21 November, 2018

Blog

Yes, We Khan! Imran Khan’s Victory Can Change South Asia 

By Dayan Jayatilleka

Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka

“That is my inspiration, that Pakistan should have that kind of humanitarian state, where we take responsibility for our weaker classes. The weak are dying of hunger. I will try my best – all of my policies will be made to raise our weaker classes, for our labourers … for our poor farmers…” ~ Imran Khan

Imran Khan’s victory in the Pakistani elections is of enormous and positive significance for all of us in South Asia. His win is of course in keeping with the global trend of the triumph of populism over the political establishment and old political parties being eclipsed by relatively new ones or ‘third force’ parties. Imran is usually described as ‘populist’, while his party the PTI is classified as ‘centrist’ and his own personal views on issues of religion is defined as ‘liberal’. That is a welcome combination that we have yet to see in contemporary Sri Lanka.

Sri Lankan politics and politicians as well as aspirant political leaders, from the Opposition and the Government, have much to learn from Imran Khan. If they want to know how to win given the global Zeitgeist, they must know which policies and profile to adopt and which are bound to fail. In this sense, Imran Khan provides an example for politicians throughout South Asia—an example of what wins elections and which kind of leader the people turn to in these troubled times.

While Imran Khan will be a first-time Prime Minister, and he was known to an earlier generation as a star of world cricket, he is in no sense a novice to politics and social issues. Holder of an Honors degree in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Oxford, Imran retired from cricket, put into practice his concern for the poor by starting a cancer hospital in which 70% of the patients were poor and treated for free. He went on to build a second and follow it up with a university, both of which gave weightage to the poor. After building the cancer hospital, Imran went on to form his political party the PTI in 1996, which has finally won “after 22 years of struggle” as Imran said. He was twice elected to Pakistan’s Parliament.

In a long televised address claiming victory, Imran rolled out his policies and made solemn promises to the Pakistani people. What struck me was the stark difference between his discourse and those of Sri Lankan politicians and political aspirants today. 

His speech which was spontaneously delivered, with only a single sheet of paper on his table which he didn’t look at except before the speech began, had two components, national and international. As the BBC commented immediately after, the heavy emphasis was on Human Development and the social issues facing Pakistan; the poor and the weak and their upliftment through poverty alleviation, social welfare, health, education. He went on to speak about the labourers and the farmers, “ who cannot give proper food to their children”, the “children who are out of school…children who fall sick by drinking dirty water”, the unemployed, the disabled, the minorities, women and even the domestic workers “without rights”. He said he will not enact policies which primarily benefit a “small elite”. No country which has an island of the rich among a sea of poor, is a successful country, he stressed. 

Here is a true progressive vision, unlike the various technocratic ‘visions’ trumpeted here. This was a social democratic program for a South Asian society. Pakistan has found a leader who cares for its people, putting the people first, starting with the poor, the needy and the neglected: 

“My effort will be that we try our best to raise these people up, that all of our policies be focused on human development. I want the whole country to think like this. No country can prosper when there is a small island of rich people, and a sea of poor.” 

“I am saying to you today, that for the first time, Pakistan’s policies won’t be for the few rich people, it will be for the poor, for our women, for our minorities, whose rights are not respected. My whole aim will be to protect our lower classes and to bring them up.” 

How many political figures in South Asia or Sri Lanka speak, think or feel this way? Here the local “Clintonian” neoliberals speak of global markets while the local “Trumpian” neoconservatives speak of race and religion—but neither prioritize the people and their identifiable needs. 

Imran quoted the Prophet Mohammed’s instructions for the running of Medina, instructions which founded the holy city’s administration upon social justice and welfare. He described it as the world’s first “humanitarian state” and said that this was his objective for Pakistan, to transform it into a “humanitarian state”. This slogan can and should resonate throughout South Asia.

Imran Khan’s two main sources of intellectual inspiration are known to be the famous Pakistani poet Mohammed Iqbal (a Communist sympathizer) and the Iranian Islamic thinker Ali Shariati (a renowned progressive and inspirer of radical and left trends within Islam).

Unlike many so-called Sri Lankan patriots, Imran does not think that his country, culture or civilization is superior to the West, axiomatically, intrinsically and in every way. He does not defend discrimination or inequality in the name of a dominant culture, ethnicity or language. He tries to learn from the strengths of the West to rectify the weaknesses of Pakistan: We will set an example of how the law is the same for everyone. If the West is ahead of us today, it is because their laws are not discriminatory…this will be our biggest guiding principle.”

Imran’s extensive references to China were quite different from those that are made in Sri Lanka, where they are a monumental misunderstanding of the Chinese experience and interpreted primarily as a path to rapid growth, through managerial and technological quick fixes and the rule of the professionals. There was none of this distortion in Imran Khan’s understanding of the lessons of China. In his very first sentence on the subject he said: We want to learn from China how they brought 700 million people out of poverty …” we must learn from China’s experience in poverty alleviation”.

