23 June, 2024


The Misunderstood Flexible Inflation Targeting Of The Central Bank

By W.A Wijewardena

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Criticising the Central Bank’s new monetary policy framework

In the past few years, specifically in the last two weeks, there has been a number of contributions made by some independent economists expressing reservations about the Central Bank’s new monetary policy framework known as ‘flexible inflation targeting’. Some of these critics have come from among mainstream economists who normally subscribe to the accepted economic wisdom relating to money and monetary policy. However, among them, a few have distanced themselves from the mainstream economists calling themselves as products of alternative economics schools and been critical of the new policy framework.

The first category has branded flexible inflation targeting as impractical. The second category has gone beyond this criticism and labelled it a monstrous policy coming from IMF, one of the three institutions making up of now dead Washington Consensus that worship, according to them, neoliberal economic policies. Hence, their objection to flexible inflation targeting is an extension of their deep-rooted objection to IMF, Washington Consensus and neoliberal economic policies.

Criticisms should be welcome by the Central Bank

The Central Bank should welcome such criticisms of its policies by independent economists for two reasons. One is that it causes to generate a public debate over the Bank’s policies, a must in an accountable democracy that upholds the virtues of good governance principles. The other is that it gives an opportunity for the Bank to ascertain the shortcomings of its communication strategies and make amends for same. Hence, in my view, the Bank should promote such public debates, both within and outside the Bank, as much as possible.

The guiding principle is that, Homo sapiens, Man the Wise, is by nature argumentative and that has to be accommodated in any social intercourse he wishes to have. Hence, those arguments, especially the dissenting ones, should be resolved in platforms in which the opponent in a debate, as laid down by Emperor Asoka in one of his rock inscriptions, should be treated with honour and respect in every way possible.

Flexible inflation targeting was a process

The Central Bank’s journey toward inflation targeting was started in 2004 as a part of its modernisation program. But, due to a lack of any support from the government in power at that time, the Central Bank could not attain much progress in the project. It was virtually an abandoned project until it was rediscovered in 2016 by IMF when it rescued Sri Lanka by offering an extended fund facility to the country. To obtain the facility, the Sri Lanka government had pledged to IMF that it would introduce both a flexible exchange rate regime and an inflation targeting framework over the next three-year period.

The Central Bank too in a special box article in its Annual Report for 2016, released in April 2017, had emphasised the need for introducing inflation targeting as the country’s monetary policy framework. The previous government, in its medium-term economic policy strategy contained in Vision 2025 released to public in August 2017 and the economic policy statement delivered in Parliament in October had reiterated its commitment to support the Central Bank to go for flexible inflation targeting.

The detailed outline of the Bank’s flexible inflation targeting was presented by its Senior Deputy Governor Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe in a memorial oration delivered in Colombo later in the year. A review of this memorial oration can be found here.

In this review, while endorsing the Bank’s move to flexible inflation targeting, it was suggested that wide public education is needed in order to disabuse the minds of the people about the new policy framework. This suggestion has become prophetic today, given the adverse criticisms levelled against the Central Bank by some of the mainstream economists in the country.

Central banks are to manage aggregate demand to avoid both inflation and deflation

The current criticism against the flexible inflation targeting has arisen from a misunderstanding of what a central bank is for and what is meant by its monetary policy framework.

Central banks throughout the world have been created by respective societies only for one purpose: That is to maintain the value of money it produces by managing the total demand in the economy, known as the aggregate demand for goods and services, to be equal to the total supply of goods and services, known as the aggregate supply. If the money stock suddenly increases and people do not want to keep that money at homes in the form of money, it would cause them to spend that money to buy goods and services, on one side, and invest in bonds leading to a decline in the interest rates in the system, on the other.

When money is spent on goods and services, it would directly increase the aggregate demand. If it is spent for buying bonds, the resultant decline in the interest rates will force people to increase consumption as well as investment. Whatever the course of action they would take, it would increase the aggregate demand and through it, a general increase in the price level causing a reduction of the real value of the wealth they are holding.

