By Kumar David –
This essay argues that despite the victory of a right-wing Hindutva party and leader, Indian democracy and secularism are secure. The landslide was in an extended cow-belt; let me call it the bovine-belt. Cow-belt refers to the solid Hindi speaking cluster (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Uttarakhand and Delhi). To expand it to the bovine-belt I add Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Orissa. Interestingly less than 40% of India’s 1.2 billion live in the so defined cow-belt; expand it to the bovine-belt and that adds another 300 million souls. If the cow-belt is the Hindi heartland, then the larger bovine-belt is the current Hindutva heartland. Here you will find the 2014 base support of the BJP, the RSS and Shiv Sena (Maharashtra only).
The parliamentary seats won by the BJP (NDA) in the 2014 elections were 282 (336), but 264 (320) of these were in the bovine-belt; that is to say the BJP/NDA performed appallingly in Kerala (0 out of 20 seats), West Bengal (2/42), Tamil Nadu (2/39), Telangana (2/17), Orissa (1/21) and did not do well in most small states in the North East and elsewhere. This is a bovine-belt landslide, not an all India triumph for Modi and the BJP. Since India employs a first-past-the-post system, even in the heart of the cow-belt, Utter Pradesh, India’s most populous state with 80 seats where the BJP carried 71, its vote share was 42%. Only in Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra (BJP-Shiv Sena combine) did it poll over 50%. (The UP numbers in the table are slightly inexact). The biggest landslide was in the bovine-belt beyond the core cow-belt. Nationally, the percentage polls were; NDA, that is BJP+, 39%; Congress+ 24%; Others 37%.
The BJP’s poor performance in Orissa tells the story of how Naveen Patnaik’s secular Biju Janata Dal tactically played along with the BJP without joining the NDA and carried the state (20 out of 21), losing just one seat to the BJP. A sad story is Bihar, where Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal party lost badly (2 seats to NDA’s 31) since it opposed the BJP’s nomination of Modi as prime ministerial candidate. Nitish Kumar is one of India’s best Chief Ministers, but the juggernaut overwhelmed him. As an Indian commentator put it, “This is a fight about who will be PM, not who will be CM; in this fight, Nitish has no place, Modi has the edge”.
The landslide in perspective
India’s first-past-the-post parliamentary system is no stranger to huge electoral victories. In the 1951, 1957 and 1962 elections Nehru led Congress to resounding victories securing between 360 and 370 out of 490 seats and 44% to 48% of the popular vote. In 1967 Indira Gandhi secured 289 of 520 seats and 41% of the popular vote. She climbed back to 350 seats and 44% in 1971. There is however a far more crucial difference between these victories and 2014; all of them were all-India based. Congress won decisive endorsement, figuratively speaking from Srinagar to Kanya Kumari and Calcutta to Amritsar. It was no cow-belt story; it was an all-India phenomenon. Indira was defeated in 1977 because of her 1975-77 emergency folly but she too lost to an all-India alliance of several parties. (Congress still held on to 189 seats and 41% of the vote). I emphasise this to assert that Indian democracy and secularism are secure; a bovine-belt phenomenon has no national transformative prospect in such matters.
Indira swept back in 1980 in a Nehru style victory, and in 1984, after her assassination, Rajiv Gandhi, secured the largest victory in Lok Sabha history (414 seats and 49% of the votes). Both times support was spread throughout India. Starting with the 1989 Lok Sabha, it has been a run of minority governments but since they were based on India wide alliances the government had an all-India complexion. For example the just outgoing UPA government included major parties from Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and the North East, in addition of course to cow-belt parties.
This time the logistics are remarkably different; the landslide is limited to the bovine-belt. This reduces the BJP’s room for manoeuvre. It can, technically, govern without the support of its main NDA allies Shiv Sena and Telegu Desam Party, but this unlikely because the former provides storm-troopers and the latter gives it some semblance of respectability in the south. It is this narrowness of constituency that warrants confidence that Modi and the BJP will not step out of line provoking communalism or smothering democracy despite pressure from extremist quarters. They do not want the other half of India and the country’s 180 million Muslims to mobilise against what in a very real sense is a minority government. This is one reason for my confidence that BJP-Modi cannot threaten Indian democracy or secularism in a serious way. The other reason is programmatic.
