14 September, 2026

Blog

Tepid Progress On Justice For Past Abuses – UNHRC Should Press AKD Government On Accountability: HRW

The Sri Lankan government’s prosecution of past grave abuses has lagged, raising concerns for future progress, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. United Nations officials and UN member countries at the Human Rights Council should call on the government led by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to show greater determination to address emblematic rights cases and cooperate with international accountability efforts.

The 49-page report, “‘Not Genuine with Justice’: Sri Lanka’s Lack of Will to Prosecute Past Abuses,” provides an overview of domestic justice efforts in seven prominent cases of grave abuses in which the Dissanayake government has made a measure of progress since taking office in 2024. Human Rights Watch found that many emblematic cases, including a massacre of aid workers, the targeting of journalists, and enforced disappearances of academics and others, remain stalled, while families of victims and human rights defenders face threats and intimidation.

“The Dissanayake administration needs to break from past government practice of delaying and denying justice for grave abuses,” said Lucy McKernan, UN Human Rights Council director at Human Rights Watch. “The UN Human Rights Council should urge the Sri Lankan government to take credible steps toward accountability for past crimes and end reprisals against victims, their families, and human rights defenders.”

Human Rights Watch interviewed 32 victims of abuses, family members of the disappeared, and lawyers and other human rights defenders, and extensively reviewed court documents and other sources.

Tens of thousands of people were tortured, forcibly disappeared, abducted, and killed by government security forces and nonstate armed groups during Sri Lanka’s 1987-1989 Marxist insurgency in the south and the civil war between the government and the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), which ended in 2009.

Sri Lanka has a legacy of failed attempts at obtaining justice for past abuses. Successive governments have appointed more than 10 commissions since the 1990s to inquire into human rights violations, but none led to prosecutions or revealed what happened to thousands of people who disappeared. Various administrations either made minimal progress on cases or actively intervened to block the few criminal investigations underway.

“Excavations [of mass graves] alone will not provide justice,” said a family member of a disappearance victim in Jaffna. “Will those who are responsible for abuses be held accountable?” Investigators have recovered the remains of 582 people from a mass grave at Chemmani, near Jaffna, but there has been no apparent progress in identifying the victims or finding what happened to them.

The Dissanayake government has made some progress in important investigations that were previously derailed. These include the inquiry into the 2009 murder of a newspaper editor, Lasantha Wickrematunge; the 2010 enforced disappearance of a journalist, Prageeth Ekneligoda; and the enforced disappearance by naval intelligence officers of 11 young men who were held for ransom in 2008 and 2009.

An investigation into an alleged high-level government conspiracy behind the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings, which killed 269 people, wasonly able to proceed after President Dissanayake took office. In February 2026, police arrested Suresh Sallay, a former military intelligence officer, for colluding with an Islamist group accused of carrying out the attacks. In June, a Sri Lankan court banned former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and two other military intelligence officers from foreign travel in connection with the ongoing investigations into the attacks.

Despite the limited progress, the Dissanayake government has not responded with the needed urgency to end impunity for grave abuses, Human Rights Watch found. There has been no progress in other important cases in which senior officials have been implicated, including the 2006 killing of five Tamil students and the massacre of 17 mostly Tamil members of the French aid group Action Contre la Faim. Twenty years on, no one has been arrested, let alone prosecuted, for these killings.

The Dissanayake government has not accepted the Sri Lanka Accountability Project, established by the UN Human Rights Council to collect evidence of serious rights abuses. It has failed to establish the promised Directorate of Public Prosecution to independently prosecute past abuses.

Instead, it has backed initiatives of previous governments, such as the Office on Missing Persons and the Office for Reparations, which many victims’ families have rejected because they consider them efforts intended to delay justice.

Since the end of the civil war in 2009, the UN has played an important role in promoting justice and accountability while seeking to end ongoing violations. The UN Secretary-General’s 2011 Panel of Experts report and the 2015 investigation on Sri Lanka by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) documented extensive war crimes and other abuses by both sides during the civil war. And the UN Human Rights Council has adopted a series of resolutions seeking accountability.

The UN Human Rights Council and the OHCHR should continue to review the Dissanayake government’s progress on justice and press for action to address decades of impunity, Human Rights Watch said.

“The Dissanayake government should jumpstart its efforts to obtain genuine accountability for the killings and disappearances in the past conflicts,” McKernan said. “The UN high commissioner and UN member states at the Human Rights Council should urge the Dissanayake government to demonstrate its expressed commitment to justice in Sri Lanka.”

Latest comments

  • 3
    1

    Instead, the Government should clearly demonstrate that this amendment is intended to advance progress on justice and accountability for past abuses. iT Should be presented to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) as evidence of the Government’s commitment to strengthening accountability, addressing unresolved violations, and ensuring that those
    responsible for serious abuses cannot simply escape scrutiny.

