13 July, 2024

Blog

UK’s Bumpy Fall, Change Of Guard & Lessons Beyond!

By Mohamed Harees –

Lukman Harees

‘’The good news, to relieve all this gloom, is that a democracy is inherently self-correcting. Here, the people are sovereign. Inept political leaders can be replaced. Foolish policies can be changed. Disastrous mistakes can be reversed” ~ Theodore C. Sorensen

UK, has had a bumpy fall; so bumpy, in fact, that Liz Truss resigned as Prime Minister , after only six weeks in office, admitting that she could not deliver the mandate on which she was elected. Only a day before, she said in the House of Commons that she was a fighter and not a quitter. It appears that the serious problem with British politics today is an absurd governing party – the Tories in power continuously since 2010, that hardly even trusts itself to govern any more. Amid this mess,  Rishi Sunak (RS) became Britain’s third prime minister in two months, vowing to put the public’s need above politics, in recognition of the growing anger at Britain’s political class and the ideological battles that have raged ever since the historic 2016 vote to leave the European Union. Be it as it may, as German paper Die Welt stated, British politics has developed a self destructive centrifugal force that should serve as a chilling example to those who still tout easy solutions to our solutions.  

Liz’s brand of Trussonomics, a plan for massive tax cuts aimed at Britain’s wealthiest, however became an instant disaster. The Truss-Kwasi Kwarteng “Growth Plan 2022” started out as a budget at war with itself, with vast emergency spending sitting alongside big unfunded tax cuts. These measures of course sent the British financial markets into a weeks-long tailspin, on top of a deepening cost-of-living crisis, sent foreign investors fleeing from the British economy, and drove the Pound to a record-low value against the dollar. The proposals introduced by one Chancellor had to be rolled back and comprehensively reversed by another, who succeeded the former after he was booted out. By the time Liz apologised for all the economic turmoil the proposals created and resigned, the damage was already done. The question now remains: Can RS clean up the economic mess left by Liz Truss, and be the rescuer from Number 11, now he’s moved next door. or will his election, referred to as a landmark historic event – the first PM of colour, as a successor to Liz be just another  eyewash?

RS will have many challenges on his plate from the start. Many faces in his cabinet seems the same old faces . Selection of Suella Braverman as home secretary days after she quit over data breaches already stirred the hornet nest. Moreover, over the past decade, there has also been a clear rise of populism in the UK and the West. Liz calling herself a Zionist, was also hinting at forging stronger relationship with Zionist Israel, even to the extent of moving the UK embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. RS also has gave a similar assurance, which will put the new administration and UK in an avoidable  international crisis. With the Ukrainian  and climate crises on the lobal front and an unprecedented cost of living crisis to tackle internally, Britain under him will not at will be a cake walk for RS.   

The examples of both crazy Boris’ and crazier Liz’s disastrous tenure of office show how self conceited and inefficient political leaders can comprehensively trash the reputations of their party and their country. British citizens do not deserve it; meaning prime ministers of this calibre. As Washington Post stated, Liz’s tenure is a disastrous series of self inflicted wounds which turned into a political death spiral and that the country looks like an isolated Atlantic island state instead of an international player. Britain has sadly become thus a government by lettuce (which some media humorously stated outlasted Liz), destined to end up in the political dump. A woeful Post Brexit six years has thus hastened the decline of a major global power, thanks to dunces and charlatans thrust into command. 

This pitiful status quo in UK certainly offers apt lessons to politicians and citizens even in other countries including Sri Lanka, which is also facing a similar crisis due to similar brand of self conceited political leadership – but family based and corrupt. This is however just a tip of the iceberg of a worrying phenomenon: how gradual erosion of  democratic norms are leading to democratic collapses. Under the guise of democracy, many vested interest groups and right wing media work in concert to make and break governments to suit their vicious agenda. Many analysts said that election of Liz was spearheaded by the 55, Tufton Street Gang, an address which brought together a right wing, Eurosceptic, climate-sceptic think tanks such as IEA, Tax Payers Alliance and  Vote Leave. This gang reportedly quietly created the Brexit campaign, influenced the deal and campaigned for a Hard Brexit and was the mastermind behind the recent disastrous mini budget. 