He went on to mention poverty in his references to India, saying that the alleviation of poverty must be the number one priority of any government in south Asia and it is in order to facilitate the achievement of this goal that we need cooperation within South Asia, especially cooperation between Pakistan and India.    

The foreign policy component of Imran’s victory speech was of particular interest because it was departure from the views usually expressed in the sub-continent which happen to be US-centric or Indo-centric. Imran’s remarks were multi-sectoral, arguably even multi-tiered. His opening mention was of the relationship with China. He went to neighboring Afghanistan, saying that he hoped for an open border arrangement someday, such as that which prevails in Europe. His next reference was to Iran, followed by Saudi Arabia and the Middle-East region. He then moved to the two trickiest of relationships, namely the USA and India. Imran Khan had been a long standing opponent of the US drone war in the Af-Pak theatre.  In his speech he said that Pakistan should not fight America’s wars. Obviously the relationship with the USA was not his first priority and had been replaced by that with China and the ‘larger Middle East’ as it is known.

In the matter of the relationship with India, Imran Khan struck a fine balance. He reminded the audience that as a cricketer he had traveled the length and breadth of India, and therefore he was saddened by the fact that the Indian media seemed to depict him as a “Bollywood bad guy”. He was unafraid to grasp the nettle of Kashmir, arguing that there could be no military solution to a problem with political roots. He concluded his foreign policy presentation by saying that India and Pakistan should move towards each other, pledging that if India were to take one step forward, then Pakistan under his leadership would take two steps forward toward friendship with India.   

Imran Khan’s views on Afghanistan, Pakistan’s own Baluchistan province, Kashmir and the relationship with India, have a common philosophical thread running through it. While he opened his televised victory address with a strong denunciation of terrorist suicide-bomb attacks and it is an open secret that he has enjoyed the support of Pakistan’s influential military especially during this election, having long cultivated its support, it is also the case that he strongly believes that political and ethnic problems at the root of insurgencies cannot be solved by military action and that even deploying the army to face political unrest which enjoys mass support, is counterproductive anywhere and everywhere in the world. 

South Asian politics had only one charismatic star in the firmament—Narendra Modi. Now it has two. Imran Khan has achieved in domestic politics that which he used to achieve on the cricket field. It is possible that he will go beyond the domestic arena and achieve for Pakistan in the global political arena that which he achieved for his country in the realm of Test cricket and by so doing he may contribute through his ideas and personality, substance and style, to South Asian politics as a whole, that which he did in the game of cricket, in his earlier avatar. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 5
    3

    India’s R&AW will now be put to work overtime………….

    • 6
      4

      Thondamany

      “India’s R&AW will now be put to work overtime………….”

      So Dayan the public racist will be earning an extra bit.

      • 3
        0

        “When a manager with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is the reputation of the business that remains intact.” – W. Buffett

        This is what’ll happen to Imran Khan ……… It’ not in the stars but right in front of our noses …….. if people can only open their eyes to see ………

        Then for billions of years …….. man has lived in hope …….. even though living in hope is what kills them all ………….

        Hope is what Dayan sells ……… even though all the “hope” he has sold before for 60 years has not come to pass ……….

        I sell reality; no one is buying! ……….. all the “customers” are with Dayan or Mahinda or Gota or Ranil or Sirisena …….. or Marilyn Monroe ………..

        I only sell hope to gals ………. but not many takers ……. they are hip to all the tricks ….. such is life!

    • 1
      0

      This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 4
    5

    DJ appears overexcited about the prospects of Pakistan (and South Asia) changing as a result of Imran Khan’s possible election. But his hunger for power was as bad as anyone’s in the region in the past. He always intended to use his cricketing popularity to gain political power.

    Imran’s power trip started by marrying the daughter of the richest man in the UK at the time, James Goldberg, through contacts he had with her mother. The marriage was doomed from the beginning, due to the large age gap and social incompatibility..The Muslim Pakistan smelt a rat about the powerful Jewish connection and Imran failed to make any headway as planned. She went back to her active social life in London after a few years and two children. But Imran became incredibly rich as a result of the divorce settlement.

    Then he tried the next route by marrying a divorced, highly westernised TV journalist. That marriage did not work either and she wrote a ‘tell all’ book.

    He has not won conclusively yet. But if he wins, a lot of change is unlikely anyway, in such such a corrupt country. Also, he will have to hide from the Taliban or he will be bumped off.

  • 1
    2

    In praise of an emerging leader; lets praise what DJ has written.

