4 December, 2020

Blog

A Few Practical Suggestions For Police Reforms

By Basil Fernando

Basil Fernando

Basil Fernando

“A History of Ceylon Police” by late A.C. Depp, former Inspector General of Police, is a book consisting of three volumes that gives a good insight into the manner in which the police system came about in Sri Lanka. Reading these pages removes any surprise about the rather pathetic condition into which this institution has evolved.

The unfortunate thing is it need not have been this way.

There was a short period of experiment into the development of the Sri Lankan police in line with the Metropolitan Police instead of the Royal Irish Constabulary. The following opening remarks of Chapter I of this book refer to this short-lived experiment:

“We cannot concede that the Irish Constabulary is at all an analogous Force to our Ceylon Police, and we would here beg leave to express our opinion, that it would have been more conducive to the efficiency of our Force, which is or ought to be, almost entirely occupied in the usual duties of a town Police, if the English Metropolitan Police had been preferred as a model to work from, instead of a Force, however, admirable in its own country, so unsuited to our requirements as would appear to be the Irish Constabulary . . .   (From the Report of the Commission on Police, 1864)

… Before 1866, the Ceylon Police Force was influenced in its development by the London Metropolitan Police and the Royal Irish Constabulary. From 1840 onwards, under the guidance of Mr. John Colepeper, a former Sergeant of the P ‘ Division of the Metropolitan Police, the Ceylon Police Force grew up resembling the Metropolitan Police in dress and manner of work. However, this influence was shortlived. Mr. Thomas Thompson, a former Inspector of the Royal Irish Constabulary took charge of the whole Force in 1845. Later, Mr. William Macartney, another Inspector of the Irish Constabulary took over from him in 1848 and began shaping the Force on the lines of his old Force. The outward appearance underwent a visible change, the Blue Serge uniform of the Metropolitan Police giving place to the Green uniform of the Irish Constabulary. Changes took place in other respects too.”

In 1832, the London Metropolitan Police was created and it transformed the nature of policing in the United Kingdom and later also in the United States. This model was also adopted with suitable modifications in almost all countries of the developed world. The change of the policing model was in keeping with the political and social changes that were taking place in Europe at the time where democracy was transforming the political and social landscape. The State had to come to terms with people’s demands for recognition of their human dignity. The relationship between the State and the people had to undergo a transformation in keeping with the ending of the rule by the Monarchy. That “law is the king”, was the common slogan which summed up the nature of this transformation. A completely new discipline was needed within the policing establishment to make it capable of establishing a relationship with the people who had become the masters of their own destinies. Thus, the Metropolitan Police was built within the framework of overall change in a society organised around democratic principles.

It was this system that was introduced to Sri Lanka in 1840. However, when the leadership within the organisation changed with persons recruited from the Royal Irish Constabulary, the system once again fell back into the ‘old model’ and unfortunately it is within that “old model” that the entire policing service has remained, to-date.

The narrative given in this three-volume book on the History of Policing in Sri Lanka, graphically illustrates that there was no overall design for the institution at any time. What took place was ad hoc developments depending on various exigencies that the system faced from time to time. The shaping of the institution was in the hands of various officers recruited for leadership and their tenure of office lasted only for short periods. Besides this, particularly in the 19th Century, the practical difficulties were overwhelming. Even finding personnel to be officers proved a difficult task. The following story illustrates the type of problems that were faced:

“Adverse criticism eventually led to the appointment of a Commission. The members of this Commission consulted all the available material regarding the Force, questioned a large number of witnesses and produced their report in December 1864. They observed that there was no proper test by which the efficiency of the Force could be judged. But from the evidence gathered and from the observations made, they concluded that the Force was inefficient. They attributed the inefficiency to the lack of proper inspection and supervision of the men. They observed that very inferior men were being taken into the Force and old worn-out men were allowed to continue in Service. The most striking instance was that of the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Mr. P. H. de La Harpe, whom they had viewed at one of their sittings. De La Harpe was one of the veterans of the Force and an officer who had served with Mr. Thomas Oswin, the first Superintendent of Police in 1833. He had an unblemished record and was reputed to be one of the ablest detectives of his day. Of him, the Commissioners observed: ‘on his coming before us we were surprised and pained to find that a man so broken and decrepit should have been left, as was then the case, in charge of the Force of the Town. It is in our view to be regretted that he has not ere this been allowed to retire. We must submit that he should now be called on to do so and that the office should not be filled up’”.