The system of MPs voting for a Prime Minister may sound democratic, but it is what produced the likes of Liz. Racism has already been playing up among Tory circles indicating whether election of brown skinned RS will let the hell loose. In a recent radio LBC, one of the Tory supporters also indicated that people electing do not want a brown skinned at the top, meaning it is not what the Tory vote bank will wish for – incidentally very unrepresentative of the people of UK; they are predominantly male, wealthy, elderly and living in the South of England. Another striking feature of Boris’ and Liz’s governments was the strong presence of loyalists who had backed them for their premiership. 

Be it as it may, UK is in an economic crisis, a political crisis ,food crisis and also a morality crisis. This political crisis is one which Britain can barely afford to carry, at a challenging time when households and businesses are grappling with galloping inflation and a slowing economy which has lead to increasing food prices and mortgage rates. This sense of government incompetency has bled into an all-consuming worry about how bad Britain’s economic crisis could get, with some predicting it seems to be regressing back to painful economic times of the 1970’s. 

A national election does not need to be called until 2024, but the opposition including Labour, have demanded one to be held now saying government lacks legitimacy. In this context, the incoming election may only be a sideshow, with the lobby supported by right wing Media, which elected the likes of Liz  be fully alert and functional to safeguard their ulterior agenda, at the cost of the ordinary hard working people of Britain whose real wages and standard of living have gone down in qualitative terms. These crazy neo-liberal ultras tanked the economy and ripped the nation’s fabric apart. 

Years of political turbulence which followed 2016 Brexit have led British politics to descend into warring factions, and Liz’s transient administration appears to be the climax of that turbulence. As Britain continue to project an image of instability, some analysts called Brexit a seismic event, which delivered a huge shock to the country’s global reputation as a beacon of stability. UK’s attempts since, to redefine itself has gone off course making it a broken Britain. Great Britain is at a crossroads and how they navigate in the coming weeks and months will determine whether or not it will hold on to its “great” name and status.

One apt lesson which other countries can take from the political crisis is how political accountability is viewed and adopted. Any issue that deals with the governance of a country is, by definition, political. What the issue may not be is partisan politics, but it is political by nature. Former PM Johnson’s parties, during a COVID-19 lockdown that had been imposed on citizens, were enough to cost him his office. Gross mismanagement of the economy, even if it was just 45 days, was enough to cost Truss her prime ministerial post. One beacon of hope thus for UK has been the authority of Parliament and other bodies such as Bank of England which were ‘reaffirmed’ in recent days and so was the viability of the political system which does not allow political misfits to survive, despite the enormous influence of political vested interest groups . 

However, in countries such as Sri Lanka, politicians from both sides of the divide are allowed to overstep and only hold them accountable at best during a general election. Even the statutory bodies which need to oversee accountability such as COPE are stuffed with political loyalists That should not be. Our local system should be designed so that a politician who missteps, who takes the public’s trust for granted, or who does not fulfil a mandate or promise made to the electorate should do the right thing. That is where our governance system must be. Politicians need not wait for any legislation to be passed in Parliament. The ironic thing about integrity is that it is something that should not have to be policed. Integrity must come from within. 

The political crisis in Sri Lanka sadly has been the cumulative result of decades of misgovernance and corruption arising from lack of potent and vibrant mechanisms and ‘checks and balances’. Politicians cling to power at all costs. Gotabaya had to be literally flushed out, and those who advocated real changes to political system in Sri Lanka are being persecuted and put behind bars. Family dynasty which virtually destroyed Sri Lankan economy are still entertaining plans to come back, thanks to a family friend who was voted into power as the President until next elections. He has been using all available powers to suppress public dissent and activism.

No matter how high or low the post a politician occupies, doing the right thing should be par for the course. And in a case where the majority of the voting public is demanding that you go, simply do the right thing and, like Johnson and Truss, tender your resignation. Of course there was public pressure to do so. But, if this were in Sri Lanka, however, Boris and Liz would still be in office. The party would have played the ethnic and religious card, in fact, they would have hired thugs or even to use ‘legalistic’ means to break up any attempt to challenge them. But the British held firm and pushed them and all the law breakers out. 

