20 August, 2017

Towards An Informed Water Vision

By Ranil Senanayake

Dr Ranil Senanayake

The three basic substances of our biosphere, Air, Water and Soil share the characteristic that they are all dynamic and vary in quality and quantity from place to place on this planet. However there is what is generally recognized as the ‘optimal range’ of values for each one of these substances, to render the environment hospitable to life. While my comments today, are focussed on water, it should be kept in mind that they apply equally to the other two.

Water is a critical element of all living things and it is the medium through which much of life is expressed, all animals and plants including humans are made mostly of water. Water is an essential material for the maintenance of global ecosystems; it is required in the right quality and quantity for each purpose that it is used for. Water enters a landscape as rain or fog and moves across a landscape responding to gravity and heat. It flows both above and below the soil level in every terrestrial ecosystem increasing its load of suspended and dissolved solids, organic and inorganic compounds as it flows. The ability to clean groundwater is demonstrated by active soils, wetlands and by evapotranspiration, is a critical consideration not only for human sustainability but also for the sustainability of our life support systems. As such, a visioning process that seeks to address all aspects of water and harmonizes this vision with the existing international agreements is critical.

In the examination of the role, function and value of water, an obligatory needs of water management to address the goals of agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), The Commission on Sustainable Development (CBD), The Convention to Combat Desertification (CCD) and the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), becomes obvious. Thus one statement that might provide an intergrative vision is; “The requirement for developing optimally functioning watersheds at the local, regional and global levels is a fundamental development goal”.

From the local level on, management must be focussed on the watershed, it can begin as a mini watershed of a brook and the scale or treatment area widened into the watershed of a stream or of a river basin.

A basic need for all humans is the ability to have access to clean water and air. For this country the question clean air is still largely an urban problem, however, the question of clean water is much more ubiquitous and ominous.

Sri Lanka is rapidly moving towards a situation where the traditional knowledge of basic health care and the stability of climate buffers are becoming dangerously eroded. The surface waters of the country are demonstrating a rapid decline in quality.

The estimated groundwater potential of the country is 780,000-hectare meters per annum. (Natural Resources of Sri Lanka, 1991). Rainfall is the primary source of groundwater. Its contribution to the groundwater recharge is estimated to be 7-30% (Anon 2000), or 200 – 600 mm/year. The majority of Sri Lankans rely on surface water or shallow aquifers for their supply of drinking water. However the quality of this resource is being rapidly eroded. The water sources from the very tops of the mountains are being contaminated with large volumes of toxins and leached nutrients. This is the consequence of a socially irresponsible vision of agriculture that accepts no responsibility beyond production goals. One consequence of this view and practice of agriculture is that toxic chemicals are often applied at rates exceeding eighty times the manufacturers recommended dose. While the slow poisoning of the population through its food intake is an item that needs urgent address, the poisoning of the headwaters of our rivers bespeaks of an incredible lethargy in the monitoring of water quality by the administration.

The high loads of nutrient dumped into the river systems by wasteful applications of fertilizer, a consequence of a poorly informed agricultural sector, are rendering rivers eutrophic, full of algae and silt. The problem is compounded by the high loads of garbage and sewage dumped into the river systems by riverside towns, communities and industries that contribute towards creating algal and bacterial blooms of unprecedented magnitude. A season of low flow and drought can now render many of these waters toxic. Further, the contamination of the shallow aquifer by industrial chemicals, currently tapped by a majority of domestic wells, has now become a common phenomenon in most industrial areas. The complaints from the public over polluted wells are yet to be attended to. This trend if allowed to continue will impact not only the present population but will also compromise the health and security of future generations of Sri Lankans.

It is in this context that we should examine and comment on the draft framework for a National Water Resources Policy (De Alwis 2011). While it is a good start, more public participation and comment is obviously a good thing . It suggests a framework on a base of 18 principles :

1. All citizens of Sri Lanka are entitled to have access to water for preservation of life as a basic human right.

2. All water resources, excluding rainwater, belong to the people, but may be held and managed in trust for them by local and national bodies elected by them.

3. Rainwater is considered part of the land on which it falls and will belong to the person or institution owning or having legal rights to use of the land.

4. In situations of limited supply, traditionally accepted water use rights for drinking and sanitation will take precedence over all other claims on the resource. Maintenance of livelihoods will be next in the order of precedence.

5. The unit for planning the development and management of water resources will be the stream or river basin.

6. Where basins are spread across local government boundaries, their utilization and management would be the responsibility of next higher level government concerned. Trans-basin and multi-basin development and utilization of water resources would be managed by authorities set up for the purpose.

7. Government or Community organizations would be responsible for the distribution of water to users. This responsibility may be contracted out to private organizations where the government or community organization concerned deems it appropriate.

8. Water rights will be recognized, with regulations governing allocations in line with national priorities.

9. In order to ensure the sustainability of publicly funded water development projects, whether for domestic use, irrigation or commercial purposes, responsibility for the maintenance of the systems would ultimately be handed over to the water users. In the case of large water development projects, the government would support the formation of user organizations for this purpose.

