21 June, 2024


The Role Of Universities In Bringing Continued Economic Prosperity To Sri Lanka

By W.A Wijewardena –

This is an expanded version of the Convocation Address delivered at the 13th General Convocation of the Wayamba University of Sri Lanka on 30 August 2017.

An ambition to become a rich country in 15 years

As pronounced by the government in its economic policy statement, Sri Lanka aspires to become a developed country within the next 30 year period. To attain this goal, the statement says, Sri Lanka should have a minimum annual economic growth of 7 percent over this period. Given an annual population growth of 1 %, what it means is that the average income of a Sri Lankan, known as per capita income, will double in every 12 year period. Thus, in 36 years, the country’s per capita income will increase eightfold from the current level of $ 4000 to $ 32000. Since the developed country threshold, according the World Bank’s classifications, is per capita income of about $ 12235, at 6 % annual per capita income growth, Sri Lanka will be able to attain the status of rich country in 15 years or by 2031.

Dr. W.A Wijewardena

Sri Lanka’s past record is disappointing

This is indeed a laudable ambition. However, in the whole post independence era, Sri Lanka’s average annual growth rate has been at a dismal 4.4 percent. During this period, Sri Lanka had made progress on many fronts, but they all have been small gains when compared with its main target of creating sustained prosperity for its people. Thus, despite the proclaimed ambition to elevate the country to the status of a developed economy, Sri Lanka has remained a developing economy throughout.

Adopt policies to break the vicious cycle of inadequate development

The country’s track record of creating prosperity shows that there is a vicious cycle working against the country. It is therefore necessary to break this vicious cycle if the country is to attain a significant economic growth. The challenge to break the cycle is difficult but not impossible if proper policies are adopted.

Sri Lanka’s best resource is its people

The policies should recognise the country’s resource endowment and use the most abundant resource to push the economy up on a sustained basis. Sri Lanka is a natural resource poor country unlike some of the neighbouring countries such as Myanmar, Malaysia or Vietnam. Hence, it cannot leverage its future growth on natural resources. The only resource it has is its manpower which, according to employers, is easily trainable and upgradable. And that is the resource which Sri Lanka has to use for its future economic growth.

Empowering people is development

Economists for many years had believed that the availability of physical capital such as buildings, roads, ports and airports etc would guarantee that a nation can attain a high economic growth. The presumption made was that the human resources available to a country could use such physical capital to produce more goods and services to ameliorate the living conditions of people.

But development today is a wider concept than mere production of more goods and services. It is more to do with improving the conditions of people, their ability to sustain prosperity and the quality and nature of the freedoms they enjoy as citizens. Thus, it actually refers to the improvement in the quality of life of people. With better health, education and income, it will empower people to attain self- perfection, the ultimate goal of living as human beings.

Democracy and development are interrelated

A simple question then to be asked is whether people will be happier if economic wellbeing is delivered to them without freedom of choice. If the answer is yes, then, an authoritative ruler can deliver a sufficiently large basket of goods and services to people and keep them happy. But without human freedom, such wellbeing is incomplete. Accordingly, ushering human freedom in a democracy is the best ground condition for people to have a real quality of life. It is an essential condition that facilitates them to attain the final goal of their living, namely, self-perfection.

Hence, democracy and development cannot be separated though economic growth can take place temporarily without democracy and freedom. This was cogently presented by Nobel Laureate in economics, Amartya Sen, when he equated development to freedom in a book published in 1999 under the title ‘Development as Freedom’. To elevate growth to development, it should be connected to human freedoms which in turn will depend on the maturity, knowledge and wisdom of people.

Growth and development are also interrelated

Therefore, growth and development imperatives should go hand in hand. They are two separate goals but interconnected. Development imperatives cannot be introduced without growth. In the same way, growth without development imperatives becomes meaningless. Sri Lanka’s present development thrust should encompass both these requirements.

Trade has been Sri Lanka’s growth source

Sri Lanka had depended, for thousands of years, on international trade to bring prosperity to its people. During the times of Sinhala kings, especially during the reign of Parakramabahu, the Great in the 12th century CE, Sri Lanka was a leading entrepot trading centre in the world.

In this trading model, Sri Lanka stockpiled goods imported from the rest of the world and resold them to traders who visited the country from all other places. This is the development strategy adopted by Singapore in the initial stage of its economic advancement to a rich country. However, Sri Lanka cannot play the same role today with other competitors like Dubai which has succeeded Singapore when it switched over to an industrial powerhouse in mid 1990s.