Another lesson which could be learnt was about the death of Trussonomics which has been a cautionary tale. Politicians must learn not to over-promise. The British have proven that you cannot come to the people, promise Heaven and Earth and hope you can get away with whatever you throw at them, In a country where accountability is key, no politician can hoodwink the people and play games with the people’s fortunes and future. The UK lesson is that sound monetary and credible fiscal policy will be rewarded, but mistakes will be punished. The British system thus self-corrects because its institutions are strong. The Sri Lankan system self-destructs because its institutions are either weak, compromised or non-existent. The resulting crisis also showed the “imperative” of making sure policy is inclusive, as the attempted UK tax cuts apparently favoured the rich. There is evidence that the damage to a government’s economic credibility has long-lasting effects on political confidence, permanently changing voting intentions, weakening support for established parties who have been in power. It can lead not only to electoral defeat, but disenchantment with the whole political process.

Another lesson which will be useful is worthy to note. As a matter of fact, election of a non-white PM in the UK is indeed a landmark and a significant reflection of the coming of age in its Post-colonial history. That nation, whose one-time leader was Churchill himself, who was known to have made disparaging remarks about Gandhi and leaders in colonized countries, has come a long way from that snobbish, patronizing and condescending conduct and embraced a more humble, egalitarian and realistic attitude towards its own minorities. Today, London electing Sadiq Khan, a Muslim as its Mayor on two occasions and RS, a Hindu  as its PM are great examples, like Obama’s election in US. This is one area where countries like Sri Lanka can learn. It is dreadful to think of how the racist lobby will go on an overdrive to oppose even making such a suggestion, like what happened when Lakshman Kadisgamar’s name was once proposed for the post of PM.    

In the present context under reference, what has happened to British politics, to its reputation for stability and moderation, to its venerable Parliament, is shaken by upheavals at an accelerated pace since Brexit. Even amid such political disorder, the future of the U.K. is not lost to its present instability. Absolutely there are things it can do” to rehab its image, thanks to its robust systems. However, the new incumbent at Downing Street is set to meet a daunting set of economic and social challenges. The new UK government faces a tricky task in reigniting global investor confidence in its economic stability, even with a new prime minister widely seen as a steady hand. The new premiership must deal with a severe cost of living crisis, creaking public finances, a rash of strikes and foreign policy headaches ranging from the Ukraine war to the consequences of Brexit. Weeks ahead will tell what awaits Britain-Post Liz. The bitter lessons will however serve for the future good, not just for Great Britain, but beyond too. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 5
    2

    UK’s Bumpy Fall, Change Of Guard & Lessons Beyond!

    There young people having a bumpy fall can rule the world and other country. Our they jailing them,
    Don’t blow off another’s candle for it won’t make yours shine brighter other people deem important

  • 6
    0

    (Part!)
    LH,
    Very well written indeed and very illuminating too!!
    Focusing now specifically, to your,
    “It is dreadful to think of how the racist lobby will go on an overdrive to oppose even making such a suggestion, like what happened when Lakshman Kadirgamar’s name was once proposed for the post of PM.”
    LK was the foremost and effective FM of Independent Ceylon and Sri Lanka!! Undoubtedly confirmed!
    He was an outstanding personality from the Tamil Community and a Practicing, Leading Christian of Anglican Faith – Church of Ceylon – attending Sunday services, without fail at the Cathedral down Bullers Road – near his residence!? One need not need a certificate from the Bishop of Colombo to attest that fact of faith as he was physically present every Sunday, unless, call of duty, on many occasions made a call on him to be overseas, representing SL as its Foreign Minister!??
    However, that quality and performance desired and decreed that such outstanding Foreign Minister of any country could, should and would not be any other than a Sinhala Buddhist!!??
    So, sadly after his tragic demise, apparently at the Hands of a LTTE sniper, he was awarded the offer of a
    (TBC)

  • 7
    0

    (Part II)
    State Funeral: Low and behold the hit below the belt arrives therein – he was given a Buddhist cremation and not a ceremonial Burial in the Cemetery at Kanatte, or presumably, with the Bishops’ consent in the Cathedral grounds!!??
    Alas, that was not to be, because his stature as a pre-eminent legislator and Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka, cannot belong to any other faith than the religion and its practice of Cremation!!!??
    many years later, ironically the Muslims who fell victim to the Covid, were prevented from being Buried as per their religious (Muslim faith within 24hours) belief, but cremated to prevent, purportedly by ”spread of decease through ground water contamination”!!! Despite WHO and expert evidence, it was forced down the “Throats of all the victims bodies” and suffering of their families!!??
    So it would remain to be ‘DAY DREAM’ of ever, “a Rishi Sunak syndrome”, in this hallowed Buddhist country!??
    Sorry guys STRICTLY RESEVED, only for Sinhala Buddhists ‘ASPIRANTS,FOLLOWERS AND BELIEVERS’, NONE OTHER, even POPULACE, have to resort to 1 meal or NO Meal per day or NOTHING TO COVER YOUR STARK ‘NAKEDNESS’ – DELIGHT
    Probably, induce TOURISM, IMPROVE FOREIGN EXCHANGE EARNINGS, than advent of Disneyland!?

