15 June, 2026

Blog

Why Aren’t The Tamil Parties Consequently Insisting On The Holding Of The PC Elections?

By C.V. Wigneswaran

Justice C.V. Wigneswaran

Why aren’t the Tamil Parties of the North and East asking for the full implementation of the 13th Amendment and consequently insisting on the holding of the Provincial Council Elections at least in the North and East immediately?

Many reasons stand in the way.

Firstly each Party thinks selfishly that any solution to the Tamil Problem must be placed before the Government or any World Body under their insistence or sponsorship. In other words internal rivalry among the Tamil Parties have been the bane of the progress of the Tamils. Even though all Tamil Parties are supporting some form of federalism they are unable to “unite” in their endeavours owing to their personal rivalry.

Secondly some Parties have forgotten that Prabakaran dismissing the 13th Amendment is different from their dismissing it. Prabakaran was strong and had the ability to insist on the dismissal of the 13th Amendment.

He could speak of full and complete self-determination for the North and East because he had the military power to back his statement. In fact both J.R and Chandrika offered Chief Ministership for a guaranteed period to Prabakaran but the latter sneeringly just dismissed the idea in favour of full external self-determination for the North and East.

But those Parties who now echo indirectly the view point of Prabakaran do not realise that the LTTE is no more in existence. They forget that the resurrection of the LTTE is a far fetched dream. Merely voicing a sentiment that had some meaning when the LTTE was in existence is no more a valid proposition. We need to think anew taking into consideration the existing state of affairs.

What are they?

1. Most Sinhalese leaders are wanting to do away with the 13th Would talking of federalism to those who are opposed to the 13th Amendment which is an apology for power sharing, be of any use? What guarantee is there that the Sinhala Parties would not dangle a federal constitution, get rid of the 13th Amendment and leave the Tamils sans Federalism and sans 13th Amendment?

2. The North and Eastern Tamils may feel they are entitled to self-determination in terms of the UN CCPR. But how would they obtain it from a recalcitrant Sinhala leadership which has all the constitutional power over the North and East?

3. If the we have decided to go to International Fora and file action against the Sri Lankan Government, then have we done so yet? Even if we are thinking of taking our matter to the International Fora, till they determine the matter what of the people of the North and East? Sinhala and Buddhist infiltration in all forms is the order of the day? Therefore should we not be pragmatic and strategic in our decisions?

Thirdly many Tamil Parties think since they have certain “paper” rights, articulation of such “paper” rights would bring them relief. Would talking of our rights bring relief? The Upcountry Tamils are a good example of how they strategically step by step increased their influence and rights from the time of Independence. But they used their Trade Union power to progress from a position of servility to what they are today.

What power do the Northern and Eastern Tamils have today? Nothing! Of course we have Disunity among our Parties, continuous Sinhala Buddhist infiltration into the North and East, disregard by successive governments towards the existing provisions in our Constitution which might have some semblance of rights for the Tamil speaking people of the North and East coupled with the absence of the LTTE or any other Military Force to back up what we demand. All these have made us a pathetic community of people.

Therefore the need of the hour is a new thinking based on our existing situation. We must stop thinking that our Party and we as leaders of those Parties will last forever. It is not our leadership or our party’s leadership that the people of the North and East want. They want an amelioration of their day to day problems. A betterment to their current existence. Therefore realizing the comparatively short time that the leaders of Tamil Parties have, they must come together for the sake of our people.

Next they must stop thinking the way they thought all these years. They must realise that the North – Eastern Tamils are powerless and have none to back them today.

Next they must begin to think strategically. Strategic thinking means to realise your existing situation, be aware of the problems you face thereby, understand your power, influence and ability and decide how best to solve the problems you face.

Let us for a moment strategically think on behalf of the Northern and Eastern Tamil speaking people –

1. Existing Situation – Powerless; Dependent on the Central Government; Successive governments and the majority community are definitely overtly and covertly infiltrating into our Provinces. In every way the hand of the Central Government remains powerful and supreme.