Invent for prosperity

Yet, Sri Lanka could leverage its flexible and easily trainable human talent pool to mark its place in the global economy today. The strategy to do so is the acquisition of the new technology. But the acquisition of mere technology will not help Sri Lanka unless its talent pool is capable of coming up with new inventions – the product of using human brain to come up with new ideas. This requirement was cogently presented to Sri Lankan population in 1940s by Sinhala writer Munidasa Kumaratunga when he emphasised that ‘a nation that does not continue to invent will not prosper in the world’.

Ability to think is the essential quality of people

The same ideology has been presented by two modern economists, Paul Romer and Robert Lucas in a new growth theory. According to them, human capital should be blessed with an essential talent: ability to think and come up with new ideas and innovations. The improvement in productivity which is essential for sustaining a high economic growth comes from new ideas and innovations. Innovations are simply doing old things by new methods which take fewer resources but produce more outputs.

When inputs become scarce, improve their productivity

Paul Romer has used an example from the kitchen to explain this point. In a kitchen, we mix inexpensive ingredients according to a recipe to cook a meal. The cooking is constrained by the supply of ingredients and if we cook according to the same recipe, sooner or later, we would run out of ingredients because more meals mean more ingredients and the supply of ingredients is finite. But if we come up with better recipes, we could still cook more meals with new ingredients or in the case of old ingredients, with fewer ingredients.

Applying this analogy to an economy, Romer says that “history teaches us that economic growth springs from better recipes and not just from more cooking”. New recipes come from new ideas which are translated into innovations through vigorous and rigorous research and development.

Apple’s iPod was a destructive invention

A good example is Apple’s iPod. Prior to iPod, music was available to music lovers either through long playing or LP records or cassettes which were not portable and limited in the number of songs that could be stored. It is reported that the British entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson of Virgin Group fame who himself had been involved in music business had once humorously remarked that he would come up with a new system of music that would record thousands of songs in a digital system and it would replace overnight the old LP records or cassettes. This is in fact a new idea of doing old things in a new way. This new idea led to innovation by Apple to produce iPod and make it available to music lovers on a commercial basis.

Create and use knowledge productively

Thus, modern economic prosperity is based on the advancement of human knowledge to think in a different way. Creation of knowledge is one thing but using that knowledge for economic development is another. This was amplified by Alison Wolf, a Professor of Education at the University of London In a book published in 2002. In the book “Does Education Matter? Myths About Education and Economic Growth” she argued that education or knowledge mattered if it was relevant knowledge and if there was enabling environment for using that knowledge productively.

Joseph Schumpeter: innovations are different from inventions

This had been elaborated in economic terms long ago by Austrian-American economist Joseph Schumpeter in his 1911 book ‘The Theory of Economic Development’ and in his subsequent publications. According to Schumpeter, continuous economic growth comes from innovation which is different from invention, the creation of an output of knowledge.

Inventors should be linked to entrepreneurs

Knowledge will enable researchers, engineers and scientists to create new things which are known as ‘inventions’. There are thousands of such inventions made by knowledgeable people every day. But not all these inventions lead to creating a commercially viable new product or service. For instance, there are stories of some Sri Lankan youth inventing remarkable new products such as a ‘sea-water driven motor car’ or a ‘multi-tasked paddy-thresher’.

While such inventions have their own merit, they may not be commercially viable at the current stage of technology due to higher cost of production compared to available alternatives. Hence, they just remain as prototype inventions incapable of going through an assembly line of a factory that depends on commercial viability for its survival. Schumpeter says that these inventions are used by entrepreneurs by converting them into commercial production lines. That process was named by Schumpeter as ‘innovation’

Universities as creators of knowledge

Universities are the creators of knowledge in societies today. They do so by providing higher learning to students and engaging in research and development. But there are several prerequisites for them to perform this duty by the society. They should embark on creating new knowledge which had not been there earlier. In this respect, the instructions issued by the Singaporean government to all universities and technical colleges at the turn of the century is an eye-opener everyone. Taking into account the changes in modern technology, it instructed them to concentrate on four new fields in the new millennium. They were nanotechnology, ICT, Genetic research and engineering and entertainment. This was because in the new millennium, the masters of the world would be those nations which have mastered these four areas. However, after nearly two decades, new areas have now been added to this list.

Universities should link their inventions to business

A salutary development today is that Sri Lankan universities have embarked on a dynamic research programme, supported by funding from the government. While this is a must at the initial stage, it will run into problems in the long run when the government is faced with constraints for continued funding. In this respect, universities should explore other avenues of continued funding for their research programmes. They should perforce link themselves with the private sector to undertake collaborative research projects funded by the latter. It will also solve the problem of finding entrepreneurs to transform their inventions to commercially viable products. Since universities just sit on a massive resource base – the talent pool represented by its staff and free-thinking students – it would not be difficult for them to go for this option.