Governance and economy
The Modi Wave was not about Muslim baiting. During the campaign the BJP and Modi were at pains to hide Modi’s allegedly anti-Muslim past in Gujerat; the demolition of Babri Majid mosque was an embarrassment best forgotten. The simple fact is that the Modi Wave to the masses meant “There will be electricity in every dwelling place, all will be wonderful like heavenly Gujarat (sic), there will be jobs, the light will shine in the darkness and this time the darkness will comprehend it”. The upper classes want a determined business friendly government. Educated and/or computer literate youth crawling out of business schools, IT courses and high schools are not looking for the next Muslim to slaughter; they are waiting for Modi to bring Silicon Valley and neon signs to their vicinity. The government cannot satisfy all three groups; it will please the business classes and the spill over will indulge upwardly mobile young people, not only the much sneered at yuppies. The masses, waiting for the dawn of a new era, will have to wait for another dawn.
The point of these remarks is that this campaign and victory in no way projected an anti-Muslim or an autocratic regime; it was about the economy and governance. Yes Modi is a decisive and determined leader, he may be able to cut through regulation-raj, but let him try playing with protest politics – communalism, worker’s rights or press freedom – and he will face a tornado, the honeymoon will evaporate. But neither Modi nor the BJP hunger for evaporation. India’s secular, mass democratic and intellectual traditions are strong; very strong; much stronger than Lanka’s.
Economic and governance issues will take pole-position in the government’s action plans – no time for Hindutva or Muslim bashing since these will cut across this strategy. India’s Economic Times says that stalwart figures like Arun Jaitley, Ragnath Singh, Arun Shourie and Sushma Swraj will take key cabinet positions. (Arin Jaitly lost his seat, I think, so he will have to be brought into the Cabinet through the Raja Sabha). The journal says that if this materialises it would signal a pro-corporate, pro-Western government, an unswerving continuation in foreign policy and US aligned strategic policy, and an unchanged attitude to Lanka on human rights and ethnic issues. The BJP-Modi government has a choice, either economic strategy; capitalist reforms, relationship to global capital, better governance and curbs on populism. Or it can make itself into an extremist, ideologically decorated, Hindutva fest. I am certain it will have to be the former, give or take isolated incidents.
The Aam Aadmi factor
The AAP’s impact was far greater than the number of seats it won; all the people it went after lost their seats. Its campaign contributed to the BJP victory by destroying the legitimacy of Congress. Its own performance was not bad for a new entrant; 3.4 million votes (24%) in the Punjab, 2.7 million (33%) in Delhi, 1.1 million in Maharashtra, 0.8 million in UP, half a million in Haryana and 0.3 million in Madhya Pradesh. It won four seats, all in the Punjab. This is how some defeated AAP candidates fared; not bad at all.
A big factor in the success of the BJP is that it motivated its supporters to come out and vote. While the national turnout went up from 58% to 62%, in the six big states (previous table) where the BJP won big, the turnout was noticeably higher. The increase was partly due to the mobilisation of social-media savvy young people who want a dynamic economy. They will resist constraints on democracy and the secular ethos in which they have been raised. I am instinctively anti BJP, but it is true Congress had to go. In that case a BJP-Modi term in office is not too high a price to pay since in any case Indian democratic secularism is as secure as Fort Knox.
Safa / May 25, 2014
Please dont dampen the spirits of our patriots who are dreaming of a grand alliance between BBS and RSS, Mahinda and Modi, Dosti Dosti. They have dreamed up many similiarities between the two and it almost seems we may be entering a second Asokian era.
DesperateSL / May 25, 2014
The manner that srilankens (rural masses) elected MR for the second time and the way that they even supported in the recently held western and southern pc elections – we could call it ” landslide victory in the swine belt”.
Else, I have no reason to see why the buggers real activities were made unaware to those masses.
Today, almost anything and everything is ruined to no go status.
AR / May 25, 2014
This is an ideologically skewed analysis, as always. Just look at the Tamil Net map of where the BJP led alliance won. The BJP alliance won pretty much throughout India, except in Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, West Bengal and Orissa. Tamil Nadu is led by Jayalalithaa who is supportive of Modi but now estranged given the latters invite to Mahinda Rajapakse. He will need to reach out to her to secure his 2/3rds majority in the legislature. And the BJP opened its account for the very first time in Tamil Nadu with two seats (one of which was PMK). Andhra Pradesh is led by the Telugu Desam which is a member of the BJP led NDA. Telengana is a new state and the dynamics there are a bit different with the TRS having won given its role in the bifurcation of Andhra. Meanwhile, Orissa’s Biju Janata Dal will likely support the NDA indirectly.
