“Following on Assistant Secretary Blake’s January 29 meeting with the Sri Lankan charge d’affaires in Washington (reftel), Ambassador Butenis requested and held a meeting on January 31 with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Bogollagama to raise U.S. concerns regarding Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) harassment of presidential candidate Fonseka, raids and threats against independent media, and an article published on the MOD website by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona falsely allegedly that Secretary Clinton had orchestrated a sanctions campaign against Sri Lanka in the UN Security Council. Bogollagama denied the Kohona article was the GSL position and promised to look into it, largely ignored the press-freedom issue, and offered vague excuses why the GSL treatment of Fonseka was not harassment but promised he would be given due process. ‘The Government of Sri Lanka will not harass anyone,” he asserted, noting they did not want a situation “where the whole world again is criticizing us.'” the US Embassy Colombo informed Washington.
The Colombo Telegraph found the related leaked cable from the WikiLeaks database. The cable was written on February 01, 2010 by the US Ambassador to Colombo, Patricia A. Butenis.
Ambassador Butenis wrote; “On the recent report of government harassment of the media after the election, Ambassador pointed out that raids and threats had been escalating against MTV and other independent media outlets and that for a president who had just claimed such a resounding victory, the press should be able to operate freely. The GSL’s current treatment of the press, however, made the president look weak and defensive. Such actions sent the signal that people with different views were un-welcome in Sri Lanka — which was a reason why the Tamil diaspora was not returning to the country to assist the re-development effort, as the GSL hoped they would do, and as Bogollagama had earlier complained about.”
Read the cable below for further details;
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000076 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2020 TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR RAISES POST-ELECTION CONCERNS WITH FOREIGN MINISTER REF: SECSTATE 9654 COLOMBO 00000076 001.2 OF 002 Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS. REASONS: 1.4 (B, D) ¶1. (C) SUMMARY: Following on Assistant Secretary Blake's January 29 meeting with the Sri Lankan charge d'affaires in Washington (reftel), Ambassador Butenis requested and held a meeting on January 31 with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Bogollagama to raise U.S. concerns regarding Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) harassment of presidential candidate Fonseka, raids and threats against independent media, and an article published on the MOD website by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona falsely allegedly that Secretary Clinton had orchestrated a sanctions campaign against Sri Lanka in the UN Security Council. Bogollagama denied the Kohona article was the GSL position and promised to look into it, largely ignored the press-freedom issue, and offered vague excuses why the GSL treatment of Fonseka was not harassment but promised he would be given due process. "The Government of Sri Lanka will not harass anyone," he asserted, noting they did not want a situation "where the whole world again is criticizing us." END SUMMARY. GENERAL FONSEKA --------------- ¶2. (C) Ambassador noted that since the January 26 election, President Rajapaksa had made statements on reaching out to the opposition and on his victory as a victory for all Sri Lankans, but the treatment General Fonseka was receiving by the GSL appeared to be harassment or pay-back. Whether there were charges against Fonseka was not the business of the U.S. But Ambassador pointed out that if any charges were brought against him or he was imprisoned, we expected such actions would only be undertaken in full compliance with Sri Lankan law. She also pressed for Fonseka's family to be allowed to leave Sri Lanka. ¶3. (C) FM Bogollagama pressed for more specifics on Fonseka's harassment, which Ambassador proceeded to provide. She started with the surrounding of Fonseka's hotel the day after the election day by military troops under the pretext of a search for deserters (Fonseka claimed his private security were retired military); noted that while the government said Fonseka was free to leave the hotel, it took all day before he was actually allowed to do so; and pointed out the difficulties Fonseka said he was having in getting his family out of the country. Ambassador argued this all looked like persecution. MEDIA FREEDOM ------------- ¶4. (C) On the recent report of government harassment of the media after the election, Ambassador pointed out that raids and threats had been escalating against MTV and other independent media outlets and that for a president who had just claimed such a resounding victory, the press should be able to operate freely. The GSL's current treatment of the press, however, made the president look weak and defensive. Such actions sent the signal that people with different views were un-welcome in Sri Lanka -- which was a reason why the Tamil diaspora was not returning to the country to assist the re-development effort, as the GSL hoped they would do, and as Bogollagama had earlier complained about. KOHONA ARTICLE -------------- ¶5. (C) Ambassador passed to Bogollagama a copy of an article COLOMBO 00000076 002.4 OF 002 by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona that appeared on the MOD website, alleging that the U.S. and Secretary Clinton had led a campaign to influence the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on Sri Lanka. Ambassador flatly denied this allegation and asked whether the article represented the position of the GSL. She also pointedly remarked that while the U.S. was critical of Kohona's remarks, we were not insisting on shutting down any media outlets. BOGOLLAGAMA RESPONSES --------------------- ¶6. (C) The Foreign Minister began with the Kohona article, noting that the GSL had never said the U.S. was behind the undermining of Sri Lanka. The FM always had maintained good relations with the U.S., including during the fight with the LTTE, and relations must be kept "intact." The view of the president, according to Bogollagama, was to be a friend to all and to want to enhance relations with the U.S. He promised to look into the Kohona statement. On press freedom, Bogollagama said little, except to refer vaguely to the value that the GSL placed on a liberal political environment in Sri Lanka. ¶7. (C) On Fonseka, Bogollagama started off defensively, responding with vague references to the general's culpability if deserters were at the hotel, the fact that the hallways at the Cinnamon Lakeside had been "packed" that evening with un-registered guests, and a claim that during the subsequent police raid on Fonseka's office, un-registered motor vehicles were discovered. But then he began to moderate his response, saying the family (mother and daughters but not Fonseka himself and the son-in-law, who faces separate investigation on corruption allegations) was free to leave Sri Lanka. (NOTE: Just after the meeting, Fonseka's office confirmed that the two daughters already had departed Sri Lanka for the U.S.; the general's wife had declined to leave her husband. END NOTE.) Bogollagama claimed that unless there was evidence of wrong-doing, Fonseka would be left alone. "The Government of Sri Lanka will not harass anyone," he asserted, noting they did not want a situation "where the whole world again is criticizing us." He concluded by noting that Ambassador's points were well taken and "that's why we're working on them closely with the president's office." BUTENIS
Fathima Fukushima / April 6, 2014
Now if they come they will be arrested and sent to BOOSSA!
