18 November, 2019

Blog

The Many Dimensions Of Surveillance

By Malinda Seneviratne

Malinda Seneviratne

Edward Snowden was unknown, just as Julian Assange was a nonentity until he blew a whistle.   The disclosures regarding the extent, pernicious character and the political economy of surveillance has raised the ire of a lot of people.  Americans of the United States, in particular, are livid about this invasion of privacy, apparently sanctioned by the self-appointed high priests of democracy and freedom (not just for the citizens of that country but the rest of the world as well) themselves.

It has been wryly observed that ‘White America’ seems to have just woken up to smell the coffee, so to speak.  For that ‘America’ largely insulated from the horrors of the world and the tragedies at their doorstep, Snowden is a ‘newsmaker’.  For large sections of the ‘other’ America (of the US), as well as for the rest of the world, unburdened of illusion a long time ago, it is just something that spilled into the comfort zones of privilege.

The truth is that Big Brother never blinks, although he can be so blinded at times by ignorance and arrogance that he misses both wood and tree and errs terribly.  Mohamad Tabbaa, a doctoral student in Criminology and Law and the University of Melbourne has laid it out well in ‘Suddenly, white people care about incursions’, an article that’s available at www.salon.com.  He notes that for many in the USA, government surveillance has been a regular part of life, especially since 9/11. He asks, therefore, ‘So why the outrage now?’ and murmurs, ‘Welcome to the world of the Muslim, post September 11’.

There’s a lot of truth in the assertion for if privilege in that country has a color, it is white.  But there are whites and there are whites.  The class structure is not white-on-top and  non-white-below.  There is ‘white poor’ and there are whites who object to much that ‘Big Brother’ does.  The anarchists, in particular the ‘Black Bloc’ associated with the anti-globalization protests in Seattle in November 1999, were white.  The communists hounded during the McCarthy weren’t all non-white. Ethel and Julius Rosenberg were hanged. They were white.

The demarcating factor is perception of threat to a fairly well established system of privilege.  The mover is fidelity to a project of sustained exploitation and control.  Barack Obama, self-appointed grand abbot of democracy and freedom didn’t mince his words when he said that if you want security you must submit to surveillance.  The point, however, is that surveillance is not about public security.  It only gives that impression.  It is about system-security where ‘system’ is about exploitation, plunder, strategic needs to sustain these etc.  The ordinary US citizen has to submit him/herself to surveillance so that system stays.

Some say it’s all exaggerated.  Here’s a story that will demonstrate the no-stone-unturned bottom line of anxiety and control that is an integral part of the US ‘security’ system.

In the year 2000, I wrote a series of articles titled ‘Sketchbook USA’ for the Sunday Island.  It was all about my experiences in the USA, my observations during the7 years I spent in that country as a student. One of the articles was titled ‘My professors and friends’.  I wrote about the teachers I respected most, learned from the most and were more colorful than their colleagues.  Among them was Geoff Waite of the German Studies Department.

‘Geoff Waite, the only card-carrying member of the Communist Party at Cornell University and Professor of German Studies, who taught Marx, Nietszche, Freud, Lacan and Althusser to both undergraduates and graduate students, was far more relaxed. All he wanted from us was that we maintained a journal, i.e. write regular commentaries on the reading material or the class discussion. “As long as I am convinced that you are doing some serious thinking, I will be satisfied,” he would say.’

‘Card carrying member’ was shorthand for ‘radical’, ‘brave’ and ‘unique’.  I didn’t spell it out because it was a light piece.  The person who used that phrase, one of Geoff’s doctoral students, didn’t spell it out either.  He knew, I knew. That was enough.

This was in a Sri Lankan Sunday newspaper. A light piece, as I mentioned.  It was not ‘missed’ by whoever does surveillance in Sri Lanka for the CIA/FBI though.  The FBI paid Geoff a visit, I learned a couple of years later.  Maybe I was naïve.  Geoff obviously wasn’t.  He had observed, I was told, ‘Malinda screwed me’.   I was so naïve that when I was informed of this, I couldn’t imagine how on earth I could have caused any harm to that lovely man endowed with one of the sharpest minds I’ve encountered.  It took me a few months to figure out what must have happened.

Mohamad Tabbaa is a student in Australia. I don’t know which country he is a citizen of.  He is being watched now, if he was not being watched before.  What Snowden has revealed is far more sinister; people are being watched in terms of a ‘just in case’ logic.

And it is unlikely that governments other than the one in Washington haven’t picked a surveillance leaf from that nasty book.