So the only two numerically significant states that stand out as non NDA are Kerala which went Congress (the only one in India) and West Bengal which went Trinamool.
No one uses the term Bovine belt any more! Maharashtra and Gujarat went BJP – and both are industrialized. The point of the matter is that the BJP never secured this type of majority in the Hindi belt ever before!
EW Golding / May 26, 2014
The author (David) argued four points.
a) Despite Modi-BJP Hidutvaism, India will remain secular and an attack on the Muslims is out of the question.
b) Despite the Shiv Sena neo-fascists and RSS extremists being in government, Modi will not be able to challenge Indian democracy or impose authoritarianism like in Sri Lanka.
c) Indian foreign and security policy and the linkage with the US will remain as a pivot.
d) There will be policy continuity towards Sri Lanka.
Which of these, if any, is AR contesting? Despite his numbers game I do not read a challenge to any of these key propositions. Take a rest AR!
M.Sivananthan / May 25, 2014
Muslims and Christians can have their religious power in their countries but HINDUS cannot. That is your nasty COW mentality.
Narendramodi will teach good lessons to Catholic/Christian morons who support LTTE criminals.
Ram / May 25, 2014
The LTTE supporters were NOT restricted to Christians/ Catholics. Far from it.
What is perhaps interesting is that the ‘Hindus’ of Tamil Nadu, in an essentially Hindu state did NOT support the Hinduthva party, but were limited by their claimed for ethnicity, (just as they are in Sri Lanka). The question is ‘Is India ONE country’?.
Native Vedda / May 25, 2014
Ramu the Sinhala speaking Demela,
Tamilnadu never claimed to be a religious state.
“The question is ‘Is India ONE country’?”
Unlike the racist Aryan Sinhala/Buddhist one nation, broadly speaking with all its short comings, diversity and multiple identities India still remains a secular state. A concept you are not used to hence you will find it difficult to learn there is something that’s been cherished in India that is the idea of unity in diversity.
India accepts that it cannot impose a single identity on its diverse culture and people.
Being a Lanky, I know this is bit hard for you to understand.
aratai / May 25, 2014
India is not One Country… for now they are because of Pakistan.
If Tamilnadu or South separates from India, I cannot imagine what will happen to Lanka….
The best bet for Sinhalese is, not Hindians, Not Chinese, Not even Americans but Tamils.
Amarasiri / May 25, 2014
“The question is ‘Is India ONE country’?.”
Yes, one Country with different states, languages, ethnicity and religions and tribes.
But as far as Native Veddah in Lanka are concerned, the Land of the native Veddah, are concerned, ALL Indians are Paradeshis, Paras, Foreigners.
When will the Lanka Paras, Para-Sinhala and Para-Tamil, join the Indians, and leave Lanka, the land of the Native Veddah?
Ram / May 26, 2014
PARA-masiri plays second fiddle to the false Veddah (aka Fitzpatrick) who claims to own Sri Lanka. You can wait…
ABCD / May 25, 2014
NO disrespect to UP, Bihar and M.P but they are the reason why India reamins third world. Even one of indias ministers chindabaram stated that if India was only the south and west of india india would have progressed at a much faster rate this a fact.
This is partly due to these peoples racial mentality. If you look at the average bihari, UP person they have very little aryan in them. It is only the upper castes amongst these peoples who are aryan but yet all these fools think that they are aryans
BBS Rep / May 26, 2014
Modi’s biggest stumbling block will be the ‘Corruption Raj’. The ‘Corruption Raj’ is a multi tiered, multi faceted establishment, immovable like Mount Everest itself. Not even ship loads of ‘Amruth’ (devine nectar of the gods and not the pretend Indian Whisky)can move it. When Modi continues to hit his head against this rock solid establishment every which way he turns, he will indeed need a bogeyman to take out his frustation. Enter the hapless Muslims.
Despite KD’s summation that sanity and secularism will prevail, and I hope it will, I am still of the opinion that Muslim bashing is still in the agenda, and it will be big time this time.