26 September, 2018

Blog

WikiLeaks: Why The Tamil Diaspora Is Not Returning To The Country – Butenis Gives A Reason

“Following on Assistant Secretary Blake’s January 29 meeting with the Sri Lankan charge d’affaires in Washington (reftel), Ambassador Butenis requested and held a meeting on January 31 with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Bogollagama to raise U.S. concerns regarding Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) harassment of presidential candidate Fonseka, raids and threats against independent media, and an article published on the MOD website by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona falsely allegedly that Secretary Clinton had orchestrated a sanctions campaign against Sri Lanka in the UN Security Council. Bogollagama denied the Kohona article was the GSL position and promised to look into it, largely ignored the press-freedom issue, and offered vague excuses why the GSL treatment of Fonseka was not harassment but promised he would be given due process. ‘The Government of Sri Lanka will not harass anyone,” he asserted, noting they did not want a situation “where the whole world again is criticizing us.'” the US Embassy Colombo informed Washington.

Butenis

Butenis

The Colombo Telegraph found the related leaked cable from the WikiLeaks database. The cable was written on February 01, 2010  by the US Ambassador to Colombo, Patricia A. Butenis.

Ambassador Butenis wrote; “On the recent report of government harassment of the media after the election, Ambassador pointed out that raids and threats had been escalating against MTV and other independent media outlets and that for a president who had just claimed such a resounding victory, the press should be able to operate freely. The GSL’s current treatment of the press, however, made the president look weak and defensive. Such actions sent the signal that people with different views were un-welcome in Sri Lanka — which was a reason why the Tamil diaspora was not returning to the country to assist the re-development effort, as the GSL hoped they would do, and as Bogollagama had earlier complained about.”

Read the cable below for further details;

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 COLOMBO 000076 

SIPDIS 

DEPARTMENT FOR SCA/INSB 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/31/2020 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PREF PHUM PTER EAID MOPS CE
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR RAISES POST-ELECTION CONCERNS WITH 
FOREIGN MINISTER 

REF: SECSTATE 9654 

COLOMBO 00000076  001.2 OF 002 

Classified By: AMBASSADOR PATRICIA A. BUTENIS.  REASONS: 1.4 (B, D) 

¶1. (C) SUMMARY: Following on Assistant Secretary Blake's 
January 29 meeting with the Sri Lankan charge d'affaires in 
Washington (reftel), Ambassador Butenis requested and held a 
meeting on January 31 with Sri Lankan Foreign Minister 
Bogollagama to raise U.S. concerns regarding Government of 
Sri Lanka (GSL) harassment of presidential candidate Fonseka, 
raids and threats against independent media, and an article 
published on the MOD website by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona 
falsely allegedly that Secretary Clinton had orchestrated a 
sanctions campaign against Sri Lanka in the UN Security 
Council.  Bogollagama denied the Kohona article was the GSL 
position and promised to look into it, largely ignored the 
press-freedom issue, and offered vague excuses why the GSL 
treatment of Fonseka was not harassment but promised he would 
be given due process.  "The Government of Sri Lanka will not 
harass anyone," he asserted, noting they did not want a 
situation "where the whole world again is criticizing us." 
END SUMMARY. 

GENERAL FONSEKA 
--------------- 

¶2. (C) Ambassador noted that since the January 26 election, 
President Rajapaksa had made statements on reaching out to 
the opposition and on his victory as a victory for all Sri 
Lankans, but the treatment General Fonseka was receiving by 
the GSL appeared to be harassment or pay-back.  Whether there 
were charges against Fonseka was not the business of the U.S. 
 But Ambassador pointed out that if any charges were brought 
against him or he was imprisoned, we expected such actions 
would only be undertaken in full compliance with Sri Lankan 
law.  She also pressed for Fonseka's family to be allowed to 
leave Sri Lanka. 

¶3. (C) FM Bogollagama pressed for more specifics on Fonseka's 
harassment, which Ambassador proceeded to provide.  She 
started with the surrounding of Fonseka's hotel the day after 
the election day by military troops under the pretext of a 
search for deserters (Fonseka claimed his private security 
were retired military); noted that while the government said 
Fonseka was free to leave the hotel, it took all day before 
he was actually allowed to do so; and pointed out the 
difficulties Fonseka said he was having in getting his family 
out of the country.  Ambassador argued this all looked like 
persecution. 

MEDIA FREEDOM 
------------- 

¶4. (C) On the recent report of government harassment of the 
media after the election, Ambassador pointed out that raids 
and threats had been escalating against MTV and other 
independent media outlets and that for a president who had 
just claimed such a resounding victory, the press should be 
able to operate freely.  The GSL's current treatment of the 
press, however, made the president look weak and defensive. 
Such actions sent the signal that people with different views 
were un-welcome in Sri Lanka -- which was a reason why the 
Tamil diaspora was not returning to the country to assist the 
re-development effort, as the GSL hoped they would do, and as 
Bogollagama had earlier complained about. 

KOHONA ARTICLE 
-------------- 

¶5. (C) Ambassador passed to Bogollagama a copy of an article 

COLOMBO 00000076  002.4 OF 002 

by Sri Lankan UN PermRep Kohona that appeared on the MOD 
website, alleging that the U.S. and Secretary Clinton had led 
a campaign to influence the UN Security Council to impose 
sanctions on Sri Lanka.  Ambassador flatly denied this 
allegation and asked whether the article represented the 
position of the GSL.  She also pointedly remarked that while 
the U.S. was critical of Kohona's remarks, we were not 
insisting on shutting down any media outlets. 

