10 December, 2024

Blog

Karma & Grace: Religious Difference In Millennial Sri Lanka

By Premakumara de Silva

Prof. Premakumara de Silva

In this book Neena Mahadev, an anthropologist and Sri Lankan expert explores the contesting efforts of Buddhist nationalists and Christian evangelists to reshape Sri Lanka’s religious, economic, and political landscapes. Mahadev recounts how modernist and traditionalist Theravāda Buddhists, Pentecostal newcomers, long-established Christian denominations, local deity and spirit cults, and the innovations of mavericks intermingle in Sri Lanka’s multi-religious public sphere. Karma and Grace examines the nationalist anxieties that have grown alongside intensifying millennial urgencies as Theravada Buddhist revivalists seek to retain and Christian evangelists express hopes to newly carve out sovereign religious domains. Through vivid ethnography and keen observations of media events, the book explores these competing aspirations, techniques of political mobilization in the war and post-war eras when various religious agents were embroiled in effort to redraw the lines of conflict and belonging in Sri Lanka.

By Neena Mahadev, Published by Columbia University Press, New York – 2023, 336 Pages, List Price: $35.00, ISBN: 9780231205290

This book contains six chapters, along with an introduction and brief epilogue. Chapter One introduces the stakes of Buddhist–Christian tensions in contemporary Sri Lanka, traced through narratives of conspiracy theories, conversions, and economic crises. Chapter Two provides a detailed study of the ostensible tension between Karma and Grace, by attending to the insufficient logics of gift-giving, particularly Buddhist dana against Christian charity. Chapter Three focuses on Pentecostal beliefs in the miraculous everyday divine presence, while Chapter Four attempts to analyze Roman Catholics interventions and the emergence of evangelical Catholicism. Chapter Five detailed out Buddhist re-orientations towards the salvific possibilities of the Bodhisattva Maitreya. Chapter Six provides, perhaps, the most refined ethnographical detail of tracing ‘Ordinary Biographies of Converts, Apostates, and Dual Belongers’ in ways which remix and complicate themes introduced in earlier chapters. It shows how ordinary Buddhists and Christians converts find a number of small ways to mitigate conflict and simply persist in the experiment of living together.

The book is setting out to contribute to scholarly literature on nationalism and evangelism, rapture and cultural continuity, religious media and mediation, and most importantly the negotiated nature of pluralism in a multi-religious context in contemporary Sri Lanka. The book vividly explains how Pentecostal Christian evangelists publicize their faith and explores how “the Good News” (suba aranchiya) promises the immediacy of Christ’s gift of grace is received among Buddhist disbelievers who conceive of the attainment of nirvana as requiring many lifetimes of deep moral labour or meritorious karma. It theorizes the presences and liveliness entailed by Buddhism and Christianity as rival forms of religiosity while exploring the conditions of possibilities for religious pluralism in postwar and millennial Sri Lanka. Despite overarching intensifications of anti-pluralistic religious politics, the possibility of accommodating religious differences have been presented with detailed ethnographical examples. The ethnography illuminates how Buddhists and Christians, even those who are interpolated by exclusivists’ forms of religiosity, manage to mitigate interreligious antagonisms. Several chapters of the book demonstrates how interreligious competition creates a field that generates not only of antagonism but also possibilities for diversification of religious movements and forms that allow plurality to flourish even in the face of ever-rearticulating conflicts. Therefore, the book finds not just familiar hostilities but unexpected convergences in the present religious landscape in Sri Lanka. It also demonstrates how Christians and Buddhists undertake complex negotiations to ensure social peace across religious divides. This contribution is most welcomed to Sri Lankan studies and is well-structured and beautifully written as it combines a comprehensive critical assessment of the literature and debates on anthropology of religion and inter-religiosity in contemporary Sri Lanka.

Karma and Grace will be of obvious interest to any scholars of Sri Lanka; of the anthropology of religion; religious pluralism and of religious tensions in general. On top of that I must mention that the book has won the most prestigious book prizes this year including the Clifford Geertz Prize in the Anthropology of Religion of Society for the Anthropology of Religion in the American Anthropological Association (AAA).

Latest comments

  • 2
    1

    Thank you, Prof. de Silva for bringing this book to our notice and for the succinct review. It sounds like an interesting contribution to our understanding of religious change in Sri Lanka.

  • 3
    6

    Prof. P de Silva, This book may be good reading, but since its about all religions and their various permutations and combinations, the author is not expressing any deep religious belief of his own at a deep level. Sometimes it is better to write about your own genuine belief system than collect all other religions from books and journals and summarize them according to what others believe and have written. Whether it is called dana or charity or even evangelical Catholicism or Pentecostal Christian Evangelists, what on earth can anybody receive from these contradictory combinations called religion.

    • 9
      0

      DTG,
      ” even evangelical Catholicism or Pentecostal Christian Evangelists, …. what on earth can anybody receive from these contradictory combinations called religion.”
      So what exactly is your preferred variety of Christianity? Your own genuine belief system? Why are you so shy to tell us? Are you ashamed of your religion?

      • 0
        4

        old codger, you are proving to be a joker again and again. Only idiots like you are ashamed of their religious beliefs. God cannot be fitted into your mould. You fit into his.