10. The development of water resources would take economic, social and environmental sustainability into account.

11. The responsibility for maintaining the quality of a water resource, according to the uses to which it is put, should rest with the users either individually or collectively as the case may be. External polluters of water sources shall be liable under the law to appropriate penalties.

12. Groundwater extraction and pollution will be monitored and appropriately regulated through the relevant institutions in groundwater sensitive areas.

13. Management of water resources will be devolved or decentralized as provided in prevailing Constitutional provisions.

14. Water resources should be shared among the demands of major competing uses including domestic use, irrigation and drainage for agriculture, animal husbandry, fishery, aquaculture, biodiversity maintenance, power generation, industry, tourism and construction in a balanced and integrated manner.

15. Where there are competing demands for limited water resources, the quantity of water available after satisfying the demand for domestic supplies and livelihood maintenance would be allocated on the basis of national priorities and economic rather than financial returns.

16. In situations of water scarcity, fiscal, and if necessary legal, punitive measures would be taken to prevent wastage, pollution and luxury consumption of water.

17. All developers of water resources including state agencies will need to obtain the approval of the National Water Resources Authority (NWRA) which would be set up to regulate the development and use of water resources. There will be incentive schemes for the improvement of water quality and quantity increase and disincentive schemes for the reduction of water quality and quantity.

18. The State will actively promote the integration of gender and public health concerns in policies, plans and programmes in water sector activities

I have contributed a few minor edits to the above in italics, in an endeavour to strengthen such a national dialogue, The most significant addition being that ‘There will be incentive schemes for the improvement of water quality and quantity increase and disincentive schemes for the reduction of water quality and quantity’. The idea being that good water management within a watershed must be seen as an environmental service and have economic recognition. Many countries are adopting such water responsible schemes as an integral part of water management. For instance, in Honduras, the management of the Rio (river) Mocal watershed with an agriculture that mimicked their forests, restored the water holding capacity of the montane ecosystems and increased the dry weather flow by 100 percent in ten years. Promotion of such activities must become a lynchpin on any national policy on water.

We have been conscious of the value of our forested hills for a long time. The role of our forests in maintaining water quality and quantity was perceived well by the Hon. D.S.Senanayake who states:

“ In the days of the Sinhalese Kings when the mountainous regions were forest-clad (they) absorbed and retained a considerable proportion of the rainfall. The denudation of the high hills that foreign capital enterprise has brought about has admittedly tended to reduce the fair-weather flow streams and to remove a useful source of replenishment. The fact that Forests have an intimate relationship to water supplies, have largely been ignored in modern planning. Wadsworth commenting on Forests and Water states “The delayed release of rainwater from forested soils of the uplands are vital to lowland water supplies. Litter that accumulates on the forest floor absorbs the physical impact of torrential downpours and releases the water gently to the mineral soil beneath. This cushioning action largely prevents the water from suspending large quantities of surface soil particles and thus clogging soil pores beneath. In addition, the decaying litter enriches the water entering the soil and supports organisms that produce porous upper soil layers. These processes are the most obvious ways forests enhance water supplies. The draft on soil water is greatest under forests with their deep-rooted trees and high rates of transpiration. Between storms porous soils again become highly receptive to new water.”

This view of forests and their relationship to water was hi-jacked by monoculture plantations of timber or crop trees being promoted as ‘forests’. Further, global forestry investment was directed by such ‘foresters’ who saw trees as forests, ignoring the fact that trees only constitute one percent of a forests biodiversity, they have created plantations that have nothing in common with forests in either biodiversity or environmental services. Thus a good national policy on water must address, critical landscape needs of water as well as both quality and quantity.

The loss of forests also contributes greatly to the water cleaning functions of any nation. The quantity of water released annually by forests are like aerial rivers cycling about 6250 billion tons of water into the atmosphere per annum. This quantity of evaporative water not only greatly influences local cooling events, but also contributes to the distribution of heat in the atmosphere. One of the most significant consequences of evapotranspiration by terrestrial vegetation is the ʻcleaningʼ effect on groundwater, releasing polluted ground water freed of the chemical pollutants that it was once burdened with. This cleaning function is hardly recognized nor evaluated.

References:

1. Anon 1991Natural Resources of Sri Lanka, Conditions and trends , Colombo
2. Kingsley A. de Alwis, 2011 Draft Framework for a National Water Resources Policy with Special Reference to Groundwater December 25-27th, Island Newspaper
3. D.S. Senanayake 1985 Agriculture and Patriotism. Ministry of Lands & Land Development, Colombo

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    0

    Horapalanaya govt is trying to privatize water board in ohter words water resources

    That is IMF needs because, Water is commercialized in the west. Water bottles in Sri lanka are the example. Once warter is privatized, that will be the end of clean water in Sri lanka as everybody will start polluting it becuse now it can be sold.

    Sri lanka is selling everything for money. So needs to be careful.