2. The problems we face thereby are (a) We are not arbiters of our destiny. (b) Daily infiltration takes away our grip on our own land and environment (c) Expropriation of our resources takes place while we look on helplessly.

3. What legal and constitutional power do we have? Almost nothing. Except that there is the 13th Amendment which on paper gives us inadequate powers and influence. We could decide to forge ahead by making use of those provisions in the 13th Talking about Federalism will not bring any benefits. But while we propose Federalism as a permanent solution we could take charge of a Provincial Council under the 13th Amendment and strengthen it day by day and try to reach a better environment step by step. The Sinhalese cannot prevent us doing so since the 13th Amendment was the result of the Indo Sri Lankan Accord of 1987 and if all the Tamil Parties insist on the holding of the Provincial Council Elections under the 13th Amendment, Sri Lankan Government would have to agree. India’s insistence might help in this direction.

How do we set about it strategically?

Tamil Parties could decide that Provincial Council Elections in the North and East be held immediately and their decision could be conveyed to the Government. As soon as the Elections are held and Provincial Council are elected, the statutes for the Northern and Eastern Provinces could be enacted and passed and the Province could be strengthened thereby. Our financial inadequacies could be discussed with the Government in power. India could help in this direction.

I agree with you that the insistence of the holding of the Provincial Council Elections in the North and East is the only way by which some form of immediate relief could be ensured for the people of the North and East. A permanent solution could wait until we are regionally strong.

Latest comments

  • 3
    7

    I am tired of you, Justice C.V. Wigneswaran.
    Did you not have the opportunity to take up your grievance, – Why the Tamil Parties are asking for the implementation of the 13th Amendment and insisting on the Provincial Council Elections, at least in the North and East immediately -, when you had the chance as Chief Minister?

  • 4
    9

    It was Mr. Wigneswarn in his past capacity as chief minister who brought much discredit to the Provincial Councils system. He showed how easily the they can be abused and how they have the potential to be run as the fifedom of swollen headed individuals. The main constructive thing in this essay is Mr. Wigneswaran’s implicit admission that the search for inclusion and citizenship followed by the Hill Tamils has been successful, while the confrontational method of the Ceylon Tamils who searched for exclusion and separation has been a failure.

  • 6
    7

    LOL. Look who’s talking? During his tenure as Chief Minister with his polarising and petty-minded leadership style, he did his best to undermine the provincial council system and foment conflict among Tamil groups. His main contribution was strengthening the hands of extremist Sinhalese groups. Perhaps, it was intentional.

    Most of all, he squandered the opportunity to contribute to any real development for the Tamil people of the north with his incompetent governance capabilities. Yes, the provincial council system is the minimum we have at the moment, but no thanks to Mr. Wigneswaran!

  • 8
    3

    “Did you not have the opportunity to take up your grievance,”
    We should understand that the 13th amendment was brought in 1987 where North and East Provinces as one unit and Mr. Wigneswaran took the Northern provincial council in 2013 – 2018. We should understand the provincial he took was with the very limited power and without the support of central government. Of course Wigneswaran would have managed it better and politics of Tamil parties are very weakened along with power greediness.It was the same national politics who brought the religion to cover up their robbery or power greediness of few families which brought bankruptcy which also influenced Tamil politics.
    Even now NPP do the same politics with the religion without devolution of power. That means we are going back again another cycle.

    • 6
      3

      “We should understand the provincial he took was with the very limited power and without the support of central government.”
      But his incompetence was worse than all the excuses put together.

  • 8
    1

    For the Tamil Speaking Citizens of SL (TSC) the choices are limited.
    LTTE failed to get Eelam as even India ( along with the Dravidian parties of Tamil Nadu) were working against us.
    This would have been the best hope for TSC.
    Currently our Tamil politicians are basically interested in getting elected to the Provincial Council in order to get power money comforts etc for THEMSELVES. GoSL will continue to colonise the traditional Tamil areas and have people belonging to the majority race in government jobs in the N&E .
    Should we not work on a NEW Constitution that will provide us equal rights as the majority race?

