19 June, 2024


July 1983: Ranil Wickremasinghe Followed Cyril Mathew

By Rajan Hoole –

Rajan Hoole

Sri Lanka’s Black July – Part 19

During that period several ministers seemed to be inspired by the rulers of Malaysia and in particular Dr. Mahathir Mohamed, who of course never set fire to his economy. Mathew strongly advocated Malaysia’s Bhumiputra policy. He cited in Parliament (4 Aug.83) Mahatir’s argument that the Chinese and Indians of Malaysia, if forced to leave, could find an alternative home, but not the Malays. Mahatir’s assertion that an indigenous race is one that is ‘truly identified’ with a country was adduced by Mathew to make his case. Mr. Ranil Wickremasinghe, Minister of Education and Youth Affairs – who as Jayewardene’s relative, shared with Jayewardene’s chief henchman Mathew, his political estate in Kelaniya – closely followed Mathew in his view of the situation. Mr. Gamini Jayasuriya, Minister of Agriculture, said in an article (Daily News, 26 Aug. 83): “The immediate cause of the recent outburst of violence is not an independent or spontaneous act. It was the climax of a long drawn-out and well-planned series of treacherous acts over the years committed by the terrorists of the North.” Thus Mathew, Wickremasinghe and Jayasuriya advanced Sinhalese anger as the cause of the violence and failed to distance the Government from its planning and execution.

Mathew cannot be accused of not being frank. Speaking on the 6th Amendment in Parliament on 4.8.83, he was clear that it was the majority’s prerogative to use violence against a minority who did not fall in line. He said, “70% of the people in this country are Sinhala people. In a country like Malaysia, there were only 53% of ‘Malaysians’ (i.e. Malays). The Chinese of the country acted high-handedly and the Malaysians had patience only for 6 days before taking action (i.e. the 1969 violence). But the Sinhalese people of this country had been patient for 10 years.” As though his speech were wanting in candour, he uttered the cry, “If the Sinhala are the majority race, why can’t they be the majority?”

However, apart from hinting at Sinhalese settlement in the North-East as a means to solving the Tamil problem (on the 6th Amendment, CDN, 6.8.83), Ranil Wickremasinghe’s statements were more an attack on the SLFP than a defence of the UNP’s role during the July violence. While saying it was ‘unfortunate that certain Tamil prisoners were killed by some other prisoners’, it should be remembered, he added, that the SLFP had killed about 10,000 youth [during the 1971 JVP insurgency]. He also opined that the ‘tragedy’ which had befallen the ‘non-Sinhala’ trader due to the ‘machinations of an extreme political party’ as a result of their factories and premises being burnt down, ‘was nothing compared to the tragedy imposed on the Sinhala entrepreneur by the Bandaranaikes since 1956.’

He claimed that the nationalisation policies pursued by the Bandaranaikes had adversely affected private enterprise in areas dominated by the Sinhalese. But when the SLFP encouraged local manufacturing, he said, the bulk of the licences went to non-Sinhalese. He mentioned his cousin Upali Wijewardene among those Sinhalese adversely affected. In concluding his Daily News Interview (12.8.83), he stressed that the Sinhalese entrepreneur was complaining of discrimination against them by the Government. It was as though the July 1983 violence had redressed the damage done to the Sinhalese entrepreneur by the SLFP, which, according to him, favoured the Tamils. This theme of redress also appears in a speech by Athulathmudali cited below.

Combining this theme with the Left master- plan of Jayewardene and others quoted earlier, it may appear that the July violence resulted from the Left suddenly becoming zealous about improving the competitive edge of Sinhalese capitalists through the use of non-market forces.

The Rt. Rev. Lakshman Wickremasinghe, the Anglican Bishop of Kurunegalle, was an eminent public figure at that time. He was also president of the Civil Rights Movement. Soon after the 1983 violence, he returned from England, where he was taking a much-needed sojourn and visited most of the refugee camps in the island housing victims of the violence. He visited a refugee camp in Akkarayan with Dr. Luther Jeyasingham and Mr. Kanthasamy of the MIRJE, Jaffna. After talking to the refugees, he was discovered alone, crying. When asked he replied that from his conversations with the refugees, he had found that his family had been closely linked to the violence. The Bishop died on 23rd October 1983, a broken man. Persons close to him confided that the conduct of two members of his family in particular had grieved him.