This is what we want to avoid and we, as members of society, have created central banks to deliver this much cherished price stability to us. We do not want prices to go up or go down. An increase in the prices will bring forth inflation reducing the real value of our wealth. A decline in prices will cause deflation reducing the profits of the producers. If this deflationary trend continues, the producers would become bankrupt causing a production cut and massive unemployment. Central banks are expected by us to avoid both these extremes by managing the aggregate demand properly. To attain that objective, the operating system they use is called monetary policy. That is why monetary policies are also known as demand management policies.

Monetary policy is only the operating system 

Thus, the job of a central bank is to manage aggregate demand to avoid both inflation and deflation. The operating system it would use to accomplish this job is called the monetary policy. Whenever the central banks would find that the particular operating system is not effective, they would seek to improve it or replace it with a completely new operating system. This can be understood by considering an analogy. Take for example, a computer and its operating system. The job of the computer is to process the data that is fed to it and produce the end results which the user of the computer desires. For instance, if the user desires to draw a graph by using a particular set of data, the computer alone cannot do it without a supportive operation system. There are many such operating systems like Ubuntu, MS Office or iOS and the user is free to change from one system to another if the existing system is not effective. This analogy tells us that one cannot reject the operating system without rejecting the computer as well.

Central Bank has liberally changed the operating system in the past

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka in the past 70-year period has changed its operating system on a number of occasions when it had found that particular operating system it had been using was not effective in delivering its main job, that is to avoid both inflation and deflation. Till about early 1980s, the Bank had used a particular operating system focussing on the control of what has been defined as the narrow money supply consisting of the currencies and demand deposits held by the public. Since this happened to be the knowledge base which economists had about money supply in late 1940s, even the Monetary Law Act under which the Bank has been setup had legally defined the money supply to be so.

Broadening money supply and use of controlling Monetary Base

But by early 1980s, Governor Warnasena Rasaputra had realised that that particular definition was inadequate and instructed the Bank’s officials to come up with a new definition of money supply. Under Rasaputra’s direction, two improvements were made to the operating system. One was to broaden the operational money supply as broad money supply consisting of time and savings deposits held by the public in commercial banks, in addition to the currencies and demand deposits which had been covered under the narrow money definition.

The other had two sides: first to focus on controlling what is known as seed money created by the Central Bank through its operation. The second was to connect these money goals to a National Credit Plan. If the Bank can control this seed money, also known as Reserve Money, Base Money, Base, Monetary Base or High-Powered Money, it could control the final level of money supply in whatever way it is defined.

The National Credit Plan allowed the Bank to allocate that final level of money that does not create either inflation or deflation between the government and the private sector and among the private sector borrowers, for what the Bank has identified as priority sectors. In a few years’ time, the Bank realised that the National Credit Plan does not work and therefore it was abandoned.

Realising the need for inflation targeting

However, the Monetary Base Control as the main operating system of the Bank was continued with minor improvements till early 2000s. In about this time, the Bank realised that the operating system involving the control of the Monetary Base was not effective and there was a need for going for a new operating system. The identified new operating system was to target inflation directly known as inflation targeting. This work continued under the direction of Governor A.S. Jayawardena when the Bank had embarked on a modernisation project. However, he could not hold onto that position until its final outcome was produced.

That was done under Governor Indrajit Coomaraswamy in about 2017. But there was a slight modification to inflation targeting by further qualifying it as flexible inflation targeting. The flexible part allowed the Central Bank to do away with inflation targeting if the economy was hit by deflation resulting in a decline in the total output or an increase in unemployment. In other words, the Bank has awarded itself the freedom to change the direction of the monetary policy if it is confronted with an adverse situation like the one it experiences today as a fallout of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Imposing costly import and exchange controls

What this means is that the critics of the flexible inflation targeting have not properly understood the purpose of a central bank and the difference between a central bank and its operating system. When they have criticised the operating system calling for its rejection, they invariably call for the rejection of the central bank that operates the operating system involved.

Once both are rejected, society does not have a mechanism to control the production of money over and above the needs of the economy. That money would be spent on goods and services and to the extent those goods and services are procured from external sources, it leads to an imbalance in foreign receipts and foreign payments. The resultant deficit leads to a depreciation of the exchange rate as it has happened throughout the post-independence history of Sri Lanka.

