22 June, 2021

Blog

Learn From Pakistan’s Struggle For Democracy

By Jehan Perera

Jehan Perera

The government’s plan to impeach Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake appears to be running into unforeseen problems.  The indications are now that the government’s charge sheet against the Chief Justice is not as watertight as the proponents of the impeachment motion had believed.  In addition, opposition to the impeachment has come from an unexpected quarter.  The four chief priests of the Buddhist Sangha have expressed their displeasure in a written statement.  This has been followed by the Bar Association’s call to the government to reconsider the impeachment.  Apart from die-hard government supporters there appears to be little or no public support for the impeachment amongst the intelligentsia.  Those who are in the government camp, such as a group of lawyers of the rank of President’s Counsels, did not feel it prudent to let their names be attached to a statement they put out in support of the government view.

In these circumstances, the government would be concerned about the loss of popular sympathy and the possible fragmentation of its voter base.  It needs another cause that will rally popular support. The strategy it seems to be using to regain lost ground is an appeal to ethnic majority Sinhalese nationalism. The government has shown itself to be sophisticated in offering different sections of the polity what would like to have, so as to keep them quiet on other issues.  This may account for the sudden floating of the idea of a 19th Amendment to the constitution that will abolish the scheme of devolution of power contained in the 13th Amendment and put in place an alternative structure to ensure a solution to the ethnic problem.  The 13th Amendment has always been a controversial piece of legislation, as it deals with an issue on which there is no consensus in the country, which is the ethnic conflict and its political resolution.

So now comes government minister Wimal Weerawansa, a fiery orator known to have close links to President Mahinda Rajapaksa who has filed legal action in the courts of law to repeal the 13th Amendment.  The government would hope that this will help to reunify its ethnic majority Sinhalese support base.  As Minister Weerawansa is not a member of the ruling party but is a member of a coalition party, the government retains the option of distancing itself from this legal action if it runs into serious trouble.  The proposed repeal may be rejected by the courts or it can be opposed internationally, especially by India, in a manner that the government deems detrimental to itself.  In such a situation the government is likely to claim that the initiative was one that was solely that of the minister in question.  However, at the present time, the government gives an impression that it intends to push ahead with its decision that the 13th Amendment needs to go.

STRENGTHENED DEVOLUTION

The fear of divisive forces that exist both within and outside countries is not limited to Sri Lanka. Take Pakistan for instance. There is justifiable concern amongst Pakistanis that their country is threatened by powerful international actors in a manner that could divide it.   Virtually every day there are reports of bombings and attacks on military installations and civilian targets in that country. Last week I visited Pakistan to attend a conference at the University of Karachi on “Federalism in pluralistic developing societies: learning from the European experiences.”  But as the conference in the University of Karachi demonstrated, the academic community in Pakistan is prepared to discuss the concept of federal government along with politicians and share it with their students.  One of the issues discussed was the transfer of powers from the central government to the provincial governments.

The 18th Amendment to the Pakistan constitution was passed into law in 2010.  This amendment reduced the powers of the presidency, including the President’s power to dissolve Parliament unilaterally.  It was the first time in Pakistan’s history that a president relinquished a significant part of his powers willingly and transferred them to parliament and the office of the prime minister.  Senator Mian Raza Rabbani who is considered as the architect of the 18th Amendment addressed the conference in his capacity as chief guest and said, “We can learn and understand various concepts. We looked at several constitutions of countries with a federal system including Switzerland, Germany and Canada when drafting the 18th Amendment. But at the end of the day it came down to home-grown solutions.” Senator Rabbani said the amendment had given rise to federalism in Pakistan. “Seventeen ministries have been devolved. After 1947 it is perhaps the biggest structural change in our governmental machinery. It is not a perfect document — it has its ups and downs.”

Among other changes made by the 18th Amendment in Pakistan, courts will no longer be able to endorse suspensions of the constitution, a judicial commission will appoint judges, and the president will no longer be able to appoint the head of the Election Commission.  It is therefore ironic that the 18th Amendment in Sri Lanka, which was also passed in 2010 is very much the reverse of the 18th Amendment in Pakistan.  It further centralized powers of appointment of high state officers in the Presidency.  As a country that continues to battle terrorism that comes from beyond its borders as well as within the country, Pakistan has more reason than Sri Lanka to fear the weakening of its central government.  But the more enlightened political leaders of Pakistan have realized that the powers of government are meant to be shared and not hogged by a few persons and that it is the legitimacy that accompanies the system of shared governance that will best keep Pakistan together.

LOOKING OUTSIDE

In making efforts to resolve conflicts in a manner that paves the path to the rapid development of the country’s productive forces, the government can look outside Sri Lanka to see how other countries have solved their problems and are forging ahead.  Government leaders, most notably President Mahinda Rajapaksa, have frequently said that they look to Asian countries for inspiration.  One of the Asian countries that the government can embrace is Pakistan, which stood by successive Sri Lankan governments during the years of war.  However, even in post-18thAmendment Pakistan, the struggle to sustain democracy continues.  The devolution of powers is resisted by the central government authorities.  The military, that once ruled Pakistan, has its own national security concerns and continues to put pressure on the democratic leaders.

