By Ranjan de Silva –

Ranjan de Silva
On the 4th of February every year, we raise the lion flag and speak of democracy. We speak of 78 years of “self-rule.” But honesty demands we ask: what kind of rule have we actually had? It was not democracy. Democracy is government for the common good, constrained by law, informed by reason, and accountable to truth.
What Sri Lanka has had for 78 years is demagoguery — government by manipulation, by party, and by passion
Defining the Curse: The dictionary defines demagoguery as “political activity that seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by rational argument.” Its tools are simple: divide the people, promise the impossible, demonize the opponent, and govern for the next election, not the next generation. That is the political culture we inherited in 1948 and perfected since.
78 Years of Evidence: The record is not ambiguous. Policy by Pendulum – 1948–2024. Instead of a national development plan, we got a partisan wrecking ball. 1956: The “Sinhala Only Act” was passed not after linguistic study, but as an election mobilization tool. 1970-77: The SLFP nationalized private enterprise and imposed import controls. 1977: The UNP reversed course with an open economy overnight. 2005-2014: Mega infrastructure was built on Chinese loans with no feasibility transparency. 2015-2019: Those same projects were called “white elephants” and stalled. 2020-2021: The organic fertilizer ban was announced as a populist “green” policy, reversed 6 months later after it collapsed agriculture and food prices. The Colombo Port City, Hambantota Port, and the Central Expressway all followed the same pattern: started, stopped, rebranded. The country pays twice. The party takes credit once. Economics as Election Candy. Demagoguery is expensive. 1960s: Subsidized rice to win rural votes, leading to the 1971 food crisis. 2005-2014: Fuel subsidies and public sector hiring sprees that doubled the wage bill. 2019: Unfunded tax cuts that removed Rs. 500 billion in annual revenue with no offset. By April 2022, external debt hit $51 Billion and we defaulted for the first time. The party that cut taxes was not in power to manage the IMF program. The party that inherited it was blamed for the austerity. This is the cycle. Institutions captured. A democracy needs referees. We turned them into party cadres. The 17th Amendment 2001 created independent commissions. The 18th Amendment 2010 abolished them. The 19th 2015 restored them. The 20th 2020 gutted them again. Police transfers, university vice-chancellors, and state bank chairmen have all been decided by party headquarters, not merit.
When the institution serves the party, the citizen gets leftovers
Identity over Ideas: From 1956 to 1983 to 2009 to 2022, our elections have been won on fear, not spreadsheets. “They will erase your language.” “They will sell the country.” “Only we can protect Buddhism/the minorities/the nation.” Rational debate on debt, productivity, or climate adaptation never wins a rally. Prejudice does. That is demagoguery by definition.
Party Interest subverted the National Interest: The core damage of 78 years of partisan politics is this: the nation became secondary to the party. Need power sector reform? Impossible, because our unions will strike. Need to cut 300,000 ghost employees? Impossible, because our voters will defect. Need a 20-year education and export plan? Impossible, because it won’t show results before the next election. So we borrowed. We patched. We lied. The result: a railway system that still runs on 1950s engines, hospitals without paracetamol in 2022, and a brain drain of 300,000+ skilled workers since the crisis. The parties rotated. The country declined.
The Opposition’s Original Sin and here, all parties share guilt equally. In opposition, the job is not to govern. It is to destroy. The UNP in the 60s called the SLFP “communist.” The SLFP in the 70s called the UNP “imperialist.” The JVP called both “traitors.” The SJB, SLPP, and NPP today use the same script with new logos. Every tax is “anti-people.” Every reform is “a sell-out.” Every crisis is proof the other side is evil and must be removed at any cost. Then they win. And implement 80% of what they opposed. Because demagoguery has no principles, only positions. 78 years of unmerciful, bad-faith criticism has not produced accountability. It has produced cynicism. The public now believes all politicians are the same — because for 78 years, they have behaved the same.
Breaking the Curse: Changing the party in power will not end this. We must change the incentives that reward demagoguery. Three reforms are non-negotiable: Bind future Parliaments to national policy. Pass 10-year frameworks for energy, education, and public debt with 2/3 majority protection. Infrastructure and fiscal rules should outlast one government, as they do in Chile and New Zealand. Depoliticize the state. Independent commissions for police, elections, public service, and bribery must have constitutional budgets and appointment panels that exclude MPs. No more 18th/20th Amendment style rollbacks. Demand better from voters We must stop rewarding the best slogan and start demanding the best spreadsheet. Town halls over rallies. Costings over promises. A 5-year plan over a 5-minute speech.
