20 September, 2018

Blog

A Reply To Victor Ivan: Give Him A Mask, He Will Tell You The Truth

Sinhala version of the following reply was sent to Ravaya, but they did not carry it.

By Uvindu Kurukulasuriya

Uvindu Kurukulasuriya

“Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth” – Oscar Wilde.

As a reply to a short report I wrote to the Colombo Telegraph, Victor Ivan, the Editor of Ravaya has written a long reply titled “Reconcillation (sic) and the Gotabhaya Factor”. In the first part of his letter he questions my reporting, gives instructions as to how I should have written it and avers that that report is untrue. In the second part he analyses a background he has identified in a “crisis”. Thirdly, he analyses the good, the bad but not the ugly of the Secretary of the Ministry of Defence.

His reply should be discussed for two main reasons. First, it is a question of the professionalism in journalism. Second also, it is a question of the professionalism in journalism.

The discussion at issue had taken place among Victor Ivan, Minister DEW Gunasekara, his partner Barbara Seneviratne and Wilfred Wickramasingha, a businessman closely associated with President Rajapaksa. This was not a casual chit chat or a dinner but, as Victor Ivan himself has written, a serious political activity taking around two-and-a-half hours. What Victor proposes now is that I should have obtained information after contacting all the discussants and verified the authenticity of the information. Even if I quote hundreds of articles he has written in his 25-year media life span checking facts, not only on all sides but with even a single person, I asked him, before finding fault with others, although he had the ability, to show it by action knowing very well that I would not be exonerated from the charges he has levelled at me. On the other hand, thereby any civilized discussion would have been prevented. What Ivan states is that though I talked to him there was no confirmation of such information. According to him what I had asked him was only whether he had been at a dinner with DEW. He also states that he said “yes”, disconnected the phone because of lightning and that after been satisfied with what he said I had written the report.

What Really Happened?

One of my sources was talking to me and, quoting Wilfred Wickramasinghe, said Victor Ivan is doing a fantastic job of canvassing on behalf of Mahinda Rajapaksa and Basil Rajapaksa, in a way no one else is able to do. My reply was “It’s something that everybody knows. Can you call this a news item?” But my curiosity was aroused because of the connection of businessman Wickramasinghe. So I asked him to get me some more information on this matter. What the source divulged two days later was that, at a discussion at Wickramasingha’s residence, Victor Ivan had said that President Mahinda Rajapaksa was not aware of the US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Robert Blake’s visit to Sri Lanka, or why he was coming. Blake had given a letter to be given to the President and G.L. Peiris had not passed on the letter. Apparently Blake and Mahinda Rajapaksa never met prior to the US- backed resolution against Sri Lanka. And the External Affairs Minister G.L. Peiris was the main culprit.

Wilfred, Victor, DEW and Barbara

Victor Ivan has said that Mahinda Rajapaksa is kept ignorant purposely by people close to him. Victor’s big worry is that if a sufficient number of MPs cross over the government would collapse, and he is doing everything he can to prevent this. The suspicion is that most of the President’s close associates are not sincere. Neither G.L. Peiris nor President’s Secretary Lalith Weeratunge can be trusted.

I decided to write this. I spoke to Victor on the phone. I asked him whether it’s possible to speak with him. “Yes” he said. As I said “This a news item about you.  A friend of Willa said that you’re doing a huge task on behalf of Mahinda and Basil”. Victor angrily retorted “Here you Uvindu, you can write anything you like!”. When I asked him “Don’t you complain that journalists write unilaterally?” he was softened a bit. When I asked him ”Did you have dinner at Willa’s?” he replied “Not only Willa but DEW was also there”. Then he began to explain his advocacy project on “uniting politicians and the people”. He stated that he meets not only government parliamentarians but opposition and Tamil Alliance MPs and continued to describe his project. He vehemently rejected what, according to my source, he had said about G.L. When asked whether he said Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa is the cause of every problem for the regime, he did not deny it straightaway, but said that he disagrees with some of Gotabaya’s actions while agreeing with others. Victor Ivan cut short the phone conversation saying there was heavy lightning in Colombo. The conversation between Victor and me took 7 minutes.

Victor’s method and my method

It was from Victor that I learnt DEW Gunasekara had participated in this discussion. Now Victor accuses me of not getting the correctness of my information verified by talking to those present at the discussion. Getting the information authenticated by the discussants is one method. Instead, the method used was to assign this task to two of the closest associates of the discussants. It took some days. The dinner had taken place on the 3rd.  I wrote the news item on the 10th.  Hence, the time taken. There was absolutely no disparity in what my first source divulged and the information given by the other sources. What happened was the accumulation of further facts, one of which is that DEW Gunasekara’s partner, Barbara, had also participated in the discussion. DEW Gunasekara had participated in the discussion to obtain information from Victor as DEW believed that Victor is a very close associate of the President and that the President tells everything to Victor.  In the process of answering Barbara’s questions Victor had busted the “number plate” of the former President. Except for the last-mentioned facts about Chandrika Kumaratunga all other facts were included in my report. Anyone interested in this can read about it on this website.