    • 5
      9

      Let us get something clear.
      This Tamil Eelam thing was about the Tamils of the N&E. It never concerned the Muslims (majority living outside N&E) or the HCT (predominantly outside N&E).
      Will the people of low caste enjoy equal rights?

      • 8
        4

        This Tamil Eelam thing was about the Tamils of the N&E.
        “Will the people of low caste enjoy equal rights?”
        Tamil Eelam thing came only after 1975. It came only after B_C Pact and Dudley-Chelva Pact. The Muslim Congress only formed after 1981. Denial of rights for these so called low caste is a common problem for whole Sri Lanka. You have no right to talk about low caste because you are not from that group.This should have been brought into at least in the 1972 Constitution instead of special status to Buddhism. Since you were part of that constitution of “Srimavo” you should take full responsibility for all the problems. Still you behave like the same way as before – divide the people and enjoy the suffering of the people.

        • 0
          3

          There was an embarrassing question I suppose.

    • 1
      9

      SL Tamils should learn from minorities who coexist peacefully with a dominant majority despite discrimination that favors the majority.
      1. Malaysian Chinese (30%)-heavily discriminated – but their leaders are shrewd businessmen (and not elite cantankerous lawyers with chips on their shoulders who were kinsmen of Wigneswaran).
      2 Singapore utilizes strict ethnic quotas in public housing (the Ethnic Integration, not “exclusive Tamil homelands”) but constitutionally ensures Chinese-majority dominance.
      3. The Hispanic community in the USA (19%), with Majoritarian Spanish in Southern California, New Mexico, Arizona and so on.
      4. Fiji had ethnic coups; Today the indigenous iTaukei population rules over the large Indo-Fijian minority. Indigenous Fijians enjoy exclusive land ownership rights (under the TLTB).
      5. The Jewish community in the US, shrewd businessmen, who control the purse strings of the US elections without clamouring for Arasu in New York or singing the national anthem in Yiddish.
      6. The UK and several Nordic countries institutionally privilege Christianity, yet social peace, and safety for CONFORMING minority communities.
      6. Since the end of the civil war in 2009, SL minorities live, work, and own businesses across major urban centers like Colombo alongside the Sinhalese majority. The peace is maintained through community-level resilience and economic activity, although misguided politicians with the 1970s Vaddukkoddai mentality still bark, especially on Prabhakaran’s birthday and on Mulliavaikal day.

      • 6
        12

        Again, deliberately cherry picking and misleading, and trying to compare an ancient indigenous population, that has its own homeland and is the majority there, with other immigrant minorities in the rest of the world to justify his diabolical pro-Sinhalese Buddhist racist agenda. Comparative analysis reveals that a minority group’s socio-political strategy depends heavily on its historic ties to land and the structural nature of state power. While some global minorities leverage wealth or seek civil integration, Sri Lankan Tamils’ unique focus on territorial autonomy stems from their deep-rooted geographic history and structural exclusion by the state.

      • 6
        13

        Core Premise: The socio-political status of the Sri Lankan Tamils is shaped by territorial history and state-sponsored discrimination, distinguishing their situation from other minority experiences.
        Malaysian Chinese: Unlike the geographically contiguous Sri Lankan Tamils, the Malaysian Chinese leverage economic power for political accommodation, operating as a non-territorial diaspora
        Singapore (EIP): Minimises ethnic friction through strict housing quotas, meritocracy, and official multilingualism, contrasting sharply with Sri Lanka’s historical state-enforced linguistic and religious majoritarianism.
        US Hispanics: Work within a federal civil rights framework to seek representation and policy reform, rather than pursuing the regional sovereignty or devolution characteristic of the Tamil nationalist movement.
        Indo-Fijians: Face institutional land-ownership restrictions and political marginalisation by indigenous populations, frequently resulting in professional emigration rather than territorial autonomy movements.