The 20th Century brought about new problems, but the policing service did not undergo any change in design either in its overall institutional blueprint or in terms of any significant organisational changes. Each new problem was faced only in an ad hoc manner and that naturally led to the ever deepening of a chaotic situation. From time to time commissions were appointed such as the Justice Soertz Commission of 1946, but the recommendations of these commissions were never implemented.

It was this ad hoc approach, which even led later – when insurgencies took place in the South as well as in the North and East – to the authorisation of enforced disappearances of persons after their arrests were secured. Such ad hoc arrangements, which allowed even illegal acts to be performed by the police, further undermined the chaotic system, which was created in line with the Royal Irish Constabulary.

Despite constitutional changes bringing about a National Police Commission, and some honest efforts made by some Chairpersons of the Commission to undo the unacceptable situation, it has proved impossible to cure the ills arising from the very nature of the organisation itself.

It is quite unlikely that in the near future, any government will dare to undertake the venture of police reform, although mere talk of such reform will always remain in the political vocabulary. Perhaps the task of police reforms should be approached from a more practical point of view.

All over the world we are witnessing an unimaginable scale of changes brought about by the information communications revolution. The echoes of this change can also be felt even in the remotest corners of Sri Lanka. Perhaps, the changes in the police organisation should be thought of in terms of overhauling its completely outdated communication system at all levels.

From the very first act of taking down of complaints of victims of crime into every aspect of investigations as well as communications with the Courts, modern technological methodologies should be brought in and this could virtually transform the system within a short time and with much less costs.

What we would require is to have the assistance of persons qualified in the use of such technologies, and they are not hard to find. When looking at jurisdictions where such transformations in adopting modern technologies have already taken place, one can easily see that bringing about this change is quite within the reach of Sri Lanka, both from the point of view of availability of skills in such technology as well as from the point of view budgetary requirements.

In fact, not long ago, in the years 2006/7, the World Bank funded a project in Sri Lanka in assisting such a change in introducing an automated courts system. The project was abandoned before it could be launched countrywide. However, that project was only related to the courts. If the entirety of the policing system’s work is also brought within such an overall automated system, it would become possible for Sri Lanka to have a type of a policing system that is suitable for its needs in the present time.

What is required is the imagination and the will to achieve such a change and thus a willingness to answer to the cries of the people for an efficient system of justice.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 4
    0

    ‘What is required is the imagination and the will to achieve such a change and thus a willingness to answer to the cries of the people for an efficient system of justice’

    Neither Ranil nor Sirisena have the imagination or the will for this.

  • 2
    0

    Paul: “Neither Ranil nor Sirisena have the imagination or the will for this”. Absolutely correct. But who else in this country can you name to undertake this reform? The stinking political culture established by the so far tested corrupt politicians have brought about misery to the country and the people. They, the politicians have deliberately made the people destitute so that they can thrive in their plunder of the national wealth; to which aim they make the Policing a tool. There is no vision or mission to do things correct. Police Reform is a vast subject, presently messed up in Sri Lanka to be discussed. I will come back later on this matter

  • 3
    0

    Basil, don’t you think itis better to close down PD? It is an organized body wielding corrupt power coming under the purview of so many politicians. Dissolving would take off corruption. The present active personnel could be absorbed by divisional secretaries, transport department and the Military Police dept. to diligently handle the laws taken care by respective bodies. Present Police stations could be changed into extensions of Divisional Secretaries and Grama Niladari offices. CID could operate with Govt. Analyst, FCID, Fraud bureau, PNB etc. could come under AG’s office.

    Present Police Dept. has lost its credibility in professionalism, politeness, being people friendly, speed with which to assist public. There are many minuses than pluses.

  • 1
    0

    In the thirties and forties, when a young man who completed the Senior School Certificate applied to join the police force, a senior policeman in mufti visited the immediate area where he lived and inquired from citizens about the applicant.
    If the inquiries were satisfactory, he was written to, to be present on a given date, with testimonials/character certificates from three prominent citizens of the area – school principals, temple trustees, clergymen etc.
    If the interview was successful, he was selected for training, after a medical examination.

    From about the fifties, political thugs who ‘assisted’ various candidates at elections, were recommended by them and appointed to the police force.
    Some of these became top rung officers by sheer seniority and political backing.
    Now, even if dedicated men/women are selected, they are quickly made to behave like their seniors, towards citizens.

    Thus, selection is most important.
    At present, the average citizen has no respect for, or trust in, the police.
    No woman will visit a police station alone, especially at night, for any purpose.

