30 October, 2020

Blog

WikiLeaks: JVP Electricity Strike Could Delay Reforms – US

“Unions affiliated with the Marxist- Nationalist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party have warned of a strike and country-wide blackout on May 23 in protest of government moves to present electricity reforms to Parliament, which they fear would lead to privatization of the state electrical utility. However, the strike may be ineffective (i.e. unable to produce a blackout or force the Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) to give in to union demands) as technical staff, including engineers, will not be joining the protest. Nonetheless, the government may delay the presentation of the reform bills in Parliament to give time for discussions which would appease technical unions, which want more time to study the bills. This is a first, albeit small, test of this Government’s willingness to stand up for needed reforms in the power and energy sector.” the US Embassy Colombo informed Washington. 

K.D.Lalkantha - Head of the JVP unions

The Colombo Telegraph found the related leaked cable from the WikiLeaks database.The unclassified cable was written on May 19, 2006.

According to Mr. M.M.C. Ferdinando, Secretary, Ministry of Power and Energy, the government is determined to go ahead with the reforms. Speaking at a recent energy managers meeting organized by the PUC, he suggested that the government may refer the bills to a parliamentary consultative committee without directly presenting them to Parliament on May 23 as planned. According to Ferdinando, this decision may delay the parliamentary presentation to early June. It is not clear if this move would be taken due to JVP protests or due to complaints of inadequate time for consideration of the bills.

Placing a comment the Embassy wrote; Recently, the government has shown signs of moving reforms ahead in the electricity and energy sectors; the most important being the decision to procure a much delayed and much needed coal power plant. Last week, the President laid the foundation stone for a 300MW coal power plant, which will be built by the Chinese under a long- term concessionary loan. In April 2006 the government increased fuel prices, for the first time since June 2005, and is reportedly likely to do so again in the coming days. This may partially reduce government subsidies of fuel (though a recent analysis suggested that, with oil topping USD 70 per barrel, the Government may spend close to USD 2 billion on fuel subsidies in 2006). The GSL’s response to threats by the unions and decisions made surrounding the potential strike could be a harbinger of whether this government will stand for reform or cave in to union pressure on a variety of matters.

Read the cable below for further details;

VZCZCXRO0291
RR RUEHLMC
DE RUEHLM #0819/01 1390710
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190710Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3409
INFO RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 9643
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 9204
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 6095
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 4130
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 6649
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000819 

SIPDIS 

STATE FOR EB AND SA/INS; MCC FOR D.NASSIRY AND E.BURKE 

USDOC FOR EROL YESIN 

SIPDIS, SENSITIVE 

E.O 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ENRG CE
SUBJECT:  Electricity strike could delay reforms 

Ref:  05 Colombo 1901 

¶1.  (U) Summary:  Unions affiliated with the Marxist-
Nationalist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) party have
warned of a strike and country-wide blackout on May 23 in
protest of government moves to present electricity reforms
to Parliament, which they fear would lead to privatization
of the state electrical utility.  However, the strike may be
ineffective (i.e. unable to produce a blackout or force the
Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) to give in to union demands)
as technical staff, including engineers, will not be joining
the protest.  Nonetheless, the government may delay the
presentation of the reform bills in Parliament to give time
for discussions which would appease technical unions, which
want more time to study the bills.  This is a first, albeit
small, test of this Government's willingness to stand up for
needed reforms in the power and energy sector.  End Summary. 

¶2.  (U) The government is planning to present two bills to
the parliament to implement electricity sector reforms
agreed in 2005 (reftel) after protracted discussions between
the government and the unions.  The amendments to the Ceylon
Electricity Board Act and the Electricity Reform Act would
allow the state-owned power utility, Ceylon Electricity
Board (CEB), to be reconstituted as a holding company and
establish six subsidiary companies to take over the current
generation, transmission and distribution functions of the
CEB.  The CEB would fully own these subsidiary companies. 

