16 June, 2019

Blog

Commonwealth People’s Forum Can Enhance Government’s Credibility

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The significance of international pressure in directing the government along the path of good governance can be seen in several recent developments.  As a member country of the international community, Sri Lanka has many obligations to fulfill, even as it seeks the benefits of being a member of the international community.  But for the country, and its political leadership, to reap these benefits that accrue from being an integral part of the international community, it has also to subscribe to international rules and norms.   It now appears to be starting to do so.  The government’s decision to conduct the long delayed election to the Northern Provincial Council is also, without doubt, primarily due to international pressure.

Obtaining foreign investments and hosting international conferences, such as the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in November this year are amongst the benefits of membership in the international community for the government.  It will provide the government with an opportunity to showcase Sri Lanka to a large part of the world.  As the host of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting this year, President Mahinda Rajapaksa will be entitled to be the Chairman of the Commonwealth for the following two years.  This would grant him an unparalleled opportunity to be a leader on the world stage, as the Commonwealth counts 54 countries (with Fiji being suspended on account of a military coup).

However, there was, and remains, strong opposition to the decision to permit Sri Lanka to host the CHOGM by some groups in the Commonwealth countries and even by the Canadian government.  Some of the main criticisms they have leveled against the Sri Lankan government have been due to its poor post-war performance in terms of strengthening key institutions, not least the judiciary.  Sri Lanka today ranks close to the bottom of several international indices, including those for human rights, media freedom and state failure.  The absence of a political solution that would address the issues that gave rise to war, counts as one of the country’s failures.

The prospect of a country that flouts Commonwealth values taking the position of leadership in the Commonwealth is unpalatable to those who oppose Sri Lanka playing host to the CHOGM.  The Commonwealth Charter, to which Sri Lanka is a signatory, calls for the Rule of Law, Separation of Powers and Freedom of Expression, among others, some of which are under threat in the country.  The Commonwealth Journalists’ Association; the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative; the Commonwealth Lawyers’ Association; the Commonwealth Legal Education Association; the Commonwealth Magistrates’ and Judges’ Association; Human Rights Watch, the United Nations Human Rights Council are other Commonwealth groups that have expressed their opposition to Sri Lanka hosting CHOGM.

 Latest Challenge 

The latest area of challenge to Sri Lanka lies in observing Commonwealth values in relation to the strengthening of civil society.  International pressure can be useful in expanding the shrinking space for civil society in Sri Lanka.  Recently the government has been talking of new legislation with new registration requirements to get a tighter control over NGOs.   The Role of Civil Society is one of the 16 paragraphs of the Commonwealth Charter which has also been signed by Sri Lanka.  It states, “We recognise the important role that civil society plays in our communities and countries as partners in promoting and supporting Commonwealth values and principles, including the freedom of association and peaceful assembly, and in achieving development goals.”

However, instead of there being a strengthening of civil society work in partnership with the government, there has been a weakening of it in Sri Lanka over the past few years.  There has been a constriction of the space for many civil society activities in Sri Lanka due to the appearance of government mistrust of these organizations.  NGOs are often laboratories of small scale initiatives that can be replicated at a higher level by bigger entities.  Unfortunately, the government does not give NGOs a place on their planning or advisory committees although there are some exceptions.  The Ministry of National Languages and Social Integration has an advisory expert committee which brings in many from civil society groups and NGOs.

But when NGOs do work at the community level, the police (both Criminal Investigation Department and Terrorist Investigation Department) routinely come and inquire as to what is going on, and sometimes even sit in on the proceedings, which intimidate the participants into maintaining silence for fear of being reported as enemies of the state. Those NGOs which are active in human rights, peace and reconciliation are routinely described as being anti-national and a threat to national security by government leaders and the state media.  Sri Lanka is also unique in having NGOs register under the Ministry of Defense.

In contrast the Commonwealth Charter and values look on NGOs and civil society groups as being partners with the government in promoting human rights and democratic freedoms of the people.  Due to the importance that the Commonwealth places in civil society, since 1991 the practice has been for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting to be accompanied by a Commonwealth People’s Forum that brings civil society leaders from across the Commonwealth to share their experiences with one another. A Commonwealth People’s Forum will be held in Sri Lanka in the run-up to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting.

 New Opportunity 

The agenda of the meeting and participation at it is currently being worked out with two important Sri Lankan civil society organizations, the Sarvodaya Movement and Sewalanka Foundation playing leading roles in it.  Coming up with a programme that addresses civil society concerns will be a very challenging task given the negative climate for civil society in Sri Lanka at the present time.  So far the main themes that have been identified include those of reconciliation, development and dialogue between civil society and government which are of crucial importance to civil societies worldwide.  Civic groups such as the Friday Forum in Sri Lanka have written to the Commonwealth Secretary General asking that a special one day session on Good Governance be included in the programme.

Those Sri Lankan civil society leaders who have undertaken the task of preparing the structure and content for the Commonwealth Peoples Forum will be challenged to do so in a manner that meets the needs and expectations of civil society leaders attending the event both from Sri Lanka and the international community.  Hopefully they will produce an outcome that enhances the credibility of Sri Lanka as the host country and ensures serious and genuine civil society deliberations. They also have to contend with pressure from the Sri Lankan government itself which sees building roads and other infrastructure and improving the economy as the path to reconciliation.

