On
Saturday 12th July 2014 at 4.30pm
At
Bonus Pastor Catholic College
Winlaton Rd. Bromley BR1 5PZ
Keynote speaker :
Dr. Jayampathy Wickramaratne
(Director, Institute of Constitutional Studies ) Please RSVP: By 10th July 2014 to
tulf.london@gmail.com
kiafiya Addar / July 9, 2014
This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn’t abide by our Comment policy.For more detail see our Comment policy https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/comments-policy-2/
/
R. Varathan / July 9, 2014
A Sinhala lawyer from the Left to speak in the Memorial of a man, a prominent former Tamil politician – who called for a Separate State.
And that too in a Tamil political landscape in London dominated by LTTE supporters. Is the Sri Lankan political reality undergoing a seismic change?
R. Varathan
/
Real Peace / July 10, 2014
Varathan
If pariah Prabaharan had left Amirthalingam to conduct politics for Tamils in the aftermath of 1987 Indo-Lanka accord, the Tamils would not have gone through a holocaust in 2009.
/
Agnos / July 10, 2014
I don’t think any serious change has happened. After the murder of Amirthalingam by the LTTE, his family had become disillusioned with Tamil nationalist politics, and didn’t say anything about separation.
MR even used his familiarity with Amir when the latter was opposition leader to flatter Amir’s son, when the latter met him in Sri Lanka during a visit.
So Amir’s family, or those close to them, inviting a leftist constitutional lawyer for commemoration, is not a “seismic” change.
/
R. Varathan / July 10, 2014
Agnos – The family could have invited a prominent Tamil or a Britisher. I think inviting a Sinhala gentleman is a message
from the Amirthalingam family the time to forget the past and
move towards the future and reconciliation is here – despite the
diabolical rule of the army and the continued suffering of the Tamil people in the North.
R. Varathan
/
Agnos / July 13, 2014
Varathan,
Maybe so, but the thrust of my point is that Amir family may no longer be the flag-bearer of mainstream Tamil nationalism, even though this may have resulted from the assassination by the LTTE. That mantle has shifted to the TNA, which by virtue of being elected, holds certain authenticity. The leftover TULF no longer has any significant support, as evidenced by the election loss of Anandasangaree. So their family’s message, even if what you say was the intended one, is not going to get any traction.
/
Rufus / July 9, 2014
why don’t u first hear what he has to say. Amir was killed by LTTE. Don’t you remember that?
/
K.A Sumanasekera / July 10, 2014
Apparently Peter, Visu and Siva killed Amir in Colombo. This was when Mr Prabakaran had his Eelaam in the North.
Wonder what Amir was doing in Colombo?..
Will there be any friends and relatives of Peter, Vasu and Siva to tender an apology?.
I mean these people now, are all about reconciliation and HR protection of their brethren. Aren’t they.
And they only want revenge ,for killing Mr Prabakaran and his loyal Brigades…
/
Tamodaya / July 11, 2014
One good thing done by Tamil modayas.
Closing the Mail aru sluice gate was the other “wise” thing by Tamil modayas.
/
Javi / July 11, 2014
Stupid Fanatic you are a humourless dreamer!
Modayas win elections because poor fools vote for them believing in promises of the `Lying Race`
/
Bensen Burner / July 11, 2014
At the 1977 general elections, Amir and his henchmen/women used the Tamil youth clamouring for a separate Tamil State and let them loose in a state of euphoria in order to win the elections. Once the elections were won with an overwhelming majority in the Tamil areas with the help of the youth it was too late to contain the disillusioned Tamil youth who expected a Tamil State and who had been taken for a ride. There was then the 1977 riots sponsored by JRJayewardene, the new President of the Sri Lankan State to subdue the Tamils. As expected the Tamil youth became militant and hence the genesis of the LTTE. It is no surprise that Amir was assassinated by the LTTE. Bensen
/
Agnos / July 13, 2014
Bensen,
The TULF would have won the elections even without using those “clamoring” youths. Once the TC joined the FP and formed the TULF, there was no other party to offer a challenge. The UNP, SLFP and the leftists all had only a very small share of the votes and were in no way a threat to the electoral prospects of the TULF.
So I think your take on Amir is unfair. He and other leaders were pressured by militants to adopt a hard line, but as elected politicians they were bound to work within the existing system. Militant youths were oblivious of how the world, especially India, was–and still is– unsympathetic to all-out separation. The world will support federalism but it was and is wishful thinking to expect anything beyond it, regardless of any TULF rhetoric. The youths should have had the maturity to understand that despite any rhetoric, the TULF had to be pragmatic and ready to compromise.
/
Thondamannar / July 12, 2014
Quote:There was then the 1977 riots sponsored by JRJayewardene, SECONDED BY HIS NEPHEW RANEIL WICKS, the new President of the Sri Lankan State to subdue the Tamils.
/