        • 1
          0

          DTG,
          How can I be ashamed of beliefs that I don’t have?
          Come on now, tell me what sect of Christianity you follow? Don’t be ashamed.

    • 11
      0

      Hello DTG,
      Sorry to disagree, but it is not good reading. I have read the Introduction, so far, and struggle to read the rest. But I will persist and see if this Post-Modernist diatribe will start to make sense. I think the Author has been reading too much Jordan Peterson. Come back Alan Sokal, all is forgiven. “Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity” was easier going than this.
      I will see if I change my mind by the end of the book. The Introduction is 40 pages long only another 290 or so to go.
      “As in sacrifice, dispossession converts having into being; the struggle for achievement is over, material possessions are traded for grace”. If anyone can decipher this quote (Julian Pitt-Rivers, Anthropologist) in a meaningful way, please enlighten us. My translation – give up your worldly possessions etc, you will be rewarded in Heaven. The usual religious B*llocks.
      Best regards

  • 6
    0

    Karma and Grace in SRILANKA filled with so called SINHALA BUDDHIST MONKS.
    .
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8HvlYwgJgA

    Such stories were also ignored during my childhood (70s and 80s). Unfortunately, people are not yet mature enough to stand up against temple crimes. Crimes behind MONK#S constume.

  • 4
    1

    Jesus never talk about Grace. It is an idea/opinion put forward Paul who established the Christian Church. Paul never followed Jesus.

    Jesus’s main teaching was based on Love. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.

    Another one:
    A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you also love one another

    • 6
      0

      It is an idea/opinion put forward by Paul who established the Christian Church. Paul never followed Jesus and not his disciple.

    • 0
      3

      SWHSF, you are a joker who needs to keep your trap shut if you don’t know the biblical account. Paul met Jesus on the road to Damascus and asked who are you Lord and he said “I am Jesus whom you are persecuting” In Acts 22,7 Paul says “I fell to the ground, heard a voice say Saul why are you persecuting me” Saul later became Paul. In Phil.3,10, Paul says ” That I may know him, the power of his resurrection, the fellowship of his suffering, being conformed to his death, to attain to the resurrection from the dead. Phil.3,20 says “Our citizenship is in heaven, we wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ.” Paul went on 3 missionary journeys around Mediterranean countries and there is a lot more. Shame on you, a purposeful liar.

    • 1
      0

      Hello SWHS,
      It was a word used by the Church of Scotland at our Primary School. I never figured out what it meant at the age of 5. By the time I could it was irrelevant to me.
      Best regards

    • 0
      0

      Why do you try try to do an atomic split between love and grace? Both grace and love carry the same meaning in different words. Grace in Sinhala is කරුණාව හෝ දයාව (compassion) and why ‘love’ is different to those two words? It is the same!

      • 1
        0

        Hello Jit,
        There are a few different meanings of Love in English, but the Greeks had at least 6. “Ancient Greek philosophy differentiates main conceptual forms and distinct words for the Modern English word love: agápē, érōs, philía, philautía, storgē, and xenía”. – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love
        I remember reading Alice in Wonderland and laughing at Humpty Dumpty on meaning, “When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less”.
        Best regards

        • 0
          0

          Thanks for explaining more about the word LS!. To me so many things in the Bible are not convincing, but its definition that love and grace occur together is, however! And I believe… ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less”. 🤣

    • 0
      0

      “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.”


      Does that mean ……. Old Codger’s God lives in Pittsburgh?

  • 5
    0

    If you are wondering what religion would be best to follow, look at the writings in the holy books and see what will appeal to our innate sense of logic and rational argument. For example, is the Earth a mere 6000 years old? Did the first fully grown Caucasian man created by a divine blowing of breath live to be 900 years old? If he had only three sons and no daughters with the product of his own rib, would not the incestuous relationships among siblings create chaos? What is eternal life? Life as we know it is made up of organic material like any other animal or plant, and neurological perception that gives us sensations and feelings. When that living system dies, and a spirit ascends to a heavenly realm, how will we experience “life”? Will “we” still sense things? What is better? A belief or conviction that is mostly observable and consistent with developments over the years? Once we are happy with the outcome, we can choose what we want to believe.

    • 1
      0

      Hello Lasantha Pethiyagoda,
      You have forgotten after Cain slew Abel he went to the distant Land of Nod, East of Eden, and took himself a Wife. I think I was about 6 years old when I first read this in Genesis. This contradiction was later (years later) to get me thrown out of the RE Class for disrupting lessons with my questions.
      That and Genesis 38 (and many other chapters) were the source of much cognitive dissonance for our RE teachers. You could see their brains squirming as they tried to justify the unjustifiable. It usually ended with me being asked? to get out.
      Best regards

      • 0
        1

        LankaScot, Biblical knowledge prophesied by God to believers who have written them, is not given in story-form as in a physical account for already fallen Satan to deceive unbelievers into hell. But the needed answers to all issues faced by humans are found scattered in the human situations as and where they have occurred as tragic and misleading issues leading finally to the New testament where Jesus on earth paid the price through substitution for all humans. Need to have faith to accept what is freely given by Jesus without do it yourself.

      • 1
        0

        LS,
        “You could see their brains squirming as they tried to justify the unjustifiable. “
        Poor things. They were just singing for their supper.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 5 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.