¶3. (U)  The JVP-aligned unions do not support any reforms
and did not approve the 2005 reform package.  The JVP fears
these reforms will lead to the eventual privatization of the
CEB.  The JVP union in the CEB has threatened to stop work
on May 23 and has warned of a countrywide power outage
unless the bills are withdrawn. 

¶4.  (SBU) The JVP trade union action is unlikely to be
effective.  The powerful engineers union of the CEB will not
be joining the strike.  Ananda Piyatilake, President of the
engineer's union, told EconFSN that their union has given
consent to the reforms, but is urging the government not to
rush the legislation through parliament.  The engineer's
union wants time to study the legislation to see if it
complies with reforms agreed to last year.  (Note:  The
draft legislation was made available to the public only
recently and not in sufficient numbers - the government
publication sales office received just 15 copies which sold
out immediately.  End note.)  According to Piyatilake, the
JVP strike will not be effective because engineers and
technical staff would not participate.  The JVP union has
membership among clerical and other non-technical staff of
the CEB.  While the JVP union has threatened to bring
workers at the government-owned Ceylon Petroleum Corporation
(CPC) into the strike, several union representatives at the
CPC told EconFSN that they are not likely to join in a
strike, although they want to show their cooperation,
possibly through limited action walkout protests or the
like. 

¶5.  (U) Meanwhile, CPC unions are holding separate
discussions with the Government regarding CPC reforms.  The
unions are urging the government to take action to return to
the CPC the 33 percent of total CPC shares held by the
Treasury.  CPC unions also fear eventual privatization of
these shares. 

¶6.  (U) According to Mr. M.M.C. Ferdinando, Secretary,
Ministry of Power and Energy, the government is determined
to go ahead with the reforms.  Speaking at a recent energy
managers meeting organized by the PUC, he suggested that the
government may refer the bills to a parliamentary
consultative committee without directly presenting them to
Parliament on May 23 as planned.  According to Ferdinando,
this decision may delay the parliamentary presentation to
early June.  It is not clear if this move would be taken due
to JVP protests or due to complaints of inadequate time for
consideration of the bills. 

¶7. (SBU) Comment:  Recently, the government has shown signs
of moving reforms ahead in the electricity and energy
sectors; the most important being the decision to procure a
much delayed and much needed coal power plant.  Last week, 

COLOMBO 00000819  002 OF 002 

the President laid the foundation stone for a 300MW coal
power plant, which will be built by the Chinese under a long-
term concessionary loan.  In April 2006 the government
increased fuel prices, for the first time since June 2005,
and is reportedly likely to do so again in the coming days.
This may partially reduce government subsidies of fuel
(though a recent analysis suggested that, with oil topping
USD 70 per barrel, the Government may spend close to USD 2
billion on fuel subsidies in 2006).  The GSL's response to
threats by the unions and decisions made surrounding the
potential strike could be a harbinger of whether this
government will stand for reform or cave in to union
pressure on a variety of matters. 

ENTWISTLE
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    reforms? what reforms? these suddas have been taken for a ride from as far back as ’06, and they still think the rajapakses will listen to reason… naive idiots

  • 0
    0

    So JVP organized an Electricity strike in 2006 too, to the annoyance of the US Embassy.

    Wonder whether the Monitors are annoyed this time around too,now that FUTA, the Lawyers Collective, UNP , and TNA are joint organizers and participants.

    • 0
      0

      SumaLeesekara you are spoiled outrageously by the marionette and the cohorts. Don’t bash on what you know nothing and you will dash and crash with stupidity.

  • 0
    0

    oh!! oh!! poor people, this are useless works,we have to join with our development activities not these stupid works..#333

    • 0
      0

      Misnomered, you could have been rubbered somewhere.

  • 0
    0

    They doing various things to outstanding and also medias want something to show peoples from there channels as news.So JVP give them chance again and again.carry on but no use.#688

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.