18 May, 2022


A Victory Not Just By The Minorities

By Raashid Riza

Raashid Riza

Raashid Riza

Images have been making the rounds on facebook, with various hues and shades, highlighting the fact that the sixth executive President of Sri Lanka, Maithripala Sirisena, won with the support of minority communities in Sri Lanka, whereas Mahinda Rajapaksa, the last President obtained the votes of a majority of the majority. There is another image on facebook, that of a line drawing of a rabbit, requesting those who have time to go about colouring a map of Sri Lanka to induce racism, to colour the rabbit.

That is how much Sri Lankan society has been polarised over the last few weeks.

President Rajapakse was the clear front runner to win the elections in November 2014 when elections were called. The probability of him winning the elections kept thinning since then, when the General Secretary of his own party defected to the opposition to occupy the mantle that was the common opposition candidate. Come election eve, Mahinda Rajapaksa was still the favourite to win, albeit only just.

Never did I come across someone who whole heartedly committed to the fact that Mahinda would lose, even in the predominantly anti-regime circles that I move in. The most optimistic notion doing the rounds was that Maithripala had a very fair chance of winning, that optimism however was swiftly disqualified by that commonest of statements – should the unthinkable happen, the Rajapaksas are so entrenched in their power politics, that they will never let go, and even if they did it would be after a bloodbath. Days before the elections, the prices of vegetables and other household commodities soared as a premonition soaked public stockpiled for the violence and curfew that was expected to eventuate.

The unthinkable happened, Rajapaksa lost, he allegedly tried to use the military to create chaos, the army refused, and what ensued was probably the most peaceful elections and post election climate in my close to thirty year lifetime.

Gnanasara |Picture courtesy Foreign Correspondents' Association of Sri Lanka Facebook page

Ministers and ministerial offspring were running amok and thugs in robes went about desecrating the sanctity of the noble philosophy that is Buddhism|Picture courtesy Foreign Correspondents’ Association of Sri Lanka Facebook page

The Muslims and Tamils voted en masse for the opposition, particularly the Muslims. Not because they had faith in the opposition, but because the Rajapakses had to be deposed.

Under the Rajapaksa’s, Sri Lanka descended from a precarious political balance to an utterly damaged one. Media freedom was stifled and Sri Lanka went from being a benign smiling island nation to a surveillance state, with state of the art technology mustered to wage the war now being used to protect the power balance of the regime. Journalists were killed in broad daylight; media institutions and other organs of a functioning democracy were stifled at best or bullied to submission. Ostentatious construction projects were instituted, some meaningful, some not so – but the incentive behind many such projects were the fruits of corruption enjoyed by those involved.

Political appointees were common place, and many at the highest echelons of power could trace some link to the Rajapakse family. Sri Lanka’s first female Chief Justice was impeached allegedly for blocking a project largely involving one of the Rajapakse brothers. The impeachment process itself was not moral and the very process reflected the tatters in which political decency lay, where it is rumoured that one of the loquacious ministers of the government addressed her derogatorily in Sinhala as ‘baby’.

As a nation many felt that we had lost our spirit under the Rajapaksas. As a people, we were being groomed to dislike the other, in a land which abrasively and wrongly claimed to be that belonging to just one race. Racism was allowed to thrive; indeed bureaucratic apparatuses were struggling to survive without it. Ministers and ministerial offspring were running amok and thugs in robes went about desecrating the sanctity of the noble philosophy that is Buddhism.

Corruption was so rampant that it became such a deeply ingrained and embedded element of our psyche. Indeed when one lives in abnormality for long enough, that which was once considered abnormal slowly yet firmly goes through a subtle metamorphosis to become normal. Decadence becomes so gradual that it happens without grazing the sensitivities of our collective consciences, and eats away at our soul.

The Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), largely unrepresentative of the average Sri Lankan Buddhist wrought carnage upon the carefully evolved and preserved Sinhala-Muslim relationship. To the credit of the Muslims however, they have been astute to identify the BBS as a terror group and not of a representative wing of the majority Sinhala community. The BBS was out in the open, in its aggression towards Muslims, a country where law and order is considered sacrosanct would have no dilemma in having many of the BBS charged and punished. Instead, they were harnessed and even prospered under the watch of the last government. Among the reasons for their invincibility in the sight of many was their perceivably close relationship with the former defence secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa.

Hundreds of properties and close to dozens of mosques were damaged, causing immense physical and emotional trauma upon a beleaguered and innocent Muslim community. It was, and as of today, continues to be a symbol of the decadence of our society that hate speech so easily spewed from the electronic mouths of many educated Sinhala youth under the watch and connivance of the state.

However in all this, Muslims must not, should not and should never be tricked to indulge in turgidity that this was a victory brought forth by the Muslims and other non-Sinhala ethnic groups.

Rajapaksa had to go, and the people rose against him, and that is all.

Muslims should move beyond the parochialism that has plagued politics in recent decades, it didn’t use to be this way; abnormality has once again come to be known as normal. It is understandable that circumstances pushed Muslim politicians down that path, but that time has now passed. Muslims should integrate- not necessarily with the Sinhalese or Tamils – but with all those who identify themselves as Sri Lankans, bar none.