One of the positive features of the planning process for the Commonwealth People’s Forum was the invitation extended to civil society organizations in Sri Lanka to attend an introductory meeting in Colombo.  All those who accepted the invitation to attend the meeting were accepted by the organizer of the introductory meeting.  Those who attended of their own volition were committed civil society activists, who gave an accurate and ground-level depiction of the adverse economic and social conditions in the country and what they were doing to improve them.  There will be two additional introductory meetings for civil society groups to attend in Jaffna and Galle, which will do much to attract the participation of civil society groups from the different parts of the country.  As a part of the People’s Forum there are also plans to have Learning Journeys, whereby the international participants will be hosted by local civic organizations in the Northern, Southern and Uva provinces to see at first hand the different facets of civil society engagement for the betterment of the people.

 Positive Expectations

It is expected that about 60 civil society leaders from the 54 Commonwealth countries will be attending the People’s Forum in Sri Lanka.   It is also proposed that at least 240 Sri Lankan civil society leaders will also participate at the event.  It is important the civil society leaders in Sri Lanka who wish to attend be provided with the resources to attend.  Sri Lankan civil society has many lessons to offer the rest of the Commonwealth in terms of having experienced a civil war and post-war reconstruction. At the same time, there is also a lot that Sri Lankans can learn from their counterparts in the Commonwealth.  The temptation to divert the bulk of available resources to getting international civil society personalities at the expense of local expertise will need to be resisted.

In order for the Commonwealth People’s Forum to have credibility as a civil society event, it will need to be managed by persons from civil society, and not by the government, even though it coincides with the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting which is a government event.   In view of the hostile climate towards NGOs at the present time, the Sarvodaya Movement and Sewalanka Foundation, which have been entrusted with key roles in the steering of the event, will need to be judicious in resisting possibly inevitable governmental encroachment into the decision making process.   In particular, it is important that all civil society organizations that wish to participate in the Commonwealth People’s Forum be given an equal opportunity to take part, even if they have been critical of the government’s failures in good governance, human rights and reconciliation.

If the government puts pressure to exclude some civil society leaders as either speakers at the People’s Forum or as participants on the grounds that they are promoting views that are not in favour with the government, it would be a violation of Commonwealth values of non-discrimination and freedom of expression.  Non-interference in the planning of the event, and the freedom of expression enjoyed by Sri Lankan civil society at the Commonwealth People’s Summit, will give an indication of how well Sri Lanka’s leaders will take on the rest of the challenges of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting n November and the chairmanship of the Commonwealth for the next two years.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    These NGO karayas who seek to enhance a corrupt and criminal regimes “credibility” are truly pathetic.
    Please stop talking nonsense: or have you got the contract to set up the “people’s Forum” for a colonial organization that is obsolete and irrelevant and should be shut down.
    India just needs to pull Katchativu island from Lanka and all Rajapassa’s grandstanding about being a great war hero will come to nothing in the eyes of the public.
    CHOGM and its peoples forum is a waste of time and energy and should be SHUT DOWN SO PLEASE SHUT UP!

    • 0
      0

      People should Boycott this silly Commonwealth People’ Forum and instead go on the streets in November and call for a SHUT DOWN of the meeting.

      Citizens of Lanka must take to the street and protest CHOGM and Sharma – the silly clown of the Commomwealth of Morons- for supporting military dictators like Mahinda Rajapakse.

  • 0
    0

    This [Edited out] NGO karaya Jehan, like Ranil Wickramasinghe, has forgotten that his first job is to EDUCATE the people on the regime’s corruption and what a waste of funds the Commonwealth of Clowns (CHOGM) meeting is.
    These NGO karayas expect the INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY to do their work! Jehan shame on you! Rather than educate the people and organize them to protest and demand a better health and education system, you are going with the Rajapassa CHOGM show and wasting funds on CHOGM which is a platform for third world dictators.
    What NGOs should do is boycott CHOGM and organize street protests as in Brazil where people are protesting govt. corruption and the hosting expensive of mega sports events rather than spending on health and education..

  • 0
    0

    “Sri Lankan civil society has many lessons to offer the rest of the Commonwealth in terms of having experienced a civil war and post-war reconstruction.”

    The cat is out of the bag. In the guise of writing on “Commonwealth People’s Forum Can Enhance Government’s Credibility” National Peace Council of Jehan Perera is trying to use the platform to raise the same issue with which he earned lots of money. Golden opportunity for him to take the “message” “legally” to 54-countries and make headway for NGO presentation at next year’s UNHCR sessions in Geneva.

  • 0
    0

    I wrote this before but must repeat the point again.Jehan Perera is a [Edited out] who has taken various positions at different times. Recently I came across an article by the much respected late Ajith Samaranayake in 2005. Samaranayake was writing about Mahinda Rajapakses election victory in 2005.I quote Samarankake from his article titled” Returning a nation to its roots”20 November 2005.
    He says “Jehan Perera for example was widely quoted internationally as seeing the presidential election of 2005 in terms of binary opposites, namely nationalism versus internationalism and tradition versus modernity.
    But what the kinds of Perera do not realise is that nationalism is not always a dirty word, particularly when so called internationalism which is championed is an abject surrender to President Bush or that modernity is only a vogue word for a kind of cultural neo-colonialism which has been deleterious of indegenous values in much of the third world.
    Perera’s imaginary culture war had little relevance in a context when UNP propagandists were trying to seduce farmers into slipping into bell bottoms or going in for chewing gum”

    What is Jehan Perera’s angal now ? What a disgusting record of intellectual dishonesty !How can he now argue that Rajapakses are acceptable ? has Jehan Perera forgotten everything he wrote all this time ? He is now very much like that big charlaten UNP fraud [Edited out]. Green and international during the day and Blue and nationalistic in the night ( when not occupied in sipping cocktails with white diplomats !)

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 300 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically shut off on articles after 10 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.