Making one mistake after another 

What the previous governments did was, instead of tackling the problem at source, imposing controls on foreign payments known as import and exchange control measures. They were sold to a gullible society that they were being implemented to make Sri Lanka the strongest nation in the world. But, to implement import and exchange controls, governments have to make one mistake after another and at the end, the country was completely engulfed by such a system of mistakes. I have discussed the repercussions of such mistakes in a previous article in this series.

Return to 1970s

The gist of the argument was that while these controls failed to deliver the intended results, they also led to economy-wide inefficiencies worsening the economic conditions of the country. Knowingly or unknowingly, the present government too has resorted to these control measures banning the importation of what it has classified as luxury or inessential goods altogether.

Though the present COVID-19 pandemic has helped the government to sell these control measures to people, if it is continued after the world comes back to normalcy, the result would be the creation of another 1970s in the current period.

In that scenario in 1970s, letters of credit opened by Sri Lankan banks were accepted by foreign banks if and only if they were guaranteed by third-party reputed bank. By asking importers of inessential and luxury goods to go for three to six-month credit, the government has sanctioned this third-party guarantee of the country’s payments.

In other words, the message delivered is that Sri Lanka would default its payments and therefore, it is necessary to arrange for a period letter of credit extending up to six months known as a usance letter of credit. In the current letters of credit, the bank has to make a payment immediately once it has spotted the bill, known as a sight payment, provided the exporter at the other end has satisfied all the conditions laid down in the letter of credit.

Thus, the critics of the flexible inflation targeting should realise that there is a difference between the central bank and its operating systems and rejecting the operating system would invariably lead to the rejection of the central bank as well.

*The writer, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4

    one subtle thing I noticed is the colour of the tie other two guys are wearing….
    is the Rajafakse trade mark colour and shawl going to be the dress code in the public and private sector?

  • 5

    Dear Dr W.A Wijewardena,
    If it is the details of what is going on the economy, I think that a guy like me can be out-talked by the parasites who spend their time on the Stock-market and heading the various Banks. All those financial institutions are necessary.
    We have little respect for the politicians whom we have, but then we can’t do without the guys. We have to replace those politicians with a better lot. It’s we who do the choosing, and it’s upto us to choose better.
    Why am I saying what is obvious, and has been said hundreds of times? It is because for too long now we’ve been talking “Bond Scam”. Now at last Arjuna Mahendran has begun to tell his part of the story.
    Let us wait until he has finished presenting the many parts of his story: he must be at least partly to blame – but not he alone. There is a whole class of manipulators who live off the rest of the country by controlling the money.

  • 2

    Continuing . . .
    You know the system through and through. Yet you are not of “them”. You know that there are worlds of human values which we who work in other areas know are being transgressed by these parasites.
    Please, when the picture is complete, join in that argument. It is still too early. Let Mahendran finish telling his side of the story. By exposing all the wheeler-dealers, you will ensure that the politicians will no longer be able to cheat us.
    What do you make of this?
    That deals with money as well. This man’s thinking seemed to have impressed a Christian priest who sent it to me; but hold on: this man rejects what is usually meant by Christianity. He seems to believe more in Buddhism.
    We are definitely going into a different world!

  • 3

    Always nice to read these well balanced and factual articles by Dr. WAW.

    Dr. WAW,

    I wish to bring to attention two disturbing articles published today – only one media outlet carried this, while the insidious disregard from every other media outlet indicates the state of mainstream media today.

    1) Two prominent and respected members of the main governing board of the CBSL evidently resign before being asked to do so by people bent on replacing them (as I know it these are no-nonsense straight talking individuals): http://www.themorning.lk/nihal-fonseka-and-dr-dushni-weerakoon-resign-from-monetary-board/

    2) http://www.themorning.lk/central-banks-monetary-policy-consultative-committee-changed/

    The prominent and well balanced makeup advising the main governing board has been replaced by folks like Raigam who would not know their elbow from their posterior when it comes to basic economics other than what benefits them personally.

