had encouraged monks’ as part of monkshood / Dhamma lifestyle. Therefore, your argument should be viewed in such context in which the Buddha had maintained close rapport with kings of the day so as to advise them on the importance of adhering to Ten Royal Virtues, but not in any manner of interfering with state / worldly affairs of kingship, like the way the monks are conducting themselves today. As such, this distinction often tends to be taken out of context for arguments’ sake, which is why the subject of ‘politics’ is often taken out of its context, and misunderstood, and challenged by those trying to twist the facts (reality) with myths.
/
CChampa / February 22, 2026
schandrad
There are many examples in our history where Buddhist monks had to shift their approaches depending on the situation. Their resistance to the European settler colonists to protect Buddhism from being wiped out from Ceylon is a prime example. Nobody criticized the critical role played by them in the colonial era in order to regain control of the country.
I agree with you and Sarath, Buddhist monks should not have accepted any political position as done by them in the recent past and should not have let politicians control them.
On the other hand, a government in the Buddhist majority Sri Lanka should have known better before signing secret agreements that threatened the existence of ancient Buddhist temples and archaeological sites in North and East, repeatedly insulting Buddhist monks and suppressing the freedom of speech and religion exercised by Buddhist monks and devotees.
/
SebastianSR / February 22, 2026
According to newsreports, less than 200 monks had arrended the rally. Given that SL is supposed to have about 50,000 Buddhist monks, this is about 0.4%.
The “leading monks” who had gathered are the notorious priests (in name only) that we already know of. These are individuals who wear the yellow robe, some what like the way people like Rauoppu Joseph wore the robe and did LTTE politics. The organizers like Galaboda Gnanasara, Amil, SamnthaBhadra are super politcal operators who suddenly find that thye no longer have state patronage or serious politcal party.
No leading monk of any of the three Nikayas seems to have attended. The only political leader of note who attended was Sajith Premadasa, showing his total lack of judgment. Apprently, neither Namal Rajapaksa or his supporters, not those of the “SarvaJana Balaya” had attended this “rally”. The genera; Buddhist poblic has clearly REJECTED THEM. Hope that stays so.
/
old codger / February 22, 2026
SSR,
Sajith is clearly a clueless idiot who has captured the leadership of the shadow government simply because of his name. He isn’t even a patch on his father.
/
SebastianSR / February 22, 2026
Sajith is clearly a clueless idiot who … isn’t even a patch on his father”.
Agreed. His father made a genuine attempt to resolve the Eelam conflict, with Hameed as the mediator. Anton Balasinham and others broight to five star hotel and an impressive power-sharing was offered, but in a unitary system. Instead, Prabhakaran wanted a system where he could be fully armed and be supreme ruler for life. He had no interest in elections. For good will he released 700 disarmed sinhalese policemen to the LTTE. We know how the Thalaivar/i> responded – by massacre. With time all the able people on both sides of the Ethnic equation were eliminated and we just have second rate leaders or devious crooks. Most of these errant monks profess some from of (what they think is) Marxism and a derived militancy totally contrary to Buddhist doctrines.
/