  • 1
    0

    Field Marshal Fonseka as law and order minister would have the filth shi@@ing their pants?

  • 1
    0

    As I said in my comment above, this Reformation of “Policing” is a very wide and a complex problem that cannot and should not be handled in a “Quick Fix” model. As a country, the authorities must embark on a proper plan that needs careful attention by experts. As at present Police are being fundamentally challenged by rapidly changing, (internal and external) and increasingly complex society that requires them to continually adapt and change. So in this environment, the Police need to change and adopt too to (1) Service Delivery (2) Public Confidence and (3) Performance Measures. When taking this trend there are three themes of reforms that need to be addressed viz. (1) Adaptation (2) Interdependence and (3) Knowledge to assimilate ever changing environment of technology. In considering the external and internal changes in the crimes trends, it becomes more and more complex. For example the main problem that is presently faced by the FCID is that “Change” in the nature of mega financial crimes committed by the use of “Technological Changes” that have taken place and adopted in committing such crimes. This trend in “Information Technology” has made such crimes more globalized and complex. Even that trend has “changed” the social patterns of operations.

    All the above brief account goes to ask the very important question: Is our present day Police geared to handle matters that are “complex” in terms of safety provision and investigative mechanisms to perform the service delivery expected? In my opinion it is a definite NO. Then, we must go for a complete change in the entire “Policing System” to meet the developing and changing trends in society and the external forces that affect our country. Also this “Policing” activity must not be “separated” but an “integrated” (combined) with other stake holders who play roles in safety and security of all aspects of public demands.

  • 0
    0

    Dear Douglas,

    ‘Also this “Policing” activity must not be “separated” but an “integrated” (combined) with other stake holders who play roles in safety and security of all aspects of public demands.’

    The police miseries will continue as long as IGP is controlled by politicians. The policing activity is not ‘separated’ in my earlier comment. Suggestion is to get maximum values to the public service from the administrative bodies where a ‘system’ would be followed. Any section of policing will not be influenced by other section when operated in the manner mentioned. There are good officers, but few bad eggs are enough to rotten the entire PD if the present set up continues. Recent incident with IGP is evidence of politics interfering with PD.

  • 1
    0

    Adrian: Thank you. I did not discuss the “Structural Changes” needed in my second comment excepting to point out the need to “Empower” the Police functions with injection of modern technical “Know How” in the delivery of its services. In your earlier comment you proposed a “devolution” (if I understood correctly) of Police functions to various levels in the Local Government. In that context, I would think what you say could be better achieved in a proposal like this: Now that the proposed new Constitution is contemplating on “Devolution” of Police functions to Provincial Councils, the best that could be done is to establish “Regional Police Services”. The term “Region” could be described as a “combination” of several Local Government Bodies or a “geographical area” that belongs to a Provincial Council. For example, there could be a “Regional Police” for the entire geographical area of the Southern Provincial Council. This “Regional Police” must be administered by a “Board” comprised of the Chief Minister, the Provincial Secretary, a representation of the Provincial Governor and a representation from the Civil society. Yet, the Central Government must overlook the administration by way of establishing the “Standards and Practices” that must, by statutory way required to follow in the provision of police services in the “Region”. This is to achieve “Standardization” of the Police Service countrywide. All matters relating to empowerment, such as provision of Human Resources, Equipment, Technical Know How, Finances etc. must be in the hands of the “Regional Police” and there must be a “Head” appointed to be called “Regional Police Services Commissioner” who shall be Responsible and Accountable direct to the “Regional Police Board” for its “Administration” and “Compliance” with the “Statutory” requirements laid down by the Central Government. To make all these “Regional Police Force” COMPETENT there must be established a fully pledged and properly equipped “Police University” to provide all Human Resources requirements and it must be made COMPULSORY to draw all the needs of the “Regional Police Service” from this institute and NOT from anywhere else. Next, this would involve a radical CHANGE in the educational sphere too at school level and how that could done has to be discussed in much greater extent. This proposal is an improvement based on your proposition.

  • 0
    0

    Douglas,

    What I am trying to explain is that no ‘management’ should come under the purview of Legislators. Hence, “This “Regional Police” must be administered by a “Board” comprised of the Chief Minister, the Provincial Secretary, a representation of the Provincial Governor and a representation from the Civil society.” has to be ruled out. Let a Police commissioner be the link between Politicians and the PD however the managing body should be the board. Objectively you have to de-link the politicians from interference in all the administrative affairs.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.