Mr. Lalith Athulathmudali, Minister of Trade and Shipping, took off in a different direction without touching the causes in a broadcast in the night of 31st July. He did not have one word of sympathy for the Tamil victims. But for the others, sorrow and sentimentality were overflowing: “I saw a sight which neither you nor I thought we would live to see again. We saw many people looking for food, standing in line, greatly inconvenienced, seriously inconvenienced. The scene made me very sad indeed…. I promise you again, in a few days, in a few weeks at most, the situation will be back to normal, and these last few days that you have suffered so much, and I have suffered as much with you, will be a thing of the past.”

A day earlier when Minister de Alwis announced the banning of the Left parties, he said, “the plotters then anticipated a food riot.”

The ambitious politician Athulathmudali told them the next day that he had things under control. His words, thick with buttery platitudes, make one wonder if he had prepared for this drama well in advance. The 4th Cross Street wholesale market in Pettah was affected by the violence. ‘An Insider’ in the Counterpoint of December 1994 said that Athulathmudali got over the crisis by efficient management and his policy of always holding 3 months’ stocks of essentials in warehouses, introduced after the cyclone which devastated the Eastern Province in 1978.

It is the fact that he was a clever administrator and a very ambitious politician which suggest that if the violence was planned, and he was part of the planning, he would have also thought of taking credit to himself by keeping the food flowing after the initial confusion. In the same press briefing of 27th July where Anandatissa de Alwis spoke of a mysterious hand behind the highly planned violence, he also issued an official communiqué which said the following: “The Government has moved in fast to meet a temporary dislocation of the movement of food supplies in the country. Supplies of food are being dispatched from warehouses for distribution through multi-purpose co-operative stores…”

It was a Government thinking hard and taking action to obviate possible discontent arising from food shortages. But it had nothing to say about finding out and checking the unseen hand spreading murder and mayhem. About the tail end of the violence, a well known journalist who was at a government department, casually mentioned to Athulathmudali the need for him to go home and find food for his family. What Athulathmudali said jolted the journalist and made a strong impression on him. Athulathmudali said that he was expecting such a situation and that there was plenty of food in the stores. He added that he could immediately dispatch 3 lorry loads to the government department from the CWE and asked him to put his name on the vouchers sent for that department and get his food. This could also have a more innocent explanation. Athulathmudali may have simply been trying to build up his image as a clever and far-seeing administrator who is ready for the worst.

Yet a speech he made at Piliyandale Central School in early October 1983 disclosed some peculiar notions he had about fair competition: “During the height of the trouble we opened a wholesale rice market at Duplication Road and challenged the Pettah Market into severe competition….but in no time we won – slashing prices by as much as Rs 10/- for a 67 Kg bag of rice…We did that amidst obstructions, barriers and objections. We then went to the notorious 4th Cross Street. The CWE (Co-operative Wholesale Establishment) is now getting a response from there!”

If the Tamil wholesale traders were profiteering, the Government had so many legislative and administrative means to deal with it. It did not need to send mobs to burn down shops and murder workers and owners. What he then meant by competing with a Pettah Market reduced to rubble and ashes is not clear. If these claims were not funny, they would be sinister.

Prime Minister Premadasa addressing the nation in the night of 29th July, made a bumbling populist speech. “Today they had spread rumours that Tigers have come to Colombo and are in Colombo. Just imagine the great destruction and crimes committed based on such wild rumours. Our people not only got aroused, but also engaged themselves in violent acts. Some have taken clubs and other weapons and engaged themselves in such violent acts. As a result even our Sinhalese and Muslim brethren have been subject to such harassment. You just imagine what a catastrophe it is”. He then went on to talk about punishment for separatists.

This speech was made on ‘Tiger Friday’, on a day that Premadasa’s men were known to be notably involved. Note the absence of Tamils from his brethren facing harassment. A Tamil doctor, who was then taking refuge with a Pentecostal pastor in Kandy, was told by the latter that it was a good speech. The former merely observed that he did not think so. Its appeal probably lay in crediting the Sinhalese with no more than responding foolishly to rumours and separatist provocations.