How do we respond?  Vigilance.  Counter-surveillance.  Solidarity.  Flipping the script is not easy, but flipping is a non-negotiable if you value your privacy, your freedom.  Play peek-a-boo.  It works.  You make them angry.  They slip.  They may have superior technology.  You can counter it all.  If you have a heart.  And of course a mind.  It is easy to lie but easier to be honest.  Especially if you are being watched 24/7.

Just remember: if you’ve bought their lie, the more pernicious mechanism of incursion is resident within you.

*Malinda Seneviratne is the Chief Editor of ‘The Nation’ and his articles can be found at www.malindawords.blogspot.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    Malinda,

    Good points about surveillance and privileged. Remember, you are being watched, in this global surveillance.

    Caveat Emptor -buyer beware.

    • 0
      0

      Surely, Malinda the nonentity is none other than Big Brothers Lap Dog.

    • 0
      0

      Excellent points, Malinda you should reflect on their relevance to the paranoid Gota the grand abbot of security and surveillance in Lanka to preserve the Rajapassa military dictatorship!
      Ever since the US led global war on terror the tune has been: “if you want security you must submit to surveillance.” The point is that this tune played by the US has been grabbed with broth hands by the military dictatorships and grand abbots of social control in corrupt and criminal polities in the global south.
      Check out Gota the white van goon’s crude obsession with CCTV and cyber surveillance.. a more crude version of the US wire taps!
      The massive post-war defense budget of the Sri Lanka Defense Ministry (20 percent of GDP), is an indicator of how Gota the grand abbot of security in Lanka agrees with the US’s Barack Obama that “if you want security you must submit to surveillance.”
      The paranoid and hyper-securitized Rajapassa regime (check out their military convoys speeding on the streets of Colombo) additionally has the fear of a war crimes trial and will thus take all measures to prevent any opposition to the regime and break down people’s protests via treats of surveillance and imprisonment. But as you rightly say:
      The point, however, is that surveillance is not about public security. It only gives that impression. It is about system-security where ‘system’ is about exploitation, plunder, strategic needs to sustain these etc. The ordinary Sri Lanka citizen has to submit him/herself to surveillance so that the system stays, the Rajapassa military dictatorship to loot the public wealth is secured. Time to turn the torch inward, Malinda: recognize that your Rajapassa paymasters are the bigger problem for Lankan citizens (than is Obama or anyone in the US operating a global surveillance culture to secure an INEQUITABLE global and local economic system) at this time!

    • 0
      0

      Amarasiri:
      It is apparent that you feel it is your responsibility to “look after the interests” of your fellow pandankarayas like MS. I would have thought that the regime would look after them well enough without your help. After all what better protection than PAYING them as the Rajapassas do MS for looking after their piece of junk they call a newspaper?

  • 0
    0

    If I am being watched 24 x 7 does it mean that I am protected too ?

    If I am being attacked ( robbed by cyber crooks,internet scams etc) that can be stopped as well can’t it ?

    Surely that’s a positive ?

    • 0
      0

      Don’t worry Don, Sancho is watching your back!

  • 0
    0

    Didn’t know you were so emotional. You were brandish your index finger like scimitar when that guy from Press TV was asking you questions. Didn’t actually think you believe in what you write. I thought you did it for the money.

  • 0
    0

    Material for a great deal of thought. Do we or don’t we think or speak as conscience dictates? Great men have suffered for less.

  • 0
    0

    @Don Quixote
    “If I am being watched 24 x 7 does it mean that I am protected too?”

    Correct; A recent example is that of the arrest of the accused in the murder of the businessman from Bambalapitiya. This was mainly possible because of a CCTV camera installed on a private boundary wall of a residence in the vicinity. So, surveillance has a positive element to it, if applied genuinely with no pernicious intent to the privacy and rights of innocent citizens. However, as Malinda correctly points out, US surveillance of the Big Brother brand that now makes Assange, Snowden et al flee from country to country is not just about public security. It only gives that impression. It is about system-security where ‘system’ is about exploitation, plunder, strategic needs to sustain these etc. The ordinary US citizen has to submit him/herself to surveillance so that the system stays. Wow ! Malinda always makes the obvious, obviouser (with apologies to Lewis Carrol). Love reading his pieces.

  • 0
    0

    Now that survillance, whistle-blowing, phone-tapping is the order of
    the day, and spreading , will it be possible for an US / Indian drone
    to switch-off the pace-maker implanted in a US Citizen anywhere?
    (a bad joke!)

  • 0
    0

    Isn’t our own version of Big Brother(s)alive and well in Sri Lanka?!

    Malinda, why don’t you write a piece on that?

    Or are you afraid…verrry afraid!??

  • 0
    0

    What has been radical and reading Marx got to do with being a lapdog of the regime?

  • 0
    0

    The question is can we put the government under surveillance? I think in Sri Lanka the citizen needs to be protected from the government.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.