    Any constitutional reform Must therefore be judged not merely by its wording, but by its purpose and implementation. If the present amendment is genuinely intended to promote justice for victims, strengthen independent institutions, and advance accountability, the Government should explain this openly to the UNHRC and to the people of Sri Lanka.

    The amendment should not become another mechanism for protecting the masterminds of past abuses. Sri Lanka’s constitutional reform must serve the cause of justice, transparency, and accountability—not political expediency or the concealment of past wrongdoing.

  • 8
    1

    “The UN high commissioner and UN member states at the Human Rights Council should urge the Dissanayake government to demonstrate its expressed commitment to justice in Sri Lanka.”

    Justice is only possible accepting truth. Don’t waste your time in investigating the crimes. It is difficult to accept that truth because Dissanayake government was also part of it but you have now wearing a cloth to cover your part of the racism and religious misuse of power. That is not enough. It is not a closed. It is part of the world.

  • 5
    9

    I would like to place before the UNHRC the following colloquial usage among Sri Lankans.

    “Pahath Thenin Yai Gala Jale”. In English (translation) is : The Water Always Flow Through Low Levels”

    Look at what is happening in Gaza, Lebanon, Ukrain, in particular and many other countries in general. Millions and millions have been subjected to ‘Human Torture’ and dying of starvation and abuse of power by the ‘Big Sharks’ like the USA, Israel.

    Where is your ‘VOICE’ against them? Have you gone at least to bring them to book in International Criminal Court? What you are doing is, in our way of saying is: ‘ When you see the Weak, you Hammer it Harder and Harder’. That is how you SURVIVE.

    • 3
      5

      Douglas Appu, please wake up !

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zznz7QN3phQ

      Many observers and policy experts are increasingly questioning whether the present government has demonstrated the political maturity, preparedness, and institutional capacity needed to deliver the sweeping reforms it promised. The issue is not simply the English proficiency of a minister or the occasional diplomatic faux pas; it is whether ministers are adequately prepared, properly briefed, and sufficiently knowledgeable about the subjects they are expected to defend before international institutions such as the United Nations. The controversy surrounding the proposed 22nd Amendment has further strengthened these concerns, particularly when even figures associated with the governing movement have publicly expressed reservations. At a time when the public expects transparency, accountability and serious leadership, remaining silent on contentious national issues only deepens the perception that the government is either unprepared or unwilling to confront difficult questions directly.
      Tbc

      • 2
        1

        This aims to educate Douglas et al.
        Please watch the video below.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GfYFS_WezE&t=21s

    • 1
      0

      “When you see the Weak, you Hammer it Harder and Harder’. That is how you SURVIVE.”
      You may be right if you disagree with this governments finding that past governments claim that this country ruled by past governments with racism and religious misuse of power. Do you agree or disagree with that past governments purposely misused the power and misuse the religion. Do you agree that the past governments massacred over 60000 of Sinhalese youth? Do you agree that burning of Jaffna library and massacre of Tamils in1958, and 1983 is righht?

  • 4
    6

    cont.
    .
    After nearly two years in office, the public is entitled to compare promises with measurable results rather than political rhetoric.

    Governments should be judged not by how loudly they celebrate their own achievements, but by what they have actually delivered in governance, the economy, justice, institutional reform and public confidence. Equally important, Sri Lanka must remain alert to any form of politics that weakens democratic institutions, intimidates dissent or treats criticism as an enemy of the state. Given the country’s painful history of political violence; including the destruction and loss of tens of thousands of lives during the JVP insurrection period—leaders across the political spectrum have a responsibility to reject authoritarian or intolerant political methods. The public should therefore demand competence, transparency, accountability and respect for democratic institutions from the present government, just as it should have demanded them from every government before it.

  • 2
    0

    The current NPP government in Sri Lanka appears to have no minister who is convincingly demonstrating the competence, clarity, and leadership required to steer the country out of the difficulties it has fallen into. Yet the public is continually being asked to believe that the government will somehow overcome these challenges, despite little convincing evidence of a coherent direction or effective governance. More concerning is the apparent effort to turn even inaccuracies, half-truths, and political missteps into advantages for the government through carefully managed narratives. This is possible, in part, because political literacy among the public remains relatively weak, even though Sri Lanka’s general level of formal education compares favourably with countries such as Singapore. The performance of the Finance Minister is particularly concerning.
    Tbc

  • 2
    0

    cont.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePywaD1IxaI

    His frequent difficulty in delivering even prepared speeches naturally, articulating the government’s message clearly, and communicating with confidence has contributed to a series of avoidable faux pas. Effective governance requires more than public relations and political messaging; it requires competent ministers who understand their responsibilities, communicate clearly, and inspire confidence through their actions. Without such leadership, the belief that the government can simply emerge from the deepening difficulties it faces risks becoming little more than wishful thinking.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.