Finance Minister Ronnie de Mel made something of a dissenting speech taking his cabinet colleagues to task. But the dissent was lost in its nonsensical prelude. He opened with, “I am not speaking to you in the spirit of rancour… sorrow…. [or] in a spirit of remorse”. He then spoke of Sinhalese having survived invasions from South India, beginning with the sons of a horse dealer, then colonial rule by the Portuguese, Dutch and the British and the 1958 (anti-Tamil) riots, and asked why they should fear

destruction now. He then came to the point of his speech – “the destruction caused to the economy in the last week by looting, arson, burning and the blood-shed.” Continuing, he said: “I do not know who does greater damage to the country. Is it those who advocate the division of the country or those who destroy the economy? I think both groups are traitors to the country and nation and should be punished.” As though to bring himself in line with Mathew and the rest, he told the Economist (20 Aug. 1983): “…. the Tamils have dominated the commanding heights of everything good in Sri Lanka.” He added that the ‘only solution’ is to ‘restore the rights of the Sinhalese majority’. L. Piyadasa comments (p.118 of his book): “What kind of a Finance Minister would justify such destruction? In communal terms, de Mel’s own Karava community is far over-represented in leading positions in the economy, society, politics, the church etc!” (See Chapters 8 and 12 of Piyadasa’s book and Chapter 1 of the book by the Committee for Rational Development on myths of communal privilege.)

Lalith Athulathmudali could think of picking up some votes by crying for the Sinhalese in queues and sending them food. But, de Mel’s hopes for a booming economy by 1989 were in shambles. There was nothing for him in the violence. From what we have presented up to this point, there is no doubt about the Government’s complicity in the violence of July 1983. But the important question remains not conclusively answered although strong opinions are held one way or the other: Did the Government merely blunder into the anti-Tamil violence of July 1983, or; was it the outcome of advance planning well before the event, involving agencies of the State?

If the latter, it raises even graver questions about the position of the minorities and the protection they enjoy, questions that have been fudged and largely avoided. We first present a version that points to the first by suggesting that the Government was all the way confused and helpless in the face of Sinhalese anger. Cyril Matthew’s role in the violence is admitted, but while leaving the others fairly clean. The version comes essentially from later conversations of journalists with the UNP’s cabinet members at that time such as Athulathmudali and Dissanayake, who were undoubtedly charming and persuasive. This is also essentially the version of T.D.S.A. Dissanayaka.

According to this version, the Government was plunged into uncertainty after the ambush in Jaffna where 13 soldiers died. They felt very anxious about how the Sinhalese people would receive the event. Some wanted the bodies cremated in Jaffna and the ashes to be brought to Colombo. By the time it was decided to bring the bodies and have the funeral in Colombo, it became very late. The crowd in the meantime became angry and restive and started abusing the President. The President cancelled the funeral. The crowd went berserk and started attacking Borella and Narahenpitiya.

The Government, according to this version, was in a panic. In the night several ministers pleaded with the President to declare curfew. The President’s response was “Who is going to impose the curfew?” He was in fact so unsure whether the Police and the Army would take orders from him. The Government, this version added, simply let go and tried to ride out the wave of anti-Tamil feeling. Then of course elements of the UNP went out and indulged in acts of violence to divert the anger against the Government towards the Tamils. There was no planning in any of this. Electoral lists carried by mobs did not need organisation. Every party office has these lists, this version pointed out. Ratnatunge says (p.25 of his book) that Jayewardene sent his brother Harry, Ranil Wickremasinghe, Paul Perera and UNP Secretary Abhayawardene from police station to police station in a bid to ensure their loyalty and maintain order in the City. (The last was angrily denied by a top police official: “I never heard about it. What were they wanting the Police to do? Burn the Tamils?”)

Views supporting such versions are largely advanced by well-meaning and quite knowledgeable Sinhalese. That is, hardly any planning was involved, and that it was for the most part spontaneous. This also shifts much of the blame on to the Tamils for supporting separatism and provoking the Sinhalese. By sharp contrast most Tamils, including those who were occupying high positions in the security forces, state agencies and state media are strongly convinced that the violence was well– planned and executed by the Government. We will now examine the evidence for this step by step.

To be continued..

Part one – Sri Lanka’s Black July: Borella, 24th Evening

Part two – Sri Lanka’s Black July: What Really Happened At Kanatte?

Part three – Black July: ‘Api Suddha Kara’ – JR’s Failure To Declare Curfew

Part four – Sri Lanka’s Black July: The Cover Up

Part five –  30th July 1983: The Second Naxalite Plot

Part six  – Black July: The Testimony Of Lionel Bopage, Then General Secretary Of The JVP

Part seven – Black July: Thondaman & Muttetuwegama

Part eight – What Was Behind Tiger Friday – 29th July? -The Significance Of The Pettah

Part nine – Tamil Merchants In The Pettah – Post July 1983

Part ten –  Sri Lanka’s Black July: A Family’s Tragedy In Colombo

Part eleven –  Sri Lanka’s Black July: The Question Of Numbers

Part twelve –  Welikade Prison Massacres: The First Massacre: 25th July 1983

Part thirteen –  Welikade Prison Massacres: Testimonies Given At The Magistrate’s Inquest

Part fourteen –  Circumstances Leading To The Magistrate’s Inquest

Part fifteen – Welikade Prison: The Second Massacre: 27th July 1983

Part sixteen – Welikade Prison Massacres: Chief Jailor Observed Army Commandos Coming In

Part seventeen – Welikade Prison Massacres: Postscript

Part eighteen – July 1983: Planned By The State Or Spontaneous Mob Action?

