A document that is now in the public domain has revealed that Sri Lanka’s Ambassador to Russia, Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka, has advised former President and “fake prime minister” Mahinda Rajapaksa on sustaining his government formed after a “constitutional coup”.

The document is a printout of an email sent to Mahinda Rajapaksa by Jayatilleka through “comrade” Vasudewa Nanayakkara – a Parliamentarian of the Joint Opposition. The email is titled “Urgent for PM Mahinda Rajapaksa via Comrade Vasu from Dayan.”

The email offers seven pieces of advice to Rajapaksa, in point form, to counter the pressure exerted by the Western countries against the constitutional coup engineered by the Rajapaksa-Sirisena alliance.

He opines that the statement issued by the US Department of State was a blatant interference in Sri Lanka’s sovereignty.

Jayatilleka, despite being a diplomat actively in service, suggests Dinesh Gunawardena to become the Foreign Minister. The email crystalizes that Jayatilleka, under the new regime, has become a privileged individual under the new government who could suggest who his boss should be.

“The counterrevolution is mobilizing internationally and the Us embassy in Colombo, which has four officers posted from Ukraine, will attempt to destabilize the new government,” the diplomat says.

“In the battle of arguments, ideas, and ideology, the enemy is on the offensive and we are on the defensive.”

Connecting on the email when the Colombo Telegraph editor has published the email on his personal Facebook page, Jayatilleka admitted that he was the originator of the email. He added, “(I) don’t think it’s ethical to obtain private emails and publish them, but yes, I sent it way before the Cabinet was selected and I fully stand by the analysis. Please note the date and the email address– this is not from my official email or in my new designation and capacity

Responding to Jayatilleka’s claim, Colombo Telegraph Editor Uvindu Kurukulasuriya said, “this is not a private communication since you have written to your prime minister. For me the “fake” prime minister.”

Jayatilleka also stated, “if I use my private email and sign with my first name, do not use my designation or have an official title and an indication of status, then that’s private. I wrote FROM my private email and AS a private citizen, to someone I’d known and supported long before he became PM. Furthermore I haven’t addressed it to him officially as the PM. Surely you know how a letter is written. This was a note. So it wasn’t ethical of you to post it, unless either the author (me) or the recipient (MR/Vasu) had released it to you or into the public domain. No matter: I stand by what I have written in it!”

Kurukulasuriya, however, maintained that the e-mail was a matter of public interest as it was delivered by the Prime Minister office from the citizen of the country.

Note: Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka has sent us the response below:

I STAND FULLY AND FIRMLY BY WHAT I SAID, BUT IT WAS AS PRIVATE OPINION

RIGHT OF REPLY BY DR. DAYAN JAYATILLEKA

Uvindu Kurukulasuriya (whom I regard as a friend, though less so now) has posted on his FB, and subsequently posted on his website Colombo Telegraph which he operates from London, a scanned or photocopied printout of a private email sent by me. I am not questioning the authenticity of the email and its contents, of which I am indeed the author, in my private capacity. 

I say “private email” because I have (a) used my long-standing private email address (b) not addressed the new Prime Minister, former President Rajapaksa officially in the body of the email or (c) signed even my surname let alone my designation. For these reasons I regard the posting/publication of this email, or otherwise releasing it to the public domain, as unethical.  

As a citizen of Sri Lanka deeply concerned about national and public events, I have every right to communicate with whosoever I choose to, and strive to provide inputs I regard as in the national and public interest, thereby influencing outcomes in a direction I think best, so long as I do so privately– and I have every right to expect my right to privacy to be respected. As such it was sent as a private email to a person I regard as a political leader of long acquaintance, and certainly not as part of an official communique from an Ambassador to the Prime Minister appointed by the Head of State, who is my appointing authority.  

As a public intellectual I have given political advice freely in the public domain since the 1980s, i.e. for over 30 years. For the last 5 and half years before this appointment, I have done this in my fortnightly political analysis program on national television, as the Sri Lankan public is well aware. The attempt to portray the suggestion of a name for Foreign Minister as some privilege accorded to me is ludicrous.

Now that my private email is in the public domain, I think it best to reproduce the full text, so it can be read clearly rather than speculated upon. It was as follows, and I quote:

1. The initiative should never be allowed to see-saw. The offensive momentum should be seized and maintained by the new Government.

2. The reactionary forces should never be allowed to consolidate and sustain a parallel power center/command center at Temple Trees. 

3. The US State Department statement is a blatant interference in our sovereignty and should be replied to.

4. The counterrevolution is mobilizing internationally and the US embassy in Colombo, which has four officers posted from the Ukraine, will attempt to destabilize the new Government. 

5. The struggle will be fought out on the global arena. We must have a very able, senior, experienced, politically mature, ideologically clear and consciously anti-imperialist Foreign Minister. I suggest Dinesh Gunawardena. 

6. There must be a massive mass mobilization– as big or bigger than Galle Face 2017– to demoralize the rightwing reactionary forces. 

7. In the battle of arguments, ideas, and ideology, the Enemy is on the offensive and we are on the defensive!

I stand firmly by every single word I have said—except that a post script is required on a single matter. At the time of emailing (sent on Oct 29^th 2018 at 3:18 pm), I did not know that the Cabinet had been appointed and Dr. Amunugama, whose name I had advocated as Foreign Minister for years in the mass media (including on CT), had been appointed to the post. He had never been given the chance and I thought he may have lost interest and may not be in the running or even on the shortlist.  After Mangala Samaraweera was removed and before Tilak Marapona was appointed, I strongly urged ex-President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga across the table at the Pakistani National Day reception, that she intervene to secure the appointment of Dr. Sarath Amunugama, whose ample suitability for the post she well knew. She did not disagree but said “they don’t always do what I say, but I’ll try”. I was delighted by the choice of Dr Amunugama and have applaued his appointment publicly.