Accuracy and Truth

Everyone agrees journalists must tell the truth. “Journalism’s first obligation is to tell the truth” is a maxim. Similarly, there’s another principle as “accuracy, fairness and truth”. Now, why is there one principle as “truth” and another as “accuracy”? What’s the difference between these two? What is meant by “accuracy” is the accurate reporting of facts gathered by the journalist. Sometimes however, it is possible that the information reported may not be true. Sometimes it may be partially true. In journalism, as at all times, “truth” is a process. Truth, it seems, is too complicated for us to pursue. Or perhaps it doesn’t exist, since we are all subjective individuals. There are interesting arguments, maybe, on some philosophical level, which are even valid. It is actually more helpful, and more realistic, to understand journalistic truth as a process—or a continuing journey toward understanding—which begins with the first-day stories and builds over time. This is why “follow up” and “right of reply” exist. The report I wrote is incomplete. It is true that it doesn’t contain what Victor has purported to have said in two and a half hours. It was a short report.

Gotabhaya

Victor says that what I have written are imaginary things. But Victor has practically proved that “truth” is a sorting-out process that develops between the initial story and the interaction among the public, newsmakers, and journalists over time. In the first paragraph of his reply he says that during his two- and-a-half-hour serious discussion he had not stated that Gotabaya is the cause of all problems.  Therefore, let us turn to the last paragraphs of his letter. While speaking good of Gotabaya, Victor advises him not to be mischievous. Here are the relevant sections from his last two paragraphs:

“After the conclusion of the war, the President removed General Sarath Fonseka who made an enormous contribution to the success of war, from his position. Though, it is not justifiable that he is kept in custody, the decision to remove him from the position that he held at that moment can be considered a good decision. If the Defence Secretary was not (sic) happened to be the brother of the President, similar (sic) fate would have fallen on (sic) him as well. But it was the President who got down his brother from the USA. He accomplished the task assigned to him at optimum level even risking his life at times.

“It appears that the President is compelled to remain silent in the face of whatever he does whether good or bad because of this family bond. The Defence Secretary should be prudent enough to understand this situation. He is intelligent and endowed with special talents. He should either change the tough policy that he adopted at (sic) the war and transfer to a mild policy which is appropriate for peace. Or else he should withdraw from the old role and adopt a new role which is appropriate for peace. Otherwise nothing may prevent him loosing (sic) the love of the people and the glory that he deserves”.

What is the difference between what I wrote to the effect that Victor stated certain things and this quote? The title of my article was “Gota Is the Cause of All Problems”. According to the above quote from Victor’s letter what I had written does not get invalidated. Have you ever heard something smiler from Victor Ivan before?

As Victor has surfaced a serious question about my professionalism I would like to reciprocate it with a question and throwing down the glove. My report was published on April 10th. Today is April 29th. Why is it that, except for Victor, the others in the “serious” discussion have not repudiated the contents of my article?

Notwithstanding the other discussants, as a responsible Minister whom I know quite well, DEW Gunasekara should have rejected my report as false if it was incorrect. I throw down the glove for businessman Wilfred Wickramasinghe, DEW Gunasekara and Barbara Seneviratne to pick up. If you can, reject my report by honouring the right of the people to know the truth. Please write to the Colombo Telegraph or Ravaya what you said at Wickramasinghe’s residence that day so that its readers can compare your versions with what Victor writes to the Ravaya.

I have stated above part of my reply to the main question surfaced by Victor regarding my reporting. I expect to give the other part of my reply to the other questions and accusations levelled at me by Victor.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 2
    0

    The Rajapaksa family is the cause of all the problems in this country today. When a majority of the people realise this someday in the future, it will be too late to save this country or democracy.

    • 0
      2

      I think Rajapaksha family bring peace to our country. There are no people dying either tamils or sinhala boys. So we don’t care you or Victor what you talk or write. Leave the cost of war. Think about the lives.

      • 2
        0

        ”There are no people dying either tamils or sinhala boys.” THEY DO NOT DIE.
        THEY ONLY DISAPPEAR, VANISHED INTO THIN AIR.
        WITH the HELP OF UPASAKA HOTHAMBAYA’s GOOLAYO.
        BECAUSE THE RULING FAMILY WANTS TO ATTAIN NIRVAANA SOON.