I was amongst the tens, if not hundreds of thousands at the last rally by Maithripala Sirisena in Maradana of the Colombo Central electorate, and amongst the elated crowds at the Independence Square when the new President was sworn in. The former is a Muslim stronghold and the evergreen bastion of the opposition United National Party, the latter is a national treasure. Remarkable was the fact that in one instance, Sri Lankans rallied against the incumbent, and in another they rallied in support of the new incumbent, not as antagonistic warlords who had momentarily laid down their arms, but as a harmonious clutter of Sri Lankans of all shades, celebrating what they deserve.

Maithripala Sirisena’s Presidency, or indeed his new government should not be considered better than the last unless they actively prove to be so. They have made promising new steps, but they have miles to walk. This new government has to be held accountable for all the steps they take, commended for the good they do and taken to task for the wrongs they do. Indeed never again should a regime as dastardly and corrupt as the last be allowed to surface to soak the founding principles of Sri Lankan society, one that still teaches ‘values’ in her schools.

This is not a victory by the Muslims or Tamils neither did the Sinhalese win with the help of their other racial counterparts.

In the oldest democracy in Asia, her peoples got together to depose what they thought was a representation of everything that isn’t Sri Lankan, they did so to regain the Sri Lanka they know.

That is how it should be.

I am a Muslim, I voted for the winning candidate – it is against the grain of these sentiments to highlight that I voted in a Sinhalese, but I did and not just because there wasn’t a suitable Muslim candidate. Together I am from the political majority, a majority that should embrace the minority to form a cohesive Sri Lanka, not monotonous as a people, but one people nonetheless.

Note – An earlier version of this article contained the paragraph below without the word “allegedly”. The paragraph has been edited as follows; “The unthinkable happened, Rajapaksa lost, he allegedly tried to use the military to create chaos, the army refused, and what ensued was probably the most peaceful elections and post election climate in my close to thirty year lifetime.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 9

    The minorities have responded to the Presidential elections positively using their franchise as citizens of Srilanka. It is disgusting to refer the Pr esident M. Sirisena’s victory was due to only the minorities and not the majority Sinhalese. All of them are equal citizens of SriLanka and what is wrong about it. These utterances are with the ulterior motive of creating racial violence among the different communities.

    In this context, it is interesting to refer that MR was campaigning in the north with the slogan let us forget the past whilst in the south the same person was asking the people to remember the past by continuously telecasting pictures of the war. What a hypcracy.

    • 3

      Raashid Riza -RE: A Victory Not Just By The Minorities

      It is a Victory for the people, even though many were ignorant.

      It is the people wanting CHANGE from the Corrupt and Lawless Medamulana MaRa Family Dictatorship and Dynasty.

      If you listen to the links below, it becomes clear. They prevented information reaching the masses. The MaRa regime controlled the media, Thousands of cutouts at state expense., State employees used illegally to promote the dictatorship. Eben then the majority of government employees did not vote for him. There are few minorities in the state as employees, why?

      Information Had the information distribution was efficient, 65% of the Sinhala Buddhists would have voted for Sirisena.

      Example: 2010 Horana and Bulathsinhala, Kalutara District, about 98% Sinhala Buddhists. 2010 about 66% for Mahinda Rajapaksa 2015about 56% for Mahinda Rajapaksa with resticted informatioin 2015 about 35% for Mahinda Rajapaksa, with Free Information Flow.

      That is why The MaRas and their Cronies wanted to have a short Campaign.

      Priority is to Stop Mahinda Rajapakse, then Common Candidate – Anura Kumara Dissanayake

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWODsikBwpw S

      amanalee Fonseka


      Anura Disanayaka Speaks at Ranna 02


      University Teachers for Social jutice Supports to Maithripala Sirisena Dambara Amila Thero


      Anura Disanayaka Speaks at Ranna


      Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s speech against Mahinda Rajapaksa-2


  • 6

    Superb analysis Riza. Fully agree with you in that the muslims always considered the BBS as an appendage of the Rajapakses and not representative of the Sinhalese. As a Sri Lankan I can tell you that the Sinhalese are way above the lowliness these morons display.

  • 2

    It is so sad that racism and ethnic divides have taken root in our country when we can do well without it. It is the politicians who must be blamed for pushing the racist agenda for cheap political gain. The info-graph of the results of the last election clearly demarcates the divisions, and we now know that depending on the majority Sinhalese/Buddhist vote alone to win elections is impossible since it is split between both candidates as they both from the majority community. Therefore the minority vote will always become the deciding factor to produce the true winner. This is why playing the racist card can never succeed and MR was forced to learn it the hard way. Too late to make amends since his opposite number has now benefited from it. If the racist phenomena was absent, there was every chance that MR would have retained power and the people would have missed out an opportunity for change.

  • 2

    For a better future of Srilanka a racial and religious hatred act should be brought immediately like in UK ,before GnanaSara ruin our beautiful country .

  • 0

    Well written and well rounded. It’s good to read an incisive journalistic piece in the press.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.