In Pakistan, the memory is still fresh how President Pervez Musharraf who originally took power in a military coup, had sacked Chief Justice Iftikar Mohammed Choudhry in 2007.  But this led to mass protests and in 2008 it was President Musharraf who had to step down and flee the country. Chief Justice Choudhry was reinstated along with all other judges who were sacked.  In a widely reported speech that coincided with the holding of the international conference on federalism that I attended, Chief Justice Iftikar Mohammed Choudhry referred to the role of the Supreme Court in the governance of Pakistan.   He said that the Supreme Court had been restored to its rightful position by “an unprecedented struggle carried out by a consort of such professional classes as lawyers, students, media persons and civil society at large.”

In the course of his speech the Pakistan Chief Justice said, “Gone are the days when stability and security of a country was defined in terms of numbers of missiles and tanks as a manifestation of hard power available at the disposal of the state.”  Therefore, he said “A heavy responsibility lay upon Supreme Court judges for being the guardians and protectors of the constitution to uphold the canons of the constitution’s predominance and its supremacy over all other institutions and authorities.”  The outcome of multiple crises affecting the country is unclear at the present time.  The challenge will be to resolve them in a manner that is constructive in the longer term rather than to more severe conflict.  At a time when the Sri Lankan government is planning to impeach the Chief Justice and to undo the devolution of powers found in the 13th Amendment, it should look to Pakistan’s example and listen to the wise counsel of its democratic leaders.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Latest comments

  • 0
    0

    The position of Justice is above that of Governance. Governance is subserviant to Justice. Governance without justice is tyranny.

    Our politicians need to understand this basic position and submit their whims to the laws of the land. Politicians simply by being elected by dubious means do not have the overiding power over the entire country. Even the executive should understand this and shed his absolute powers which have reeked havoc in this country.

    In the absence of political will the victims of intolerance should be able to turn to the courts for justice. This cannot happen if the judiciary are subserviant to the executive.

    • 0
      0

      The Rajapakse obsession with militarization and power concentration is pulling the country backwards despite all the spin about economic development by a so called minister who does not have any higher education and does not know the first thing about human development or poverty reduction.
      Sri Lanka is slipping into an a highly indebted dictatorship, with massive income inequality, under a criminal dictator. but Rajapakse has overplayed his hand and the people are fed up and regime change is one the cards!

  • 0
    0

    @Safa
    It’s not the politicians that need to understand, it’s the majority of the voters in the country who need to understand what is happening to this country. There is a saying, “When you pay peanuts you get monkeys.” Similarly, when a majority of the voters are jackasses, they ultimately end up voting for jackals.

    • 0
      0

      Unfortunately the vast majority of voters are poor simple people who fall for the promises of politicians. Our rural folk live isolated from the rest of the world and are daily fed with the lies on state media. They fall for nationalistic / religous incitement by the government. They do not have access to the internet or social media where they could listen to the view points of others.

      The armed forces which are well looked after by the regime have their roots in the villages. They are the people who enlisted during the war not so much the people in the towns. So there is still a great deal groundswell of support and goodwill for the govt. This is where the commanders such as Sarath Fonseka can have a great impact. Unfortunately the opposition does not support him in this area.

      So it is the duty of the opposition parties to go down to grass roots and educate them on the real facts. They also need to build up the party in rural areas and do something concrete for those people, not just at election time.

  • 0
    0

    13A is in the statute at present and is an instrument for the devolution of power. It cannot be repealed without an acceptable mechanism for devolution in place.

    Such a fundemental change in the constitution by way of an amendment or new constitution is a long way of. It will have to be discussed and agreed by all citizens of this country. It cannot be rushed like 18A or Divineguma. The timeline for such a change should be 1-2 years.

    It cannot be rushed through by the likes of Weerawansa / Ranawaka. Who are these johnnies to mess up the country and its future? What is their representation in parliment and what are their policies?

  • 0
    0

    It is a very good proposal, but can we expect it to be happened in Sri Lanka. Before senator Rabbani discussed the home-grown solution, our politicians talked about home-grown solution in Sri Lanka several times after the end of the conflict in 2009. What have they done so far except aggravating the situation further down in the Sri Lankan society? The difference between Sri Lanka and Pakistan is we are lack of such professional and intellectuals including our opposition to educate the masses about the real definition of democratic society and good governance and to rise against the rampant of corruption, cross-over parties for personal benefits, perks etc. in the society of Sri Lanka. The need of the day is, for us to struggle to protect the democratic values, whatever remains in the present day of Sri Lanka.

  • 0
    0

    When will Sri Lanka stop lying so that others can help it resolve the conflict so that intrastate conflict will not be in the way to tackle global problems for mutual benefits of all around the world:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/112933232/Sri-Lanka-lies-at-Utah-Valley-University-too

  • 0
    0

    Supreme court of Pakistan has proposed an amendment to the army act

    “The Ministry of Defence may consider amendment to the Pakistan Army Act 1958 similar to the amendments done in the Pakistan Air Force Act Rules 1957 and the Pakistan Navy Act,” the court said.

    A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed had taken up two petitions filed by Col (retd) Mohammad Akram. One seeks an amendment to the army act to provide a convict reasons for the verdict so that he could voice his grievance in the appeal and the other seeks to do away with a provision in the act which requires an accused to be cross-examined on oath and prosecution witnesses to depose their statements on oath.

    This portrays the role of the Judiciary in Pakistan. Similiar amendments in Sri Lanka would throw light on the Court Martial of General Sarath Fonseks where no records are available.

Leave A Comment

Comments should not exceed 200 words. Embedding external links and writing in capital letters are discouraged. Commenting is automatically disabled after 7 days and approval may take up to 24 hours. Please read our Comments Policy for further details. Your email address will not be published.