    Ground water already may be highly polluted because arrtificial fertilizer and pesticides. Deforestation because politicians and their henchmen needs to sell logs and lands for agriculture increase water evaporation too.

    Again comes to the status that in Sri lankan national policy is what the politicians needs. PRevious prime minister was importing only KUDU. Present, prime minister only like to travel and talk like an elite gaent. Presient is talking and he involves only everything is screwed up.

    Anyway, water, air, soil and the ecosysytem is intertwined. Buddhism says, once one’s internal environment is polluted that affects one’s external environment that includes forests, other animals, other humans and the one itself. How about water, air and soil pollution have killed many useful organisms/animals/plants including birds, crabs, eath worms, termites and many more ?

    there are 225, nothing happens they have so many issues like they are never paid enough and they say their supwer luxury sports utility vehuicles every five years become junk. Yet, everybody knows, as soon as the vehicles arives in the harbour it is sold to some one and they use the govt helicopter or the same old govt vehicle.

    • 0
      0

      Thanks Ranil! Keep up your good work.

      Fact is that those who are supposed to be Protecting the Environment, forests and water shed – the Armed forces, police, Local Govt. Authorities and corrupt politician who are destroying the environment with illegal sand mining, forest and park logging for illegal timber business, and sand mining. This is because of the epidemic of corruption and rent seeking in the country.

      IN Indonesia where MILITARY BUSINESS is well established it is well known that the military was engaged in logging forests and environmental destruction. During the war years the military in Sri Lanka did the same and are still continuing this military business networks.

      Logging of Willpattu was carried out by Navy as is the destruction and logging of tree cover at Victoria Park in Colombo carried out by the Colombo Municipality where a corrupt gang is systematically taking out trees from all State owned lands in Colombo and most roads on the pretext that trees fall on cars and people and destroying the tree cover of Colombo – once Asia’s greenest city..

      Today the High tree canopy which beings in the rain clouds as with Cloud and rain forests has been taken out and small trees put in to disguise the theft timber rich trees by CMC.

  • 3
    0

    Dr.RS. Excellent writing and drafting of a policy on the use of water which has been a long felt need. However, these matters seem unsuited for politicians nowadays as they look at it in terms of money and votes only. It would be better if OPA and likewise professional institutions take more interest in drafting the policy so that at least if people become wise and elect some intelligent representatives to the parliament perhaps such sensible policies could be made as part of the constitution. Good work.

  • 3
    0

    Another timely and important expression on Ecology in general and Water in particular from Ranil Senanayake. However, with the politicians that we are saddled with, this would be akin to wasting Water by pouring it on those metaphorical ducks’ backs!

    Our greedy politicians will gladly sell the water we have to foreign multinationals like Coca Cola and plan on shipping massive quantities (read the Uma Oya debacle) to the Middle East before considering the needs of our citizens. The fact that the Uma Oya project has caused all sorts of problems like wells running dry and houses being destabilized in the Uva Province means little or nothing to those supposed to be in charge – so much for our so-called administrators!

    Contamination of groundwater is a catastrophe just waiting to unleash itself on us and yet the indiscriminate use of pesticides, fungicides, weedicides and other poisons goes merrily along, slowly poisoning those of us with no access to organically grown products or unpolluted water.

    Just wait for that promised Port City to come into existence and try to figure out where all that extra demand for water is going to be sourced, not to mention the problems that will emerge with regard to the disposal of waste-water and sewage.

    Do we have an Environmental Ministry that is concerned with the Environment? If so, what it doing about the innumerable environmental aspects that Ranil has been highlighting and warning us about over the past so many years? Are they waiting for some irreversible problem before the actually realize the dangers we are all facing?

    It sure as hell looks like it!

  • 2
    0

    We have a Government and Environmental Ministry that is waiting to sell off our water resources to the Coca Cola’s of this world

    Increased pesticide use has decimated insects, both good and bad. I can’t remember the last time I saw a butterfly, a bee or heard a cicada. All gone !

    Visit any smallholder plot in Nuwara Eliya during the growing season and see the amount of chemicals that are being sprayed on the crops. It’s uncanny. Pesticides, Weedicides and artificial fertilisers are being subsidised with no education as to how to use it.

    There hasn’t been a single re-forestation program in the recent past that was done with the environment in mind. Meanwhile, profiteers are building temples and churches inside the national parks and no one cares

    Roads and railways plans are diverted and redrawn so that the maximum amount of timber could be cut and sold

    It will end when the country has become a desert.

  • 1
    0

    Dr Senanayake

    Thank You for your timely writing, and for telling us how things should be.

    As with the earlier responses, nothing will happen as long as we continue to vote in sub standard, time-serving politicians who interfere to make sure that nothing interrupts the vested interest of their supporters.

    Abuse of fertilisers, illegal forestry, encroachments……the list is endless. For now conservation is not a vote catcher.

    Every disaster is attributed to the Gods; our karma.

    Our beautiful island will get worse before it gets better.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.