    • 4
      0

      Mahila,
      A guy called Ralph Ignatius Thomas Alles was also persuaded to convert to Buddhism in order to further his career as founder of D.S Senanayake College and as Ministry Secretary. He was also cremated.

  • 8
    0

    “…, But the British held firm and pushed them and all the law breakers out.”
    (Great) Britain is in political evolution, they learn from their mistakes of the colonial past. But our country is always in the reverse gear. GOD SAVE SRI LANKA!

    • 0
      1

      “they (the Brits) learn from their mistakes of the colonial past.”
      Perhaps why they transformed themselves into a colony of the US.

  • 1
    1

    When all your efforts have failed, then outsource the job to an Asian.

  • 1
    0

    Mahila,
    A guy called Ralph Ignatius Thomas Alles was also persuaded to convert to Buddhism in order to further his career as founder of D.S Senanayake College and as Ministry Secretary. He was also cremated.

  • 0
    2

    So there used to be an orgnisation that tried to change the world order. They conceptualised a world based on form or liberalism foregoing all religions. They are based in UK and members of the Royal family belong to this group. They changed the world history, paticularly the sub-continent history. This island is quite special. The human civlisation begins from the island – not Africa. All this used to be a secret until recently. They keep all of this hidden by creating distractions. They would destabliase countries particularly the island of Sri Lanka. They also could be pushing Russia into a nuclear war as well. The idea is to keep all this is hidden under a massive nuclear fallout.

  • 4
    0

    There are parallels in UK & SL politics but unlike in SL, politicians are held accountable by an independent media & are forced out if found to be under performing. Boris J saw the opportunity & came to power on the promise of ‘getting Brexit done’ & though his loyalists give him the credit, it is questionable, considering the still unresolved ‘Irish protocol’. Undoubtedly, Boris is universally considered as a joker but ‘lovable’ to many, therefore, his bungling was excused. However, with rising inflation & cost of living, obviously, brought about by Brexit (which is rarely talked about now that its a done deal) but more seriously, the ‘partygate’ scandal, which implied Boris’s lack of integrity, Boris was forced to leave. His successor was to be Rishi S. but Liz Truss came from nowhere to take the lead after Tory party members gave her their backing. For Tory diehards, a millionaire Hindu of Indian ethnicity, does not represent the English Aristocracy that is identified with them, certainly, not as head of state.
    Cont.

  • 4
    0

    Cont.
    Liz Truss seem to have taken a page out of GR politics by promising tax cuts (which actually benefitted the very rich), extensive borrowing & had her own ‘viyathmaga’ advisors in the form of Tufton Street lobbyists (who are funded by multinational companies & wealthy businessmen). The economy nose dived & Liz lasted only 44 days in office. According to Tory party system, a potential candidate for leadership needs the support of 100 MPs & if there are multiple such candidates, the party members decide on the leader by a vote. Unlike serving Tory MPs who knew Rishi was the better candidate, therefore, for their own survival, voted for Rishi but for party members, Liz was the ideal Tory leader, competent or not. Second time round, Rishi had no serious opposition, therefore, the Tory faithful considered bringing back Boris J to ‘unite’ the party but for Tory MPs, Rishi was a safe bet when it came to holding on to their seats & Boris stepped down to avoid the humiliation if he didn’t get the 100 votes from MPs, allowing Rishi to became party leader & PM, uncontested.

    Sounds similar to SL politics & Ranil’s appointment? Horse trading, racism , even denial, are also in British politics but its subtle. Nevertheless, at the end of the day, survival depends on delivering & once out of power, there is no coming back. That’s the difference.

  • 1
    0

    Very sound and thoughtful analysis

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.