*From Rajan Hoole‘s “Sri Lanka: Arrogance of Power  – Myth, Decadence and Murder”. Thanks to Rajan for giving us permission to republish. To be continued..

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0

    No wonder Hon Ranil is the MOST popular UNPer ever with highest preference votes after 1983!

    Good way to earn it your excellency Ranil!

    • 0

      According to you Ranil was an LTTE Sympathizer.
      Now what you saying? You are really like Chimanzee-pika.
      You can come to a forum and bravely lie about anything.

    • 0

      Fat Mama,

      Ranil is enaged on stud duties. Try a Dog or a Donkey to Fuk u Shima

  • 0

    Fathima Fukshima!

  • 0

    Ranil the most unpopular leader of U.N.P. no doubt he can’t win any election because he can’t win the heart of the people. now it is the time to celebrate for the party longest time in opposition.we salute Ranil for bring down the largest party to bankrupt. also we salute him for keep U.N.P. in opposition.we have a hope one day U.N.P. will come to power but not under the leadership of Ranil. as U.N.P.ers we have to wait another two three decades.still we can’t see a leader in U.N.P. still a leader not born.

    • 0

      You really wish eh ali Jinna, Furzana, fukshima, Jilmart softy, Lester.
      Come on man your Gonraja’s time is over. For Ranil or otherwise people wont vote this megalomaniac nutty fake patriot anymore.

  • 2

    Another lame attempt to attack Ranil Wickramasinghe. The Sinhala chauvinists attack him saying he’s a sell-off to the tamils while the tamils say he’s racist. It just doesn’t add up.

  • 0

    it’s high time that we need more politicians like late great Cyril Mathew as Sinhalese Buddhists have to face minority terrorism not only from tamils but also from muslims. However, we are left with backbone less pimp-like politicians who lick minority a$$es for votes. this tamil guy is writing all the crap about 83 riots but he doesn’t even write a word about the thousands of sinhalese buddhists suffering at the hands of tamil terrorists. anyway, we are the majority of this country and we should be the majority. we are superior than all of you minorities.

    • 2

      fyi,CT is only publishing chapters from a book writen by rajan hoole on acount of the 83 riots anniverary its not a new book

      hhhahaahhaah so it shows the dumbness in you with your comments buddy keep it up please and continue writing such comments and it will justify the sinhalese as being racist and modayas (esp with ur comments) clap clap clap!

      • 0

        another NGO funded minority buruwa

        • 3

          your 100% wrong again portugese descendant perera!

          im a Sri Lankan and proud to be one and patriotic to the core not like you backbenders who sell yourselves to the highest bidder -;)

          btw its spelt ‘booruwa’ and not buruwa’ learn your spelling boy learn your spelling

    • 3

      “it’s high time that we need more politicians like late great Cyril Mathew”

      perera,you are a piece of shit just like the late great cyril.His ancestors should have been packed back to kerala after thei menial work was over.The lazy kandyan sinhalese job snobs deserve what they are going to get from the descendents of these people for bringing this trash here.What has happened to the tamils will be nothing compared to what will happen to them gradually being strangled in the future until they are nonexistent as a specific identity of theirs.

      As for you why don’t you go back to portugal where you belong as you are proudly clinging on to those foreign colonialist names even now as if it is a badge of honour or something.Do you think we will fall for that line that you have potuguese ancestry or something.If you throw a stone in portugal it will fall on someone with a name like silva,perera or fernando.That is why the portuguese gave their housboys and servants those names because they could not pronounce the sinhalese ones.They would not dare to give names like fonseka which is aristocratic ones of theirs unless through marriage or eminence.

