24 August, 2019

Blog

Women’s Action Network Welcomes UN Special Rapporteur Rita Iszak-Ndiaye’s Report

Women’s Action Network (WAN)* welcomes the 20th October 2016 statement by U.N. Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues, Rita Iszak-Ndiaye, following her ten-day visit to Sri Lanka.

The special rapporteur cited the failure of successive governments to address minority grievances and called on the National Unity Government to seize the momentum to protect minority rights, build trust, and promote co-existence. WAN strongly agrees with the special rapporteur that Sri Lanka is at a critical stage, and the government must not lose momentum. Now is the time for the government to take concrete steps to build trust and demonstrate its political will to protect all of Sri Lanka’s communities.

Rita Izsák-Ndiaye

Rita Izsák-Ndiaye

The special rapporteur noted several broad challenges to minority rights in Sri Lanka, including:

  • Inadequate minority participation in decision-making structures. To build trust in governance and transitional justice mechanisms and to foster shared ownership over these institutions, it is critical for minorities’ views to be included in decision-making processes.
  • Inadequate minority representation in state institutions. For minorities to trust historically Sinhala-dominated state institutions, there must be greater diversity in the government, provincial offices, law enforcement, armed forces, education sector, and health institutions. WAN welcomes the special rapporteur’s suggestion to employ community liaison officers to these state institutions as a first step to build trust.
  • Inadequate institutional protection of minority rights. The Human Rights Commission and other institutions must be strengthened and allowed to act independently to protect minority communities. WAN welcomes the special rapporteur’s call for an Independent Commission on Minorities to specifically monitor laws and policies and encourage programming to promote equal rights. Victim and witness protection measures must also be strengthened to promote engagement with the courts and transitional justice mechanisms.
  • Inadequate language access. Tamil and Muslim communities struggle with not being able to use Tamil in speaking to local authorities, judicial officers, police, Army, and hospital staff. This is a key concern as well for the transitional justice mechanisms; there must be sufficient Tamil-speaking staff to build trust and promote engagement.
  • Inadequate demilitarization, release of detainees, progress in disappearance investigations, and land return. The government must show its commitment to minority rights by expediting the pace of demilitarization, releasing or charging the remaining security detainees, returning civilian land still held by the armed forces, and transferring civilian powers exercised by the military to civilian authorities. The government should also demonstrate progress in good faith by promptly investigating the disappearance cases currently pending before the courts.

WAN strongly agrees with the special rapporteur’s statement that minority women are a particularly vulnerable group and “often face unique challenges and multiple or intersecting forms of discrimination.”

  • For Tamil women in the north and east, female-headed households face discrimination, displacement, economic insecurity, surveillance, harassment, exploitation, and gender-based violence. Former female combatants face particular stigma, both within and outside the Tamil community. As WAN has repeatedly emphasized, Tamil women’s unique views must be heard in designing transitional justice mechanisms and constitutional reforms. War-affected women also urgently need psycho-social support.
  • For Muslim women, the Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act of 1951 (MMDA) and Quazi courts deny Muslim women their fundamental rights. As Article 16 of the 1978 Constitution allows the discriminatory provisions of the MMDA to remain in effect, it therefore must be repealed. Under the MMDA, Muslim women face child marriage and child pregnancies, unequal divorce procedures, polygamy without conditions, arbitrary compensation practices and unequal treatment by the Quazi courts. These issues are not Muslim issues but rather human rights and child rights issues. The Muslim Personal Law Reform Committee, established in 2009, has yet to produce any report or update the public of its work. As WAN has repeatedly emphasized, cultural and religious rights cannot come at the expense of women’s fundamental rights. Muslim women’s voices must be fully heard in shaping constitutional reforms, and the new constitution must guarantee equal rights for Muslim women and children.

Women’s groups have been making these points for years, and we welcome their inclusion in the special rapporteur’s short statement. We hope the special rapporteur’s detailed report will go further to highlight other specific issues faced by minority women. For example, in connection with language access, despite the establishment of Children and Women’s Bureau desks at local police stations, minority women have reported difficulties communicating with these desks in Tamil. As a result, women who have suffered domestic violence and other violations must not only gather courage to make a complaint, they must do so in an unfamiliar language. The lack of language access doubly affects minority women, leading to a further reluctance in reporting violations.

Failing to consider and address the genuine grievances of minority communities has only divided Sri Lankans. To build trust and promote co-existence in a new Sri Lanka, the government must not lose momentum. As Special Rapporteur Iszak-Ndiaye has stated, minority voices must be heard and protected, and the government must take concrete steps to show its commitment to equal rights for all Sri Lankans. With the focus now on constitutional reforms and designing transitional justice mechanisms, it is critical for the government to ensure full and meaningful participation of minorities, and in particular, minority women.

*WAN is a collective of 8 women’s organizations that are working in the north and east.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 3
    0

    Jim Softy, I am posting this comment on your behalf: What about the rights of Budhidts monks who are in jail for rape and digging up treasures ?

  • 0
    1

    What do you mean by “Sinhala-dominated state institutions….”? Do you want them to be Tamil dominated or Muslim dominated? What does this mean?
    Please do not create issues that we don’t have in the country!
    In the 50s and 60s you people tried to impose Development paradigms to so called ‘Third World’ and miserably failed. Now you people are advising us how to do our job whereas you people have tons of issues in your backyard.
    I am not surprised about what the Philippine president has said in China yesterday!

    • 1
      1

      Siribiris is a typical village fruit of sinhala vedda team.

    • 1
      0

      “Now you people are advising us how to do our job whereas you people have tons of issues in your backyard.”

      My dear idiot siribiris, your sinHELLa prime minister and president are the people nowadays going around countries beg for money and request the intervention to solve their kitchen issues. so first go and advice them first.

  • 0
    0

    Shameful of this ‘Women’s Action Group’ to denigrate itself before this unknown ‘UN expert’ fantasizing about ‘race relations’ in our country after 10 days of ‘research’. It is also ironic that the Prime Minister is reported to be satisfied that the EU is impressed about yahapalana performance, and the Justice Minister who appears to be rationally above many in the cabinet also stated in a talk show program on tv, that the independence our Judiciary was praised by this ‘UN expert’. Does not he understand that he is degrading his stature with such servile utterances?

    By the way, after the COPE report we expect RESIGNATIONS, at least to keep in line with their ‘fake democracies’ of the West.

    • 1
      0

      So chandra,
      Do you need to blackout the issues of minorities in sl? you cant even tolerate the voices who are standing for minorities no?
      Your fryminister and freesident never be eligible to solve the issues of the people. They are protecting their chairs only.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.