BOGOLLAGAMA RESPONSES 
--------------------- 

¶6. (C) The Foreign Minister began with the Kohona article, 
noting that the GSL had never said the U.S. was behind the 
undermining of Sri Lanka.  The FM always had maintained good 
relations with the U.S., including during the fight with the 
LTTE, and relations must be kept "intact."  The view of the 
president, according to Bogollagama, was to be a friend to 
all and to want to enhance relations with the U.S.  He 
promised to look into the Kohona statement.  On press 
freedom, Bogollagama said little, except to refer vaguely to 
the value that the GSL placed on a liberal political 
environment in Sri Lanka. 

¶7. (C) On Fonseka, Bogollagama started off defensively, 
responding with vague references to the general's culpability 
if deserters were at the hotel, the fact that the hallways at 
the Cinnamon Lakeside had been "packed" that evening with 
un-registered guests, and a claim that during the subsequent 
police raid on Fonseka's office, un-registered motor vehicles 
were discovered.  But then he began to moderate his response, 
saying the family (mother and daughters but not Fonseka 
himself and the son-in-law, who faces separate investigation 
on corruption allegations) was free to leave Sri Lanka. 
(NOTE: Just after the meeting, Fonseka's office confirmed 
that the two daughters already had departed Sri Lanka for the 
U.S.; the general's wife had declined to leave her husband. 
END NOTE.)  Bogollagama claimed that unless there was 
evidence of wrong-doing, Fonseka would be left alone.  "The 
Government of Sri Lanka will not harass anyone," he asserted, 
noting they did not want a situation "where the whole world 
again is criticizing us."  He concluded by noting that 
Ambassador's points were well taken and "that's why we're 
working on them closely with the president's office." 
BUTENIS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    4

    Now if they come they will be arrested and sent to BOOSSA!

  • 9
    1

    This is the trouble with these ambassadors. They just can’t see the simple truth. The Tamils of the Diaspora don’t wish to return for a very simple and good reason – they are very well off in the countries where they now are. This is also the same reason why the Sinhalese who are settled abroad don’t wish to come back.

    • 5
      6

      Mind once stretched will not return to its original dimensions.

      Democracy, prosperity, security and protection, best health service, education and developed world where you and your children could excel and prosper.

      Who will want to go from a 1st world country to a lawless 3rd world one ruled by a war criminal and his gang? With the treats of white van abducting, rape, torture, disappearance and death.

    • 1
      2

      gamarala,

      Yes, that is correct. There is no economic incentive.

      The countries where they are settled have per capita incomes 5 to 15 times higher than in Sri Lanka.

      Besides, there is freedom and better economic opportunities, and no need to bribe officials, and be subject to Sinhala “Buddhist” monk Mahanama Racism.

      Is there a risk of being arrested because they are Tamil?

      They are better off going to Tamil Nadu for a visit.

      Remember, still the Tamils and Sinhala are Paras, as per native Veddah terminology, and they came from South India. The DNA proves that.

    • 0
      0

      gamarala,

      It is not as simplistic as you describe. It is true that younger generation have economic reasons for not returning but older folks are keen to spend more time in their homelands. The Dual citizenship is stopped for the minorities instilling many obstacles for the minorities from returning! In a nutshell, the MR regime would prefer none return of the Tamils in Particular!

    • 2
      0

      gamarala

      “The Tamils of the Diaspora don’t wish to return for a very simple and good reason – they are very well off in the countries where they now are.”

      Oh really?

      Many in this forum convinced me that all Tamils are employed as toilet cleaners abroad.

      Are they well paid for cleaning toilet?

      Can you attest their wealth and income?

    • 0
      0

      Some don’t even have to lift a finger for a quality of life that they could not dream of in Sri Lanka. Yo do see some of these ‘refugees’ and ‘asylum seekers’ on holiday in Sri Lanka, visiting relatives and friends showing off their new found wealth.

      • 2
        0

        Ramu

        “Some don’t even have to lift a finger for a quality of life that they could not dream of in Sri Lanka.”

        Toilet cleaning involves lot of pushing and shoving. How could they clean toilets without lifting their fingers? Its strange.

        “Yo do see some of these ‘refugees’ and ‘asylum seekers’ on holiday in Sri Lanka, visiting relatives and friends showing off their new found wealth.”

        And you envy them.

        Seriously you must consider taking up highway robbery as your vocation, which could help you amass wealth from stolen properties, gold, jewelry, cash, credit cards, debit cards, expensive gizmos, ….. . Then you too can show off.

        You need periodic riots to get into the right mood.

  • 3
    0

    The Tamil Diaspora should not ever return to Sri Lanka, they have no right to return.

    The simple reason is that when they went on their knees to foreign countries and begged them to be given refugee status, they automatically lost the right to return.

    Because the Tamils were crafty they bribed officials and were able to get Dual Citizenship.
    When the Sri Lankan M.O.D realised that terrorists were trying to re-kindle the LTTE, the Dual Citizen offer was stopped.
    The new applicants will have a more thorough tests and will be examined minutely before being considered for Sri Lankan Citizenship

  • 2
    0

    Does anyone really trust the likes of Butenis or Michelle Sison. They were sent as ambassadors to create unrest and chaos to divide nations just as they did in other countries they were appointed to.

  • 0
    0

    Good Riddance of Bad Rubbish

  • 0
    0

    Let them remain where they are … Patricia Gutennis.

    Sri Lanka are better off than these hypocrites & cut throats.
    You can keep them.

    Gota is yet flipping the pages collected fron CASTRO’S hideout.
    Now that Castro’s man NAGAGOPAN @ KAPILAN and now Nedivayan’s deputy for South East and UNHCR Refuggee applicant of Thailand is in the hand of the Sri Lanka INTEL and vomitting, Diasspora better remain where they are…………….

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.