      • 0

        get lost you piece of cow dung. your ancestors were here to clean toilets and hope you are doing the same job. you are a lump of minority second class shit

        • 3

          perera,our ancestors were cleaning their own toilets while your houseboy and servant malayalee ancestors were cleaning the portuguese ones.Why don’t you piss off to portugal name and all instead of polluting this dravidian land of indian peninsula and south of it which our ancestors like pandara vanniyan and veera pandya katta bommai fought for and shed their blood while yours were bumsucking the colonialists and still continue to do so proudly displaying their names.

          get rid of that name if you want to call yourself a sinhalese.That is not a sinhalese name.Before you bleat around about sinhala bhuddhism at the top of your voice and shout about beating up the muslims and tamils with your cyril mathew heroes,change your name and become a full converted duplicate sinhalese instead of the current half baked one that you are.

          It is better to be a full rascal than half baked one no?

        • 3

          GSR Perera,
          you prove to be a small, sleepless, pitiless, unloved, unforgiven, unloved, unkind, lonely man living inbetween this world and another. Look into the mirror and see for yourself what you look like. You must be UGLY both in outlook, and mind.
          Pity that a black shapeless UGLY spot on the beautifull scenery of Sri Lanka spoils the picture.
          Take a bath go to the temple meditate and cleanse yor UGLY thoughts and feelings. God be with you.

  • 0

    Leela the Fathima Fuck Shima, count your days my friend.

  • 1

    What is really funny here is, while it is well known that the UNP and wickremasinghe family was involved in the mayhem in july 83,Eelamists are now in bed with Ranil and scream for the head of Rajapakse.
    I refused to vote for the UNP ever since 83, for they made us hide like rats in underground bunkers to save our lives.
    83 riots not only opened a path to devided this country but also made way to a continued war well in to the future.
    Before July 83 seperatism was not very popular in the north and militancy had no takers. I was in Jaffna Feb or march 83 Visiting Nagadveepa with bunch of sinhalese and there not a sign of any trouble what so ever.
    It was the July riots that fulfilled Prabhakarn’s two most important wishes,ie.cadres in droves and unlimited supply money from the ‘Diaspora’ that was created by the 83 riots.
    Back then after seeing what Lalith Athulathmudali was upto I thought the carnage was enacted to break the strangle hold of the 4th cross street but now I see it is far too sinister than that.
    Also I can not recall any,let alone a cry but a hum from the embasies of the so called protectors of the human kind!

    They busy issuing visa’s for the future diaspora.

    • 2

      “What is really funny here is, while it is well known that the UNP and wickremasinghe family was involved in the mayhem in july 83”

      Nak,don’t make wild accusations here.What evidence have you that ranil was involved in july 83?the writer of this article makes a vague statement such as “he stressed that the Sinhalese entrepreneur was complaining of discrimination against them by the Government. It was as though the July 1983 violence had redressed the damage done to the Sinhalese entrepreneur by the SLFP, which, according to him, favoured the Tamils.”

      What is wrong with ranil attacking the SLFP as favouring the tamil businessmen over the sinhalese ones.If it had happened nothing wrong with pointing it out.

      You have pounced on that and are claiming he was involved in the riots.Ranil is a decent man and does not have a racist bone in his body.If he gravitates towards the sinhalese a little bit that is because they are his main constituents just like for sambanthan it is tamils and for hakeem it is muslims.

      If at all ranil is having a problem it is not the fact that he is not a decent human being which everyone agrees,but the fact that he lacks ability to dethrone mahinda,which also everyone seems to agree with.

  • 1

    It was commented on Indian media that Cyril Mathew was the sacrifice made to India by the JR government in a desperate attempt to neutralize her extremely negative attitude towards Sri Lanka. By that time Cyril Mathew had been made the scapegoat for taking a bold stand on behalf of the Sinhala people.

    • 1

      guys like cyril mathew were south indian keralites who became sinhalese.So they have to shout louder than the others to give credence to their sinhala credentials.That is what it ultimately boils down to.

      The original sinhalese take a quiet pride in their heritage unlike these duplicates.They say they will not even let a cat live in their houses from the areas that these converts come from,but will happily give board and lodgings to tamils from jaffna.These feelings are not prejudices but due to the bitter experience that their ancestors have had from their own converts as opposed to the good experience from tamils from jaffna.

      Now the duplicate converts outnumber the original sinhalese due to breeding 5 to six in a family and have taken political control due to the monarchy being substituted by the universal franchise.God save the original sinhalese now because the jaffna tamils have never been their traditional enemies as history will show that the pandyas came to their aid time and time again and saved their arse from their own brethren as well as the cholas with whom their enemy within allied with.History will repeat because for the real true sinhalese the enemy is within and they will be gradually marginalised into nonexistence.

  • 0


    I hope you have a sense of humour and I am sure you know what I mean

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.