    I note that one so called toy PHD ‘economist’ who I believe has been your student at some point and does not make sense in any of his loud social media rants supporting the present leadership of the country – now seems he has managed to carve his Viyath Maga all the way to the board to bring back the good old days of Cabral era central banking. God help Sri Lanka and Central Bank.

  • 4

    The Value of the currency is the strength of the country’s stability. and cure for perils. Literate skilled workers, naturally resource Ethnic Unity and Stability, Trnsaprency integrity proper ten years Economic and development Plan are the factors that build. Burrowing money from Rich countries is not the solution to economic perils. We do not require a Ph.D. to be the chairman of CB. Dedicated, Honest, and Visionary who watches the political developments should adjust his Economic plan . The main objective is to build a good Standard o living ad reduce poverty. The low poverty level ow the time rate happier the people will be

  • 5

    Is this article an another redherring to the prevailing situation in CBSL ? Everything is possible in our god punished land right ?

    In fact, current article former CBSL deputy governor is timely planned – just day before yesterday only alleged former CBSL governaor the most known Singaporean citizen broke his silence. He defended himself saying that it was a well planned conspiracy to attack UNP govt by former President SIRISENA together with MR who is now protecting SIRISENA for their political survival.

    Who is telling the truth ? Is that not the question of the hour ?
    Can anyone please question as to why Dr Wijewardhana, as one of the regular panelists to political discussions in SIRASA TV and other media institutions based on BANKU MANKOLLAYA aka day light CBSL Bond Scam (we dont know yet, it was a fairy tale or the reality, since former PRESIDENT s experts confirmed, the losses made by MR adminstration were beyond 1000 billions or more, perhaps unestimable), stay yet not revealing much about the incident. I do believe, he should have been well aware of the facts wihtin that Institution, because he was one of the deputy governors to CBSL in the days of MR-administration (2005-2015) – please correct me if I am wrong, I am not anyone that would be familar with BANK systems but in SL.

  • 0

    sad sorry Lanka has now thanks to the jarawama rajapuka’s have in their incompetent criminal manner have put the nation into a reverse gear driving it down the pallans into the crevices of the bog in the cesspit.
    as stated by me on several instances on this forum the rajapuka’s are only past master experts in performing many an act of hora boru where they specialize in robbing the Kota uda nation’s assets and reserves.
    they have no economists in their midst to guide and steer the beleaguered nation onto the much needed correct paths to prevent another chaos.
    now in their ignorance along with just knowing as to what to do they have enforced stringent import controls have raised the customs duties and the retail selling prices of many an essential living item.
    they are nothing but thick-skinned rogues, I mean petty thieves who are only hellbent in having their criminal ways and the ambitious 2/3rd majority to play bandu pandu with the silently starving suffering malnourished peasants who have no other choice but to adorn the grey gloomy cloudy skies of the jaeawama rajapukistan a by force military dictatorship.
    my deepest condolences to Ceylon and I always thank all the great Lords for having the CID and the Modera Police who were acting on the instructions of their then SP who gave me the impetus to take flight from the nation on the 5th September 1987.
    I along with my daughter are now in paradise in heaven.

    • 0

      “I along with my daughter are now in paradise in heaven.”

      If you and your daughter are in paradise in heaven, why you have to put your nose into the affairs of Sri Lanka and what Rajapuka’s are doing?

      “they have no economists in their midst to guide and steer the beleaguered nation onto the much needed correct paths to prevent another chaos.”

      Sinhalayo chose Rajapuka’s because of their proven record to deliver results.
      After ending the terrorist campaign by Tamils that dragged on for three decades, Rajapuka’s developed the economy. At the time ‘Regime Change’ mafia overthrew Rajapakshe regime, the economy was growing around 7%. During the four and half years the ‘Yahapalana’ dong kees ruled, the economic growth fell down to 1.8%. So whose record is better?

  • 3

    The resignation of Dr Dushni Weerakoon from the Monetary Board does not increase the confidence of the public in the monetary policy of the government.

  • 2

    A policy need not change with every change of government or Change of Governor or Change of Monitory Board.

    It is something permanent should be adopted after widest possible stakeholder consultation.

    Shall we go fora pennant monetary policy for Sri lanka?

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.