29 November, 2021

Blog

Veni, Vidi, Not Quite Vici: The Odyssey Of The SJB Protest

By Ruwan Laknath Jayakody –

Ruwan Jayakody

Veni, vidi, not quite vici.

The main Parliamentary Opposition, the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) led by former President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s son and future Presidential contender, Sajith Premadasa, and a mass of Party supporters took to the streets last week, amidst an animated Police force that proactively sought to thwart the protest – first by invoking the jurisdiction of various courts, seeking injunction orders against the conduct of the protest, to mixed results, and secondly, by blocking the free and peaceful exercise of the Constitutionally enshrined and guaranteed rights of speech and expression, assembly, association, and movement – by turning away busloads of people seeking to enter the epicenter, in order to protest against what they described as an accursed Government that had replicated an earlier epoch of queues for essentials and was seeking to foie gras the battle of their bulging midriffs through corrupt deals whilst decrying a foreign reserves crisis.

Under a smattering of rain, addressing the gathering in Galle Face on 16 November, the SJB and Opposition Leader Premadasa issued a clarion call to the people to rally for a “new era” under a “new vision” and a “new programme” that would see the “victory of the country and the people” via a “new Government” which would espouse exemplary human resource management practices – giving the skilled, talented, competent and capable, the pride of place.

Not to be outdone in the art of demagoguery, the Government, in particular its Public Security Minister, was quick to conjoin the Opposition with the growing rank and file of the hydra that is Covid-19. Of late, the Virus, packaged in the form of arbitrarily decided, hastily cobbled together, and increasingly selectively enforced, circulars and regulations, purporting to prevent the further spread of the pandemic, has become the Government’s favoured tool of political hypocrisy and the suppression of dissent, despite political shindigs and soirees of the ruling Party carryings-on being held with less publicized fanfare and media glare.

Now that the dust has settled on the said protest and the focus has riveted back to the pressing issue of bipeds caught in the battle royale meant for cephalopods (thus ensuring that much like the survivalist South Korean squid, working class men and women are able to stand in line in the queues for “gas, fuel, kerosene, milk powder, rice and sugar” as Premadasa described the order of the day, whilst also earning their daily keep and perhaps, time permitting, have a vital meal), and the Budget of vacuous truths for the next financial year – with its debates composed of white noise staticity interrupted only by the occasional unedifying bray, bombards the idiot boxes in this land of our lady of sorrows – Sri Lanka, one may pose the question – What was the purpose of this protest?

Was it to overthrow the Government that has a, however tenuous, two thirds Parliamentary majority, sufficient to get the said Budget in through the out door? Was it, as some have claimed, an anti people friendly act of political expediency meant to destabilize the already doddering Government which is painting itself into the madcap lunatic fringe of the “idiot, full of sound and fury” brand of political desolation, through the criminal spread of its microscopic foe? Was it a protest for the sake of a protest? Was it a warning to the Government of the united and collective disenchantment of the body politic? Was it a “rational rebellion against intolerable conditions” (as Austrian psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich notes in ‘The Mass Psychology of Fascism’) of a socio-economic nature? Or, was it a step towards a worthwhile endeavour?

Regardless of the answers to these questions, one thing is apparent from the turnout at the protest, which is that the SJB – the phoenix which has risen from the ashes of the United National Party (UNP) in double quick time as seen at the last Presidential Election, without any way near the kind of pre-preparation and time and not to mention the absence of an overbearing oedipal patriarch stymying the severing of the political umbilical noose, as enjoyed by the ruling Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna which had a similar meteoric rise at the Local Government Elections held after the Sri Lanka Freedom Party led United People’s Freedom Alliance candidate, then President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s defeat – has taken a positive step towards breaking the hoity-toity, uppity, too good for the proles kind of fat of the land elitism of the UNP and sought to shed that faux superciliousness at the innervating feet of the salt of the earth and to touch base with the ground beneath the feet, grassroots level.

It is important therefore for both the Government and the Opposition to keep the rules of the game, so to speak of its individual political objectives, in mind.

Based on the contributions to the debates of the Budget, no clear picture emerges of what the SJB would do to resurrect Sri Lanka from the eddy of the economic maelstrom. Clarity on the so called “new vision” and “new programme”, in this hour of Sri Lanka’s need, needs to therefore be the driving force if they are to make any contribution, as is their duty by the people, to the legislative process, at least in the form of introducing and pushing through any amendments to the Budget proposals, without letting their future election manifesto cat out of the bag but instead allowing the people a glimpse into the ‘vistas of prosperity and splendour’ that the SJB can conjure up.

For its part, the Government should not see such protests as acts of seditious Thoreauvian civil disobedience but as a reminder of the pertinent need for the Cabinet of Ministers to take up the role of the coxswain, and to make haste to course correct, by steering clear of naval gazing and in some cases, lotus eating, and to instead actively seek solutions which are rooted in reality, moored by expertise, and anchored on honest patriotism.

Towards this end, it is well for the Opposition to understand what Scottish author Charles Mackay describes in the ‘Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds’ as the “peculiar folly” of “every age”, where it plunges into “some scheme, project, or fantasy, spurred on by the love of gain, the necessity of excitement, or the force of imitation”. After all, the SJB Leader should as a student of history know that the sins of fathers do visit upon the children.

It is also opportune to remind both the Government and the SJB led Opposition as the Government in waiting, of Reich’s anti Machiavellian sagacity contained in ‘Listen, Little Man!’ – “You think the end justifies the means, however vile. I tell you: the end is the means by which you achieve it. Today’s step is tomorrow’s life. Great ends cannot be attained by base means. You’ve proved that in all your social upheavals. The meanness and inhumanity of the means make you mean and inhuman and make the end unattainable”.

Veni, vidi, not quite vici.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comment

  • 2
    0

    Motherlanders are starry eyed at Port City construction – its sky-scrapers, its easy livelihood from free-flowing bit-coin, block-chain transactions, and the ability to finally look like Dubai and Singapore. The high-risk factor it entails cannot remove them of the delusion the Rajapaksas entice them by.
    _
    IMF on the other hand means steadfast diligent brain-work together with some physical exertion (they don’t know that Singapore at least, involves are whole lot of the two, in very systematic and rigid military-style formation…..Dubai contains previous oil-money).

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.