/
gamarala / April 6, 2014
This is the trouble with these ambassadors. They just can’t see the simple truth. The Tamils of the Diaspora don’t wish to return for a very simple and good reason – they are very well off in the countries where they now are. This is also the same reason why the Sinhalese who are settled abroad don’t wish to come back.
/
Thiru / April 6, 2014
Mind once stretched will not return to its original dimensions.
Democracy, prosperity, security and protection, best health service, education and developed world where you and your children could excel and prosper.
Who will want to go from a 1st world country to a lawless 3rd world one ruled by a war criminal and his gang? With the treats of white van abducting, rape, torture, disappearance and death.
/
Amarasiri / April 7, 2014
gamarala,
Yes, that is correct. There is no economic incentive.
The countries where they are settled have per capita incomes 5 to 15 times higher than in Sri Lanka.
Besides, there is freedom and better economic opportunities, and no need to bribe officials, and be subject to Sinhala “Buddhist” monk Mahanama Racism.
Is there a risk of being arrested because they are Tamil?
They are better off going to Tamil Nadu for a visit.
Remember, still the Tamils and Sinhala are Paras, as per native Veddah terminology, and they came from South India. The DNA proves that.
/
Burning_Issue / April 7, 2014
gamarala,
It is not as simplistic as you describe. It is true that younger generation have economic reasons for not returning but older folks are keen to spend more time in their homelands. The Dual citizenship is stopped for the minorities instilling many obstacles for the minorities from returning! In a nutshell, the MR regime would prefer none return of the Tamils in Particular!
/
Native Vedda / April 7, 2014
gamarala
“The Tamils of the Diaspora don’t wish to return for a very simple and good reason – they are very well off in the countries where they now are.”
Oh really?
Many in this forum convinced me that all Tamils are employed as toilet cleaners abroad.
Are they well paid for cleaning toilet?
Can you attest their wealth and income?
/
Ram / April 7, 2014
Some don’t even have to lift a finger for a quality of life that they could not dream of in Sri Lanka. Yo do see some of these ‘refugees’ and ‘asylum seekers’ on holiday in Sri Lanka, visiting relatives and friends showing off their new found wealth.
/
Native Vedda / April 7, 2014
Ramu
“Some don’t even have to lift a finger for a quality of life that they could not dream of in Sri Lanka.”
Toilet cleaning involves lot of pushing and shoving. How could they clean toilets without lifting their fingers? Its strange.
“Yo do see some of these ‘refugees’ and ‘asylum seekers’ on holiday in Sri Lanka, visiting relatives and friends showing off their new found wealth.”
And you envy them.
Seriously you must consider taking up highway robbery as your vocation, which could help you amass wealth from stolen properties, gold, jewelry, cash, credit cards, debit cards, expensive gizmos, ….. . Then you too can show off.
You need periodic riots to get into the right mood.
/
e N Gland / April 7, 2014
The Tamil Diaspora should not ever return to Sri Lanka, they have no right to return.
The simple reason is that when they went on their knees to foreign countries and begged them to be given refugee status, they automatically lost the right to return.
Because the Tamils were crafty they bribed officials and were able to get Dual Citizenship.
When the Sri Lankan M.O.D realised that terrorists were trying to re-kindle the LTTE, the Dual Citizen offer was stopped.
The new applicants will have a more thorough tests and will be examined minutely before being considered for Sri Lankan Citizenship
/
carlion / April 7, 2014
Does anyone really trust the likes of Butenis or Michelle Sison. They were sent as ambassadors to create unrest and chaos to divide nations just as they did in other countries they were appointed to.
/
Abhaya / April 7, 2014
Good Riddance of Bad Rubbish
/
Thondamannar / April 8, 2014
Let them remain where they are … Patricia Gutennis.
Sri Lanka are better off than these hypocrites & cut throats.
You can keep them.
Gota is yet flipping the pages collected fron CASTRO’S hideout.
Now that Castro’s man NAGAGOPAN @ KAPILAN and now Nedivayan’s deputy for South East and UNHCR Refuggee applicant of Thailand is in the hand of the Sri Lanka INTEL and vomitting, Diasspora better remain where they are…………….
/