Sri Lanka’s universities too should take notice of the modern developments in the global technological field and amend their curricula to suit such developments. In that manner, they can effectively contribute to the growth momentum that has been started by the government today.

*W.A Wijewardena, a former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, can be reached at waw1949@gmail.com 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2

    First clean Sri Lankan Universities from bogus and fake professors and local PhDs. Appoint professors based on PhD from top ranking world class Universities and journal articles in ISI and SCOPUS indexed Journals. You have to have visiting professor position from three countries to be professor. In Sri Lanka jokers appointed as professors by UGC circulars. Then what type of innovations you are expecting these jokers.

  • 2

    Can we remind the ‘learned’ Professor Dr Wijewardena that purpose of education is not to make money or to become rich, for an individual or a country. The aim of education should be to learnh how to think, rather than what to think. We might as well start robot factories if we intend to load the minds of children with strategies on how to become rich. Mr Wijewardena really needs to get a hold of the idea of education and its purpose.

  • 1

    This is regurgitation of neoliberal notions. There is no innovative thinking the writer calls for in this piece. Take democracy and development. China got where it is because as a communist dictatorship it was able to give directions to its people. Singapore likewise. This extolling of democracy for Sri Lanka has to be seriously reconsidered. Democracy has ensured that Sri Lanka is ruled by blinkered ethnic thugs who are absolutely corrupt, outdoing each other in SInhal-Buddhist fanaticism. This cannot be got rid of if Sri Lanka has democracy which has failed in Sri Lanka.
    Another point is about universities. They teach useless subjects of little relevance to the future of the country. There is a lot of plagiarism that takes place and PhDs are awarded on the basis of such works. Very few academics publish in international journals. So it is hogwash to think of creative thinking in Sri Lankan universities.

    Whether the rules of international trade benefit developing states is questionable. So, every bit of the article can be criticized. It is based on an ideology unsuited for Sri Lanka.

  • 1

    W.A. Wijewardena in “The Role Of Universities In Bringing Continued Economic Prosperity To Sri Lanka” raises the expectations of Lankans from Universities. Obviously WA W has near ideal universities in mind.
    Higher rung university positions are filled NOT on merit BUT off political connections. The appointees are nepotistic when selecting staff. The endemic corruption, nepotism and culture of impunity has found its way into universities. In spite of impediments, Lankan Universities contribute their mite.
    WA W and like minded must work towards eliminating corruption in the GoSL.

  • 0

    Continued Economic Prosperity .!!!!!!!…….Are you serious…..Yahaplana Economics dragged down Growth by 50 % from 8 to 4……….715 Businesses in BOI have eloped With the Yhapalana Government holding the can………BASL boss left the joint . Most probably he did not want to be part of the dodgey deals there, in case Gota gets the big Gig in 2020….. Aloysious and FIL would be gone by then , with all the loot well invested in TV, Print Media , Breweries , Casinos and Luxury Condons and Shopping Mlls for the Colombo Elite…….With Dr Ranil’ and Golaya Eran putting bullet proof Legislation in place, so that no one can touch them including Walasmulla Wije…………BTW, you didn’t contribute to that spiel yesterday on how Maithri Sira,, Eran and Dr Ranil are going to make our inhabitants Singaporeans by 2025?………

  • 0

    [Edited out] Comments should not exceed 300 words. Please read our Comments Policy for further details.

  • 0

    I do not agree with the statement “The only resource it has is its manpower which, according to employers, is easily trainable and upgradable. And that is the resource which Sri Lanka has to use for its future economic growth” We have enough valuable mineral resources which have never come into the economic equations. Mineral resources such as thorium and rare earths could earn us millions if properly exploited. Also starting a chemical industry to ensure value addition such as making our own phosphate fertiliser from Epawela apatite can save us millions of dollars in foreign exchange. Manufacturing iron in Sri Lanka from our iron ore and manufacturing cement at the KKS factory should be urgent priorities. We had an advanced steel making industry as far back as 1200 A.D. and exported swords.to the middle east.
    This government and others have never thought of using these natural resources for the economic development of the country.Problem is we have long been led by economists in policy making. They know nothing about the potential of our mineral wealth and their value. They only know how to bridge a trade deficit by borrowing more money at exorbitant interest rates. Also arrogant politicians like Ranil who think he knows it all never listens to the professionals and the academia of our country. While there are several advisers to the President on matters related to foreign affairs and sports there is no science adviser. So much for economic development using science!

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.