      • 6
        12

        As Eelam Tamils, we are not an immigrant diaspora seeking integration into another nation’s state; we are an indigenous people residing in our historic homeland. Our sovereignty is rooted in centuries of independent administration, including the Jaffna Kingdom and Vannimai chiefdoms, as verified by colonial records. Like the Scots or Welsh in the United Kingdom, our rights stem from historic statehood, distinct language, and national self-determination—not mere civil integration. Conversely, immigrant minorities—similar to Sri Lankan Muslims or Malays—properly seek equal opportunity and anti-discrimination within an existing framework. Equating the Tamil national struggle with a standard minority-integration issue adopts a harmful majoritarian narrative. It erases our status as a co-founding nation and undermines our internationally recognised rights to land sovereignty and historical continuity.

        • 9
          2

          “As Eelam Tamils, we are not an immigrant diaspora seeking integration into another nation’s state;”
          I wonder if the SL Tamil diaspora in Australia would never integrate into Australian society, and preserve its identity forever!
          Does everyone of them have a bigoted mindset?

  • 8
    2

    Tamils still don’t want to be identified as Sri Lankans because of the Sinhala Buddhist Supremacy mentality held by the majority race and BY GoSL.
    AKD needs to be more assertive in ruling. He needs to control the racist politicians./clergy/ ex defence officials

    • 3
      2

      Naman

      “Tamils still don’t want to be identified as Sri Lankans …………”

      Could you first define and explain to us the idea of Sri Lankan.

    • 4
      11

      Tamils still don’t want to be identified as Sri Lankans
      Have you done a survey?

      • 1
        7

        Tamils still don’t want to be identified as Sri Lankans Long before Sinhala-Buddhists came into dominance, in the 1930s State Council, Mr. G. G. Ponnambalam and another associate declared that they were “Proud Dravidians” descendant from the Chola Aristocracy. DS Senanayake’s acceptance speech in the first parliament mentioned that ‘some people refuse to think or identify as “Ceylonse”, and called them to come together’. So, this is an old debate that rose after 1931 universal franchise where in the Tamils lost their British-construed dominant position. Ever since, Ceylon-Tamil elites have tried to recover that position by hook or crook (constitutional or military means), dreaming of an exclusive Tamil Eelam.

        • 3
          2

          “So, this is an old debate that rose after 1931 universal franchise where in the Tamils lost their British-construed dominant position. “
          What poppycock!
          This is a false claim propagated by SB racists.
          The Sinhala elite were favoured by the British rulers by way of titles and real estate extending to 1000s of acres.
          Being a government servant is not a position of dominance. At the time the Sinhalese middle classes were more interested in making money by various means.
          The poor and the ‘low caste’ people were down and out at least until 1956.

          • 0
            1

            “So, this is an old debate that rose after 1931 universal franchise where in the Tamils lost their British-construed dominant position. “
            What poppycock!
            This is a false claim propagated by SB racists.

            Read Dr. Jane Russell;s book: Communal Politics under the Donoughmore Constitution 1931-1948

      • 5
        0

        “Have you done a survey?”

        Not really. However, those who want to be branded as Sri Lankan should find out whether there are enough people to support the claim.

        When the Weeping Widow and her merry men changed the name of the island, the name change was never put to a referendum. That was the time to get authorisation from the people.

        I still don’t understand the idea of Sri Lankan.

        • 0
          1

          I suppose JRJ got authorisation for the name change and other things that happened in 1978.

    • 8
      12

      Sri Lankan Tamil identity is highly complex, fragmented by geography, generation, and historical trauma. While many island residents practically navigate a dual identity—balancing cultural Tamilness with Sri Lankan citizenship—the global diaspora often rejects the national label. For many who fled the 26-year civil war, the “Sri Lankan” identity is inseparable from state-sponsored violence and exclusionary Sinhalese symbols, leading them to prefer “Eelam” or “Ceylon Tamil.” Conversely, those who embrace the “Sri Lankan” designation do so to assert their two-millennium indigenous claim to the island as their ancestral homeland, while simultaneously distinguishing their unique heritage from the Tamils of mainland India.