    But this man Imran; uneasy to guess like his bouncing ball & many are aware of his having umpires in grip.
    Will Pakistani people, the umpires of democracy be held in grip

    His attempt to make politics a cricket pitch, more tendency to be disastrous than success.

    Neighbors, beware of this man.

    • 4
      0

      Your points may well be valid. His profile has contained no sufficient experience to be the PM of that country.
      The country is dominated by vicous groups. That is why security is no sure in that part of the world.
      Srilanka is a country can be developed much easier than any other country, but that can take long and even PAKISTAN can take even longer.

  • 3
    2

    This is the typical writing for the sake of writing by a bookish man .
    A man who is still washing Rajapaksha laundry is talking about
    changes by new leaderships formed by new generations bring in to
    other countries . How many years of hard work is it ? People who
    sell out their souls for selfishness find topics every now and then to
    blabber on . Our country with more than 90% literacy is nowhere near
    such a marvel . Shame isn’t it ? Pakistan is far behind us in literacy .
    They found their Macron of Pakistan. It is only a matter of time before
    anyone jump to conclusions about a Pakistan that chose to change
    the tradition ! A Pakistan that’s been under military and its shadow in
    its absence since its independence .

  • 2
    1

    Next on Dayan’s list of candidate fit to be President of Lanka is……wait for it…….Arjuna Ranatunge……ha ha ha!.

  • 2
    1

    Your celebration is premature Dayan Jayatilleka. Imran Khan has not won yet. He needs to cobble up minority votes. Of course the long suffering minorities, under Pakistan Army inhuman brutality will try to get relief but can Imran deliver? He cannot because the Pakistan Army is a law unto themselves. Can Imran bridle the powerful mullahs? Imran probably does not know that Pakistan’s bane are the mullahs.

    The proof of the pudding…………. Imran does not know the ingredients for the pudding!

  • 1
    0

    My dear nimal fernando

    Trump does not fall into the group; he was a businessman. I meant people who changed fields like sports, cinema

  • 1
    0

    This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/

  • 1
    1

    Soon after the infamous partition, Jinnah and other leaders of Pakistan (W &E) formed the Pakistan Army to protect themselves. The mullahs smelt the business opportunity. An impression that East Pakistanis were a dark-skinned fish-eating inferior race took root. In the mean time corruption/nepotism/impunity got established. Pakistan Armed Services staged coups.
    Late sixties saw General Yahaya Khan at the helm. He infamously said, “Kill 3 million East Pakistanis and they will eat off your hands”. He sent General Tikka Khan to do this. Tikka arrived in 1971 and told his soldiers “I want the land but not the people”. Tikka relished reaching the three million mark. To their chagrin, Bangladesh was born and the rest is history.
    Dayan: Creation of Bangladesh was a blessing for the then W&E Pakistan.
    .
    No political analyst of note will say that the Pakistan Armed Services can ever be bridled. Imran cannot.

    An aside: Imran’s intellect is at best a wee bit above normal.

  • 2
    1

    A state born out of hatred, was Nehru’s description of Pakistan and her discomfiture in 1958, when Ayub Khan with gun in hand captured the machinery of state. Yahya Khan succeeding him took over the ladle from the kitchen and served the military. The treasury too was meant to look after the armed and not the citizen. Today this poor country assessed by any and every economic criterion, is just tottering. ONE AND ONLY MODEL FOR SRI LANKA AND HER FUTURE.

    The writer’s writings will take his country to Pakistan’s 1958. Any redemption thereafter?

  • 2
    0

    Paranoid Personality Disorder
    .
    Wikipedia says people with this disorder “habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases.”
    .
    So Dayan, what’s next?
    An old sea turtle farting in the deep blue ocean?

  • 2
    0

    come on imran,we want you to win the world cup again,this time in politics.Come on arjuna,we want you to become an imran and win the political world cup.Put up your hand for president.You will definitely get much more votes than ranil.

  • 0
    0

    Dayan quotes (in block letters) a statement of Imran Khan’s intent.
    Compare this with what assassinated former PM of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto said ~ “The government I led gave ordinary people peace, security, dignity, and opportunity to progress”.

  • 0
    0

    Did the partition do any good?
    But it happened and it has come to stay. Pakistan used religion as the shield while India patronisingly looked at the sibling returning to the fold. Enter the Arms dealer. Pakistan created the Army to protect the elites. Reconciliation is rational and would have saved lots of angst to both sides. Enter the Arms dealer again. Both sides could not resist the bribes and here we are! Nuclear Arms and all that.

    Pakistan Armed forces have become a mono-religious-colossus. They encouraged religious fanaticism and the bigots took over. Pakistan is now a Muslim State – the state recognises only one sect of Islam..
    .
    Can Imran Khan bridle the bigots? He will not even try.
    .
    Is there something Lanka can learn from the Pakistan experience?

    Dayan, you must lead.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.