        • 0
          2

          you don’t get it. When the LTTE was active last 25 years we live in a country without a proper target or a plan. We just live the day. Tamils and Sinhala and Muslim. All of us. All our past leaders couldn’t finish the matter. From JR to Chandrika or from Prbakarn to Kadiragamr. But now after a huge life sacrifices from both sides we have come to and new chapter. No more war. No more our young boys from ARMY dying or no more Tamil young boys and girls been trained to use T56 but they all can be used to build our economy like Japan, Korea or Germany. We are a country with lot of natural resources for all of us. If we unite and protect them instead of still talking about our differences. You see I don’t give a fuck about Rajapksha brothers. But end of the day they did it. You cant blame day to day criminal activities all to the government. Our country have lot of uneducated uncultured population which is why the war took so long. White van can be used by anybody. I’m not whitewashing the current political leaders. But give them time and we will change them politically if they cant impress us by next election. But do not just type wearing colored glasses. White van issue is not a new thing. I too took one guy in my friends van because he owe me some money and not paying it. That was way back. I’m a [Edited out] straight and I’m telling the [Edited out] truth.

    • 2
      0

      There are so many working behind the scenes to keep the Rajapaksa administration hoisted up, and for what reason, other than for personal gain? In the 40 year political career Mahinda Rajapaksa is in political debt to so many people at the going rate a country 10x of Sri Lanka will not be sufficient to pay up his debt.

      Back in 2010 I thought Sarath Fonseka would make a good President, and I said so, precisely because he has no political baggage; and not because he had a clean record in every department.

      Alas, majority in this country thought otherwise and today we’re paying for that decision; unless you’re one of those manipulators behind MR who’s now cashing in on their horse.

      • 0
        1

        So 40 years of Mahinda’s politics can do nothing but couple of years of S.Fonseka’s can be a good for the country? WTF

  • 0
    0

    Give Victor Whisky , he will tell you the truth!! :) :) :) :)

  • 0
    0

    what I feel is Victor now scared of Gota. That’s why all these “butter ganne”.

  • 0
    0

    suz born as a boy, now i behave like a woman,i belive women more attrcttive than men in professionalism in journalism ,actualy you have that dignity of women attudinize journilism thinking power just like suz.god please make suz a real women in my next birth.i hate bottle journaliism does by victor.

  • 1
    0

    @Uvindu. Well said so diplomatically to Boru Karraya and opportunist, Victor Ivan. He is sucking up in a big way to the Rajapakses. I guess “It’s a case of survival of the fittest”. Those who bend down well with “grease” in their ……….. so that it is painless.

    • 0
      0

      It’s not easy to convince Victor types. I think you guys are very new to politics. I like to recommend you to start posting in ” Chooty Patiya” forum and come back here.

  • 0
    0

    “Sinhala version of the following reply was sent to Ravaya , but they did not carry it.”
    This is a problem

  • 0
    0

    So,now all three left leaders are having partners? Barbara, young academic and NGO Queen, respectively.

    • 0
      0

      Sunil T

      Why are you beating about the bush. Say Barbara (DEW), Sirimalee (Tissa) and Nimalka (Vasu).

  • 0
    1

    Our nation and people want PEACE IS LIKE BREAD AND BUTTER FORL SEVERA YEARS. MR leadership had bring PEACE FOR NATION AFTER 30 ODD YEARS.WE have to appriciated his role of bring peace to samll counrty like Sri Lanka.Personal differances keep aside against Rajapakasa and family.Look at whole mission he had been accomplished during his (Rajakapasa) leadership to the our country.Is correct we have to go long way to achive Democracy and indepandence & national suatanbiable of economic developement.To be overcome oustanding problmes since colonial past and indapandenc since 1948 we need more time and space.
    May we need NEW ERA of country has to go through.Indeed NO SHORT CUT PATH for economic developement and Indepandence for SRI LANKA>

    • 0
      0

      I THINK HE IS GOING TO ACCOMPLISH HIS LAST MISSION. VERY SOON.
      I WISH HIM TO DO HIS BEST,
      BUT THAT TIME MAY WE HAVE A COUNTRY OF OUR OWN

  • 0
    0

    In china there’s a saying that it does not matter what color the the cat is as long as it catches mice.That’s why they opened their economy and embraced but slowly changing to capitalism. Now there are over 300 Billioneers (US$)individuals but not politicians – In China. In Sri Lanka we embrace the color of the cat first whether it catch mice or not.This is the root cause of our economic downfall. No matter how educated or the religious or cast one belongs, if there is no equal law for everybody, honesty, justice,freedom to live and proper reward is not given for the correct people, until these are fulfilled, there won’t be any progress in the country.It’s a mystry why GL peiris did not give Robert Blake’s invitation to President Rajapakse….and how many more blunders we did before we lost Geneva HR. Someone in the GOSL has to answer to the blunder.Did the cat go after the mice. I don’t think so.

  • 0
    0

    You shouldn’t waste your precious time reasoning with cowards like Victor.

  • 0
    0

    “truth” is a sorting-out process that develops between the initial story and the interaction among the public, newsmakers, and journalists over time.
    Very well put.

  • 0
    0

    victor ask advertisment from mahind. ariyananda dobagahawatta is next bto me now ravaya got govt ads. shame janaranjana, wimalanath, lasdantha and others are in govt money

  • 0
    0

    Victor just likes to be close to power ,has no consistent principles

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.