Conclusion
In 1948 we did not inherit democracy. We inherited an election. For 78 years we have used that election to choose our favorite demagogue. The prize has been debt, division, and decay. The curse of partisan politics will only end when citizens and leaders agree on one principle: Party second. Country first. Until then, February 4th will remain a ceremony, not a celebration.
chiv / September 9, 2026
Thanks Ranjan for writing real facts of Sham Lanka.
At last after 75 years, we now have a govt, seems committed in making few changes.
/
ranjandesilva / September 11, 2026
Thanks for the comment appreciating. Yes the present government is making an attempt to change things for the better. It is up to us to see the momentum is maintained and not allow the country to roll back as it happened in the Philippines.
/
leelagemalli / September 11, 2026
Readers,
–
We should be careful about the stories we tell ourselves about our societies. Sri Lanka and India are both ancient civilisations that endured centuries of colonial domination, and neither emerged from independence with a clean slate. Human prejudice, discrimination and social exclusion did not begin with colonialism, nor did they disappear when colonial rule ended. They exist, in different forms and degrees, in virtually every society. India is often presented as the world’s great democratic and culturally pluralistic example, and constitutionally it certainly has remarkable democratic foundations. Yet the experiences revealed by independent journalists, travellers and YouTubers remind us that constitutional ideals and everyday reality can be very different, particularly for marginalised communities. The same uncomfortable question must be asked of Sri Lanka
–
Tbc
/
leelagemalli / September 11, 2026
cont.
We proudly speak about our multicultural heritage and frequently highlight the Vedda community, but how much do most Sri Lankans actually know about the descendants of African communities, Malay communities and other small groups who have lived among us for generations? Some remain socially and economically marginalised, yet receive remarkably little attention. A society cannot claim genuine inclusiveness simply because its majority population is occasionally tolerant of minorities; inclusiveness means ensuring that even the smallest and least powerful communities are visible, respected and given a genuine opportunity to prosper.
–
For that reason, I do not subscribe to the idea that Sri Lanka has endured a simple “76-year curse” since independence. Seventy-six years is not merely a story of failure. We have made considerable advances in education, healthcare, democratic institutions, infrastructure and the general standard of civilisation.
–
Tbc
/
leelagemalli / September 11, 2026
cont.
But progress should not blind us to what remains unfinished. Our next stage must be about building a stronger economy and, alongside that economic growth, developing institutions capable of applying the law fairly, consistently and without fear or favour. We should not expect to transform society overnight through slogans, legislation or political promises. Sustainable progress requires economic opportunity, better education, stronger institutions and the systematic implementation and enforcement of the law to develop together. The real measure of a civilisation is not how it treats its most powerful majority, but how it treats those who have the least political, economic and social power. If we can make that principle part of our national consciousness, Sri Lanka need not be trapped by the failures of its past; it can build upon the genuine progress already achieved and become a more prosperous, lawful and inclusive society.
/
Ajith / September 11, 2026
“In 1948 we did not inherit democracy. We inherited an election. “
The damage is done and it was dome in the name of Lord Buddha and in the name of democracy. It is not easy to get out of it. We inherited greediness but we lost humanity.
/
SebastianSR / September 12, 2026
The damage is done and it was dome in the name of Lord Buddha and in the name of democracy.
Ranjan Silva’s article is an utter simplification of facts making it totally wrong and superficial. Much progress was achieved during these 75 years, in terms of literacy, health, social equlity, workers rights, etc. This government is NOT making “changes”. It is following the IMF and executing Ranil Wickremasinghe’s programs- it is keeping the darconian privention of terroism intact; it is keeping the executive presidency; it is preventing the development of solar energy and other alternative energies and giving more leaway to the coal mafia. Ministers are under investigation for fraudulent operations, containers come in without examination, prison riots etc are rampant.
The damage was not done in the name of the Buddh, but in the name of Marx on the on hand, and in the name of Identity politics of the Tamils and the Sinhalese. Let us take the first one: (i) creating a socialist society — the left parties drove out foreign investment, nationalized, destroyed plantations, launched violence (ii) The Tamil minority wanted exclusive Tamil homelands while the majority Sinhalese rejected any such exclusion, launched violence against Tamils.
/