      • 12
        7

        Rohan25 says those who embrace the “Sri Lankan” designation do so to assert their two-millennium indigenous claim to the island as their ancestral homeland, while simultaneously distinguishing their unique heritage from the Tamils of mainland India .
        Far from it. We were born in Sri Lanka and we have a Sri Lankan passport (or possibly a dual passport) and that is it. Also, we have economic and family interests that have nothing to do with millenia. People like SJV Chelva’s proche parent were not Ceylonese; SJV was attached to the Church of India. Rohan25 himself claims that the majority of Sri Lankans are Tamils who came here in the 18th and 19th century. So, what is this two-millienium indigenous claim (for the church of India?)? This is simply a Tamil copy of the Mahawamsa mindset. Everyone has the same rights irrespective of length of stay after admission to citizenship.

    • 8
      14

      Even “Lanka,” historically misattributed to Sanskrit, likely derives from the Old Tamil verb ilangu (இலங்கு), meaning “to shine” or “to be resplendent.” Because ancient Tamil proper nouns could not begin with “L,” the prefix “I” was added, creating Ilankai (இலங்கை). While the native Dravidian root ilagu means “bright,” pure Sanskrit historically defines Lanka simply as “island.”Through millennia of linguistic exchange between Sanskrit and Tamil, Sanskrit absorbed the term, immortalising it in the Ramayana. In 1972, the country adopted the official name Sri Lanka, combining the Sanskrit honorific prefix Sri (“venerable” or “beautiful”) with Lanka (“island”). Ultimately, the meaning “resplendent” stems entirely from Tamil etymology, whereas “Sri” was added via Sanskrit during the 20th-century nationalist move

      • 9
        7

        Ultimately, the meaning “resplendent” stems entirely from Tamil etymology, whereas “Sri” was added via Sanskrit during the 20th-century nationalist move
        This false etymology goes even beyond the false etymologies that we get from the Sinhala-Buddhist “mahawamsa” mindset writers. Thambimuttu in his 1940s “History of the Dravida…in Ceylon since Pfrehistoric times” said similar things and gave SJV an explosive political program to oust GGP from his pedestal. Tamils are still suffering from it all, even today.

        • 8
          13

          Yes, “Ilangu” (இலங்கு) is a pure, classical Tamil word. It is a native Dravidian root word that has been used in Tamil literature for thousands of years, dating back to the ancient Sangam period. Meaning and Grammatical Breakdown. In Tamil grammar, இலங்கு (ilangu) functions primarily as a verbal root (வினைப்பகுதி).Primary Meaning: To shine, glow, radiate light, or emit rays (ஒளிசெய்தல் / பிரகாசித்தல்). Secondary Meaning: To be distinct, clear, or prominent. The word frequently appears in Sangam literature and classical texts to describe glowing objects, shining ornaments, or the radiating sun:இலங்கு கதிர் (Ilangu kathir): Radiant rays of the sun or light.இலங்கு வளை (Ilangu vaḷai): Shining bangles, a common poetic phrase used in ancient love poetry (அகப்பொருள்).

        • 8
          14

          Related Native Words. Because it is a core native root, it forms the base for several other common Tamil words:இலங்கை (Ilangai): The Tamil name for Sri Lanka, which historically translates to “the shining/brilliant land”.இலக்கம் (Ilakkam): A target, mark, or number (that which is made clear or visible).விளங்கு (Viḷangu): A sister root meaning to be clear, shining, or well-understood.Driven by superficial knowledge and a lack of proper research, this Tamil quisling ironically weaponised the misfortunes of the island’s Tamil population to secure a haven in Canada. From there, he continuously disseminates pro-Sinhalese rhetoric and distorts historical facts to advance his diabolical agenda.

      • 10
        4

        “Lanka… likely derives from the Old Tamil verb ilangu (இலங்கு), meaning “to shine” or “to be resplendent.”
        That is a jolly good one
        Give us another one, you.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.